Sirens wail, cities shut down as Taiwan simulates Chinese air raid
TAIPEI : Sirens wailed, roads emptied and people were ordered to stay indoors in Taiwan's capital Taipei today during an annual air-raid exercise aimed at preparing for any Chinese missile attack.
Sirens sounded at 1.30pm for the mandatory street evacuation drills, which effectively shut towns and cities across northern Taiwan for 30 minutes.
An alert, asking people to evacuate to safety immediately, was sent via phone text message by the defence ministry.
'Air defence drill. Missile attack. Seek immediate shelter,' it read in Chinese and English, accompanied by a shrill alarm.
Taiwanese authorities this month updated instructions on what people should do when air-raid alerts are issued, including for citizens who are not able to get into shelters in time or for those who are driving a car.
China, whose government views democratically governed Taiwan as its territory over the island's rejection, has ramped up its military pressure over the past five years, including almost daily fighter jet flights into the skies around the island.
In the past 24 hours, 58 Chinese military planes including fighter jets were detected around Taiwan, its defence ministry said.
Among them, 45 crossed the Taiwan Strait median line, an unofficial buffer zone.
Taiwan President Lai Ching-te, who China reviles as a 'separatist', rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims and says only Taiwan's people can decide their future.
He has repeatedly offered talks with China but has been rebuffed.
China has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control.
During the drill, police in Taipei directed vehicles to move to the side of roads and people already not inside were told to seek shelter.
Some shops and restaurants pulled down shutters and turned off lights – steps aimed at reducing the risk of becoming a target in the event of a night-time attack.
Sirens sounded 30 minutes later to give the all-clear.
The civil defence drills are taking place at the same time as Taiwan's largest ever military drills, which simulated attacks on its command systems and infrastructure, as well as China's grey zone tactics including military incursions and a disinformation campaign designed to test Taiwan's response.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
25 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Johnny Lim, first three-star general of Chinese descent, retires
KUALA LUMPUR: Lieutenant General Datuk Johnny Lim Eng Seng, who made history as the first ethnic Chinese officer to be promoted to that rank in the Armed Forces (MAF), retired today. Defence Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin shared the news in a post on his social media account after receiving a courtesy visit from the Commandant of the National Resilience College in conjunction with his retirement at Wisma Pertahanan today. "On behalf of the government and the Defence Ministry, I express my gratitude to him for his dedicated service and contributions to the nation and the military. "I hope he will continue to contribute to the country in his own capacity. Thank you, General, and best wishes for your retirement," the post read. In June, Johnny made history as the first ethnic Chinese officer to attain the rank of Lieutenant General in the Armed Forces. Lim received his early education at St Francis Primary School in Melaka from 1973 to 1978, and continued at St Francis Secondary School until 1983.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
How the US became the apex predator on trade
For a region often hailed as the future of the global economy, it's been an unedifying experience. One by one, Asian leaders swallowed trade accords with the United States that are slightly better than envisaged months ago, but more punitive than when they bet on access to the American market as a development strategy decades ago. The glory days of supply chains must seem like a prehistoric time to the countries that lined up to concede to White House demands for levies. Certainly a throw-back to an earlier, less prosperous, age: The overall level of US tariffs is now the highest since 1930s, according to Bloomberg Economics. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba was once adamant he would never accept duties, especially on autos, but concluded he could live with a 15% penalty. The European Union's top official, Ursula von der Leyen, said last Sunday the 15% rate the bloc settled on with President Donald Trump was the best she could manage. Key economies yet to strike a deal, such as South Korea and India, risk more adverse terms than those that already went along to get along. Trump is demanding a demonstration of obeisance and, in important ways, is receiving it. At the top of the commercial food chain is the United States, still the premier economy by a healthy margin. Tariffs may not revive the working-class communities that he claims to champion, but Trump can put on an emotionally satisfying show. Fingers crossed And the nations that have yielded get Trump off their back – and cross their fingers that they will fare better under the next president. In this sense, it's useful to think in terms of apex predators, those at the pinnacle of the natural food chain that are able to devour smaller players, according to Dmitry Grozoubinski, a former Australian trade negotiator. 'They are to a large extent paying protection money,' he told me. Tariffs of around 20% seem to be the benchmark for South-East Asia, based on deals announced with the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam. In the case of the latter two, they negotiated the US down from higher levels than foreshadowed in April. They will still hurt. Vietnam, which has become an export dynamo, may see its shipments to America drop by one third. Efforts to squeeze China are a feature of the pacts; Washington wants to curb the ability of Chinese firms to re-route products through third countries. The Philippines appeared to suffer a humiliation; the levy on goods from the archipelago was just a hair lower than what was announced by Trump a few weeks ago. Many details are still to be resolved and countries haven't given up on getting better terms. The common element, aside from just getting what passes as a deal done, is allowing Trump some of the theatre he craves. Praise the agreements and the White House's occupant. Counting on ties And, perhaps, when the attention is elsewhere, you can get a slightly better deal. Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr made it clear he hasn't given up. Ahead of his recent meeting with Trump at the White House, his team put great store in the close historical ties between the two nations; the Philippines was once a US colony and it regularly brushes up against Chinese ships in the South China Sea. On the face of it, Manila got little from the arrangement. Marcos' best shot is to work with negotiators while Trump has moved on. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth hinted at this by saying there may be a military component to the accord. 'The wolf is now at other doors,' said Grozoubinski, author of the book Why Politicians Lie About Trade. 'The indignity hurts less than the fight would. In return, counterparts get a semblance of certainty about the cost of entry to the United States, a vital component in the competition for foreign direct investment,' Grozoubinski added. The escape can be a form of victory. In the case of Vietnam, for example, the country is still fairly competitive with a 20% tariff. It stings, but probably isn't enough to warrant a producer packing up and going somewhere else. It may all be worth it to keep access to US customers. The administration foreshadowed this calculous before 'Liberation Day'. Stephen Miran, chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, told Bloomberg Television in March that nations have little choice other than to sell to the United States. They will pay up to retain that privilege. Seoul, you are next. South Korean officials have dangled a shipbuilding partnership as part of a potential compact. Talks with China, underway in Sweden, will be something else. Hopefully, the world economy won't be too damaged. The question Chinese President Xi Jinping will ask is whether the fight is worth it and how much resistance his own economy can stand. — Bloomberg Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
Amendments to the Education Act passed, secondary school education now compulsory
KUALA LUMPUR: The Dewan Rakyat passed the Education (Amendment) Bill 2025, which expands the definition of 'compulsory education' under the 1996 Education Act to include secondary schooling. The amendment also introduces a new provision, Section 32A, empowering the Education Minister to designate secondary education as mandatory for all Malaysian children residing in the country. It states that parents are legally required to enrol their children in both primary and secondary institutions, unless officially exempted. Under the new Section 32A(4), parents who fail to do so may face a fine of up to RM5,000, imprisonment for up to six months, or both upon conviction. The amendment further outlines penalties for non-compliance and authorises the minister to make additional regulations related to enforcement and exemptions. It also revises provisions related to primary school registration, requiring parents to enrol children who have reached the age of six by Jan 1 of any given academic year. Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek told the Lower House on Wednesday (July 30) that the legislation aims to strengthen educational responsibility rather than introducing punitive measures. 'The spirit of this amendment is not about punishment, but about education - to ensure that no child falls behind. 'The government's priority is to foster a sense of responsibility among parents and guardians to ensure their children are enrolled in school, in line to uphold every child's right to education,' she said. She added that the ministry is also taking steps to improve awareness among communities and enhance support systems to address issues of dropout and absenteeism. During the debate earlier, Cha Kee Chin (PH-Rasah) welcomed the amendment, calling it 'bold, progressive and long overdue.' However, he urged the government to clarify whether the law would apply to children of mixed-nationality parents, non-citizen children and those in private, Chinese independent or homeschool settings. In response, Fadhlina said homeschooling will be considered for exemption on a case-by-case basis, depending on the needs of each child. 'I'm open to exploring how we can ensure the justification, space and opportunity for these children without any form of discrimination,' she said. On enforcement, Cha proposed focusing on awareness and outreach rather than punishment. 'If enforced well, this could boost SPM participation rates and reduce dropout gaps between lower and upper secondary levels,' he added. Teresa Kok (PH-Seputeh) called on the Education Ministry to address the root causes of student dropouts before enforcing amendments to make secondary education compulsory. 'Many students leave school due to poverty, family problems or lack of interest in academics,' she said. Kok warned that penalising low-income parents is unjust and burdensome. She also questioned how the law would apply to homeschooled children, slow learners and those in private institutions. 'Reform should focus on curriculum and school improvements, not just legal punishment,' she said, adding that slow learners should be allowed to repeat a year to catch up. On concerns about poverty, Fadhlina Sidek stressed that the ministry had taken the matter into account and would prioritise support over punishment. 'Punitive measures are not the core of this bill - our focus is on providing assistance, including 18 forms of aid such as scholarships and school-related support like uniforms, to ensure children remain in school,' she said. Datuk Dr Radzi Jidin (PN-Putrajaya) called for clarity on how the amendment will affect students in unregistered private institutions, including pondok and tahfiz schools. 'Will these students automatically be exempted under Section 32A(3), or must parents apply individually?' he asked, referring to a provision that allows the minister to exempt any pupil or group of pupils from compulsory education, either fully or conditionally, by gazetting an official order. On this, Fadhlina said all registered private institutions, including religious schools, are subject to the provisions of the Education (Amendment) Bill 2025. 'We are engaging with unregistered institutions to encourage them to register so we can implement a standard curriculum and address issues like bullying - if they remain unregistered, the legal responsibility will fall on parents, and that's a concern we're working to resolve,' she said.
