Tanzanian opposition leader makes defiant appearance at treason trial
The leader of Tanzania's main opposition party has appeared in court at a hearing in an ongoing trial on charges of treason, in which he potentially faces the death penalty.
Tundu Lissu issued a message of defiance to supporters on Monday as he took his place in the dock at Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court in the capital, Dar-es-Salaam. The trial has added to rising concerns across East Africa about threats to democracy.
Lissu entered the courtroom with his fist raised in the air as supporters chanted, 'No reforms, no election', according to a video of the courtroom shared by his Chadema party on X.
'We will be fine. … Don't worry at all,' Lissu said as he addressed supporters.
The opposition leader, who came second in the 2020 presidential election, insisted on attending the proceedings in person after being forced to appear via videolink from prison for an earlier hearing on April 24.
Lissu, who was shot 16 times in a 2017 attack, was charged with treason last month over what prosecutors said was a speech calling on the public to rebel and disrupt presidential and legislative elections scheduled for October.
His Chadema party has been disqualified from this year's polls after demanding changes to an electoral process that it said favours the ruling party, Chama Cha Mapinduzi, which has been in power since the country's independence from British rule in 1961.
#NoReformsNoElection pic.twitter.com/DYxD1RauWl
— Chadema Tanzania (@ChademaTZ2) May 19, 2025A series of high-profile arrests has highlighted the rights record of President Samia Suluhu Hassan, who plans to seek re-election in October. She has insisted that the government is committed to respecting human rights.
However, several Kenyan rights activists, including a former justice minister, said they were denied entry to Tanzania as they tried to travel to attend Lissu's trial.
The former minister, Martha Karua, a prominent lawyer and opposition politician, and former Supreme Court President Willy Mutunga were among those detained when they landed at Julius Nyerere International Airport in Dar-es-Salaam, they said on X.
Tanzania's immigration spokesperson Paul Mselle did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
'Today was going to be a big day, and we went out there in solidarity,' Karua told the Kenyan broadcaster NTV on Monday after she was denied entry and sent back to Nairobi.
'The state cannot be used as a personal tool. You cannot deport people whom you don't like, who are not aligned to your views.'
We, @WMutunga, @Honeyfarsafi and I, have been detained at Julius Nyerere Airport, Dar es Salaam as we came in for the observance of @TunduALissu's case.
The trip was in solidarity with Tanzania lawyers and human rights defenders.
They have not given reasons for the detention. pic.twitter.com/ad8UVtT4me
— husseinkhalid (@husskhalid) May 19, 2025Mutunga and rights activist Hussein Khalid were being held in an interrogation room at Julius Nyerere airport on Monday and were expected to be deported, Khalid said on X.
Karua said last month that Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda were 'collaborating' in their 'total erosion of democratic principles' amid rising concerns regarding democracy across East Africa.
Ethiopia's leading opposition party, the Tigray People's Liberation Front, was banned from any political activity last week, before elections due by June 2026 at the latest.
South Sudan has repeatedly delayed holding its first national elections, and President Salva Kiir has placed longtime rival First Vice President Riek Machar under house arrest.
Rwandan President Paul Kagame last year won re-election with more than 99 percent of the vote amid long-running accusations of repression targeting the opposition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
18 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
How the myth of democracy fuels the US forever wars
From Vietnam to Iraq and Afghanistan, US wars left not freedom, but ruin. In a recent book, co-authors Noam Chomsky and Nathan Robinson expose how American elites sell violence as virtue, using the myth of democracy to justify endless war.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
The Take: How the myth of democracy fuels the US forever wars
From Vietnam to Iraq and Afghanistan, US wars left not freedom, but ruin. In a recent book, co-authors Noam Chomsky and Nathan Robinson expose how American elites sell violence as virtue, using the myth of democracy to justify endless war. In this episode: Episode credits: This episode was produced by Marcos Bartolome, Haleema Shah, and Sonia Bhagat, with Manny Panaretos, Mariana Navarrete, Remas Alhawari, Kisaa Zehra, and our guest host, Kevin Hirten. It was edited by Kylene Kiang. Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Our video editors are Hisham Abu Salah and Mohannad Al-Melhem. Alexandra Locke is The Take's executive producer. Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera's head of audio. Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on Instagram, X, Facebook, Threads and YouTube
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Fact check: Will ‘big beautiful bill' really allow Trump to delay election?
A liberal group and social media users shared posts that say President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' for tax and spending would let him reschedule or eliminate elections. 'If the Senate passes the 'one big beautiful bill' and Trump signs it, that's it. It becomes law,' said the viral graphic on Meta and X. 'And here's what that really means. He can delay or cancel elections – legally.' The post included a long list of other claims about what the bill would accomplish; for this fact-check, we are focusing on the elections claim. The group Being Liberal, which calls itself 'one of the oldest social media liberal political brands', took down the graphic after we reached out for comment. The group told us it didn't create the post and removed it because the elections claim wasn't accurate. The earliest reference for the graphic we found online was from an anonymous blog post on May 23. The bill does not give Trump power to delay or cancel elections, an action that would be unconstitutional. 'The bill would not directly give the president any authority over elections,' said Eric Kashdan, senior legal counsel at the Campaign Legal Center, a group that advocates for voting rights and this year sued the Trump administration over a voter registration executive order. A spokesperson for House Speaker Mike Johnson, Griffin Neal, told PolitiFact, 'The bill obviously does not provide the President of the United States with the authority to cancel or delay elections.' The US House passed the tax and spending bill May 22 and it now moves to the Senate, where lawmakers could make changes. Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the Senate majority leader, said he hopes the bill can be sent to Trump by July 4. The bill includes one provision related to democracy and checks and balances; it would expand the executive branch's power by curtailing judges' ability to hold people in contempt of court. Provision critics said it could take away the courts' power to restrain the federal government if it violates the Constitution or breaks the law. We found no provision in the bill that says the president can delay or cancel an election. In July 2020, amid the pandemic and a surge in voting by mail, Trump floated the idea of delaying the election. At the time, he was running for re-election. But the Constitution empowers Congress to set the date by which states must choose their presidential electors, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service found in 2020. 'Since 1845, Congress has required states to appoint presidential electors on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, which represents the date by which voters in every state must cast their ballot for President,' the report said. Congress still has that power, said Edward Foley, an Ohio State University constitutional law professor. The Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 added a new definition of 'Election Day' that makes it clear that a voting extension can occur only through state law specified in advance and under tightly restricted conditions, such as a catastrophe, Foley said. That means Election Day 'cannot otherwise be cancelled or delayed' and the president plays no role in any alteration of Election Day, Foley said. Congress can change the Election Day date by enacting a new statute, as it did with the Electoral Count Reform Act, Foley said. Erwin Chemerinsky, a University of California, Berkeley law professor, told PolitiFact nothing in the bill lets Trump cancel or delay elections. 'The Constitution provides that elections for Congress be held every two years and for President every four years,' Chemerinsky said. 'There is no constitutional authority to cancel elections.' The bill includes a different provision that some experts called a threat to democracy, but not at the ballot box. Section 70302 would make it harder for judges to find a defendant in contempt of court for ignoring a judge's orders. Here's how: The legislation would require plaintiffs to pay a security bond before a judge could find the defendant in contempt of court. That would mean judges could no longer waive the security bond requirement, something that frequently happens in cases against the government. The section references a federal rule that says a court may issue a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order only if the plaintiff pays a security bond to cover costs and damages by any party 'found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained'. A security bond is an insurance policy to protect someone wrongfully accused of wrongdoing from financial losses during litigation, Kashdan said. The courts can require plaintiffs to pay money that the court holds until the end of the litigation 'If they win, they get their money back,' Kashdan said. 'If they lose, and the person they sued had a right to do whatever it was they were prevented from doing during the lawsuit, they get to keep that money to help compensate them for any losses they experienced during the litigation.' However, 'those seeking such court orders generally do not have the resources to post a bond, and insisting on it would immunise unconstitutional government conduct from judicial review,' wrote Chemerinsky for the website Just Security, which publishes a Trump litigation tracker. 'It always has been understood that courts can choose to set the bond at zero.' A March White House memo that criticised organisations for suing the federal government said enforcement of the security bond rule 'is critical to ensuring that taxpayers do not foot the bill for costs or damages caused by wrongly issued preliminary relief by activist judges and to achieving the effective administration of justice'. The House bill provision raised concern among groups that have defended the judiciary's role to provide a check on Trump's power. As of May 23, at least 177 court rulings have temporarily paused Trump administration actions, according to The New York Times. Social media posts say the Republican tax and budget bill will let Trump 'delay or cancel elections – legally'. We found nothing in the bill that would let Trump cancel or delay elections. A provision would make it harder for judges to hold people in contempt of court, but that is not the same as cancelling elections. Only Congress can change a presidential election's date, not the president, and this bill doesn't change that. We rate this statement False.
