logo
Three little letters that could help transform the Irish economy: PhD

Three little letters that could help transform the Irish economy: PhD

Irish Times28-04-2025
There's a common misconception that all doctors wear white coats, carry stethoscopes, and have terrible handwriting. I'll admit to at least two of the three. But as someone who trained and practised as a medical doctor, I want to talk about a different kind of doctor: the PhD.
A quiet but important transformation is already under way. Census 2022 showed more than 38,000 people in the Republic held a doctoral degree, up 74 per cent since 2011.
In 2022, PhD enrolments increased by 5 per cent compared to the previous academic year, and 26 per cent since 2016. These numbers tell a story of progress, but they also hint at an untapped opportunity.
We need to build a culture in this State that sees the pursuit of a PhD not as a curiosity or a niche calling, but as a viable path for individuals and our national economy.
READ MORE
Too often, PhD students are imagined as solitary figures in lab coats, fiddling with beakers or analysing arcane data, locked away for years at university, while their peers begin to climb the corporate ladder.
The reality is far more exciting. Today's PhD graduates are fuelling the stburgeoning innovation ecosystem. They are solving real-world problems in industry, public policy, climate, and health. Unlocking a vast array of opportunities in emerging fields such as artificial intelligence. They are exactly the kind of minds we need to compete globally.
In a time of geopolitical uncertainty and economic upheaval, with US tariffs looming and their retreat from international scientific leadership, the State stands at a crossroads. As America turns inward, we have an opportunity to turn outward, to become a global hub for ideas. And ideas, as the economist Daniel Susskind puts it in his recent book, Growth: A Reckoning
,
are what power modern economies.
They can be reused and built upon without running out. It's these endlessly reusable ideas that have driven human progress and economic growth, and they come not from thin air, but from research, education, and, yes, from PhDs.
PhDs are the machines that generate ideas.
Patrick Guilbaud on bringing fine dining to Ireland, retirement plans, and not getting that third Michelin star
Listen |
47:51
But these ideas don't live in academic journals or university libraries alone. PhD researchers increasingly bring their skills into the heart of industry, working in R&D departments of leading companies, driving innovation, product development, and long-term strategic thinking. More than half of full-time researchers in the EU now work in the business sector.
Companies understand the value of this work. Take Apple, which spends more on research and development (R&D) in a year than the entire United Kingdom government. That's a recognition that investing in knowledge, creativity, and experimentation pays dividends in future products, competitiveness, and growth.
The International Monetary Fund 2024 Fiscal Monitor states that increasing R&D support by 0.5 percentage points of gross domestic product (GDP) annually, or about 50 per cent more than the current level in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development economies, could raise GDP by up to 2 per cent, and reduce a country's debt-to-GDP ratio for an average advanced economy over the following eight years.
That is a powerful return on investment, and one that starts with people. When we support PhDs, we're laying the groundwork for a more innovative, resilient Irish economy.
However, we are entering a more fragmented global economy, with rising protectionism, trade tensions, and tariffs. History shows that these kinds of measures often lead to a decline in international competition. When competition drops, so too does the incentive to innovate.
That's the danger for the Republic. A fall in global competition could trigger a slowdown in R&D investment here. This could create a ripple effect, dragging down productivity, increasing costs for Irish firms, and weakening the innovation spillovers we benefit from by being plugged into a competitive, globalised economy.
The State must go in the opposite direction. We need to double down on investment in knowledge, research, and people.
This Government understands what's at stake, it's right there in the programme for government. But in a time of growing economic uncertainty, we need to seize the initiative. Now is the moment to accelerate the delivery of these commitments.
We must ramp up science, technology, engineering, and mathematics participation across further and higher education, provide greater support for PhD and early-career researchers, and build stronger links between academia and industry.
That means formalising postdoctoral pathways, expanding graduate research funding, and sustaining growth through real collaboration.
We should also deepen EU research and innovation partnerships, especially for SMEs, because innovation shouldn't just happen in labs; it should power our entire economy.
This is how we transform our economy.
And while the benefits to the economy are compelling, we shouldn't overlook the personal upside.
PhD graduates enjoy a significant earnings premium, higher employment rates, and a diversity of career options. A recent Higher Education Authority analysis shows that doctoral graduates in the Republic enter the labour market successfully and maintain higher earnings for at least a decade post-graduation. Their skills are in demand both at home and abroad.
Roughly a third of Irish PhD graduates are working overseas seven years after graduation. While that might sound like brain drain, it's actually soft power. These graduates carry Irish research, values, and influence into global institutions.
And when they return, as many do, they enrich our research ecosystem with international experience, ideas, and networks.
It's time we recognised the true value of a doctorate. Not just as a title, but as a tool for building 's future.
Martin Daly is a Fianna Fáil TD for the Roscommon–Galway constituency
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Steve Dempsey: Big Tech bleating about EU AI rules little more than a fear of a basic level of oversight and respect for copyright
Steve Dempsey: Big Tech bleating about EU AI rules little more than a fear of a basic level of oversight and respect for copyright

Irish Independent

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Steve Dempsey: Big Tech bleating about EU AI rules little more than a fear of a basic level of oversight and respect for copyright

At the heart of much of the discussion here is whether the need for AI innovation trumps existing copyright laws. The US sees itself in an AI race with China, while Europe has been more focused on protecting citizens and existing rights. The European Commission recently published implementation guidelines relating to the EU AI act. These include details of legal obligations for the safe use of AI, copyright protections for creators, and transparency rules around how AI models are trained. As Europe has a track record of creating de facto rules for the West around tech legislation, it's worth understanding how these implementation guidelines have been greeted. Last week a consortium that represents rights holders from across the media, music, film & TV, books and publishing and art worlds came out against the AI guidelines. Ironically, there isn't a creative name among the host of acronyms representing the creative industries. There's AEPO-ARTIS, BIEM, CISAC, ECSA, FIM, GESAC, ICMP, IMPALA and more. Their point is clear, though. In an open letter, they claim that the European Commission's official guidance on the copyright and transparency obligations contained in the EU AI Act favours tech companies over creators and copyright owners. Their concern is that the new AI regulations will solely benefit the AI companies that scrape their copyrighted content without permission to build and train models. The letter says: 'We are contending with the seriously detrimental situation of generative AI companies taking our content without authorisation on an industrial scale in order to develop their AI models. Their actions result in illegal commercial gains and unfair competitive advantages for their AI models, services, and products, in violation of European copyright laws.' Big tech, which seems to have more lobbying muscle than coding muscle these days, is not presenting a unified front. Google has said it will sign the EU's AI code of practice but warned that the Act and the Code could make Europe an AI laggard. Kent Walker, president of global affairs and chief legal officer at Google's parent company Alphabet, ominously warned: 'Departures from EU copyright law, steps that slow approvals, or requirements that expose trade secrets could chill European model development and deployment, harming Europe's competitiveness.' OpenAI and the French artificial intelligence company, Mistral are also onboard. And Microsoft will more than likely sign too. But Meta, Facebook's parent company, is against the code. They believe it introduces a number of legal uncertainties for model developers and measures that go beyond the scope of the AI Act. Like Google, they're warning that this will throttle the development and deployment of frontier AI models in Europe, and stunt European companies looking to build businesses on top of them. Facebook knows all about how to use FOMO. And it's working. There's been another open letter, this time from the chief executives of large European companies, including Airbus and BNP Paribas, urging a two-year pause by Brussels and warning that unclear and overlapping regulations were threatening the bloc's competitiveness in the global AI race. With all these talking heads, commercial imperative and AI hype cycle, it's easy to forget what all this hot air is about. The issue here is Article 53 of the AI act that introduces transparency into the heart of general-purpose AI model deployment. This article stipulates that AI providers must create and maintain detailed technical documentation covering the AI model's design, development, training data, evaluation, testing, intended tasks, architecture, licensing and energy metrics. All of this must be available to the EU AI Office and national authorities on request. It also must be available in relation to any other downstream systems that integrate the model in question. Article 53 also ensures model providers adhere to EU copyright law and must publicly publish a detailed summary of the training data used. This aims to shed light on datasets, sources, and potential inclusion of copyrighted material. So really, all this quibbling boils down to a level of transparency, societal oversight and a respect for copyright. It's understandable that technology companies are bristling. China isn't tying itself up in this level of bureaucracy, right? The EU's history with tech regulation, such as the GDPR, have often set up roadblocks for users rather than truly protecting privacy. And there's a significant opportunity cost to complying with this level of oversight. How is big tech supposed to move fast and break things with European technocrats looking over their shoulders? But then again, maybe that's the point. When it comes to a technology that might take all our jobs or wipe us all out – depending on who you talk to – maybe a bit of technocratic oversight isn't a bad thing? We know from recent history what happens if Silicon Valley's needs are put ahead of society's. Perhaps the artists and creators who have warned against favouring big tech capital over copyright aren't just protecting their own livelihoods. They're doing us all a favour.

White House ‘considering inviting Zelensky to Alaska Summit with Trump & Putin' as Europe pushes for ‘alternative plan'
White House ‘considering inviting Zelensky to Alaska Summit with Trump & Putin' as Europe pushes for ‘alternative plan'

The Irish Sun

time7 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

White House ‘considering inviting Zelensky to Alaska Summit with Trump & Putin' as Europe pushes for ‘alternative plan'

THE White House is said to be considering inviting Volodymyr Zelensky to attend Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's Alaska summit. Trump and Putin are set to hold crunch talks over ending the war in Ukraine on Friday with sources close to the US President saying they are "very hopeful" that Ukraine's leader will be included. 5 The White House is said to be considering inviting Volodymyr Zelensky to attend Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's Alaska summit Credit: AFP 5 Russia is continuing to attack Ukraine, including air attacks on Kyiv, as the world pushes for an end to the conflict Credit: AFP 5 Trump and Putin will meet on US soil on Friday to discuss the end of the Ukraine war Credit: AFP 5 One senior administration official told NBC News that a trilateral meeting remains "absolutely" possible. Another official briefed on White House conversations said: "It's being discussed." It is believed that no official invite has been talked about with Kyiv as of yet. A senior White House official explained: "Right now, the White House is focusing on planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin." Zelensky has already been adamant that he must be involved in any peace talks as they directly impact on the future of his country. Speaking overnight, the brave leader said any pact struck without Kyiv's involvement would be "stillborn decisions against peace" and would fail before they even began. "Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace," he said. "They will not achieve anything." His powerful stance has now been echoed by European leaders. Sir Keir Starmer and the leaders of France, Italy, Poland, Finland and the EU all issued a stark warning saying there can be no peace without Ukraine. Putin's fake grandeur WON'T win Ukraine war - here's 5 things that will end it A strongly-worded statement read: "We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests. "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. "We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. "The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. "We are united as Europeans and determined to jointly promote our interests." European officials have also put forward an alternative proposal to help end the war, according to The Wall Street Journal. It comes after reports suggested Washington and Moscow are eyeing a territorial "swap" agreement to end the war. This would see both side concede to losing out ground to each other - a move which Russia would likely view as a triumph. Zelensky is adamant that he will never allow for any territory to be claimed by Moscow due to the illegal conflict. A potential three-way meeting with Zelensky, Trump and Putin would mark the first time the two war leaders have spoken since the conflict. Zelensky has constantly asked to sit down with Putin in person in the past so he can remind the despot of his atrocities to his face. But Putin has signalled reluctance on meeting Zelensky directly. He recently said: "I have nothing against it in general… But certain conditions must be created for this. "But unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions." The US president also dismissed claims that next week's historic summit hinges on a three-way meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky. Asked if Putin needed to meet Zelensky in order to meet him, Trump clarified: "No, he doesn't." Despite that, the White House is preparing for the possible bilateral or trilateral summit. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed: "The White House is working through the details of these potential meetings… details will be provided at the appropriate time."

Tariffs: Some clarity, but still a lot of uncertainty
Tariffs: Some clarity, but still a lot of uncertainty

RTÉ News​

timea day ago

  • RTÉ News​

Tariffs: Some clarity, but still a lot of uncertainty

After months of negotiations, on again-off again tariffs, delayed implementation dates and threatened higher levies, Donald Trump's 15% tariff on most imports from the EU to the US took effect at midnight on Thursday. It means many Irish products being exported to the US now face a tariff of 15% with, so far, very few exemptions. US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced two weeks ago that the US and EU have agreed on a major tariff and trade deal. They announced the 15% rate, but the finer details have yet to be published as trade talks are ongoing, and the EU suspended retaliatory measures. Businesses are now waiting on this joint declaration, a final written trade agreement between the European Union and the United States to be published. Since April a baseline tariff of 10% had been in effect, this has now risen to 15%, better than a threatened 30%, although its still not good for businesses. Exporters and manufacturers in some sectors are still waiting on whether this rate will stick, or if it could change and when. What do we have clarity on? The EU's trade and tariff deal with the US has stabilised on a single 15% tariff rate for most EU exports. This rate applies across most sectors, including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. According to European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen, this 15% is a "clear ceiling" with "no stacking" and is "all-inclusive". "It gives much-needed clarity for our citizens and businesses. This is absolutely crucial," she said. There are certain exemptions to the 15% baseline, where zero-for-zero tariffs on several strategic products have been agreed. This includes all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generics, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials. Where is there uncertainty? The EU is hoping that now that a framework is in place, there will be space to exempt more areas from tariffs in the future, but it's unclear when that might be. Some key elements, of the deal, particularly of interest to Irish exporters, still have to be negotiated. This includes what it will mean for the EU's dairy and spirits sector. On sectoral carve-outs, Tánaiste Simon Harris said the Government "very much wants to see zero-for-zero when it comes to the spirits industry." Approximately 95% of whiskey produced here goes abroad, with the vast majority going to the US. Irish whiskey, Irish cream and Irish drinks are protected under a geographical indication which means they must be made on the island of Ireland, production can't move to avoid a tariff, according to the Irish Whiskey Association Director Eoin Ó Catháin. "Until we see the exact wording of this joint declaration, which is to come from the EU and the US and until we understand exactly what exemptions are included as part of that agreement, we won't know for certain where spirits drinks or the indeed the Irish drinks industry as a whole will fall as part of this agreement," said Mr Ó Catháin. "As long as there's uncertainty, that does cause a lot of difficulties for exporters and for businesses who are hoping to grow." Last year Ireland exported almost €2 billion worth of agri-food produce to the US. So aside from spirits, Dairy and Agri food producers are still waiting for clarity on the potential for 'zero-for-zero' tariffs for certain agricultural products. While the Dairy Industry is highlighting broader implications for a tariff border on the island of Ireland. (see below) Pharmaceuticals which had previously been exempt from the 10% baseline tariff are now subject to the 15% rate. On Tuesday, just nine days after he personally agreed to a 15% EU-US tariffs deal, President Trump said in relation to the pharmaceutical sector this figure relates to "one year, one and a half years maximum". The US President also said "it's (the pharmaceutical tariff) going to go to 150%, and then it's going to go to 250% because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country," before specifically referencing pharmaceutical firms based in China and Ireland. This threat is coupled with uncertainty regarding the outcome of the US Department of Commerce's investigation under s232 of the Trade Expansion Act which is evaluating imports of pharmaceutical products. The EU said the 15% ceiling is clear and "all-inclusive", but there is still a question over the stability of that rate for pharmaceuticals. President Trump also announced a 100% levy on imported chips this week but said it will not apply to companies that are manufacturing in the US or have committed to do so. This means Apple and its 6,000 Irish employees would not be affected, after the tech giant committed to investing an additional $100 billion in its home market in the US. This announcement at the Oval Office was not a formal tariff announcement meaning it's unclear if Ireland and other Irish chip exporters will be impacted. What about tariffs across the island of Ireland? Two weeks since the deal was announced, this remains another area of uncertainty for businesses. Some sectors are calling for clarity on whether exports to the US from Northern Ireland (NI) will be treated differently to exports from the Republic of Ireland (ROI). The tariff for goods from the ROI is 15%, but the UK US trade deal agreed a 10% baseline tariff which applies to NI. Dairy Industry Ireland pointed out that the dairy industry operates on an all-island basis, with integrated supply chains and cross border trade in raw milk, ingredients, and finished products. It said any divergence in these tariffs could create huge issues and added cost for processors and farmers. The UK-US trade deal also contains a commitment to negotiate significantly preferential treatment for UK pharmaceutical products, contingent on the outcome of the s232 investigation, without clarity on a similar commitment for the EU. The difference in rates across the island could create a complicated situation and pose challenges for the post Brexit agreement, the Windsor framework. How have businesses been reacting? Many companies are working together to figure out how to navigate the tariffs, what it will mean for supply chains, increased costs, exploring new markets and avoiding laying people off. The Advanced Technologies in Manufacturing Cluster (ATIM) in the midlands comprises of over 70 members spanning engineering, polymer, food and drink, medical devices, and technology solutions. Some companies have been hit more than others depending on where their main exporting base was, according to ATIM Manager Caitriona Mordan. "I know for example one company within the spirits side, they would have been historically an Irish brand, and they have tried to mitigate against some of those tariffs, even with the 10%, but they have now relocated to the US," said Ms Mordan. She noted that some of the main issues they're actively working on include progressing trade in new markets such as Canada, and other less traditional markets like the Middle East and South America, company restructuring, how to mitigate losses and manage tight margins as well as avoiding having to lay off staff. "Things are certainly slowing down, but I think Irish companies are resilient. They do need financial supports from government as well as those supports for market discovery to new markets as well," explained Ms Mordan. "Mullingar is steeped in Irish owned, indigenous manufacturing companies, which is a rarity. "But if you begin to get that ripple where you're laying people off, it has huge impact on the wider economies that we're trying to really bolster as well, and that's ultimately detrimental. "So, we're really trying to work with them and it's that peer-to-peer piece of how we're supporting each other, how we're tapping into new markets and how they're learning." Neill McDonnell, CEO Irish Small and Medium Enterprises Association said: "Uncertainty is actually the killer of business confidence and business plans." "In an environment where you can't say with a degree of certainty what the cost base on your side and the buyer's side is going to look like in the medium term, it's impossible to borrow money, for example."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store