Left-Wing Pundit Claims Border Agents Stopped Him at Airport for 2-Hour Questioning About His Views on Trump and Gaza
Hasan Piker claimed on YouTube that he was 'detained' and questioned by U.S. border patrol agents at the Chicago O'Hare International Airport upon his return from a Mother's Day trip to France.
Piker said the agents asked him questions about his stance on President Donald Trump and the Israeli war.
The Turkish-American political commentator is a U.S. citizen who was born in New Jersey.Progressive political commentator Hasan Piker is claiming that he was recently 'detained' at the airport and questioned by federal agents because of his political views — a story that's been met with swift denials from the Department of Homeland Security.
Piker, 33, alleges in a YouTube video posted Monday, May 12, that he was pulled aside by border patrol agents at Chicago O'Hare International Airport as he returned to the United States from his family's Mother's Day trip in France. He says he was flagged down while getting scanned for Global Entry and moved into a 'detention center' at the airport.
While there, Piker says he was interrogated by agents with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, who were 'cordial' in their approach and asked him simple questions about his job — where he streams games and talks about 'current events' — before eventually turning to his stance on President Donald Trump and the Israeli war.
'I'm sitting there and they're asking me about Trump,' Piker says in the video. 'They're asking me about Hamas, and he kept saying stuff like, 'Do you like Hamas? Like, do you support Hamas? Do you think Hamas is a resistance group?' '
Related: ICE Took a Trump Supporter's Wife as They Returned from Their Honeymoon. Still, He Says, 'I Don't Regret the Vote'
Piker alleges that the agents 'kept asking over and over again' about his views on the Israel-Gaza war and he 'kept repeating' that he was 'on the side of civilians,' was a 'pacifist' and wanted the 'endless bloodshed to end.' He claimed that the agent was attempting to try to 'get me to say something like, 'Oh I support Hamas' or whatever is not allowed.'
'Like why is this denying me entry into the country of my birth?,' he questioned. 'This is my birthright. I'm an American citizen. You can't just stop me at the f------ border and be like, 'What's your opinion on Donald Trump?' '
Responding to Piker's story, a Department of Homeland Security official tells PEOPLE in a statement that the YouTube video "is nothing but lying for likes," adding that the claims 'that his political beliefs triggered the inspection are baseless.'
'Our officers are following the law, not agendas. Upon entering the country, this individual was referred for further inspection — a routine, lawful process that occurs daily, and can apply for any traveler," the statement continues. "Once his inspection was complete, he was promptly released.'
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Piker notes in the video that he was released, but suggests that the 'goal' with the interrogation was to 'put fear into people's hearts.' He also accuses the government of being 'unafraid' of using intimidation tactics because of a person's political views or 'speech.'
'Does this stop me from saying whatever the fuck I want to say? Of course not,' Piker says. 'Don't be ridiculous. But the reason why I wanted to talk about it was to give you more insight into what the government is doing, and to speak out against this sort of stuff.'
Related: Donald Trump Says He'd Be 'Honored' to Deport Americans to El Salvador Prison: 'I'm All for It'
In response to the video, Chip Gibbons — who is part of the Defending Rights & Dissent organization, which works to defend U.S. citizens' civil liberties — told The Guardian in a statement that they were "deeply disturbed" to learn of the news.
'We are deeply disturbed that CBP is stopping political commentators at the border to interrogate them about first amendment-protected activities. Such an abuse of power is an affront to press freedom," he wrote.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
17 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs
EDMONTON - Alberta is buying American alcohol and gambling machines again, three months after Premier Danielle Smith announced restrictions aimed at fighting back against U.S. tariffs. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally said Friday that the move signals a 'renewed commitment to open and fair trade' with the United States. Smith said in March that the province would no longer buy U.S. alcohol and video lottery terminals, or sign contracts with American companies. Alberta's liquor stores are privately owned but must order stock through the provincial government. That came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped heavy tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. Other premiers also announced bans on U.S. liquor along with other proposed penalties. Nally said in a statement that the decision to resume buying U.S. alcohol and gambling machines 'sets the stage for more constructive negotiations' ahead of a renewal of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. The agreement, known as CUSMA, was negotiated during the first Trump administration and is up for a mandatory review in 2026. 'Prime Minister Mark Carney has made a clear effort to reset the relationship with the U.S. administration, and Alberta's government supports this approach,' Nally said. 'We are focused on highlighting Alberta's role as a responsible and collaborative trading partner and will continue working alongside other provinces to advocate for a tariff-free relationship.' The minister said Albertans are encouraged to continue supporting local producers, even as more U.S. options return to store shelves. In April, the province paused its policy around procurement from U.S. companies in what Nally called 'the spirit of diplomacy.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
17 News' political analysts break down Trump and Musk feud
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KGET) — Some Democrats are calling the online feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk a messy breakup…coining it, 'the Real Housewives of Pennsylvania Ave.' 17 News political analysts, Neel Sannappa and Cathy Abernathy, joined 17 News at 5 to discuss the jabber between Musk and Trump. Watch the full interview in the player above for the full 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?
