logo
Alabama bill would allow law enforcement to demand people remove medical masks in public

Alabama bill would allow law enforcement to demand people remove medical masks in public

Yahoo22-04-2025
Rep. Jamie Kiel, R-Russellville, speaks to a colleague on the floor of the Alabama House of Representatives on Feb. 8, 2024 in Montgomery, Alabama. The House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee approved his bill that allows law enforcement to demand that people remove their masks while in public. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector)
The House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee Wednesday approved a bill that gives law enforcement the power to demand that people remove their medical face masks in public so that they can be identified.
HB 559, sponsored by Rep. Jamie Kiel, R-Russellville, allows people to wear a health care mask while in public without being charged with loitering, but allows law enforcement to demand that people show them a note from their medical provider to not spread an infection during a protest. It also allows law enforcement to demand that people remove their masks so that they can be identified.
'If there is not a reason to wear the mask in a public place, this also deals with universities, then there needs to be an excuse for wearing that mask,' Kiel said to members of the committee. 'Instead of just wearing a mask in a place where there may be, like a parade for instance, it is not a masquerade mask, then this would allow law enforcement to request to remove the mask unless they have a medical reason.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
According to the bill, Alabama statute states that people can be charged with loitering if they remain in a public place to panhandle, gamble and to solicit prostitution, and if they remain in a transportation facility for commercial purposes.
They can also be charged with loitering if they wear a mask while in a public space or stay on the grounds of the university or college after they are told to leave by officials with the school and who are not connected with the university in some way.
People can be charged with a violation if they are charged with loitering for the first time, but they may be charged with a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by up to three months in jail and a $500 fine.
The legislation Kiel filed exempts people from getting charged with loitering during times they are wearing a mask while in public, such as a protest or a parade, but they must demonstrate to law enforcement that they have legitimate medical reason.
'If I want to wear my mask for safety procedures, I have to get a doctor's order just for me to stand out (there), or just for the three of us gathering together,' said Tashina Morris, D-Montgomery.
Republicans on the committee allows law enforcement to identify people who stay in a public place, such as a protest on school grounds for example, in case any incidents occur, and that university and college officials agree with the measure.
'The only thing we are trying to do is when we are having a situation on campuses where we have some folks who are coming to protest,' said Porter Bannister, vice chancellor for state affairs with the University of Alabama system. 'They may or may not be students. They are telling our police officers, 'No, I will not take off my mask' when we ask them for identification. That is all we are trying to do.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oregon faces $15 billion loss in federal funding for health and food programs
Oregon faces $15 billion loss in federal funding for health and food programs

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Oregon faces $15 billion loss in federal funding for health and food programs

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — Oregon is slated to lose $15 billion in federal funding for health insurance, food benefits and other programs according to a new analysis. The Department of Administrative Services released a preliminary report Aug. 11 detailing the impact of H.R. 1 on state agency programs. Oregon's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid will be the hardest hit. In a statement, Governor Tina Kotek said, 'The Trump Administration and Republicans in Congress have betrayed American children and families, who will become sicker, hungrier, and less prosperous because of President Trump's budget bill. 'Oregonians will see less of their federal tax dollars coming back to our state for things they count on. In the statement, Kotek said the president and Congress know that states like Oregon cannot cover the gap alone. 'I am going to work with Oregon lawmakers and community partners to do all that we can to stand up for Oregonians and get through this needless, callous hardship,' she said. Federal-Impact-HR1-Initial-AnalysisDownload According to the analysis, Oregon will see a reduction in Medicaid funding of $127 million between 2025 and 2027. From there, the cuts deepen. For the 2027 to 2029 biennium, the state Medicaid program will lose $534 million. From 2029 to 2031, it will lose $531 million. The cost to implement these changes and ensure enrollees are complying with the new rules will bring the cost even higher. According to the report, the state is expected to lose $344 million for the 2025 to 2027 period, and $2.2 billion in the 2027 to 2029 period. From 2029 to 2031, it is expected to lose $2.3 billion. Impacts to SNAP were less clear since some of the changes went into effect on July 1 but federal guidance is still lacking, the report said. What is clear is that the exemption of some from receiving SNAP benefits is expected to put a strain on food banks and other support systems. The governor's office said she will meet with lawmakers and stakeholders to identify those who will feel the cuts most, and looking for opportunities to reduce the impact. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Spicy Senate fight
Spicy Senate fight

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Spicy Senate fight

President Trump has added an unsolicited, high-profile confirmation fight to the Senate's plate when they're back from August recess. Why it matters: With a 140+ person backlog on civilian confirmations, Senate Republicans left Washington vowing to fast-track the rules. Senate GOP leaders told senators to be ready to move as soon as they return to D.C. in September, sources familiar tell us. Senators have suggested everything from shorter debate time to allowing more nominees to be voted on en bloc. 🌶 But the newest nominee's a doozy: Trump said yesterday he'll nominate Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics after he fired Erika McEntarfer. Zoom in: Antoni's confirmation process will first have to go through the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) committee which is chaired by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) Cassidy called McEntarfer's removal"understandable," and he had previously demanded answers as to why BLS's jobs reports were inaccurate. He's also up for re-election next year. But HELP includes frequent Trump critics: Sens. Susan Collins (R-Me.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). "BLS's years-long failure to produce reliable data — especially when that data has broad market-moving implications — is unacceptable," a Cassidy spokesperson told Axios. "Cassidy looks forward to meeting with Dr. Antoni to discuss how he will accomplish this."

Inside the spicy Senate fight coming on confirmations
Inside the spicy Senate fight coming on confirmations

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

Inside the spicy Senate fight coming on confirmations

President Trump has added an unsolicited, high-profile confirmation fight to the Senate's plate when they're back from August recess. Why it matters: With a 140+ person backlog on civilian confirmations, Senate Republicans left Washington vowing to fast-track the rules. Senate GOP leaders told senators to be ready to move as soon as they return to D.C. in September, sources familiar tell us. Senators have suggested everything from shorter debate time to allowing more nominees to be voted on en bloc. 🌶 But the newest nominee's a doozy: Trump said yesterday he'll nominate Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics after he fired Erika McEntarfer. Zoom in: Antoni's confirmation process will first have to go through the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) committee which is chaired by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) Cassidy called McEntarfer's removal "understandable," and he had previously demanded answers as to why BLS's jobs reports were inaccurate. He's also up for re-election next year. But HELP includes frequent Trump critics: Sens. Susan Collins (R-Me.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). "BLS's years-long failure to produce reliable data — especially when that data has broad market-moving implications — is unacceptable," a Cassidy spokesperson told Axios. "Cassidy looks forward to meeting with Dr. Antoni to discuss how he will accomplish this."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store