Baidu aims to patent AI that deciphers animal sounds
Baidu unveiled its latest AI model, Ernie 4.5 Turbo, last month, saying it matched the industry's best in several benchmark tests. (Reuters pic)
BEIJING : Ever wished you could understand what your cat is trying to tell you? A Chinese tech company is exploring whether it's possible to translate those mysterious meows into human language using artificial intelligence (AI).
Baidu, owner of China's largest search engine, has filed a patent with China National Intellectual Property Administration proposing a system to convert animal vocalisations into human language, according to a patent document published this week.
Scientists have long attempted to decode animal communication, and Baidu's patent represents the latest effort to leverage AI to do so.
The document says the system will collect animal data, including vocal sounds, behavioural patterns, and physiological signals, which will be preprocessed and merged before an AI-powered analysis designed to recognise the animal's emotional state.
The emotional states would then be mapped to semantic meanings and translated into human language.
'The system could allow 'deeper emotional communication and understanding between animals and humans, improving the accuracy and efficiency of cross-species communication,' Baidu said in the patent document.
'There has been a lot of interest in the filing of our patent application,' a Baidu spokesman said when asked how soon the company could turn the patent into a product.
'Currently, it is still in the research phase,' he added.
Baidu was among the first major Chinese companies to invest heavily in AI following the 2022 debut of OpenAI's ChatGPT.
It unveiled its latest AI model, Ernie 4.5 Turbo, last month, saying it matched the industry's best in several benchmark tests.
However, the Ernie chatbot has struggled to gain traction amid fierce competition.
A number of efforts are underway outside China to try and interpret what animals want to convey.
International researchers at Project CETI (Cetacean Translation Initiative) have been using statistical analysis and AI since 2020 to understand how sperm whales communicate, while the Earth Species Project, a non-profit founded in 2017 whose backers include LinkedIn's Reid Hoffman, is also trying to use AI to decode animal communication.
Local media reports about Baidu's patent application sparked discussion on Chinese social media platforms late yesterday.
While some were excited about the possibility of eventually being better able to understand their pets, others were sceptical.
'While it sounds impressive, we'll need to see how it performs in real-world applications,' commented a user on Weibo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
8 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Over 800 foreign nationals approved under Sarawak MM2H since last year
Sarawak's tourism, creative industry and performing arts minister Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah said the education sector attracts foreigners to join the SMM2H programme, as their children can study at several international schools in the state. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The Sarawak government has approved over 800 applications for the Sarawak Malaysia My Second Home (SMM2H) programme over the past 17 months. Sarawak's tourism, creative industry and performing arts minister Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah revealed this in the state legislative assembly recently. He said 560 applications were approved last year and another 265 as of mid-May this year, Bernama reported. According to Karim, the economic benefit from these applicants saw funds amounting to RM176.9 million entering the state, in terms of fixed deposits. After having captured the interest of Chinese nationals and Europeans over the period, Karim said the state is now keen on targeting applicants from Japan. He said this was because there has been an increase in the number of tourists coming to Sarawak from Japan. 'It's up to them (the Japanese) to see what Sarawak has to offer, but from what I can observe, especially from applicants from Europe or China, they see Sarawak as a safe place with good medical facilities,' he was quoted as saying at an event in Kuching today. He also cited the education sector as a factor that attracts foreigners to join the SMM2H programme, as their children can study at several international schools in Sarawak.
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
China's rare earth dominance reshapes trade war battlefield
China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to wea-ponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise. The scramble in recent weeks to secure export licences for rare earths, capped by Thursday's telephone call between US and Chinese leaders Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, shows China has devised a better, more precisely targeted weapon for trade war. Industry executives and analysts say while China is showing signs of approving more exports of the key elements, it will not dismantle its new system. Modelled on the United States' own, Beijing's export licence system gives it unprecedented insight into supplier chokepoints in areas ranging from motors for electric vehicles to flight-control systems for guided missiles. "China originally took inspiration for these export control methods from the comprehensive US sanctions regime," said Zhu Junwei, a scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Beijing-based think tank focused on international relations. "China has been trying to build its own export control systems since then, to be used as a last resort." After Thursday's call, Trump said both leaders had been "straightening out some of the points, having to do mostly with rare earth magnets and some other things". He did not say whether China committed to speeding up licences for exports of rare earth magnets, after Washington curbed exports of chip design software and jet engines to Beijing in response to its perceived slow-rolling on licences. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in EV motors. In April, it added some of the most sophisticated types to an export control list in its trade war with the US, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licences. That put a once-obscure department of China's commerce ministry, with a staff of about 60, in charge of a chokepoint for global manufacturing. Several European auto suppliers shut down production lines last week after running out of supplies. While China's April curbs coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally. "Beijing has a degree of plausible deniability — no one can prove China is doing this on purpose," said Noah Barkin, senior adviser at Rhodium Group, a China-focused US think tank. "But the rate of approvals is a pretty clear signal that China is sending a message, exerting pressure to prevent trade negotiations with the US leading to additional technology control." Even if the pace of export approvals quickens as Trump suggested, the new system gives Beijing unprecedented glimpses of how companies in a supply chain deploy the rare earths it processes, European and US executives have warned. Other governments are denied that insight because of the complexity of supply chain operations. For example, hundreds of Japanese suppliers are believed to need China to approve export licences for rare earth magnets in coming weeks to avert production disruptions, said a person who has lobbied on their behalf with Beijing. "It's sharpening China's scal-pel," said a US-based executive at a company seeking to piece together an alternative supply chain.. As early as 1992, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping was quoted as saying, "The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths". Beijing's landmark 2020 Export Control Law broadened curbs to cover any items affecting national security — from critical goods and materials to technology and data. China has since built its own sanctions power while pouring the equivalent of billions of dollars into developing work-arounds in response to US policies. In 2022, the US put sweeping curbs on sales of advanced semiconductor chips and tools to China over concerns the technology could advance Beijing's military power. But the move failed to halt China's development of advanced chips and artificial intelligence, analysts have said. Beijing punched back a year later by introducing export licences for gallium and germanium, and some graphite products. Exports to the US of the two critical minerals, along with germanium, were banned last December. In February, China restricted exports of five more metals key to the defence and clean energy industries.
Malay Mail
16 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Is a trustless society the future? — Noor Ismawati Jaafar
JUNE 8 — In today's fast-moving world, a strange new term is now making waves: 'trustless society'. At first glance, it sounds like a dystopian nightmare which refers to a world where no one trusts anyone. But the truth is more complicated and, in some ways, already a part of our lives. A trustless society doesn't mean people are more dishonest. In fact, it means we are beginning to depend on systems and technology that don't require trust at all. Instead of trusting each other, we trust machines, apps, and coded rules to keep everything fair and square. Trustless doesn't mean untrustworthy In traditional societies, trust is a key part of peoples' lives. We trust our neighbours, our teachers, and our communities. Trust makes us feel safe, belong and connected. But as the world becomes more digitalised and automated, many of our interactions no longer depend on trust between people. We depend so much on machines and computers. And that's where trustless systems come in. These systems are designed so that transactions and interactions can happen without personal trust. They rely on clear rules, automatic processes, and transparent data. You don't have to worry whether the other person is honest because the system will take care of everything. It sounds great and convincing right? And believe it or not, we're already surrounded by trustless systems. Here are just a few examples: Online shopping: We don't personally know the sellers, but we rely on platforms like Shopee or Lazada, backed by secure payment systems, buyer protection policies, and customer reviews. Ride-hailing apps: You don't know your driver, and they don't know you — but both parties trust the app (like Grab) to handle the process fairly and safely. Cryptocurrency & blockchain: Bitcoin and other digital currencies are based on blockchain technology. This system records every transaction in a public ledger, making it nearly impossible to cheat or change the data. All of these examples remove the need for personal trust and replace it with system reliability. In Malaysia, we're also seeing signs of a shift toward a trustless society, especially with the rise of cashless payments, e-wallets and digital public services. — Picture by Hari Anggara The good and the bad There are some major benefits to this new way of doing things: Less room for corruption: Automated systems follow rules strictly. They don't play favourites or accept bribes. Faster processes: Trustless systems remove delays caused by paperwork, middlemen, or negotiations. Global reach: You can do business with someone across the world without ever meeting them because the system handles everything. This kind of efficiency has huge value in a fast-paced, global economy. But as we rely more on trustless systems, there's a danger of losing something important: human connection. In a fully trustless society, people become more like users than neighbours. Instead of building relationships, we build profiles. Instead of offering a handshake, we scan a QR code. Everything becomes about the transaction not the trust behind it. And while machines and computers may be fair and fast, they can't be understanding or forgiving. A system can't show empathy if you miss a payment. It can't recognise good intentions when a mistake happens. It follows rules, nothing more. In some cases, this can lead to cold and rigid outcomes, especially for people in difficult situations. Malaysia's cashless and digital governance In Malaysia, we're also seeing signs of a shift toward a trustless society, especially with the rise of cashless payments, e-wallets, and digital public services. For example, apps like Touch 'n Go eWallet, GrabPay, and Boost have made it easy for people to buy groceries, pay bills, ride public transport, and even donate to charity, without carrying a single ringgit in their pockets. You don't need to trust the hawker stall uncle or the parking attendant you just scan the QR code, and the system handles the rest. Similarly, the MySejahtera app during the Covid-19 pandemic was a clear example of digital governance. It allowed the government to trace contacts, manage vaccine appointments, and monitor health status through automation, minimising the need for face-to-face checks or personal trust in reporting. Even JPJ's MySikap system and KWSP's i-Akaun now allow Malaysians to manage road tax, EPF contributions, and withdrawals online, reducing human involvement and relying instead on automated rules and systems. These tools increase efficiency and transparency, but they also raise questions about privacy, data security, and whether we are trading away human interaction for convenience. It's a powerful reminder that while technology helps us do more, it shouldn't replace the values that hold our society together. Let's be clear: there's nothing inherently wrong with using systems that help us avoid fraud, speed things up, or simplify life. But we must also ask: At what cost? If we depend too much on systems, we may lose the skills and values that come from personal trust: patience, forgiveness, loyalty, and kindness. These are things that no app or algorithm can replace. For example, a community that helps each other during hard times isn't built by rules, it's built by people who care and trust one another. The way forward for us The key isn't to reject technology or trustless systems but to balance them with the human side of society. We can use trustless systems for what they do best: securing transactions, protecting data, enforcing fairness. But we should also invest in relationships, build strong communities, and teach values like honesty and empathy. A world run by code may be efficient, but a world run by compassion is what truly makes life worth living. As we move toward a more digital future, the idea of a trustless society will continue to grow. But we shouldn't let technology replace the human heart of our communities. After all, no system, no matter how smart can hug a child, help a friend, or offer a second chance. Let's build a future where trustless systems support us but where real trust still brings us together. * Prof. Dr. Noor Ismawati Jaafar is a Professor in Information Systems at the Department of Decision Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, and may be reached at [email protected] ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
