
From no hope to a potential cure for a deadly blood cancer
A group of 97 patients had longstanding multiple myeloma, a common blood cancer that doctors consider incurable, and faced a certain, and extremely painful, death within about a year.
They had gone through a series of treatments, each of which controlled their disease for a while. But then it came back, as it always does. They reached the stage where they had no more options and were facing hospice. They all got immunotherapy, in a study that was a last-ditch effort.
A third responded so well that they got what seems to be an astonishing reprieve. The immunotherapy developed by Legend Biotech, a company founded in China, seems to have made their cancer disappear. And after five years, it still has not returned in those patients — a result never before seen in this disease.
These results, in patients whose situation had seemed hopeless, has led some battle-worn American oncologists to dare to say the words 'potential cure.'
'In my 30 years in oncology, we haven't talked about curing myeloma,' said Dr. Norman Sharpless, a former director of the National Cancer Institute who is now a professor of cancer policy and innovation at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. 'This is the first time we are really talking seriously about cure in one of the worst malignancies imaginable.'
The new study, reported Tuesday at the annual conference of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and published in The Journal of Clinical Oncology, was funded by Johnson & Johnson, which bought Legend Biotech.
The 36,000 Americans who develop multiple myeloma each year face an illness that eats away at bones, so it looks as though holes have been punched out in them, said Dr. Carl June, of the University of Pennsylvania. Bones collapse. Dr. June has seen patients who lost six inches in height.
'It's a horrible, horrible death,' Dr. June said. 'Right now advanced myeloma is a death sentence.' (Dr. June has immunotherapy patents that are owned by his university.)
There have been treatment advances that increased median survival from two years to 10 over the past two decades. But no cures.
Dr. Peter Voorhees of the Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute in North Carolina and the Wake Forest University School of Medicine, who is lead researcher for the newly published study, said patients usually go through treatment after treatment until, ultimately, the cancer prevails, developing resistance to every class of drug. They end up with nothing left to try.
The Legend immunotherapy is a type known as CAR-T. It is delivered as an infusion of the patient's own white blood cells that have been removed and engineered to attack the cancer. The treatment has revolutionized prospects for patients with other types of blood cancer, like leukemia.
Making CAR-T cells, though, is an art, with so many possible variables that it can be hard to hit on one that works. And it can have severe side effects including a high fever, trouble breathing and infections. Patients can be hospitalized for weeks after receiving it.
But Legend managed to develop one that works in multiple myeloma, defying skeptics.
The Chinese company gained attention for its CAR-T eight years ago when it made extravagant claims, which were met by snickers from American researchers.
Johnson & Johnson, though, was looking for a CAR-T to call its own. So, said Mark Wildgust, an executive in the oncology section of the American drug giant, the company sent scientists and physicians to China to see if the claims were true. 'We went site by site to look at the results,' he said.
The company was convinced. It bought Legend and began testing the treatment in patients whose myeloma had overcome at least one standard treatment. Compared with patients who had standard treatment, those who had the immunotherapy lived longer without their disease progressing.
The immunotherapy received regulatory approval in that limited setting and is sold under the brand name Carvykti. The study did not determine whether this difficult treatment saved lives.
The new study took on a different challenge — helping patients at the end of the line after years of treatments. Their immune systems were worn down. They were, as oncologists said, 'heavily pretreated.' So even though CAR-T is designed to spur their immune systems to fight their cancer, it was not clear their immune systems were up to it.
Oncologists say that even though most patients did not clear their cancer, having a third who did was remarkable.
To see what the expected life span would be for these patients without the immunotherapy, Johnson & Johnson looked at data from patients in a registry who were like the ones in its study — they had failed every treatment. They lived about a year.
For Anne Stovell of New York, one of the study patients whose cancer disappeared, the result is almost too good to be true.
She says she went through nine drugs to control her cancer after it was diagnosed in 2010, some of which had horrendous side effects. Each eventually failed.
Taking the Legend CAR-T was difficult — she said she had spent nearly three weeks in the hospital. But since that treatment six years ago, she has no sign of cancer. She said it was still difficult for her to believe her myeloma is gone. A new ache — or an old one — can bring on the fear.
'There's that little seed of doubt,' she said. But in test after test, the cancer has not reappeared. 'It's a relief for me every year to get a bone marrow biopsy,' she said.
Myeloma experts applauded the results. Like treatments for many other cancers, treatments for multiple myeloma come with a high price.
The drugs are 'hideously expensive,' Dr. June said, costing more than $100,000 a year. The total cost over the years can be millions of dollars, Dr. June said, usually paid by insurers, 'and it doesn't even cure you.'
CAR-T is expensive too. Carvykti's list price is $555,310. But it is a one-time treatment. And, more important, the hope is that perhaps by giving it earlier in the course of the disease, it could cure patients early on. Johnson & Johnson is now testing that idea.
Dr. Kenneth Anderson, a myeloma expert at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute who was not involved with the study, said that if the treatment is used as a first-line treatment, 'cure is now our realistic expectation.'
That, at least, is the hope, Dr. Sharpless said.
And for those like the patients in the new study who are living at least five years — so far — without disease, the outcome 'really is eye-popping,' Dr. Sharpless said. 'That's getting to a point where you wonder if it will ever come back,' he added.
Gina Kolata reports on diseases and treatments, how treatments are discovered and tested, and how they affect people.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kill the Big Ugly Bill, says Elon Musk as Tesla CEO declares war on Donald Trump's bill
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has started a fierce campaign against US President Donald Trump's $4 trillion tax and spending bill, urging Americans to pressure lawmakers to reject it. In a viral post on X, Musk warned that the bill would bankrupt the country, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and dubbing it the 'Debt Slavery Bill'. On June 4, Musk posted "Kill the Big Ugly Bill," signalling his intent to oppose the bill championed by Trump, who has previously referred to it as a "Big Beautiful Tax and Spending Bill." According to reports, Musk's primary concern is the bill's potential to exacerbate the national debt and lead to severe economic consequences. Elon Musk's Opposition to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' The bill, which extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts, increases defense spending, and raises the national debt ceiling, has drawn criticism from fiscal conservatives . Musk, who recently left his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), argues that the legislation undermines cost-cutting efforts and could inflate the deficit by $2.5 trillion. Elon Musk, who has long warned of the national debt as an 'existential threat,' had previously offered only mild critiques of the bill despite his role as an informal adviser to Trump. However, his latest comments mark a dramatic escalation in tone. Musk urged his 180 million followers to contact their senators and representatives, stating: 'Call your Senator. Call your Congressman. Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' He also shared a photoshopped poster of Quentin Tarantino's 'Kill Bill', replacing the film's title with his anti-bill slogan. White House says Bill will stimulate US economy The White House has pushed back against the deficit projections, with officials arguing that the CBO estimates fail to account for the potential economic growth spurred by the tax cuts. They claim the bill's provisions will stimulate the economy enough to offset the increased spending. However, Musk's public rebuke highlights growing tensions within Trump's Republican Party over the legislation, which faced a rocky passage through the House due to opposition from both fiscal conservatives and moderates. The bill's passage has also drawn scrutiny from independent fiscal watchdogs. A recent CBO report warned that the tax provisions alone could increase the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next decade, while proposed cuts to social programs like Medicaid and food stamps would only reduce spending by $1 trillion. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group, estimated the bill could add roughly $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the same period. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
US trade delegation arrives in India for fresh round of bilateral trade talks
New Delhi: A US trade delegation arrived in New Delhi on Thursday ahead of a fresh round of negotiations on the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with India, scheduled to begin on Friday, two people told Mint. This marks the fifth round of in-person discussions overall and the second led by the US side, which is led by Brendan Lynch, assistant US trade representative for South and Central Asia. The Indian side previously took part in three face-to-face rounds in Washington, with the most recent held from May 19 to 24. Earlier talks were conducted in both virtual and physical formats, during which both sides exchanged priority lists and initial proposals. The upcoming discussions are seen as a crucial step toward resolving tariff-related issues and strengthening bilateral trade ties. India is seeking tariff concessions for key sectors such as textiles and pharmaceuticals, while the US is pushing for broader access to dairy, e-commerce, and digital trade. 'Lynch is accompanied by officials from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), the US Department of Commerce, and senior negotiators including Emily Ashby,' one of the persons mentioned above said, requesting anonymity. 'The Indian side will be led by chief negotiator Rajesh Agarwal, and both teams are working under a tight deadline to reach a pre-harvest deal before July 8, when the temporary 90-day pause on US reciprocal tariffs is set to expire,' this person added. As first reported by Mint on 16 May, the looming deadline has intensified efforts on both sides to stitch a trade deal. On 29 May, Mint reported that an American negotiating team was expected to arrive in New Delhi in early June for potentially the final round of face-to-face discussions between India and the US. Both sides are aiming to close the deal by the last week of June, According to the second person mentioned above, the upcoming negotiations will focus on finalising issues related to market access, tariff reduction, and non-tariff barriers, and potentially outlining a framework for a formal BTA. 'Key areas on the table include digital trade, intellectual property, agricultural goods, and critical minerals,' this person added, also requesting anonymity. Spokespersons for India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry, the Office of the United States Trade Representative, and the US Embassy in New Delhi did not immediately respond to emailed queries. The latest round of in-person talks between India and the US come amid rising tariff tensions. The US recently rejected India's notice at the World Trade Organization (WTO) challenging the 25% tariffs imposed on Indian steel and aluminium exports. India hopes to resolve these issues through the BTA negotiations but has indicated it may exercise its right to retaliate at the WTO if no resolution is reached by 8 June. The talks also carry geopolitical weight, taking place amid US concerns over India's recent defence deal with Russia—an issue that has reportedly unsettled Washington. Both countries are also seeking to diversify their supply chains and reduce dependence on China, adding strategic urgency to the talks. Meanwhile, experts have advised caution as India moves forward with broader free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations with the US. On 28 May, the US Court of International Trade struck down US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' reciprocal tariffs, ruling them illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. While the court held that trade deficits do not constitute the 'unusual and extraordinary threat' required to invoke emergency powers, the ruling blocks a key pillar of Trump's trade policy, though Section 232 tariffs on steel and automotive imports remain unaffected. 'India should resist any agreement shaped by threats or based on unlawful measures. Not only do these Trump-era tariffs violate World Trade Organization rules, but the US court has now confirmed they also breach US domestic law,' said Ajay Srivastava, a former trade service official and founder of economic think-tank Global Trade Research Initiative. 'With the Trump tariffs standing on shaky legal ground, India must pause and reassess its negotiation strategy before committing to an FTA that could disproportionately favour US interests,' he added.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Secret leprosy infected the Americas before European arrival
Representative image (AP) What to know: Leprosy is one of the oldest human diseases and originated in Eurasia or Africa A new study has found a different species of leprosy-causing bacteria existed in the Americas before European settlement. Scientists once believed Europeans brought leprosy to the American continents via infection from the bacterial species Mycobacterium leprae. But now a new study published in the journal Science reveals that a different form of leprosy-causing bacteria — called Mycobacterium lepromatosis — was already circulating in the Americas for at least one thousand years. Leprosy was therefore already affecting American indigenous peoples well before European colonization. Mycobacterium lepromatosis in America The study authors analyzed more than 800 samples taken from ancient remains in Canada and Argentina. The genomes of the bacteria taken from the samples were reconstructed, analyzed, and dated. Comparisons between the samples showed the bacterial genomes were of distinctive branches of the lepromatosis species at each end of the continent. However, they remained genetically similar. This suggested that the bacteria species had spread rapidly across the Americas, probably covering the landmass in just a few hundred years. Leprosy is caused by two bacteria species, not one. Leprosy is an ancient disease Leprosy has been infecting humans for thousands of years. The disease presents as multiple numbing skin lesions. If left untreated, it can result in nerve damage, muscle weakness, paralysis and blindness. Today, leprosy can be treated with antibiotics, but ancient sufferers weren't so fortunate. Skeletal records from 2,000BCE have been found in India with traces of the disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. These are matched by written records of leprosy cases in ancient literature from Indian, Chinese and African civilizations, as well as stories in the Abrahamic religions. Often, these ancient descriptions associated the affliction with stigmas of immorality or ritual uncleanliness. But in 1874 the Norwegian doctor Gerhard Armauer Hansen discovered that leprosy was caused by the microscopic organism Mycobacterium leprae. In 2008, doctors in Mexico found another leprosy-causing bacteria species — Mycobacterium lepromatosis — in a leprosy patient. Before this, it was believed leprae was the only pathogen capable of causing the disease. Now both forms of the bacteria are known to cause it. Europeans spread diseases, leprosy too Nicolas Rascovan, head of the Microbial Paleogenomics Unit at the Pasteur Institut in France led the investigation. He and his colleagues estimate lepromatosis and leprae diverged from a common ancestor about one million years ago. "The diversification happened probably independent of humans," Rascovan told DW. The arrival of the first European fleets to the Americas in 1492 marked the introduction of new diseases to the Americas. Leprosy — in the form of the leprae bacterium — was among them. Archaeological evidence has shown leprae migrated with human groups out of Africa and into Asia and Europe around 40,000 years ago. Its introduction to the Americas, along with other diseases, by Europeans devastated indigenous communities and intensified the impact of pathogens that were already circulating before colonization. The discovery of lepromatosis' longer history on the continent further highlights the diversity of pathogens and their complex relationship with humans throughout history, said Rascovan. "Europeans had a very important impact by bringing this new species [leprae] that was absent in America," he said. Leprosy track and trace Rascovan hopes the presence of lepromatosis in the archeological record will improve understanding of pre-colonial disease, especially in the absence of written records. In addition, the study helps understand modern cases of leprosy, especially how it could make the jump from animals like squirrels to humans. "Our work is giving the kick start to really start analyzing, monitoring and understanding the diversity of natural reservoirs [disease carriers]," said Rascovan. He said monitoring the disease and preventing spillovers from animals to humans should be a priority. The disease is still prevalent today — 200,000 cases are reported each year globally. Brazil, India and Indonesia still report more than 10,000 new cases annually, according to WHO data.