SC slams UP govt's hurry in ordinance
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi deprecated the approach of the state government in moving the court in 'clandestine manner' and questioned the hurry for enacting an ordinance Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025 to take over the management of the ancient temple. The top court said it would appoint a committee headed by a retired high court or district judge to manage the affairs of the temple in the interest of lakhs of devotees besides including the main stakeholders in the managing committee.
The bench told Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, 'Less said the better. How do you justify the directions passed by the court? The state in the most unfortunate way came to the court in the most clandestine manner without informing the court receiver or stakeholders (members of the family who claimed to be the owner of the temple). Get the directions behind their back and set aside the order of the high court. This is the least thing we expect from the state.'
The top court at present is not adjudicating the constitutionality of the ordinance and the high court will look into it. The bench asked Nataraj to seek instructions while deciding to pass an order on August 5 to keep the May 15 order in abeyance and appoint someone as the managing trustee of the temple to look after the daily affairs.
'This is the land of lord Krishna. He was the first mediator known to the world. Let's find a way out to resolve the dispute pending for years and develop the area in the interest of lakhs of devotees who visit these iconic religious places. Basic amenities need to be created as nowadays religious tourism is one of the biggest sources of revenue,' the bench said.
It assured all the stakeholders, including several warring factions, who claim to be owners of the temple that some responsible person would be given charge to manage the affairs of the temple aside from a mandate to develop the adjoining areas and small temples in nearby localities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
INDIA parties back Rahul, say it is his responsibility to comment on issues of national interest
New Delhi: INDIA bloc parties on Tuesday termed "unwarranted" the Supreme Court observations against Rahul Gandhi for his alleged remarks on the Army, and asserted it was the responsibility of political parties to comment on issues of national interest. The remarks came a day after the Supreme Court censured Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, over his alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during his Bharat Jodo Yatra. Floor leaders of several parties of the INDIA bloc discussed the remarks of the Supreme Court against Gandhi at a meeting here. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Gandhi were present at the meeting. "All the leaders of the India parties agreed that the sitting judge has made an extraordinary observation which is unwarranted on the democratic rights of political parties," the Congress said in a statement. "It is the responsibility of political parties especially the Leader of Opposition to comment on issues of national interest," the statement said. "When a government fails so spectacularly to defend our borders, it is every citizen's moral duty to hold it accountable," it further said. Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra also said that Rahul Gandhi holds the Indian security forces in high esteem and as Leader of Opposition he has every right to question the government. Asked about the top court's observations, she told reporters at the Parliament House complex, "With due respect to the honourable judges of the Supreme Court, they do not decide who is a true Indian. It is the job of the opposition leader, it is his duty to ask questions and to challenge the government." "My brother would never say anything against the Army. He holds the Army in the highest respect. So it is a misinterpretation (of his remarks)," she said. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih on Monday told Rahul Gandhi, "You are leader of opposition. Why don't you say things in Parliament, why do you have to say it on social media?" The bench further asked, "Why do you make these statements without having any material? If you are a true Indian, you won't say such a thing."
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
SC judges can't decide who is a true Indian: Priyanka after SC raps Rahul
New Delhi: Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Tuesday rallied behind Rahul Gandhi, her brother, over the Supreme Court's reprimand, saying it is not up to the judges to decide who is a "true" Indian. She said her brother has the highest respect for the army and will never say anything against it. As the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi is liable to ask questions of the government, Priyanka said. The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the proceedings against Gandhi before a Lucknow court over his remarks on the army during his December 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra. The top court, however, censured the Congress leader, saying if he is a "true Indian," he would not say such a thing. Asked about the court's observations, Priyanka told reporters at the Parliament House complex, "With due respect to the honourable judges of the Supreme Court, they do not decide who is a true Indian. It is the job of the opposition leader. It is his duty to ask questions and to challenge the government." The Wayanad MP added, "My brother would never say anything against the Army. He holds the army in the highest respect. So it is a misinterpretation (of his remarks)." Later, she said, "With due respect to the judiciary, it is outside its purview to decide who is a true Indian and who is not." "Justices can't decide on this. Rahul ji has always respected the army, soldiers and officers. In all his speeches and comments, that respect is reflected. It is the responsibility of the Leader of Opposition to ask questions of the government, and he fulfils that," she added. Congress general secretary organisation K C Venugopal said Rahul Gandhi's remarks are the thoughts of every Indian. "When we ask questions inside the House or outside, they (the government) do not answer. We are termed anti-national for asking questions. But we are the true Indians who demand answers," he told reporters in the Parliament House complex. The BJP on Monday took a swipe at Rahul Gandhi, saying he has vowed to "strengthen China." The Congress, in response, said that every patriotic Indian has had questions since the Galwan incident, but the government chose to "obfuscate" the truth with its policy of "DDLJ -- Deny, Distract, Lie, and Justify."
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
Supreme Court to hear plea for restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood on August 8
The Supreme Court is likely to hear on August 8 a plea seeking directions to the Centre for the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan mentioned the matter on Tuesday before a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran. "The date (on SC website) shows as August 8. Let it not be deleted," Sankaranarayanan submitted, according to news agency PTI. The CJI accepted the request. Incidentally, Tuesday, 5, August marks the sixth anniversary of the 2019 abrogation of Article 370, which accorded a special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. The decision stripped Jammu and Kashmir of statehood and bifurcated the former state into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Ever since the abrogation, the majority of politicians and leaders in Jammu and Kashmir have been demanding the restoration of statehood. The demand for reinstating the statehood of Jammu and Kashmir has intensified after the Omar Abdullah government was formed, following the assembly elections. On December 11, 2023, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the revocation of Article 370, even as it ordered that assembly elections be held in Jammu and Kashmir by September 2024 and its statehood be restored "at the earliest". Last year, a plea was filed in the top court seeking directions to the Centre for the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir within two months. The application was filed by Zahoor Ahmad Bhat, an academician, and Khurshaid Ahmad Malik, a socio-political activist. "It is submitted that the delay in the restoration of statehood would cause serious reduction of democratically elected government in Jammu and Kashmir, causing a grave violation of the idea of federalism which forms part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India," the application said. The assembly elections and the Lok Sabha polls were conducted peacefully in Jammu and Kashmir without any incident of violence, disturbance or any security concerns being reported, it said. "Therefore, there is no impediment of security concerns, violence or any other disturbances which would hinder or prevent the grant/restoration of the status of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir as had been assured by the Union of India in the present proceedings," the plea said. The application stated that Jammu and Kashmir, being an individual state that has gone through many struggles and hardships, requires a strong federal structure to help develop the area and also celebrate its unique culture. In its December 2023 verdict, the apex court held that Article 370, which was incorporated in the Indian Constitution in 1949 to grant special status to Jammu and Kashmir, was a temporary provision. The President of India was empowered to revoke the measure in the absence of the Constituent Assembly of the erstwhile state whose term expired in 1957, the court said. Key Takeaways The Supreme Court will hear a plea regarding Jammu and Kashmir's statehood on August 8. The region has seen intensified demands for statehood restoration since the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. The apex court's December 2023 verdict underscores the importance of timely assembly elections and restoration of statehood.
