'Udaipur Files Is Deeply Communal': Arshad Madani Moves Supreme Court Against Clearance To The Film
Islamic scholar Maulana Arshad Madani has filed strong objections before the Supreme Court against the clearance granted to the controversial film Udaipur Files by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting's screening committee. Madani, president of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, contends that the film's content is not only factually misleading but also deeply communal in nature.
In his petition, Madani argues that Udaipur Files promotes a dangerous narrative by portraying Indian Muslims as sympathisers or agents of Pakistani terrorists. 'These narratives do not merely concern India-Pakistan tensions but actively portray Indian Muslims as inherently disloyal, sympathetic to, or working at the behest of terror groups," he stated in court filings. Such depictions, he argues, are both mala fide and aimed at stoking communal tensions across the country.
He has also raised serious concerns over the manner in which the film received approval. Madani alleges that the Ministry's screening committee order lacked proper reasoning and failed to adequately respond to his detailed objections. 'The committee's report simply records some submissions and suggests six inconsequential changes, without analysing the broader communal implications," he claimed.
Furthermore, Madani has alleged a 'conflict of interest" in the composition of the screening committee. Since the CBFC (Central Board of Film Certification) had already granted certification to the film — a decision under challenge — Madani argues that delegating the matter to a committee largely comprising CBFC members undermines the credibility of the review process.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Rush Hour: SC says Bihar SIR should aim for inclusion, Congress questions Centre on Pahalgam & more
We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. The Supreme Court said that the Election Commission should focus on 'mass inclusion' rather than 'en masse exclusion' while revising the electoral rolls in Bihar. The court reiterated its suggestion to the poll body to consider adding Aadhaar and voter identity cards to the list of valid documents. However, the bench refused to restrain the Election Commission from publishing the draft voter list on August 1. It will fix a time on Tuesday for the final hearing of the case. Last week, the Election Commission argued that Aadhaar and ration cards could not be included as standalone valid documents, as they could be obtained by fraudulent means. In response, the court said that any of the documents listed by the poll panel as acceptable could also be forged. The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of their eligibility to vote. Read on. The Union government has been unable to arrest those responsible for the Pahalgam terror attack even after 100 days, the Congress has stated. During a debate in Lok Sabha on the attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor launched by India, Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi also said that Union Home Minister Amit Shah 'needs to take the responsibility' for the alleged security lapse. 'The country wants to know how these terrorists were given shelter and information,' said Gogoi. 'And 100 days later, the government has no answer.' He criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for failing to visit Pahalgam after the terror attack. Earlier on Monday, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh told Parliament that while the Opposition had questioned the government's claims, they had not once asked how many Pakistani aircraft had been shot down. He claimed that the Opposition's questions did not reflect the national sentiment. Singh said it was 'absolutely wrong' to claim that India halted Operation Sindoor under any pressure. He maintained India decided to pause the military operation as it had achieved its political and military objectives. Read on. The Supreme Court has stayed a Calcutta High Court order blocking the implementation of a West Bengal government notification classifying 140 communities as Other Backward Classes. A bench headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai said that the High Court order was 'prima facie erroneous'. The court expressed surprise at the High Court's reasoning that only the legislature could approve the OBC list, and not the executive. The matter pertains to a notification issued by the West Bengal government earlier in June that added 76 sub-castes to the OBC category, taking the total number of communities in the grouping to 140.
Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Centre unable to arrest terrorists even after 100 days of Pahalgam attack, says Congress
Although nearly 100 days have elapsed since the Pahalgam terror attack, the Union government has not been able to arrest those responsible, Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said in the Lok Sabha on Monday. Opening the Opposition's response during a 16-hour debate on the terror attack and Operation Sindoor, the Congress' deputy leader in the Lok Sabha added that Union Home Minister Amit Shah 'needs to take the responsibility' for the security lapse that led to the attack. 'The country wants to know and those who lost their families want to know how the government could not catch those terrorists,' said Gogoi. 'The country wants to know how these terrorists were given shelter and information. And 100 days later, the government has no answer.' He added: 'You have drones, Pegasus, and security forces, and you could not catch. What kind of arrangement is this?' Gogoi said that Shah 'cannot hide' behind Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha. 'If someone needs to take the responsibility, it is the Union home minister,' said the Congress leader. The comment was in reference to remarks made by Sinha during an interview with The Times of India on July 14 that he takes 'full responsibility' for the Pahalgam attack. The lieutenant governor had said that the attack was 'undoubtedly a security failure'. During his response to the debate, Gogoi also criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not visiting Pahalgam after the terror attack. 'He attended a government program and addressed a political rally in Bihar,' said the Congress MP. 'If someone went to Pahalgam, it was our leader Rahul Gandhi.' He also claimed that although the attack was carried out by Pakistan, it was China that had orchestrated it. 'I would like to ask [Defence Minister] Rajnath Singh, why did you not talk of China in your speech when you claim that you will show red eyes to China?' said Gogoi. Referring to United States President Donald Trump's claims on the ceasefire agreement between New Delhi and Islamabad amid Operation Sindoor, Gogoi said the Opposition demands to know the number of jets that were lost during the conflict. On July 18, Trump claimed that five jets were shot down during the conflict between India and Pakistan. He also repeated his claim that Washington had helped settle the tensions between the two countries. New Delhi has rejected Trump's assertions about the role of the US in halting the firings. Opening the 16-hour debate in the Lok Sabha earlier in the day, Rajnath Singh told Parliament that it was ' absolutely wrong ' to claim that India halted Operation Sindoor under any pressure. India decided to pause its action against the terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as it had achieved its political and military objectives, he added. Singh also said that while the Opposition had questioned the government's claims, they had not once asked how many Pakistani aircraft had been shot down. 'I believe these questions do not reflect national sentiments,' he said. Tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad escalated on May 7 when the Indian military carried out strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed in the shelling. India and Pakistan on May 10 reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following the four-day conflict.
New Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Jaishankar denies Trump's involvement in India-Pak ceasefire, says no call or contact with Modi
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Monday sought to end speculation over any involvement of US President Donald Trump in brokering the ceasefire between India and Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. Addressing Parliament during the ongoing 16-hour debate on the Pahalgam attack and Op Sindoor, Jaishankar said, 'There was no call between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump between April 22 and June 17.' The Pahalgam terror attack occurred on April 22, and the ceasefire between India and Pakistan was announced on June 17 — nearly 100 hours after India launched precision strikes on terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, prompting Islamabad to retaliate with missile strikes targeting military and civilian centres. Jaishankar added that during heightened tensions between India and Pakistan in May, the U.S. had warned India of an imminent Pakistani strike. He said U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance called Prime Minister Narendra Modi on May 9, 2025, cautioning him about a 'massive Pakistani attack' expected within hours. 'PM Modi responded that if such an attack happened, it would be met with an appropriate response. Our Armed Forces foiled that attack,' Jaishankar said. The next day, on May 10, India received calls from various countries indicating that Pakistan was ready to cease hostilities. 'Our position was clear — if Pakistan was serious, the request had to come through the DGMO channel. That is exactly how it came,' he said. Jaishankar also clarified that there was 'no linkage with trade' in any conversations with the U.S. during this period. 'Secondly, there was no call between PM Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump from April 22, when he called to express sympathy after the Pahalgam attack, till June 17, when he again spoke to PM Modi in Canada.' At this point, Home Minister Amit Shah intervened, asking the Opposition why they placed more faith in a foreign leader's claims than in India's own External Affairs Minister.
