What kind of Second Lady will Usha Vance be?
Washington just got a new Second Lady, and this one comes with serious legal chops, a history-making title and a husband who knows a thing or two about military life.
Usha Vance, wife of Vice President JD Vance, is the first Indian American, Asian American and Hindu to hold the role of Second Lady. But let's be real: military spouses are probably wondering what that actually means for them.
So far, she's kept things pretty quiet. But with her legal background, her husband's Marine Corps experience, and her deep connections in Washington, she might just be gearing up for something big.
Historically, the role of the Second Lady has been what each woman makes of it—but for military spouses, some have made a huge impact.
Jill Biden co-founded Joining Forces, an initiative to support military families with employment, education, and wellness.
Karen Pence focused on mental health for service members and their families.
Michelle Obama pushed major efforts in military spouse hiring, working with private companies to expand job opportunities.
JD Vance's military background and Usha's legal expertise give her a rare advantage in tackling issues that military spouses face daily, including employment, legal advocacy and veterans' benefits.
Before becoming Second Lady, she built a career as a Yale-educated lawyer, an appellate specialist, and a clerk for Chief Justice John Roberts. She spent years crafting legal arguments that reached the Supreme Court, shaping high-stakes cases with national impact.
Now, she steps into a role that has taken many different forms over the years, each defined by the person holding it. Some Second Ladies, like Jill Biden and Michelle Obama, went full force with education and military family advocacy. Others, like Karen Pence, focused on mental health and art therapy. And then there were the quieter players, like Marilyn Quayle, who worked behind the scenes on policy.
Where will Usha land? Well, if history tells us anything, it might be somewhere between military life and the legal world.
JD Vance served in the Marine Corps, and while Usha didn't live the typical military spouse experience (they met in law school long after his service), she's seen firsthand how military life shapes careers, families, and financial stability.
That connection alone makes her one to watch. Will she take on military spouse employment issues? Advocate for legal support for military families? Push for better legal protections for veterans navigating post-service life?
With her background, she could be the perfect person to tackle the legal challenges military families face, or she could take a totally different route toward education, civic engagement, or judicial advocacy. So far, she's kept her cards close.
Usha Vance isn't stepping into this role as just another political spouse. She's a powerhouse in her own right. With a Yale law degree, a clerkship under Chief Justice John Roberts, and years of experience in appellate law, she built a career on precision, strategy, and a deep understanding of constitutional issues. Unlike many of her predecessors, she comes from a world where legal arguments don't just shape policy—they decide the future of national debates.
If she turns her focus to military families, she has the expertise to make a real impact. She could push to expand pro bono legal resources, ensuring that service members, veterans, and their families have better access to representation in benefits disputes, housing conflicts, and employment protections. Active-duty service members often face an uphill battle in custody cases, where deployments and frequent relocations create legal complications. With her background, Usha could advocate for judicial protections that prevent courts from penalizing military parents for the demands of their service.
She could also bring a legal framework to military spouse employment issues, where progress has lagged behind policy discussions. Many military spouses struggle to maintain careers because of rigid state licensing laws, employer bias against frequent moves, and hiring systems that fail to recognize the realities of military life. Usha, with her deep understanding of legal systems and personal connection to the military community, could push for stronger protections and federal policy shifts that make employment more accessible for military spouses.
Her next steps remain unclear, but few Second Ladies have entered the role with this level of legal expertise. If she decides to use it, she could change the conversation on military family rights, judicial fairness, and legal advocacy in a way that lasts long beyond her tenure.
Since stepping into the role, she's already been spotted on diplomatic trips to France and Germany and was appointed to the board of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. But when it comes to domestic initiatives, she's taking her time.
So the big question remains: Will Usha Vance step into a hands-on role, championing military family issues, or will she keep things low-key?
Whatever she chooses, military spouses will be watching, because when the Second Lady has a legal mind and a military connection, there's potential for real impact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Defying Trump's Firing, Smithsonian Says It Controls Personnel Decisions
In a challenge to President Trump, the Smithsonian said on Monday that the president did not have the right to fire Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery, despite his recent announcement that she had been terminated. 'All personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the secretary, with oversight by the board,' said a statement from the Smithsonian, which oversees that museum and 20 others, as well as libraries, research centers and the National Zoo. 'Lonnie G. Bunch, the secretary, has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian.' The statement came hours after the Board of Regents, including Vice President JD Vance, discussed the president's announcement at a quarterly meeting. When Mr. Trump said 10 days ago that he had fired Ms. Sajet, he called her 'a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position.' The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ms. Sajet was not mentioned in the Smithsonian's statement. But the board said it was asking Mr. Bunch to take steps to ensure the institution's nonpartisan nature. 'The Smithsonian must be a welcoming place of knowledge and discovery for all Americans,' the statement said. 'The Board of Regents is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence, and we recognize that our institution can and must do more to further these foundational values.' The statement said the board had directed Mr. Bunch to articulate expectations to museum directors about what is displayed in their institutions and to give them time to make any changes needed 'to ensure unbiased content.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Trump administration mobilizing 2,000 more National Guard troops for Los Angeles protests
The military said Monday it is mobilizing another 2,000 members of the California National Guard to respond to protests in Los Angeles, joining thousands of National Guard and hundreds of Marine Corps personnel already assigned to the city. Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell said on X late Monday the additional troops have been "called into federal service to support ICE & to enable federal law-enforcement officers to safely conduct their duties." The move adds to 2,000 National Guard troops who were called up by President Trump late Saturday to protect federal personnel and property. The military also activated about 700 active-duty Marines on Monday to assist the Guard. Marines could start arriving in the Los Angeles area as soon as Tuesday, a defense official told CBS News The move to effectively double the number of Guard personnel was immediately panned by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who called it "Reckless" and "Disrespectful to our troops." The governor wrote on X that many of the initial 2,000 troops called up by the federal government over the weekend are still "sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders." "This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego," Newsom said. The military presence came after days of protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests in the nation's second-largest city. The federal government has accused local authorities of not doing enough to deal with violent clashes and protect ICE agents from being assaulted, which state and local officials deny. Local officials have blasted the military deployments, calling them unnecessary and warning they could further inflame the situation in Los Angeles. The city is facing a fourth night of protests Monday. The state of California sued the Trump administration over the National Guard deployments, calling them a "power grab" that illegally usurped Newsom's authority over the Guard.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' rallies set for Saturday in Bluffton
BLUFFTON, S.C. (WSAV) – Activists across the country are planning to make their voices heard again this weekend. 'No Kings' rallies are set to take place in nearly 1,400 cities including at least four in the Coastal Empire and Lowcountry. Their message, push back against what organizers call an abuse of power by the Trump administration. 'It's not a hate filled event, it's to make our voice heard,' Rita Conrad of Lowcountry Indivisible said. The advocacy group Lowcountry Indivisible has planned the 'No Kings' event in Bluffton Saturday. 'America fought a battle many, many, many years ago to end King rule in the country. It seems like almost every day there's something that the Trump administration is doing that is kingly,' Conrad said. 'And he's not a king. He is the President. An American President is obligated to follow the Constitution and the rule of law.' Since Trump took office there have been a variety of rallies in several Lowcountry towns and cities. Conrad said several hundred people have joined on with 'indivisible' to make their voices heard. 'We're concerned that he's not responding to rulings from the Supreme Court,' Conrad said. 'He's taking actions, and I don't think anybody believes that the American system is perfect. Even the immigration system, we need to make changes to improve it. And yes, deporting people who have committed crimes, you know, and are here illegally, I don't have a big problem with that. But it's the way they're being rounded up and without due process of law. And I just think that that's not what we are as a country, there are ways to make changes that aren't cruel and don't ruin people's lives.' While the California protests ended with national guard troops called in and some violence, that is not the goal of this rally according to Conrad. Families, kids and dogs are welcome. They have also added a food drive as well to help the people affected by cuts that came or are coming from Washington. 'Cutting health care and food stamps or SNAP benefits to a lot of people who really need help,' Conrad said. 'And the beneficiaries will be people who don't need help. And to me, it's sort of Trump's way of saying let them eat cake. So, our response is, no, not cake. We'll provide some solid food for people who need it.' The Bluffton demonstration will be in front of Beaufort County government building starting at 4 p.m. Saturday. Beaufort and Hilton Head will also be holding rallies on Saturday at noon. The Savannah event begins at 11 a.m. at Thomas Square Park. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
