FCC commissioner rips a 'weaponized' agency punishing news outlets Trump dislikes
A Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission tore into the panel's recent actions under its new chairman, without naming him, saying the agency has been 'weaponized to chill speech and to punish the press.'
'We are witnessing a dangerous precedent: the transformation of an independent regulator into an instrument of political censorship,' Anna Gomez, a 2023 Biden appointee, said Thursday during a fiery speech at the 2025 Media Institute Communications Forum in Washington, DC.
Gomez did not directly name Brendan Carr, the Trump-appointed FCC chair who has used his authority to pressure media outlets President Donald Trump has deemed unfavorable. Carr has opened investigations into PBS and NPR over their sponsorship practices; reopened a probe of CBS for 'news distortion;' reinstated complaints against ABC for its handling of a presidential debate between Trump and then-Vice President Kamala Harris; and opened new probes into NBCUniversal and Disney, ABC's parent company, over their promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
'This FCC has made clear that it will go after any news outlet that dares to report the truth if that truth is unfavorable to this administration,' Gomez said. In contrast, she applauded past FCC chairs who demonstrated 'courage' by 'refusing to wield the agency's licensing authority as a weapon… even in the face of political pressure.'
Gomez said she will 'refuse to stay quiet' as the federal government 'weaponizes its regulatory tools' to violate the First Amendment and attack the news media. After fellow commissioner Geoffrey Starks resigns this spring, Gomez will be the lone Democrat on the five-seat commission, alongside Carr and another Trump appointee. The remaining slot currently sits vacant.
'Unfortunately, the administration efforts to censor and control appear to be working, at least for now,' Gomez said. 'Some media outlets are finding it is easier to retreat in the face of government threats, veiled or otherwise, than to be responsive to their audiences.'
Gomez pointed to changes at CBS News and its flagship news program '60 Minutes' as examples of what gets lost when political pressure comes to bear on reporting the news.
CBS News is reportingly considering a settlement of a lawsuit brought by President Trump, which accuses the broadcaster of deliberately mis-editing a '60 Minutes' interview with Harris to manipulate the November election. While many experts have deemed the lawsuit to be bogus, CBS parent Paramount Global has begun discussing a settlement, especially as company chair Shari Redstone looks to complete a merger with Skydance Media — a deal that will require signoff from Carr's FCC.
The pressure to settle the lawsuit and clear the way for a merger has trickled down to CBS News. In late April, longtime '60 Minutes' executive producer Bill Owens stepped down because he felt he could no longer make 'independent decisions based on what was right for 60 Minutes,' according to a memo he wrote to the show's staff.
Days later, the newsmagazine's host Scott Pelley said on-air that Paramount had begun 'to supervise our content in new ways' amid the Trump pressure, leading Owens to feel 'he had lost the independence that honest journalism requires.'
'Pardon my language, but that is a B.F.D.,' Gomez said on Thursday of the '60 Minutes' ordeal, using a shorthand for 'big f**ing deal.' She continued: 'Corporate parents should give journalists the independence they need. A free press requires free journalists.'
Gomez closed by saying that if she's removed from her seat, 'it wasn't because I failed to do my job. It's because I insisted on doing it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
15 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Appeals Court Lets Sweeping Tariffs Stand for Now
A federal appeals court granted Tuesday the Trump administration's request to keep far-reaching tariffs in effect for now, but agreed to fast track its consideration of the case this summer. The court said it intends to hear arguments on July 31, which means the levies will likely remain in effect for at least the next two months. 🔎 Dig deeper:
CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
Los Angeles police begin ‘mass arrests' after downtown curfew kicks in
Update: Date: Title: Where else are protests happening around the US? Content: Protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that kicked off in Los Angeles on Friday have since sparked similar protests in various cities around the US – some of which have broadened into protests against the Trump administration. Here's where they're taking place: Update: Date: Title: It's past midnight in LA, where a curfew is in place. Here's what to know Content: A curfew is currently in place in part of downtown Los Angeles, with police saying they have begun arresting dozens of protesters Tuesday evening. Scattered demonstrations have also popped up in multiple cities across the US, with Texas deploying the National Guard in response. Here are the latest developments: Update: Date: Title: Texas National Guard deployed to "ensure peace and order," governor says Content: Members of the Texas National Guard will be deployed to various locations in the state ahead of planned protests this week, Gov. Greg Abbott said Tuesday. South Texas organizations are expected to hold anti-ICE rallies on Wednesday and Saturday, CNN affiliate KSAT reported. Among the demonstrations is a 'No Kings' protest in San Antonio this Saturday. Abbott's announcement comes a day after authorities used tear gas and pepper ball projectiles to disperse demonstrators at Austin's State Capitol Complex. 'Peaceful protest is legal,' Abbott said in a post on X. 'Harming a person or property is illegal and will lead to arrest.' The Republican governor said the Guard 'will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order.' Update: Date: Title: Where are protests happening in Texas? Content: Inspired by demonstrations in Los Angeles, protesters in Texas have gathered in droves to challenge the Trump administration's sweeping immigration crackdown. Like California, the Lone Star State is home to one of the country's largest immigrant populations. Over the past few days, demonstrators have said they are speaking out for members of their community, many who fear taking to the streets themselves. 'Immigrants are the backbone of our society. Once again, they are all of us. They are our family members. They are our community members,' Laiba Khan, an organizer with the Party for Socialism and Liberation, told CNN affiliate KEYE. What began as a show of solidarity devolved into chaos in Austin on Monday, when police declared an unlawful gathering outside the J.J. Pickle Federal Building, later deploying tear gas on demonstrators, KEYE reported. Another protest near the State Capitol building, also in Austin, ended with law enforcement deploying tear gas and pepper rounds, the Texas Department of Public Safety said. Thirteen people were arrested in the city, police said. About 290 kilometers (180 miles) away in Dallas, video from a Monday demonstration shows a tense standoff unfolding between protesters and police in riot gear. Several demonstrators, their faces covered with bandanas and masks, were heard shouting expletives. An observer told CNN that police used what he believes was mace on a person being restrained and another person attempting to intervene. Hundreds gathered outside San Antonio's City Hall on Sunday in a protest that remained peaceful, CNN affiliate KSAT reported. Ahead of more demonstrations in the southern Texas city, Mayor Ron Nirenberg urged residents to 'exercise their rights…safely and responsibly.' Nirenberg's calls for calm come after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the deployment of the Texas National Guard, ahead of the planned protests. 'The reports of the Governor deploying the National Guard to our community underscore the need for us to remain peaceful and safe this weekend,' Nirenberg said. Update: Date: Title: "Mass arrests" in downtown LA, police say Content: The Los Angeles Police Department said late Tuesday that 'dozens of arrests' have been made as several protest groups continue to gather in the designated curfew zone. 'Multiple groups continue to congregate on 1st St between Spring and Alameda,' the LAPD wrote on X. 'Those groups are being addressed and mass arrests are being initiated.' 'Dozens of arrests have been made for failing to disperse at the scene of an Unlawful Assembly,' the police said in a later post. Update: Date: Title: Downtown Los Angeles is under curfew. Here's what to know Content: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass declared a curfew in downtown Los Angeles tonight. Here's all that you need to know: When: The curfew is in effect from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. PT. 'We certainly expect for it to last for several days,' Bass said Area affected: The area of downtown Los Angeles where the curfew will take place is 1 square mile, Mayor Karen Bass said. The total area of the city is 502 square miles, she noted. Residents affected: Officials who enacted a curfew in parts of downtown Los Angeles assess that fewer than 100,000 of the city's nearly 4 million residents actually live within the zoned off area, a law enforcement source familiar said. Businesses affected: While numerous corporations and other businesses are based in the downtown area, the source said officials believe the 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew will affect only a relatively small number of residents, which was a factor in determining the start and end time of the order. Exemptions: LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said residents of the impact area will be exempt from the curfew. Others exempted include: credentialed media, public safety and emergency personnel and people experiencing homelessness. Penalties: Anyone not deemed exempt who is within the designated curfew area in Los Angeles between 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. PT will be 'subject to arrest,' McDonnell said.
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump's China ‘truce' is nothing of the sort
At long last, the United States has reached a trade agreement with China. Again. After a testy war of words that escalated into a tit-for-tat restriction on key exports, American and Chinese officials this week met in the United Kingdom with a singular goal: Find a way to agree to what they had agreed to a month earlier in Geneva. It appears the countries' top trade negotiators have accomplished that. On Tuesday night, both Chinese and Trump officials said they had agreed to a framework to implement the consensus they reached in May, and the trade truce would be sent to their respective leaders for their approval. Businesses, consumers and Wall Street investors will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief: Burdensome tariffs have raised significant anxiety, and easing trade barriers between the world's two largest economies should lower costs and help inject some much-needed certainty into an economy that has been demonstrating some signs of strain. But in reality, the trade truce – if that's really what was accomplished this time around – is mostly just a return to the already-tense state of affairs from before April 2. Tariff rates from both countries remain historically high, and significant export restrictions remain in place. The United States has not opened its doors to China's autos, nor is it going to sell its high-end AI chips anytime soon. And, in President Donald Trump's parlance, China isn't treating America much more 'fairly' after this agreement than it did before. Without a doubt, a trade agreement was much needed. After Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcements, tensions ran so high that trade between the United States and China came to an effective halt. A 145% tariff on most Chinese imports made the math impossible for US businesses to buy virtually anything from China, America's second-largest trading partner. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, America's chief negotiator in both trade talks with China, said previous tariff levels were 'unsustainable.' On May 12, delegates from China and the United States announced they would significantly roll back their historically high tariffs on one another. Economists pared back their recession forecasts, and moribund consumer confidence rebounded. But Trump and his administration in recent weeks grew increasingly hostile toward China, accusing the country of breaking the promises it made in mid-May. China similarly said the United States failed to live up to its obligations under the Geneva agreement. The Trump administration had expected China to lift restrictions on rare-earth materials that are critical components for a wide range of electronics, but China has only very slowly allowed them to return to the open market, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a series of export restrictions on US goods to China, three administration officials told CNN last month. China has a virtual monopoly on rare earths, without which cars, jet engines, contrast dye used in MRI machines and some cancer drugs cannot be manufactured. Trump told reporters Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping had agreed to allow exports of rare earth minerals products to begin, but industry analysts said the crucial materials had not been flowing to the United States as they once had. If both countries satisfy the terms of the agreement this time around, the de-escalation should prevent the direst warnings about the trade war, including potential pandemic-level shortages. Despite the good vibes, the United States and China remain in an economic standoff. The Trump administration – and the Biden administration before it – have maintained that Chinese companies are more than happy to sell inexpensive products to the US market but that China places significant restrictions on US businesses operating in the country and encourages Chinese companies to steal American intellectual property. China has long disputed those claims. Trump, in his first term, raised tariffs on China based on national security concerns. Biden maintained many of those tariffs and doubled down on some. But the second Trump administration has taken trade barriers to an unprecedented level. It has placed a 10% universal tariff on virtually all goods coming into the United States. It put in place an additional 20% tariff on Chinese goods in an effort to get China to take action to reduce the flow of fentanyl over the US border. Both of those extraordinary tariffs remain in place on most Chinese goods, with the exception of some products like electronics. In addition, the White House closed the so-called de minimis exemption that allowed packages with a value of under $800 to come into the United States tariff-free. Hefty new tariffs remain in place on small packages, undermining the business models of Chinese ecommerce giants Shein and Temu. The compounding tariffs create significant trade barriers with America's second-largest trading partner, raising prices for American businesses and consumers with no easy fixes or clear market alternatives. Some gigantic companies, such as Apple, have complex supply chains that can withstand some of the price pressures. But even Apple, which has said it would ship most US iPhones from India as Chinese tariffs rise, said it would face a $900 million quarterly cost increase because of tariffs – at their current levels, not at the sky-high 145% rate. So a trade truce may be better than the alternative – if it lasts this time.
