logo
5 immigrants deported by the US to Eswatini in Africa are held in solitary confinement

5 immigrants deported by the US to Eswatini in Africa are held in solitary confinement

Politico17 hours ago
The men, who the U.S. says were convicted of serious crimes and were in the U.S. illegally, are citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and Laos. Their convictions included murder and child rape, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said, describing them as 'uniquely barbaric.'
Their deportations were announced by Homeland Security on Tuesday and mark the continuation of President Donald Trump's plan to send deportees to third countries they have no ties with after it was stalled by a legal challenge in the United States.
Eswatini, a country of 1.2 million people bordering South Africa, is the latest nation to accept third-country deportees from the U.S. The Trump administration has sent hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, El Salvador and Panama, and deported eight men earlier this month to South Sudan, also an African country.
The deportees to South Sudan are citizens of Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan. They were held for weeks in a converted shipping container at a U.S. military base in the nearby country of Djibouti until a Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for them to be finally sent to South Sudan. The U.S. also described them as violent criminals.
Eswatini's government confirmed on Wednesday that the latest five deportees were in its custody after landing on a deportation plane from the U.S.
Local media reported they are being held at the Matsapha Correctional Complex, outside the country's administrative capital of Mbabane, which includes Eswatini's top maximum-security prison.
The Eswatini government said the men are 'in transit' and will eventually be sent to their home countries. The U.S. and Eswatini governments would work with the U.N. migration agency to do that, it said.
The U.N. agency — the International Organization for Migration or IOM — said it was not involved in the operation and has not been approached to assist in the matter but would be willing to help 'in line with its humanitarian mandate.'
Eswatini's statement that the men would be sent home was in contrast to U.S. claims they were sent to Eswatini because their home countries refused to take them back.
It's unclear how sending the men to Eswatini would make it easier for them to be deported home. There was also no timeframe for that as it depends on several factors, including engagements with the IOM, Mdluli said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Epstein fallout latest: Trump threatens to sue WSJ and orders release of grand jury testimony
Epstein fallout latest: Trump threatens to sue WSJ and orders release of grand jury testimony

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Epstein fallout latest: Trump threatens to sue WSJ and orders release of grand jury testimony

Amid the fallout over his handling of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, President Trump is now saying that he has directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to unseal grand jury testimony in the late accused sex trafficker's criminal case. 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Thursday. 'This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' It's unclear whether a judge would approve such a request or if the release of that material would appease Trump supporters demanding to see all of the files the government has on Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while in federal custody awaiting trial. The post came less than an hour after Trump vowed to sue the Wall Street Journal over a report that he sent Epstein a racy birthday letter in 2003. In a separate Truth Social post, the president said that he personally warned the newspaper's owner, Rupert Murdoch, and its editor, Emma Tucker, that the letter was 'FAKE' before the report was published and called the story 'false, malicious, and defamatory.' What did the WSJ report say? According to the Journal, Trump's letter, along with dozens of others, was part of a leather-bound book put together by Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell for the disgraced financier's 50th birthday. 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,' Trump's letter concluded in a typewritten message to Epstein, per the Journal. The text was 'framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with heavy marker,' the report stated. 'A pair of small arcs denotes the woman's breasts, and the future president's signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.' The president responded in another Truth Social post after the Journal's story was published. "These are not my words, not the way I talk,' Trump wrote. 'Also, I don't draw pictures." How did we get here? Epstein has long been the focus of unfounded conspiracy theories, pushed by some of Trump's prominent supporters, which claim the late financier was murdered to conceal the names of powerful people on a secret 'client list.' During the 2024 campaign, Trump said he would consider releasing additional government files on Epstein. And when Trump took office earlier this year, he directed the Justice Department to conduct an exhaustive review of the evidence collected on Epstein. Appearing on Fox News in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Epstein client list was 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' 'That's been a directive by President Trump,' she added. But last week, the DOJ and FBI released a two-page joint memo, concluding Epstein 'committed suicide in his cell' and had no 'client list.' What was the reaction to the memo? The memo angered some high-profile MAGA loyalists — including Tucker Carlson, former senior White House adviser Steve Bannon, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and far-right provocateur Laura Loomer — and led to a reported rift between Bondi and high-ranking FBI officials. Last weekend, Trump released a lengthy statement expressing his frustration over the Epstein saga. 'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein. For years, it's Epstein, over and over again. 'One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World,' he added. 'Let's keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.' Then on Wednesday, Trump lashed out at his supporters while repeatedly referring to the case as 'the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax.' 'My PAST supporters have bought into this 'bullshit,' hook, line, and sinker,' the president fumed in a Truth Social post. 'All these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax.' What has Trump said about his relationship with Epstein? The Journal report also put a spotlight on the president's past relationship with Epstein. 'I've known Jeff for 15 years,' Trump told New York Magazine for a 2002 profile of Epstein. 'Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' In 2019, after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges, the president distanced himself, saying he was 'not a fan.' 'Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,' Trump told reporters following Epstein's arrest. 'I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan."

Donald Trump's tariffs are pulling in billions, but is it really a win?
Donald Trump's tariffs are pulling in billions, but is it really a win?

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump's tariffs are pulling in billions, but is it really a win?

Data rolling in on the collection of tariffs by the United States suggests the trade war initiated by President Donald Trump is already generating significant revenue for the U.S. Treasury. More than US$26.6 billion was brought in for June, nearly quadruple the US$7.3 billion raised in January. More than US$108 billion has been collected in the first nine months of fiscal 2025, nearly double the total raised at this point a year earlier. The increase in tariff revenue began to spike in April when customs duties (after any refunds) hit US$15.6 billion. By May, the haul had jumped to US$22.2 billion. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said the tariffs — as low as 10 per cent for some countries and at least 50 per cent for China and some Canadian imports such as steel and aluminum — are on track to pull in US$300 billion. It's a sizeable haul for a president who has faced criticism for on-again, off-again tariff threats that earned the nickname TACO — short for Trump Always Chickens Out. While the tariff data so far is being heralded by the Trump administration as a win, policy and trade observers aren't as sure it signals a long-term victory. 'On balance, I would expect tariff revenue to be higher in the short run than out in the medium to long run,' said Marc-André Pigeon, an assistant professor at the University of Saskatchewan's graduate school of public policy. Recession risk He said a number of things could cause a drag on the increased revenue, some desirable to the Trump administration and others not. More re-shoring of industry, which the administration wants, would cause the figures to drop. On the negative side of the ledger, so would an economic downturn, which some economists are predicting as a result of the trade policies, and a stronger U.S. dollar relative to other countries' currencies. Several countries including Canada are in the midst of talks aimed at securing more favourable trade terms that would offset the tariffs imposed on them. If successful, it would mean lower revenue for the U.S. government over time, but there is no assurance Trump will yield. Prime minister Mark Carney told reporters this week that securing a trade deal with the U.S. without some tariffs is unlikely. Teresa Cyrus, an associate professor and chair of the Department of economics at Dalhousie University in Halifax, suggested the US$300 billion tariff haul Bessent is touting for the year may not bode well for further deals with Trump. 'Perhaps Bessent is hinting that trade deals are unlikely?' she said in an email. Global trade shuffle In the past, sustained steep tariffs have not come without upheaval in trading partners and supply chains as countries seek alternatives trading partners and buyers turn to jurisdictions where they can pay the least for supplies — and that, too, could have an impact on U.S. tariff-based revenue. William Pellerin, a partner in the international trade group at law firm McMillan LLP, said some of that is already happening. 'We expect that many global companies will (look) for ways to get their products from countries with the lowest tariffs,' he said. 'This kind of supply chain reshuffling is already happening in Canada, and we believe it will happen even more in the United States.' A major plank in Trump's tariff campaign, which was unleashed almost immediately after he took office in January, was to bring industry and manufacturing back to the United States. But it was also pitched as a way to bolster U.S. government revenues to help pay for tax cuts in a major piece of legislation he dubbed 'one big beautiful bill.' The latest estimate from the Congressional Budget Office is that the legislation, which was signed by Trump and became law on July 4, will increase deficits by $3.4 trillion over the 2025 to 2034 period. Robert Wolfe, a professor emeritus at Queens University, whose research focus is global trade, said the tariffs suggests an 'incoherence' in longterm policy goals, despite the positive early data. 'Either tariffs are a source of revenue, or they are a means to protect American industry — beyond the short term they can't be both,' he said. 'If imports decline in response (to) the tax, so will revenues.' • Email: bshecter@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump says he 'absolutely loves' that CBS canceled Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show'
Trump says he 'absolutely loves' that CBS canceled Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show'

USA Today

time24 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump says he 'absolutely loves' that CBS canceled Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show'

Colbert announced the cancelation of the iconic program, which comedian David Letterman also hosted for two decades, before his July 17 studio audience at New York City's Ed Sullivan Theater. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump cheered the cancelation of "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert," one day after the comedian and frequent Trump critic announced CBS would be ending his show. "I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings," Trump said in a July 18 Truth Social post, before also ripping ABC's Jimmy Kimmel, another late-night host known to skewer Trump. "I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert." Trump added that conservative Fox News personality and comedian Greg Gutfield ‒ host of Gutfeld! and co-host of The Five ‒ "is better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show." Trump previously worked for NBC during his days as the star on "The Apprentice." More: 'Late Show with Stephen Colbert' to end next May: 'This is all just going away' Colbert, 61, announced the cancelation of the iconic show, which comedian David Letterman hosted for two decades prior to Colbert, before its studio audience on July 17 at New York City's Ed Sullivan Theater. 'Late Show' will continue for one more season and end in May 2026. "It's not just the end of our show, it's the end of the 'Late Show' on CBS," said Colbert, who has hosted the show since 2015, adding that, "I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away." The move comes after Paramount Global, CBS's parent company, agreed on July 1 to a controversial $16 million settlement with Trump over a defamation lawsuit tied to a "60 Minutes" interview with 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. Democrats and Colbert fans speculated whether politics could have played a role in the network's decision given the comedian's history of targeting Trump. "Just finished taping with Stephen Colbert who announced his show was cancelled," U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California, said in a post on X. "If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better. More: Jimmy Kimmel irate over Colbert cancellation, criticizes CBS ending 'Late Show' The traditional late-night shows on the three big networks have faced increasing challenges for viewers amid the rapid rise of streaming options. More: From Joe Rogan to Greg Gutfeld, conservative comedy's influence grows Paramount in a statement called the move "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content, or other matters happening at Paramount." "We consider Stephen Colbert irreplaceable and will retire 'The Late Show' franchise at that time," the statement said. "We are proud that Stephen called CBS home." Contributing: Bryan Alexander of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store