Clayborn Temple, Historic Landmark In Memphis With Ties To Martin Luther King Jr., Catches Fire
CLOSE Source: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Getty
A historic landmark in downtown Memphis with ties to the Civil Rights movement tragically caught fire on Monday morning. According to WREG, the Memphis Fire Department and the ATF are still investigating what caused Clayborn Temple, a place of worship at the intersection of Hernando Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, to be engulfed in flames. In the meantime, community leaders in Memphis are left reeling over the destruction and hoping the temple will be restored.
'Clayborn Temple is more than a historic building. It is a sacred ground. It is the beating heart of the civil rights movement, a symbol of struggle, hope, and triumph that belongs not just to Memphis but to the world,' Memphis Mayor Paul Young said via press release. 'Clayborn Temple has seen struggle before, and it has always overcome. So will we.'
Dr. Russ Wigginton, President of the National Civil Rights Museum, also lamented the tragedy, but, like the mayor, he expressed hope and optimism, declaring that the fire could take down the temple's walls, 'but it cannot destroy the spirit that built them.'
'The recent fire that consumed Clayborn Temple is a devastating blow, not only to Memphis but to the nation,' Wiggington said in a statement. 'This historic church, a nerve center of the Civil Rights Movement, was more than just bricks and stained glass; it was a beating heart of a community that chose unity over division, progress over fear, and community over chaos.'
Here's a little more history on the temple via WREG:
Clayborn Temple was the launching point for a march for sanitation workers' rights that brought Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to Memphis in 1968. The iconic 'I Am A Man' signs used in the march were printed there.
Dr. King planned to march with sanitation workers from Clayborn Temple on April 8, before he was assassinated April 4 on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel. His wife, Coretta Scott King, led strikers and thousands of supporters in his place.
The building dates to 1892, when it was originally Second Presbyterian Church.
In 2018, the National Trust for Historic Preservation officially named the church a national treasure. It has been undergoing a multi-million dollar restoration and is the site of the I Am A Man Plaza.
Fire Chief Gina Sweat reported that firefighters were still putting out hot spots around 9 a.m. Monday morning. It's unclear how extensive the damage is, but photos taken at the scene show a building consumed in flames and a building in ruin in the aftermath, indicating that any road to recovery will be a long one.
SEE ALSO:
Memphis Police Sergeant Under Fire For Suggesting Descendants Of Slave Owners Are Owed Reparations
Candace Owens' MAGA Meltdown: The Hypocrisy, The Flip-Flop, and the Fallout
SEE ALSO
Clayborn Temple, Historic Landmark In Memphis With Ties To Martin Luther King Jr., Catches Fire was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: God does not gerrymander
'What we're fighting for is democracy,' Texas state Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins said Sunday. She didn't say this at a news conference or in a committee hearing or a TV interview. She spoke the words in a Chicago church, with the blessing of Father Michael Pfleger who heads St. Sabina on the South Side of the city. Can a house of worship really serve two masters? Those being God — and overtly partisan politics? The answer, as your Sunday school teacher might have told you, is a firm 'no.' Her appearance raises an old but urgent question: Where is the line between preaching moral truth and campaigning from the pulpit? This one's a little more complicated than a simple 'amen' or 'no way.' Gervin-Hawkins, who fled her home state, was speaking about her efforts to avoid a redistricting push led by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. Try as they might to spin this as the great moral issue of our day, mapmaking — at least in this context — is a partisan gambit about political power. This comes as the IRS recently signaled that churches may engage in more overt political speech without risking their tax-exempt status. There are certainly times when the church provides clarity on faith-based principles that shed light on the pressing issues of the day. Pastors are, and should be, able to preach freely about all manner of subjects that could deal with everything from loving our neighbors (no matter which country they come from) to championing peace in times of war. Many Black churches played crucial roles in promoting the rights of Black Americans during the Civil Rights Movement — not by and large by promoting politicians, but by speaking biblical truths — including that all men and women are created equal in the sight of God. But, back to the church-going Texas Democrats. It's worth pointing out that the difference between faith and politics is that while politics is about power, religion is about connecting to a higher power. In other words, just because you can, doesn't mean you should. Just as no two people need the same spiritual medicine, so to speak, church members each have unique political perspectives. Churches are supposed to be a safe haven from such naked partisanship — one of the few left in modern American society. God does not write electoral maps. And he does not smite one side messing with our democratic process and ring the bells of heaven for the other. We don't pretend to know the will of the Almighty on salamander-like districts, but we're guessing he is of the view that each side should look to themselves.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Frank White recall: Kansas City Election Board shares voting information
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Kansas City Election Board (KCEB) is sharing new details about the special election that will determine whether Jackson County Executive Frank White Jr. is recalled from office. The election will take place on Sept. 30. Woman hospitalized, Chihuahua killed in off-leash dog attack at Lawrence park Due to a shortened election cycle, KCEB said fewer polling locations will be open on election day. To expand access, additional no-excuse absentee voting locations will be available. Approximately one week before the election, KCEB said voters will be mailed a notification card detailing their polling information. Voters can also confirm their details at On election day, KCEB said voters can vote at any poll – including KCEB, by using a ballot marking device. Those who wish to vote on a pre-printed paper ballot must do so at their assigned polling location on election day. Voters who wish to vote absentee before election day, can do so with an excuse starting Aug. 19 at KCEB, 4407 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Voters without an excuse will be able to vote at KCEB and additional satellite locations starting Sept. 16. Additional details on no-excuse absentee voting, such as satellite locations, days and hours will be announced in the coming days, KCEB said. You can view a sample ballot below. Sample-Ballot-for-Frank-White-Recall-ElectionDownload Here are the important dates to know: Registration to vote deadline is Wednesday, Sept. 3. Absentee voting, with an excuse, begins on Tuesday, Aug. 19 at KCEB. Absentee voting, no excuse needed, begins Tuesday, Sept. 16 at KCEB and additional satellite locations. Days, hours and locations will be announced soon. Election Day: Tuesday, Sept. 30. Polls will be open 6 a.m. – 7 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
The Impact On Organizations Post Trump's DEI Executive Orders
The Impact On Organizations Post Trump's DEI Executive Orders getty A major change in U.S. policy is forcing many organizations to rethink their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. In January this year, President Donald Trump signed two executive orders that formally reversed federal DEI mandates. These orders directed agencies to dismantle internal DEI offices, eliminate DEI training programs, and withdraw equity-focused funding, calling such efforts 'discriminatory' and 'ideologically driven.' For over a decade, DEI has influenced the way teams are built, people are supported, and communities are included in decision-making. It drove innovation, improved team performance, and helped people from overlooked backgrounds feel seen, heard, and included. Trump's new orders push back against DEI, replacing it with 'merit-based' hiring, raising concern about what's lost in the process. The shift left many teams unsure of how to move forward, especially those who've built their culture around inclusion. Organizations are reassessing policies, directing legal and cultural shifts, and working to preserve inclusive values even as federal priorities move in a different direction. Trump's move to dismantle DEI efforts began with two executive orders signed within days of taking office, setting off immediate ripple effects across federal agencies and beyond. These orders marked an aggressive reversal of long-standing federal policies , affecting not just government operations but also private contractors who rely on government partnerships. Executive Order 14151, titled "Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing," directed the termination of what it calls "discriminatory programs" going by the name of diversity, equity, and inclusion. The order instructed agencies to shut down DEI offices, cancel equity-centered grants and contracts, and eliminate DEI performance requirements for employees, contractors, and grantees. Federal agencies were given broad mandates to dismantle these programs "to the maximum extent allowed by law." Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," took a different approach by revoking several prior orders focused on equal employment opportunity and workplace diversity. This order directed agency heads to submit reports by May 20, 2025, identifying "the most egregious and discriminatory DEI practitioners" in their sectors and outlining specific steps to deter DEI programs that might constitute illegal discrimination. A third order, Executive Order 14281, signed in April, aimed to "eliminate the use of disparate impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible." This targets a legal theory that holds employers liable for policies that disproportionately affect protected groups, even without intentional discrimination. The administration frames these changes as a return to "merit-based" hiring, arguing that identity-focused practices are discriminatory and unlawful. However, the orders don't define "illegal DEI," creating uncertainty for organizations trying to understand what's permissible. This ambiguity has prompted many companies to scale back or completely eliminate their DEI programs, even as legal challenges to the orders work their way through the courts. The effects of Trump's executive orders are moving beyond policy changes into measurable workplace outcomes. A July 2025 survey from , of 965 U.S. companies with active DEI programs before November 2024, reveals the tangible consequences organizations are facing. The numbers show immediate shifts in hiring and retention patterns. One in five companies has eliminated DEI initiatives entirely, with 74% citing the changed political climate as their primary reason. Among companies that cut programs, 57% report hiring fewer people from underrepresented groups. The decline is particularly pronounced for women of color (37% decrease), LGBTQIA+ candidates (33% decrease), and men of color (33% decrease). By comparison, only 12% reported decreased hiring of white men. The workplace culture impacts are equally significant. Nearly half of the companies that reduced DEI efforts report declining employee morale, while 36% struggle with retention of diverse talent. Leadership representation has also shifted, with 30% noting fewer people of color in leadership roles and 24% reporting fewer women in leadership positions. Perhaps most concerning, 18% of organizations report increased incidents of workplace discrimination or bias following DEI program cuts. 25% acknowledge reputational damage, suggesting the changes extend beyond internal operations to external perceptions. The survey reveals divided opinions among business leaders about these changes. Some view DEI elimination as removing divisive elements, with one respondent noting it "restored a sense of fairness." Others express disappointment, with leaders describing the loss of "safe spaces" and being worried about being "worse off as a company." These patterns suggest the executive orders have created a ripple effect that extends across public agencies, private companies, nonprofits, and educational institutions. The changes are reshaping not just policies but fundamental aspects of how organizations attract talent, build leadership, and maintain workplace culture. The executive orders affect government agencies, federal contractors, private companies with federal funding, nonprofits, and educational institutions tied to federal grants. Even organizations without direct contracts are experiencing ripple effects as partners and industry peers adjust policies to comply. Organizations that eliminated DEI programs report widespread morale issues. Employees who valued these initiatives feel abandoned, making them more likely to seek opportunities elsewhere. Recruitment has become more challenging, particularly with younger workers, while unclear communication about policy changes has damaged internal trust. Companies that cut DEI programs are losing employees , especially women, black professionals, and other underrepresented groups who prioritize inclusive workplaces. Hiring for these groups has slowed, and fewer younger candidates are applying. Internally, trust has weakened, opportunities feel less equitable, and problem-solving has suffered due to reduced diverse perspectives. Without DEI initiatives, companies struggle to attract diverse talent. Skilled candidates who value inclusion often bypass employers that don't demonstrate clear commitment to equity, intensifying competition for talent in an already tight market. Stepping away from DEI can damage both public perception and internal culture. Externally, organizations may appear out of touch, hurting brand image and stakeholder trust. Internally, the absence of DEI structures can allow bias or discrimination to go unchecked, weakening morale and creating unsafe work environments. Some companies, like Meta and McDonald's, have scaled back DEI programs amid political pressures. Others, including Costco, Apple, and Microsoft, maintain their inclusion commitments. Cutting DEI risks backlash from progressive employees, investors, and customers, while maintaining programs may provoke conservative opposition. Organizations must navigate these competing pressures, particularly as black consumers' buying power is projected to nearly double by 2030, underscoring the business case for inclusion. The Trump administration's executive orders have created significant uncertainty for organizations across all sectors. Federal agencies are intensifying enforcement of civil rights laws, potentially creating legal risks for companies that maintain DEI programs. This has left businesses facing a difficult decision. Some are dismantling programs to avoid potential scrutiny, while others are maintaining their diversity commitments despite the political shift. Organizations don't have to navigate these changes blindly. Clear, honest communication with employees and stakeholders helps maintain trust during this transition period. Companies should continue focusing on essential practices like fair hiring, equitable career development, and respectful workplace policies, regardless of what these efforts are called. Legal reviews of existing programs can help identify potential compliance issues while preserving inclusive practices. The key is balancing political realities with organizational values and goals. Companies that stay committed to inclusion, even if they rebrand their approach, can continue attracting diverse talent and driving innovation. Those that abandon these efforts entirely risk losing valuable employees and damaging relationships with customers and stakeholders who value diversity. Success requires both flexibility and strategic thinking. Organizations that communicate transparently, review their policies carefully, and maintain inclusive cultures will be better positioned to weather this period of change while keeping the benefits of diverse, engaged teams.
