logo
Karen Millen ignites fury with breastfeeding claim as Katherine Ryan wades in

Karen Millen ignites fury with breastfeeding claim as Katherine Ryan wades in

Daily Mirrora day ago

Karen Millen has come under fire after she sparked fury by claiming breastfeeding an infant after six months is 'selfish' as she appeared on Vanessa Feltz's Channel 5 show
Fashion designer Karen Millen has come under fire after making a series of damaging claims about breastfeeding during her appearance on The Vanessa Show earlier this week.
Karen, 63, issued an apology via Vanessa Feltz's eponymous Channel 5 programme after claiming it was 'selfish' for mothers to continue to breastfeed their children after six months of age – which sparked anger online.

As she appeared on the programme on Wednesday, Karen discussed a video of a mother breastfeeding her three-year-old. She said: "There's no benefit, is there? For a child to be breastfed beyond six months, really. I think it's quite a selfish thing on the mother's part."

Vanessa, 63, asked: "Do you?" To which Karen replied: "I do, actually." When asked why she feels that way, Karen explained: "Well, I just think, you know, that's not good emotionally for that child."
Karen's comments sparked fury online, and she later issued an apology via The Vanessa Show. Vanessa shared a video on her Instagram to speak on behalf of Karen in an apology which has also come under fire. Vanessa said in the video: "Karen has faced some backlash for what she said yesterday on the show and some social media clips, too, have been quite antagonistic. And she's now said she'd like to apologise and she's given us this exclusive statement."
The video then cut to footage of Karen who addressed the issue to the camera, as she said: "I know I've upset a lot of your viewers and that was not my intention. The question was aimed at a three-year-old being breastfed and my thoughts on that and my answers reflected that, not the subject of breastfeeding. I have three children and I breastfed all three of them up until six, seven months. Despite it being incredibly painful, I got mastitis each time and cracked and sore nipples. But I did it because I knew it was the best thing for them for at least six months. So, you know, I think my issue was more on the fact that, you know, as a baby breast milk is the best.
"And beyond being a baby, growing into being a toddler, I just found it more difficult to come to terms with how that would benefit a three-year-old toddler. So, anyway, everyone has their own personal choice and decision in these things and I respect that.

"And, as a woman to women, I do respect your choices and I do want to support you. So, my apologies once again. I hope you forgive me."
The clip then cut to Vanessa again who added: "Now the World Health Organisation recommends infants are breastfed exclusively for the first six months of their lives and then up to the age of two and beyond that if it suits the family."
Karen's apology via Vanessa has sparked further outrage and done little to pacify mothers and breastfeeding experts – including celebrity mums. Comedian Katherine Ryan, who recently announced she is pregnant with her fourth child, jibed at Karen's apology as she sarcastically wrote in the comments section: "Everyone knows: an infant baby becomes a FULL CALF at six months old and that's when milk from a natural source (cow) becomes more suitable than milk from its mother of the same birth species. #science".

While Ferne McCann shared a post about Karen's comments on her own Instagram feed. She posted a video of herself breastfeeding her daughter Finty, who turns two in July, and wrote in the caption: "A few of you have messaged me about the recent Karen Millen comments on breastfeeding. While I'm really passionate about this subject, I think it's more powerful to encourage open conversation than to shut people down for having a different opinion and here's why.
"I've actually been on the other side of this before when I shared how much I loved breastfeeding. I got messages saying it was insensitive to those who couldn't. So I really do understand that this topic stirs strong feelings on all sides."But what's important here and actually very positive is breastfeeding IS being spoken about more."Conversations like this can shine a light on just how many mums want to try breastfeeding but don't feel confident or supported enough to do it."The UK has some of the lowest breastfeeding rates in the world. The studies show the biggest reasons are that many new mums feel unsure, judged, or alone so opt out before even trying."The more we talk, the more we normalise. And the more we normalise, the more confident we become."Above all, every mum deserves to make her own choices (whatever she feels is right for her) free from shame, and full of confidence."

The NHS states and the World Health Organisation both have information on breastfeeding. The NHS recommends that mothers "breastfeed your baby exclusively (give them breast milk only) for the first 6 months of their life.
"Breastfeeding still has lots of benefits for you and your baby after 6 months. It protects them from infections and there's some evidence that it helps with the digestion of your baby's first solid foods. It also continues to provide the balance of nutrients your baby needs."

Meanwhile, the World Health Organisation states: "WHO recommends you keep breastfeeding your child up to two years and beyond and for as long as you both want to continue. Breastfeeding never stops protecting children from infectious disease."
Karen's comments have caused a stir online as experts and mums commented on the apology post from Vanessa. One said: "When discussing topics like this on TV, it would be beneficial to also have an expert in infant feeding available, to negate opinions that the general public may deem as truth. Ie "breastfeeding isn't beneficial after 6 months, it's selfish"."
Another added: "This really isn't a full apology and it continues to spread misinformation. A 6 or 7 month old is not a toddler. Breastfeeding beyond infancy is normal, beneficial and recommended by the World Health Organization. The original statements about it being 'selfish' or causing 'attachment issues' were incredibly damaging to parents - and they remain untrue. If you're going to use your platform to comment on infant feeding, please take the time to understand the evidence first. So many mums already feel guilt and pressure around feeding - this kind of messaging only makes it worse."

And a third said: "I think this has made the situation worse, firstly the apology isnt really an apology, secondly they are justifying her answer with the 6 months comment at the end and 'for longer if suits the family' but do not mention all the benefits up to the age of 2? It's not just because it 'suits' the family.."
Meanwhile, angry social media users are taking to Karen Millen's brand page to share their anger over her recent comments as one said: "Donating all of my clothes with your label to charity and boycotting you for life. I'm currently breastfeeding a 4.5-year-old and, if you'd like to learn about the benefits, just visit the WHO and NHS website. Get yourself educated on breastfeeding before you spout incorrect information. You are entitled to your own opinion, but don't state things as fact that aren't."
Another wrote: "This is actually breastfeeding friendly. Shame I would never purchase anything from a brand which shames the most selfless gift a mother can give her little one." As a third wrote: "Stick to the dresses, let actual lactation consultants give advice on breastfeeding".
The brand has now since issued a statement on their Instagram story, which read: "We hear and understand the concerns regarding Karen's comments. To be clear, while Karen founded the brand, she is no longer involved in the business, and her comments do not reflect the views or values of our brand. We recognise the decision to breastfeed is deeply personal, and we fully support every parent in making the choices that are right for their family."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Love Island lines up three stunning female bombshells to cause chaos – and they're already in the villa
Love Island lines up three stunning female bombshells to cause chaos – and they're already in the villa

Scottish Sun

time20 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Love Island lines up three stunning female bombshells to cause chaos – and they're already in the villa

It comes after a killer twist aired last night ISLAND ANGELS Love Island lines up three stunning female bombshells to cause chaos – and they're already in the villa Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TEMPTING trio of new bombshells have strutted into the Love Island villa. Viewers are holding their breath to see if Blu or Shea will step down and relinquish their spot in the villa after last night's savage recoupling twist. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 5 Love Island bombshell Malisha Jordan Credit: malishaa.j/Instagram 5 The Sun previously revealed Sydney native Emily Morann is heading into the villa Credit: emilyxmorann/Instagram 5 Londoner Yasmin Pettet has also nabbed a spot as a bombshell Credit: yasminpettet111/Instagram The Sun has revealed that one boy has already left following that moment but kept their ID secret to hold the surprise for fans. But that lad will be gutted to have missed out on the triple whammy of beauties who landed last night. Yasmin Pettet, Malisha Jordan and Emily Morann slow-mo walked into the love nest to shake-up Villa action. Not much is known about Londoner Yasmmin, as she's wiped her social media, bar from a few glamorous snaps shared in recent weeks. Yasmin is seen hanging out in posh restaurants across the capital, mainly around Kensington and Notting Hill. She certainly has the credentials for life in the villa, with a bikini body that will make heads swivel. Pretty Malisha Jordan has just 15 photos on her Instagram - all of them stunning snaps from her travels abroad. She's spent time in Italy, Egypt, Dubai and and Marrakesh. Emily Moran, who lives in Sydney, Australia, has also jetted to Majorca and is set to scramble the boys' heads. A source said: "Emily's originally from Aberdare, the same town as Nicole Samuel from last year's show. Furious Love Island fans slam cliffhanger as HUGE twist revealed in shock dumping "Her ex-boyfriend is tall dark and handsome so she'll have plenty of options when she does make it into the villa. "She's been unlucky in love since moving Down Under and is hoping to find Mr Right with a little help from Maya Jama and the British public." It comes after a devastating twist left Blu and Shea vulnerable. Last night the girls were given the power to decide who they wanted to recouple with. The girls then stood up to make their decision one by one and pick their guy - until only Shea and Blu remained. However, in a MAJOR twist Dejon then received a text which read: "Blue and Shea, you are now single. Between you both you should now decided who should stay and who should go." But both lads said they were determined to stay. Blu confidently said: "I ain't f****** leaving," as Shea echoed: "I ain't either." The episode then ended, and caused fans watching at home to come up with a theory about who will go home. Taking to X, one fan said: "Surely Shea should stay and let Blu go home." While another added: "Please can someone escort Blu off the premises." This one said: "Blu has been in the villa for 4days and did nothing pack your bags sir!" For all the latest on Love Island keep up to date with our live blog. 5 Love Island fans say they know who will be dumped out of Blu and Shea Credit: Shutterstock Editorial

‘What are her neighbours thinking?!' people gasp as woman takes out her rubbish out ‘with no trousers on'
‘What are her neighbours thinking?!' people gasp as woman takes out her rubbish out ‘with no trousers on'

Scottish Sun

time20 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

‘What are her neighbours thinking?!' people gasp as woman takes out her rubbish out ‘with no trousers on'

RUBBISH CHOICE 'What are her neighbours thinking?!' people gasp as woman takes out her rubbish out 'with no trousers on' IF there's one thing we've learned over the years, it's to never buy bottoms in the same shade as your skin. Why, you may wonder? Because you'll end up looking like you've forgotten to throw on trousers. Advertisement 4 'Curvy' mum Jade went viral on Instagram for all the wrong reasons Credit: INSTAGRAM/kennedy_curves_ 4 Her bottom half appears entirely naked, thanks to her flesh-coloured wide leg bottoms Credit: INSTAGRAM/kennedy_curves_ Over on Instagram, a mind-bending video has one viral for that very reason. It's all very innocent, showing mum Jade Kennedy Gonzalez taking out the rubbish from her back garden. However, at first glance, it looks shockingly explicit. Her bottom half appears entirely naked, thanks to her flesh-coloured wide leg bottoms. Advertisement In the now-viral clip, which has racked up close to an astronomical 20million views, the mum had paired the bottoms with black Crocs, as well as an oversized T-shirt. ''Today's your lucky day! You get to watch me take out the trash for half a minute!'' said Jade, who regularly shows off her ''curvy'' figure online. Unsurprisingly, the head-scratching post has racked up thousands of comments, with many left totally baffled. One message included: ''I wouldn't wear that color pants, makes you look like you don't have any on.'' Advertisement Another viewer wrote: ''I thought she was naked.'' Someone else agreed, writing: ''This colour of trousers should be illegal.'' The moment a woman leaves the gym stunned as her legging choice makes it look like shes naked from the waist down Meanwhile, others were more concerned about the people living nearby. ''What are her neighbours thinking?'' Advertisement 'No trousers on' Recently, one jet-setter also left people gobsmacked after she appeared to board the plane with ''no trousers on''. A video of the passenger was shared on Instagram by radio host Shellian, who joked that she must have been listening to Dexta Daps' song No Underwear. 4 A woman left fellow travellers stunned as she appeared to be trying to board a plane with "no trousers on" Credit: Instagram/@shellianpearce 4 But others insisted she was definitely "naked" from the waist down Credit: Instagram/@shellianpearce Advertisement "What is this going on?" she raged. "Lord give me strength. I see no drawers!" Referring to the airline the woman was travelling on, Shellian added: "Are you going to let this happen? "You need to ban some s**t. This ain't right. She have on no drawers." Advertisement Why the latest fashion trends are a disaster for real women's bodies From bum-skimming micro shorts to flesh-baring blouses, it seems the "new-in Fabulous' Fashion Editor Clemmie Fieldsend explains why she, as a size 10, is struggling to add this season's latest trends to her wardrobe. "If if I was to wear the season's styles, I'd look stupid. My job as Fashion Editor is to know what's hot and what's not, what's in shops and what people are wearing. But this season, stores seem flooded with looks I find unwearable — and I'm sure many more 'normal' people do, too. For example, I wouldn't be caught dead in the love handles-baring low-rise jeans that are dominating the High Street. And I recently saw a picture of the stunning Sydney Sweeney in a pair — with boyish-looking boxers poking out the top, and matching bandeau crop top. Despite her beauty, I thought the White Lotus star looked daft. And I had to ask myself: 'What reinforcements has she got holding up her boobs?' The other thing irritating me about fashion is, if it's not open at the back, it's open at the front. While I'm all for body confidence and wearing what you want, there's no way I'm standing on a packed train, or visiting the office, with my stomach, bra and boobs on show. I'd hate to put anyone off their corn flakes. Right now, Zara is the worst offender. When its models aren't crouching awkwardly on top of kitchen stoves they are wearing crocheted flared trousers and spaghetti-strapped sequin crop tops. I'm a 33-year-old M&S woman. From underwear to outerwear, I love them and look to them every week to see what's trending. They're really nailing waistcoats at the moment. Simple and stylish, they've got them in cotton, linen and a rainbow of colours." However, in the comments section people were divided as to what was going on, with many insisting the woman was wearing skin-coloured leggings. "You can see a crease at the back of the knee," one wrote. "Also, human skin has dimples, uneven discolouration in random spots, cellulite and jiggling." But others hit back, as they were certain that the female passenger was naked, after her dress rode up. Advertisement "If it was leggings you wouldn't see the separation of her butt cheeks," one wrote. "They are not leggings!" "Take a photo, zoom in, she doesn't have pants on! She is buck naked!" another laughed.

‘What are her neighbours thinking?!' people gasp as woman takes out her rubbish out ‘with no trousers on'
‘What are her neighbours thinking?!' people gasp as woman takes out her rubbish out ‘with no trousers on'

The Sun

time20 minutes ago

  • The Sun

‘What are her neighbours thinking?!' people gasp as woman takes out her rubbish out ‘with no trousers on'

IF there's one thing we've learned over the years, it's to never buy bottoms in the same shade as your skin. Why, you may wonder? Because you'll end up looking like you've forgotten to throw on trousers. 4 4 Over on Instagram, a mind-bending video has one viral for that very reason. It's all very innocent, showing mum Jade Kennedy Gonzalez taking out the rubbish from her back garden. However, at first glance, it looks shockingly explicit. Her bottom half appears entirely naked, thanks to her flesh-coloured wide leg bottoms. In the now-viral clip, which has racked up close to an astronomical 20million views, the mum had paired the bottoms with black Crocs, as well as an oversized T-shirt. ''Today's your lucky day! You get to watch me take out the trash for half a minute!'' said Jade, who regularly shows off her ''curvy'' figure online. Unsurprisingly, the head-scratching post has racked up thousands of comments, with many left totally baffled. One message included: ''I wouldn't wear that color pants, makes you look like you don't have any on.'' Another viewer wrote: ''I thought she was naked.'' Someone else agreed, writing: ''This colour of trousers should be illegal.'' The moment a woman leaves the gym stunned as her legging choice makes it look like shes naked from the waist down Meanwhile, others were more concerned about the people living nearby. ''What are her neighbours thinking?'' 'No trousers on' Recently, one jet-setter also left people gobsmacked after she appeared to board the plane with ''no trousers on''. A video of the passenger was shared on Instagram by radio host Shellian, who joked that she must have been listening to Dexta Daps' song No Underwear. 4 4 "What is this going on?" she raged. "Lord give me strength. I see no drawers!" Referring to the airline the woman was travelling on, Shellian added: "Are you going to let this happen? "You need to ban some s**t. This ain't right. She have on no drawers." Why the latest fashion trends are a disaster for real women's bodies From bum-skimming micro shorts to flesh-baring blouses, it seems the "new-in Fabulous ' Fashion Editor Clemmie Fieldsend explains why she, as a size 10, is struggling to add this season's latest trends to her wardrobe. "If if I was to wear the season's styles, I'd look stupid. My job as Fashion Editor is to know what's hot and what's not, what's in shops and what people are wearing. But this season, stores seem flooded with looks I find unwearable — and I'm sure many more 'normal' people do, too. For example, I wouldn't be caught dead in the love handles-baring low-rise jeans that are dominating the High Street. And I recently saw a picture of the stunning Sydney Sweeney in a pair — with boyish-looking boxers poking out the top, and matching bandeau crop top. Despite her beauty, I thought the White Lotus star looked daft. And I had to ask myself: 'What reinforcements has she got holding up her boobs?' The other thing irritating me about fashion is, if it's not open at the back, it's open at the front. While I'm all for body confidence and wearing what you want, there's no way I'm standing on a packed train, or visiting the office, with my stomach, bra and boobs on show. I'd hate to put anyone off their corn flakes. Right now, Zara is the worst offender. When its models aren't crouching awkwardly on top of kitchen stoves they are wearing crocheted flared trousers and spaghetti-strapped sequin crop tops. I'm a 33-year-old M&S woman. From underwear to outerwear, I love them and look to them every week to see what's trending. They're really nailing waistcoats at the moment. Simple and stylish, they've got them in cotton, linen and a rainbow of colours." However, in the comments section people were divided as to what was going on, with many insisting the woman was wearing skin-coloured leggings. "You can see a crease at the back of the knee," one wrote. "Also, human skin has dimples, uneven discolouration in random spots, cellulite and jiggling." But others hit back, as they were certain that the female passenger was naked, after her dress rode up. "If it was leggings you wouldn't see the separation of her butt cheeks," one wrote. "Take a photo, zoom in, she doesn't have pants on! She is buck naked!" another laughed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store