Thomas Sorber, Brooks Barnhizer reveal what they learned about Thunder's playoff run
Even during the busiest two months of their lives, any basketball junkie would find time to keep up with the NBA playoffs. It's the best time of the year as teams battle it out to win a championship. The Oklahoma City Thunder captured their first Larry O'Brien trophy after an NBA Finals Game 7 win over the Indiana Pacers.
Showing how the NBA is a 24/7 business, the Thunder only had three days to celebrate the championship before they shifted their focus to the 2025 NBA draft. Thomas Sorber and Brooks Barnhizer were the latest additions to the NBA champion.
As they went through their predraft process and met with teams, Sorber and Barnhizer kept an eye on the Thunder's championship run. After all, both likely knew for weeks there was a decent chance that OKC could take them in the draft.
Minutes after Sorber was drafted, he rode the high of reaching his dreams when he promised that the Thunder will go back-to-back. That's what every NBA champion feels like in the immediate aftermath, but OKC is best set up compared to previous champions to accomplish the rare feat.
"Yeah, I watched the NBA Finals," Sorber said. "Honestly, it just felt good to be chosen by Sam and just to be able to bring whatever I could do to bring to the team."
Meanwhile, Barnhizer had his first of 16 NBA workouts with the Thunder. The 23-year-old had the NBA champion on the back of his mind throughout his other 15 visits. He caught Sam Presti's eye when he attended a Northwestern game last season.
"Of course I watched the NBA Finals, and I think something that me and Thomas, we were talking about earlier, how physical that series was and the kind of kids that we are and things that we're able to bring into that culture is just really exciting," Barnhizer said. "Definitely thrilled to end up in this position for sure."
The truth is, the Thunder won't need to rely on rookies in the playoffs if everything goes right. Sorber and Barnhizer are long-term plays that could contribute down the road when the payroll jumps up. But there's definitely room for them to contribute in the regular season. An 82-game season invites everybody to get some runs in eventually.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
If Caitlin Clark's worth a ‘billion' to WNBA, why is she paid only a fraction of that?
In 1997, economists from MIT and Cambridge co-authored a paper on the economic value of NBA superstars, focusing on Chicago Bulls' icon Michael Jordan. At the time, Jordan had already won four NBA championships, briefly retired, then returned to the league. The window in which Jordan was away from the NBA provided a clearer glimpse into the value he brought to it. Advertisement Beyond what he meant to the Bulls, the two economists, Jerry Hausman and Gregory K. Leonard, found that Jordan generated $53 million to other teams during the 1991-92 season — around $121 million today — through analyzing star-powered factors such as gate revenue, and local and national TV revenues. Jordan was making around $3 million in salary at the time — around $7 million today. 'A significant portion of an NBA team's revenue can be traced to Michael Jordan,' they wrote. Caitlin Clark has produced a similar financial effect on the WNBA. Since she entered the league as the top draft pick in May 2024, the Indiana Fever have become the WNBA's equivalent of The Beatles. Everywhere Clark goes, eyes follow: when she attends Pacers games, Taylor Swift's Eras Tour concert or a Kansas City Chiefs game. Even when she played in an LPGA Tour pro-am, fans flocked to the course. Clark and the Fever have set WNBA viewership records, consistently sell out Gainbridge Fieldhouse and prompt some opponents to move their games to larger-capacity NBA arenas. The Fever unveiled T-shirts this season with the tag-line 'Every Game is a Home Game.' 'To see the influence that she has on people, bringing people out here, and to see how amazing of an influence she is for sports, (that) was really cool to see firsthand,' said Nelly Korda, the world's No. 1 golfer after playing nine holes with Clark this past November. Usually, where such attention is attracted, money follows to an athlete's pocket. Clark has gained millions in endorsement deals with Gatorade, State Farm, Nike and others (valued at $11 million in 2024, per Sportico), but it's obvious her value to the WNBA — and women's sports, more broadly — is significantly higher than the $78,066 salary she is contracted to receive. 'In my lifetime, we had Muhammad Ali, we had Michael Jordan, we had Tiger Woods, and to me, it's early, but we have Caitlin Clark,' said John Kosner, a former ESPN executive turned industry consultant. 'People who don't care and don't follow the sport that she plays (in) have been driven not just to watch, but to watch avidly.' .@CaitlinClark22 delights fans in Dallas 👏@IndianaFever | #IONWNBA — WNBA on ION (@IONWNBA) June 27, 2025 However, she doesn't receive compensation like sport's other Mount Rushmore figures. She's unlikely to ever be paid even close to what she is really worth to the league. Her agent, Excel's Erin Kane, said she didn't think that would ever be possible. So what is Clark worth to the WNBA? 'It's hard to believe she's not worth close to a billion to the league,' said one industry source not authorized to discuss the matter publicly. Advertisement Clark, of course, is just one of many WNBA players who is vastly underpaid — a key prompt for players currently renegotiating their collective bargaining agreement with the league. But because of how much Clark drives the league's economy, the delta between her salary, which is two-thirds the league average of $117,133 (as of opening night), and her actual value is especially stark. Consider that her salary is around 0.02 percent of the Fever's recent valuation by Forbes of $340 million. Television ratings, attendance and merchandise sales are just some factors economists use to assess an athlete's value. That was the focus of the Jordan study three decades ago and remains relevant today. The Caitlin Clark Effect is well-documented and taps into such categories for analysis. But Judd Cramer, an economics lecturer at Harvard, also cites the dramatic increases in both media rights deal valuations and franchise valuations across women's sports since Clark's senior year at Iowa when thinking about her value. The Fever's valuation increased 273 percent from 2024 to 2025, according to Sportico, and the average valuation of WNBA franchises rose 180 percent in that span, too. 'The idea that she (is) maybe worth 1,000 times her salary in franchise value is not inconceivable,' Cramer said. Under the current CBA, the WNBA supermax contract is $249,244 and Clark would have to finish her rookie contract (four years) before earning that. A lot would have to change in the women's basketball landscape for her to earn 1,000 times her current salary of $78,000 — $78 million would be about $20 million more than the highest-paid NBA player (Stephen Curry) this past season. Merely multiplying Clark's salary by 10x would be a leap under the WNBA's current salary structure. As was the case for Jordan when he stepped away from the game from 1993-95, Clark's absence — she missed five games over nearly three weeks with a quad injury — demonstrated how much she moves the needle. Two games on NBA TV had viewership drop by 40 percent compared to the Fever's first game on the network with Clark, though one still ranked in the channel's top-10 broadcasts. Although the Fever's game against the Chicago Sky reached 1.9 million viewers – the third most for a WNBA game on CBS — it was 30 percent fewer than watched the Sky-Fever game with Clark on ABC. The resale tickets for the game at the United Center also dropped about 70 percent after Clark's injury was announced, yet it still drew a Sky-record 19,496 fans. Advertisement 'She's going to be massively underpaid because it's not just what she's doing for her team but what she's doing for the other teams,' said Michael Leeds, a professor of economics at Temple University. Said the aforementioned industry source: 'She's making opposing owners seven figures when she shows up.' Clark entered the WNBA at an opportune time after growing her brand at Iowa, profiting off modern name, image and likeness rules and more television exposure for women's basketball players. The WNBA was already entering a substantial growth period, too, with league revenues doubling from 2019 to 2023, per Bloomberg. Yet, while Clark was jet fuel for the moment, the structures of the sport have stopped her from capturing her full worth. The WNBA's ownership model prevents players from receiving the bulk of its revenue. The NBA owned half of the league before 2022, when the WNBA sold 16 percent of its equity in a $75 million capital raise, a transaction that diluted the then-12 teams' total stake to 42 percent. NBA players take home 50 percent of basketball-related income, while the other half goes to the owners. In the WNBA, the league's owners don't even control 50 percent of the league, so a theoretical 50/50 split of total revenue would leave only 21 percent of the pie each to both the owners and the players. Beyond the realm of the hypothetical, no such splitting provision even exists in the current collective bargaining agreement; player salaries presently account for less than 10 percent of revenue. 'The WNBA is hamstrung by this, because if they tell the amazing story of what's going on in their league in terms of revenue, then they have to explain why the players are paid so badly,' said David Berri, a professor of economics at Southern Utah University. The CBA has a mechanism for revenue sharing if certain targets are reached. However, that agreement was created in 2020, when the league played a pandemic-impacted bubble season and essentially made no money. Because the revenue targets are cumulative, the WNBA hasn't caught up despite recent rapid growth, preventing all players from benefiting from financial gains. Advertisement The league also has a hard cap per team that limits individual salaries. The cap is currently $1.5 million, a total spread among 11 to 12 players per team. To increase the cap, and thus increase salaries, the league needs a massive growth in revenue. And the biggest driver of revenue across sports leagues is media rights. Last year, the league signed the richest media rights deal in women's sports league history. The value of what commissioner Cathy Engelbert has called the WNBA's 'tranche 1' deals — around $200 million annually over 11 years with Disney/ESPN, NBC and Amazon as of 2026 — jumped from $33 million with ESPN in 2025. (The total value of the W's current media rights with all of its partners is about $50 million this year.) But the uptick in value was agreed upon before Clark-mania officially began in the WNBA. The NBA and WNBA did not announce the terms of the new media rights deal until July 2024, but a source with knowledge of the agreement, who was not authorized to discuss the deal publicly, said the details were agreed upon before the start of the 2024 WNBA season, and before the announcement of the Toronto and Portland expansion teams. At a congressional hearing this May, Bill Koenig, the NBA's president of global content and media distribution, said the WNBA was mindful of the league's growth trajectory and put in provisions to reflect the league's upside. The WNBA can still sell additional media rights as part of its 'tranche 2' deals; it currently has deals with ION and CBS, for instance, and just extended its agreement with ION in June. There is also a revenue-sharing provision in the 'tranche 1' agreement, in which the WNBA would benefit incrementally if advertising revenue exceeds a certain level. Perhaps most importantly to the league's future revenue is an opportunity for the WNBA to initiate a 'look-in' provision in three years to increase the value of the agreement. But experts said it's still unclear how much renegotiated media rights deals would be worth. Leeds, the Temple professor, said that it is difficult to ascribe broadcast rights effects directly to a single player, because the negotiation involves a broader, multi-year package. Furthermore, while the WNBA's national regular-season ratings are comparable to those of major men's leagues and set records (or near records) on an almost weekly basis, WNBA playoff ratings still lag. 'Media value is not something that is particularly precise and calibrated to exactly what happens week-to-week, month-to-month or even year-to-year,' said Ed Desser, a longtime NBA employer who negotiated the WNBA's first media contract and is now an industry consultant. Advertisement Though the incoming media rights deal is a historic sum for the WNBA, the total figure is still only about five times the current deal and future increases via the look-in are unlikely to be massive. Even if all of the TV revenue were funneled into player salaries, the individual max would still be in the realm of $1.25 million. Thus, this source of revenue would still fall short of capturing the additional value Clark has brought the league. Cramer, the Harvard economist, hasn't modeled how much of the WNBA's economic growth can be attributed to Clark, but he said, 'Consider if there was an increase in the league over a 10-year horizon in the order of billions. If she's 25 percent of that, then that's how I would say she could have brought $750 million to the league.' He said she's made an even more significant impact on the economics of women's sports more broadly. 'I think her overall value to women's sports starts with a B,' Cramer said. 'It's in the billions for sure.' His insight draws on the significant increases in media rights and franchise valuations over the last few years, as Clark rose to prominence in college and now stars in the pros. All of this projection comes before Clark has played in an Olympics, made a deep postseason run, or even finished a season with a winning record. Clark will almost assuredly never receive in salary what she is worth to the WNBA. In that regard, she's a lot like Jordan, and other all-time greats across sports. Yet, no matter the challenge in quantifying her value, her impact is palpable. As Kosner, the former ESPN executive, put it, 'I think every commissioner in every sport wishes he or she had a Caitlin Clark.' (Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; Visual data: Thomas Oide / The Athletic; Photo of Caitlin Clark:)
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
How Wisconsin basketball center Steven Crowl can earn a roster spot with the Utah Jazz
Former Wisconsin center Steven Crowl will look to make the most of his Exhibit 10 contract with the Utah Jazz this summer. Despite not hearing his named called either Thursday or Friday evening during the 2025 NBA Draft, Crowl is poised to represent an NBA squad during its quest for a summer league title. The Jazz kick-start their summer slate with a three-day circuit at the Jon M. Huntsman Center in Salt Lake City, Utah from July 5-7 before making the trek to Las Vegas the following week. The one-year, non-guaranteed minimum salary deal enables NBA teams to sign undrafted playmakers to their summer league squads for an opportunity to land on the franchise's G League affiliate -- a low-risk, high-reward move. If Crowl plays extremely well, he could muscle his way into a two-way deal with the team before the 2025-26 season. Prior to the draft, Crowl did work out with the Golden State Warriors, New Orleans Pelicans, Charlotte Hornets and Denver Nuggets. Utah's summer league slate will essentially serve as another extended workout against another batch of NBA hopefuls. Utah will play three games in Salt Lake City from July 5-7 against the Philadelphia 76ers, Memphis Grizzlies and Oklahoma City Thunder. The Jazz will then tip off against the New Orleans Hornets (July 11), Golden State Warriors (July 13), San Antonio Spurs (July 14) and Washington Wizards (July 16) in Las Vegas. To claim one of 15 regular season roster spots or one of three two-way contract opportunities, Crowl will need to showcase his ability to stretch the floor as a 3-point shooter, particularly from the top of the key. As a senior, the Minnesota native averaged 9.9 points, 5.3 rebounds and 2.4 assists while shooting 54% from the field, a blistering 41% from 3 and 82% from the free-throw line. In today's NBA, that type of efficiency plays. 2024 NBA G League Rookie of the Year Oscar Tshiebwe and former Duke standout Kyle Filipowski are listed ahead on the Jazz's depth chart, so if Crowl hopes to scale the three-man hierarchy, his ability to knock down open shots from outside will be paramount. One other important factor: rebounding. The 7-footer averaged just under six rebounds per contest across 153 games during his tenure in Madison, although he never attained the role of an enforcer. In fact, following a zero-rebound outing against Illinois as a senior, his former head coach Greg Gard publicly commented on Crowl's lack of aggressiveness down low. A no-show for Crowl in the painted area cannot happen in either Salt Lake City or Las Vegas. If he corrals three or four rebounds per appearance, plays stout interior defense and disrupts passing lanes near the basket, coaches, scouts and executives may favor his inclusion as a two-way player. That journey commences on July 5 at 9:00 p.m. EST against the 76ers in Utah. Contact/Follow @TheBadgersWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Wisconsin Badgers news, notes and opinion
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Unlikely Destination Emerges for Lakers Star LeBron James Amid Trade Speculation
Unlikely Destination Emerges for Lakers Star LeBron James Amid Trade Speculation originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Los Angeles Lakers pulled off one of the most unexpected blockbuster trades in recent NBA memory, landing Luka Doncic from the Dallas Mavericks in exchange for Anthony Davis. Advertisement A new report suggests the Lakers could top that with an even bigger trade, naming the Mavericks as a potential destination if LeBron James hits the trade block. James chose to opt in to the final year of his contract for the Lakers for $52.6 million, but The Athletic's Sam Amick reported that there are growing rumors among front offices that the move could be a precursor to a trade. "The speculation was rampant all around the league when news of James' decision broke, with rival executives wondering if this was a precursor to a trade request (James, remember, has a no-trade clause and could thus control any such move)," Amick wrote. Amick added that there are differing opinions, with some believing that James is just pushing the Lakers to build a title-contendeing team for what could be his final NBA season. Advertisement "Or, of course, it could be yet another attempt to apply pressure to the front office to find a way to add impactful talent," Amick wrote. "Either way, it's becoming increasingly clear that — even if James doesn't retire next summer — this could be his last season in a Lakers uniform." Lakers reporter Jovan Buha suggested that the Mavericks could be a destination for James if he indeed hits the trade block. "If LeBron asks out, keep an eye on Dallas," Buha noted. While it could come as a surprise for the Lakers to send another star to Dallas, The Athletic's Amick suggested the Lakers are primarily concerned with the long-term future and finding a new co-star for Doncic. Advertisement Related: Lakers Urged to Trade for $48 Million Center to Solve Roster Question This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
