NATO leaders agree to hike military spending, restate 'ironclad commitment' to collective defence
NATO leaders agreed on Wednesday (June 25, 2025) on a massive hike in defence spending after pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, and expressed their 'ironclad commitment' to come to each other's aid if attacked.
The 32 leaders endorsed a final summit statement saying: 'Allies commit to invest 5 per cent of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations.' Spain had already officially announced that it cannot meet the target, and others have voiced reservations, but the investment pledge includes a review of spending in 2029 to monitor progress and reassess the security threat posed by Russia.
The leaders also underlined their 'ironclad commitment' to NATO's collective security guarantee – 'that an attack on one is an attack on all.' Ahead of the summit, Mr. Trump had again raised doubts over whether the United States would defend its allies.
The show of unity vindicated NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte's billing of the summit as 'transformational,' even though it papered over divisions. The spending pledge sets European allies and Canada on a steep path toward significant military investment.
The spending hike requires each countries to spend billions of dollars. It comes as the United States — NATO's biggest-spending member — shifts its attention away from Europe to focus on security priorities elsewhere, notably in the Middle East and Indo-Pacific.
But ahead of the meeting, Spain announced that it would not be able to reach the target by the new 2035 deadline, calling it 'unreasonable.' Belgium signalled that it would not get there either, and Slovakia said it reserves the right to decide its own defence spending.
Many European countries face major economic challenges, and Mr. Trump's global tariff war could make it even harder for America's allies to reach their targets. Some countries are already squeezing welfare and foreign aid spending to channel extra funds into their military budgets.
On Tuesday, Mr. Trump complained that 'there's a problem with Spain. Spain is not agreeing, which is very unfair to the rest of them, frankly.' He has also criticised Canada as 'a low payer.' In 2018, a NATO summit during Trump's first term unravelled due to a dispute over defence spending.
But Mr. Rutte conceded that 'these are difficult decisions. Let's be honest. I mean, politicians have to make choices in scarcity. And this is not easy.' But he said: 'given the threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative.' Russia's neighbours lead the pack in boosting spending Other countries closer to the borders of Russia and Ukraine — Poland, the three Baltic states and Nordic countries — have committed to the goal, as have NATO's European heavyweights Britain, France, Germany and the Netherlands.
'This is a big win, I think, for both President Trump and I think it's also a big win for Europe,' Finnish President Alexander Stubb told reporters. 'We're witnessing the birth of a new NATO, which means a more balanced NATO.' He said it would take nations 'back to the defence expenditure levels of the Cold War.' NATO countries started to cut their military budgets in safer times after the Berlin Wall collapsed in 1989.
In a fresh take on Mr. Trump's MAGA movement, Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda said: 'We should choose a motto, make NATO great again.'' After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the NATO allies agreed to make 2 per cent of GDP the minimum spending level. Last year, 22 countries were expected to hit that target, up from just three a decade ago.
In The Hague, the allies endorsed a major revamp of their spending targets. They upped the ante for what NATO calls 'core defence spending' to 3.5 per cent, while changing how it's counted to include providing military support to Ukraine.
To hit Trump's 5% demand, the deal set a second target of 1.5% of GDP for a broader range of defence-related spending, such as improving roads, bridges, ports and airfields so that armies can deploy more quickly, countering cyber and hybrid attack measures, or preparing societies to deal with future conflicts.
Progress will be reviewed in 2029, after the next US presidential elections.
'This declaration is historic. We are 32 allies supporting that ambition, which is huge,' said Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre. 'We have been struggling to get above 2 per cent and now we said 3.5 per cent, which is necessary in order to reach our capabilities.' Earlier this month, NATO agreed individual purchasing targets for nations to stock up on weapons and military equipment to better defend Europe, the Arctic and the North Atlantic, as part of the US push to ramp up security spending.
U.S. decision on forces in Europe expected in coming months
Extra funds will also be needed should the Trump administration announce a draw-down of forces in Europe, where around 84,000 U.S. troops are based, leaving European allies to plug any security gaps. The Pentagon is expected to announce its intentions in coming months.
Beyond Trump's demands, European allies and Canada have steeply ramped up defence spending out of concern about the threat posed by Russia. Several countries are concerned that Russia could carry out an attack on NATO territory by the end of the decade. Hungary is not one of them, though.
'I think Russia is not strong enough to represent a real threat to us. We are far stronger,' said Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, fielding questions from reporters, leaning back with his hands thrust into his pockets. Orban is considered Russian President Vladimir Putin's closest ally in Europe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘100% communist lunatic': Trump slams Indian-American Zohran Mamdani after NYC primary win; mocks Democrats
US President Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani (AP) US President Donald Trump on Wednesday called Indian-American politician Zohran Mamdani 'a 100% communist lunatic' while reacting to a major political upset in New York City, his former hometown. The remark marks Trump's first public statement since Mamdani's apparent win over former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. 'We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous,' Trump wrote. 'He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he's not very smart, he's got AOC+3, Dummies ALL backing him, and even our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, is groveling over him.' Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, who is Jewish and has no Palestinian background, along with house minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, congratulated Mamdani on Wednesday morning and pledged to meet with the state legislator, though they did not offer an official endorsement. Republicans have sought to portray the 33-year-old democratic socialist as the symbol of the Democratic party, while prominent conservative activists have linked Mamdani to 9/11 in online attacks targeting his faith. In a follow-up post, Trump sarcastically gave an idea to Democrats to nominate representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas for president and representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York as her running mate.


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Trump Repeats Claim Of US "Obliterated" Iran Nuclear Sites
US President Donald Trump has once again asserted his claims on Washington "obliterating" Iranian nuclear sites during its targeted strikes on June 22, riding on Israel's assessment made by the Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) on those sites. In a post on Truth Social on Wednesday (local time), Trump noted the assessment made by IAEC on the Fordow nuclear site in Iran, where Israel's primary nuclear regulatory authority stated that the US' strike had "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable." "Israel just stated that the Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED! Thank you to our great B-2 pilots, and all others involved!" Trump wrote. Trump's announcement came in the wake of an assessment made by the IAEC, where they detailed the impact of the US strike on Fordow and other nuclear sites, noting that the strikes in Fordow had destroyed its "critical infrastructure" and made the enrichment facility "inoperable". In its statement, as announced by the Israeli Prime Minister's Office, IAEC also noted that the US strikes combined with Israel's attacks on the facilities had caused a major setback to Tehran's nuclear weapons development programme by "many years". "The devastating US strike on Fordow destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable. We assess that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran's military nuclear program, have set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years. The achievement can continue indefinitely if Iran does not get access to nuclear material," IAEC read. Trump's repeated remarks on the US destroying Iran's nuclear sites and causing a major setback to its nuclear development programme have gained much pace following a CNN finding that suggested that the strikes did not destroy nuclear sites in Iran as claimed by the US President or his administration. The findings, first reported by CNN, citing seven individuals briefed on the assessments, noted that the early evaluation from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) suggested that the attacks only caused a temporary disruption, possibly setting Tehran's nuclear program back by a few months. CNN further reported that the findings based on a battle damage assessment by US Central Command contradict public claims made by US President Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who asserted that the US "completely obliterated" Iran's nuclear capabilities. As per CNN, citing intelligence sources, the centrifuges in Iran's nuclear facilities remain mostly functional, and enriched uranium stockpiles were likely moved before the strikes. The conflict between Iran and Israel began on June 13 when Israel launched a large-scale airstrike targeting Iranian military and nuclear facilities under "Operation Rising Lion". Iran responded by launching "Operation True Promise 3", a campaign involving missile and drone attacks against Israel's infrastructure.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Trump warns Israel-Iran conflict could restart soon
27:17 NewsTrack on India Today debates the outcomes of the recent Iran-Israel conflict, with experts discussing who emerged with an advantage. The program also examines Donald Trump's claims about brokering ceasefires between India-Pakistan and Israel-Iran. Key points include Israel's strikes on Iranian targets, Iran's retaliatory capabilities, and the role of regional players in de-escalation efforts.