logo
Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises

Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises

Wales Online8 hours ago

Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises
Parents may be wondering if their child is ready to stay at home alone or go out unsupervised this summer
Many parents grapple with tough choices when it comes to their children, one of which is determining the appropriate age for their children to stay at home without adult supervision.
During school holidays parents often find themselves needing to arrange child care. This could involve relying on family members or shelling out for holiday clubs but some parents might deem their child mature enough to stay at home alone. Whilst there's no legal age stipulated for when children can be left at home unsupervised it's illegal to leave a child alone if it puts them in danger.

As we approach the summer holidays we checked guidance published by the NSPCC to assist parents in making informed decisions during the summer break.

Helen Westerman, the NSPCC's head of local campaigns, said, "a child who doesn't feel comfortable shouldn't be left alone". She said this is why making a universal legal age is impractical as some children, albeit the same age, have different levels of maturity. Parents must also consider if it's safe for their children to play outside without supervision, reports the Liverpool Echo.. Sign up for our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here.
Ms Westerman added: "Lots of parents will be thinking about whether it's safe to leave their children at home safely and if they're old enough to leave the house unsupervised. This can be a really tricky decision for parents and carers to make as it will differ from child to child.
"As well as navigating if a child is ready to be left alone lots of parents will also find managing work alongside the school break really challenging, particularly in light of the soaring child costs and the cost of living crisis, which is putting additional pressure on families."
Article continues below
In 2022 Ms Westerman said the NSPCC had received more than 21,000 calls concerning children being unsupervised in the past four years with nearly half of these calls coming during the summertime.
"As children get older it's common for them to want more freedom and learn to be independent.
"This is an important part of growing up, but we know there can be a lot to think about for parents. As every child is different, we recommend building up their independence at their pace and checking in with them to make sure they feel safe."

She provided advice for parents and carers considering leaving their children home alone or allowing them to go out unaccompanied during the summer.
Are they ready to be left home alone?
Parents should consider whether their child is prepared to handle being unsupervised, especially in the event of an emergency. Ms Westerman said: "Think about if they can deal with risks; will they behave responsibly, and will they be safe? And, perhaps most importantly, how does your child feel about this idea?"
Take sensible precautions
If you're contemplating the idea of your child staying at home alone make sure to take safety measures such as providing them with a spare set of keys and ensuring they can access food and the bathroom. Ms Westerman added: "Consider if there's anything that could hurt them and how you could reduce that risk."

Never leave infants or little ones by themselves
It is crucial that infants and very young children are never left on their own, irrespective of whether they seem peacefully asleep or are wide awake. Ms Westerman said: "Children under the age of 12 are rarely mature enough to cope in an emergency and should not be left at home alone for a long period."
The organisation also cautions against leaving minors under the age of 16 unsupervised overnight and reminded caregivers to think about whether a child has any special requirements before making the decision to leave them on their own or in the care of an older sibling.
Be informed if they're going out without adult supervision
Knowing where your child plans to go, what they'll be doing, who they'll be with, and how far they'll be travelling is essential when they venture out without adult oversight. Having this information is key for parents to "make the right decision".

Ensure they know important contact numbers
Ensure your child has a reliable means of contacting a parent or guardian and identify a trustworthy nearby adult to turn to in an emergency if they are staying home alone. Ms Westerman advised: "If they're going out alone make sure they know a trusted adult's full name and address and have two trusted adults' phone numbers."
Discuss various scenarios with your child
Have an open conversation with your child about potential situations they may encounter and how to stay safe. Ask them how they would react and how they think they would feel.
Ms Westerman added: "If they're going to be home alone, for example, ask them what they'd do if they hurt themselves or if a stranger knocks on the door.

"If they're going out alone you might want to ask them what they'd do if someone asks them to do something they're not comfortable with."
Set clear boundaries
Make sure your child is fully aware of the rules when they're unsupervised, whether at home or out alone, so both you and they understand how they should behave in your absence.
Ms Westerman said: "It's a good idea to agree on some house or outside rules that suit their maturity before you leave them alone.
Article continues below
"Give your child a chance to build their independence by building your trust. If they adhere to rules and boundaries you set you'll feel more confident letting them do more on their own."
If you have concerns about a child contact the NSPCC helpline on 0808 800 5000 or email help@nspcc. org.uk.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fraudster nurse who put babies at risk banned from the profession
Fraudster nurse who put babies at risk banned from the profession

Wales Online

time6 hours ago

  • Wales Online

Fraudster nurse who put babies at risk banned from the profession

Fraudster nurse who put babies at risk banned from the profession Tanya Nasir was jailed after lying about her qualifications Tanya Nasir outside court (Image: Wales News Service ) A woman who lied about her qualifications to get a job as a senior nurse at a hospital in Wales where newborn sick babies were being treated has been struck off the nursing register. Tanya Nasir's actions "put vulnerable patients at a real risk of significant harm, which could have had catastrophic consequences," the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) found. The former registered nurse, who was jailed for five years for fraud, was banned from the profession officially after her case went before a panel. ‌ Nasir, 45, was found guilty of nine charges including fraud and securing access to unauthorised computer material following a five-week trial at Cardiff Crown Court between June and July last year and was sentenced to five years in prisoning at hearing at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court in October. ‌ An NMC professional standards committee heard that the charges arose while Nasir was employed as a band seven ward manager registered nurse at the Princess of Wales Hospital in Bridgend where she was "entrusted as a senior nurse with the responsibility for newborn babies at the neonatal unit". Sign up for our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here. Nasir applied for roles that she was not qualified for by using faked documents "which put patients at a serious risk of harm", the committee was told. Nasir's actions were described as "calculated and premeditated" and it was said when it was revealed she had taken steps to further her deception by creating documents to try and cover it up. Article continues below When her attempted cover-ups failed she was reported her to the police by her employer. During her court case the jury was told that an investigation by the NHS Local Counter-Fraud Authority revealed Nasir's deception began in 2010 when she failed to disclose a conviction while studying at Buckinghamshire New University in breach of the university's fitness to practise policy. She subsequently fabricated a letter claiming to be from Hertfordshire Probation Service which said she was under no obligation to disclose her convictions. The letter convinced the university to allow her to continue her studies. ‌ Between 2013 and 2015 the defendant was employed as a staff nurse assistant at Hillingdon Hospital in London and went on to work at Spire Bushey Hospital in Watford before returning to Hillingdon. Following her appointment as a band seven ward manager at the Princess of Wales Hospital it was discovered that information provided by Nasir on her application form, and two applications for Hillingdon, were false. In total the court heard the defendant received more than £200,000 in wages at the two hospitals including just short of £95,000 at the Bridgend hospital. In her application she claimed she had qualified as a nurse and became registered with the Nursing Midwifery Council in 2010. But officers confirmed with the university that she did not qualify until 2014. You can read the details of her court case here. Nasir, who did not attend the NMC fitness to practise hearing on May 23 and was not represented and did not engage with the process despite being asked, had shown no evidence of insight or remorse for her actions, said NMC representative Naa-Adjeley Barnor. ‌ Ms Barnor told the panel that Nasir had "a longstanding history of acting dishonestly" which suggested "deep-seated and harmful attitudinal concerns which are not easily remediable". She said Nasir was highly likely to repeat the behaviour with "a significant risk of repetition in this case". In its written findings, now published online, the committee said: "Nasir was practising in a senior nursing position whilst managing a neonatal ward. However she was clearly unqualified and as such unable to practise safely. ‌ "The panel was satisfied that Ms Nasir put vulnerable patients at a real risk of significant harm, which could have had catastrophic consequences. "Beyond her own actions the panel was of the view that Ms Nasir's actions would have likely deprived someone who was qualified from obtaining the role. "It considered that Ms Nasir took steps to cover up the fraud when she realised it was being discovered. The panel was of the view that Ms Nasir's actions had been sophisticated and planned, which demonstrate deep-seated attitudinal issues. In light of this the panel was of the view that Ms Nasir's conduct was not easily remediable. ‌ "There is evidence of harmful deep-seated attitudinal issues and the panel is not satisfied that Ms Nasir has insight nor that she does not pose a significant risk of repeating her behaviour. The conduct, as highlighted by the facts found proved, was a significant departure from the standards expected of a registered nurse." The panel struck Nasir off after finding the following allegations proved. That: On July 16, 2024, at Cardiff Crown Court she was convicted of fraud, possession of articles for use in frauds, using a false instrument with intent, securing unauthorised access to computer material with intent, and using a false instrument with intent. The panel judged that as a result of this the former nurse's fitness to practise was impaired. Article continues below NMC rules mean the striking-off order cannot take effect until the end of a 28-day appeal period. The panel therefore made an interim suspension order which will be replaced by the substantive striking-off order to begin 28 days after Nasir is sent the decision of the hearing in writing.

Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises
Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises

Wales Online

time8 hours ago

  • Wales Online

Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises

Legal age parents can leave children alone as summer holidays approach and what NSPCC advises Parents may be wondering if their child is ready to stay at home alone or go out unsupervised this summer Many parents grapple with tough choices when it comes to their children, one of which is determining the appropriate age for their children to stay at home without adult supervision. During school holidays parents often find themselves needing to arrange child care. This could involve relying on family members or shelling out for holiday clubs but some parents might deem their child mature enough to stay at home alone. Whilst there's no legal age stipulated for when children can be left at home unsupervised it's illegal to leave a child alone if it puts them in danger. ‌ As we approach the summer holidays we checked guidance published by the NSPCC to assist parents in making informed decisions during the summer break. ‌ Helen Westerman, the NSPCC's head of local campaigns, said, "a child who doesn't feel comfortable shouldn't be left alone". She said this is why making a universal legal age is impractical as some children, albeit the same age, have different levels of maturity. Parents must also consider if it's safe for their children to play outside without supervision, reports the Liverpool Echo.. Sign up for our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here. Ms Westerman added: "Lots of parents will be thinking about whether it's safe to leave their children at home safely and if they're old enough to leave the house unsupervised. This can be a really tricky decision for parents and carers to make as it will differ from child to child. "As well as navigating if a child is ready to be left alone lots of parents will also find managing work alongside the school break really challenging, particularly in light of the soaring child costs and the cost of living crisis, which is putting additional pressure on families." Article continues below In 2022 Ms Westerman said the NSPCC had received more than 21,000 calls concerning children being unsupervised in the past four years with nearly half of these calls coming during the summertime. "As children get older it's common for them to want more freedom and learn to be independent. "This is an important part of growing up, but we know there can be a lot to think about for parents. As every child is different, we recommend building up their independence at their pace and checking in with them to make sure they feel safe." ‌ She provided advice for parents and carers considering leaving their children home alone or allowing them to go out unaccompanied during the summer. Are they ready to be left home alone? Parents should consider whether their child is prepared to handle being unsupervised, especially in the event of an emergency. Ms Westerman said: "Think about if they can deal with risks; will they behave responsibly, and will they be safe? And, perhaps most importantly, how does your child feel about this idea?" Take sensible precautions If you're contemplating the idea of your child staying at home alone make sure to take safety measures such as providing them with a spare set of keys and ensuring they can access food and the bathroom. Ms Westerman added: "Consider if there's anything that could hurt them and how you could reduce that risk." ‌ Never leave infants or little ones by themselves It is crucial that infants and very young children are never left on their own, irrespective of whether they seem peacefully asleep or are wide awake. Ms Westerman said: "Children under the age of 12 are rarely mature enough to cope in an emergency and should not be left at home alone for a long period." The organisation also cautions against leaving minors under the age of 16 unsupervised overnight and reminded caregivers to think about whether a child has any special requirements before making the decision to leave them on their own or in the care of an older sibling. Be informed if they're going out without adult supervision Knowing where your child plans to go, what they'll be doing, who they'll be with, and how far they'll be travelling is essential when they venture out without adult oversight. Having this information is key for parents to "make the right decision". ‌ Ensure they know important contact numbers Ensure your child has a reliable means of contacting a parent or guardian and identify a trustworthy nearby adult to turn to in an emergency if they are staying home alone. Ms Westerman advised: "If they're going out alone make sure they know a trusted adult's full name and address and have two trusted adults' phone numbers." Discuss various scenarios with your child Have an open conversation with your child about potential situations they may encounter and how to stay safe. Ask them how they would react and how they think they would feel. Ms Westerman added: "If they're going to be home alone, for example, ask them what they'd do if they hurt themselves or if a stranger knocks on the door. ‌ "If they're going out alone you might want to ask them what they'd do if someone asks them to do something they're not comfortable with." Set clear boundaries Make sure your child is fully aware of the rules when they're unsupervised, whether at home or out alone, so both you and they understand how they should behave in your absence. Ms Westerman said: "It's a good idea to agree on some house or outside rules that suit their maturity before you leave them alone. Article continues below "Give your child a chance to build their independence by building your trust. If they adhere to rules and boundaries you set you'll feel more confident letting them do more on their own." If you have concerns about a child contact the NSPCC helpline on 0808 800 5000 or email help@nspcc.

He lied to his girlfriend that his mum had died and he needed thousands of pounds for the funeral
He lied to his girlfriend that his mum had died and he needed thousands of pounds for the funeral

Wales Online

timea day ago

  • Wales Online

He lied to his girlfriend that his mum had died and he needed thousands of pounds for the funeral

He lied to his girlfriend that his mum had died and he needed thousands of pounds for the funeral Andrew New's mum was very much alive, a court heard 'I gave this person everything I had' (Image: Liverpool Echo ) A fraudster falsely told his girlfriend that his mum was dead so that he could swindle her out of more than £15,000. A court heard Andrew New claimed that he needed cash in order to arrange his mother's funeral, despite his mother being very much alive and well. His ex also transferred him money so that he could purchase Champions League final tickets on the empty promise that he would pay her back. But the "born again Christian", who previously found himself in the dock after scamming a woman who he met on dating website Plenty of Fish, has been spared an immediate prison sentence because his case has taken three years to come to court. ‌ Liverpool Crown Court heard on Thursday that New, 36, had been in a relationship with Sarah Haslam between April and June 2022. During their brief relationship New had made repeated requests for her to transfer money into his bank account, as well as those of a friend and his "Uncle Joe", for a "variety of fabricated reasons". ‌ Henry Riding, prosecuting, described how these included having forgotten to take his credit card while filling up his car at a petrol station and a wish to purchase tickets for Liverpool FC's 2022 Champions League final against Real Madrid in Paris. Most shockingly, she sent him thousands of pounds so that he could "make funeral arrangements" for his own mum who was alive. New, from Wirrall who now resides in a rehab facility in Motherwell, Scotland, "promised to pay her back in due course, but never did". This led to him pocketing a total of £15,734.65 of Ms Haslam's money in just two-and-a-half months. Article continues below Andrew New promised to pay her back but never did (Image: Liverpool Echo ) Reading her witness statement, Ms Haslam said: "As a result of what happened to me, I'm exhausted both mentally and emotionally. I've told very few people what they did to me three years ago. I say they, because I can't say their name out loud. "This was a person I believed cared deeply for me. I now know I was manipulated by them. I gave this person everything I had. In return, I was controlled and coerced until they broke me. I've lost part of myself. ‌ "Three years on, I still live the trauma. I felt like I had ruined my life. A day doesn't go by when I don't feel the hurt, pain and shame for not recognising what was happening to me." Having been arrested in 2022, and pleading guilty during his first appearance before the crown court in August last year, New's case did not proceed to sentence until now due to ongoing proceeding against the two other men whose bank accounts were used as part of the scam. These charges were ultimately dropped against them by the Crown Prosecution Service. The court heard that the defendant has a total of four previous convictions for four offences, including for fraud in 2019. Don't miss a court report by signing up to our crime newsletter here ‌ Defence barrister Paul Becker, told the court: "The defendant is sorry for what he has done. He did not know, first thing today, that the victim was going to be present. Having heard her victim personal statement, he is utterly ashamed of himself. "This is an unusual case. The delay, in some respects, helps the defendant, because he has been able to rebuild his life. He has moved to Scotland. He has been at a rehab centre for the last year. "He works six days a week helping people. Because he is working, he gets free accommodation. He has been able to move away from this area, from obviously problematic relationships and the addiction he has had. ‌ "He has stayed off cocaine. That was the blight of his life. He can only say that it was because of drugs. "He has an unattractive record. He has done his best since he moved away to try to turn his life around. If the defendant goes to jail today, he spends a few months in jail, he comes out on licence and he is back to square one. "Everybody wants Mr New to be rehabilitated, to stay off drugs, to stay away from a situation where he is essentially stealing and to be a working, productive member of society. My submission is that the defendant should be given a chance today." ‌ New admitted one count of fraud by false representation and was handed a 21-month imprisonment suspended for 20 months with 180 hours of unpaid work, a rehabilitation activity requirement of up to 20 days and a 12-month condition of residence. Upon sentencing, Judge Gary Woodhall said: "On many occasions you asked her to make transfers, saying that you owed others money or you were paying for items such as petrol, funeral arrangements for your mother, although she was alive and well, and football tickets. "All of these transfers flowed on the basis that you would pay her back. You never did. You had no intention of doing so. ‌ "What you did has caused her very significant financial difficulties. She is still now, three years on, repaying monies which you took from her. That has delayed her ability to buy her own home. "You have accepted full responsibility. You had issues with the use of cocaine. You are now residing in a Christian rehabilitation facility. You now identify as a born again Christian. "You work on a charitable basis six days a week, paying for your accommodation. You act as a mentor. You have expressed remorse and shame and want to apologise to your victim. As Mr Becker puts it, you have rebuilt your life. You have tackled, or are in the process of tackling, your addiction, which underlines all of your offending. ‌ "The mitigation in your case all flows from one thing. That is the delay in bringing this case to resolution, a delay of around three years. It cannot be said that the delay is attributable to your actions. "That delay means that you can show that you have committed no further offences and allows Mr Becker to identify that you have turned your life around in that three-year period. That is very significant. "This is a case where appropriate punishment could only be achieved by an immediate custodial sentence. However, there is the significant issue in this case, which I am obliged to take into account. That is the fact that the offending is now three years old. Article continues below "Had you been sentenced closer in time to the commission of this offence, I have no doubt that an immediate custodial sentence would have been the only correct disposal. "An immediate custodial sentence would mean a number of months in prison, the removal of your support network and, frankly, has the potential of unpicking the progress that has been made. You have come very close to going to prison today. If all the promises suggested on your behalf are not made out and you return to offending, this sentence will be activated."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store