Malaysian drug mule gets stay of execution in Singapore
Pannir Selvam Pranthaman was arrested in 2014 for having 52 grams of heroin and sentenced to death three years later.
He is due to be hanged on Thursday, making him the fourth person to be put to death in the Southeast Asian country this year after two others were executed for drug-related crimes and one for murder.
Singapore anti-death penalty activist Kirsten Han said the Appeals Court allowed the stay of execution on the grounds that there is an ongoing constitutional challenge by other death row prisoners to a section under the drug law.
Although Pannir is not involved, he has said in his plea the case could potentially impact his conviction.
Another factor for the stay is Pannir's complaint to the Law Society of Singapore against his former lawyer, where he is the main witness, Han said.
The court in its judgement allowed his bid to mount another appeal against his conviction.
"This is a huge relief and very good news, but a stay of execution is not a complete stop," said Han.
"What Singapore needs now is an immediate moratorium on the use of the death penalty, with a view to full abolition. Pannir lives tomorrow, but as Singaporeans we must keep fighting to make sure no one is killed in our names ever again."
On the 6th of February, Amnesty International Malaysia and @ADPANetwork held a press conference to call on the Msian gov't to take immediate & decisive action on behalf of Malaysian national Pannir Selvam Pranthaman, and others who are at risk of execution in Singapore. pic.twitter.com/uYkbZXQ5ec
— Amnesty International Malaysia (@AmnestyMy) February 7, 2025
Singapore's strict laws mandate the death penalty for anyone caught carrying more than 15 grams of heroin and 500 grams of cannabis.
However, critics say the law only targets low-level traffickers and couriers.
Pannir's family, his lawyers and various rights groups noted that the Singapore court had found that he was merely a courier transporting the substance.
The 36-year-old has said he didn't know he was carrying drugs.
Still, the court had to hand down the death sentence after prosecutors refused to issue Pannir a certificate of substantive assistance, vouching that he helped their investigation, which would have spared him the noose, they said.
Malaysian lawmakers called on their government to intervene to halt Pannir's execution and have him extradited to facilitate further investigation.
The Malaysian government, which recently scrapped the mandatory death penalty, didn't respond to media queries.
"We oppose the use of the death penalty on drug mules who are themselves victims in the million-dollar transactions by syndicates that are roaming free," Malaysian lawmaker Ram Karpal Singh was quoted as saying by The Star newspaper.
MEDIA STATEMENTFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEStay of Execution for Pannir Selvam: A Step Towards Compassion and JusticeWe welcome with immense relief the decision by the Singapore High Court to grant a stay of execution for Malaysian citizen Pannir Selvam Pranthaman, who was…
— Yuneswaran Ramaraj (@r_yuneswaran) February 19, 2025
Pannir's last-minute reprieve was hailed by dozens of supporters attending a candlelight vigil at a park in Singapore.
Holding placards and torchlights, they chanted "Justice for Pannir" and "Execution is not the solution."
Dozens others gathered outside the Singapore High Commission in Kuala Lumpur for a similar vigil, singing songs and reading excerpts of poems and letters written by Pannir.
Pannir, the third of six children, is the son of a church pastor who worked as a lorry driver to make ends meet, said another Singapore activist Kokila Annamalai.
He loves music and played in the church band growing up, she said.
In prison, Pannir has penned letters, songs and poems about the anguish of being on death row and hopes of a second chance, she said.
His family has shared some of his songs, which were sung by several Malaysian singers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
DOGE scores win on appeal as court rejects labor union challenge
A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected an effort by a group of labor unions to block President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, from accessing potentially sensitive U.S. user data from several government agencies. Judges on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 to vacate a lower court's preliminary injunction that blocked DOGE from accessing certain user data, citing concerns that DOGE's access would violate federal privacy laws. The ruling is a near-term win for the Trump administration, allowing DOGE to access sensitive user information compiled by the U.S. Department of Education, Treasury Department, and Office of Personnel Management. Unions had sued to block the access earlier this year, citing privacy concerns. The 2-1 appeals court ruling vacates the lower court's preliminary injunction, handed down by U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardma, and remands it back to the lower court to be heard on its merits. The computerized data could include access to Social Security numbers and immigration and citizenship status. The case will continue to be litigated on the merits, but for now it is a legal victory for the Trump administration. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Washington Post
5 hours ago
- Washington Post
How the White House wriggled out of contempt of court
The Trump administration probably defied District Judge James E. Boasberg's order in March when it sent immigrants from U.S. soil to be imprisoned in El Salvador without due process. And the officials responsible will probably get away with it after a Friday appeals court ruling quashed Boasberg's contempt of court inquiry. That might be for the best, because the judiciary would have lost this interbranch battle anyway. But the risk is that the Trump administration is emboldened to defy judicial orders in the future.
New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
Appeals Court Allows DOGE Access to Sensitive Data at Several Agencies
A federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed teams affiliated with the Department of Government Efficiency to gain access to potentially sensitive data on millions of Americans, overruling a lower court that had blocked that access in February. By a 2-1 vote, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted the access to data stored at the Treasury Department, the Education Department and the Office of Personnel Management, citing the Supreme Court's decision in a similar case in June involving Social Security data. The decision cleared the way for teams put in place this year by Elon Musk to reclaim 'high-level I.T. access' to government databases, Judge Julius N. Richardson wrote, over the objections of a number of labor unions who had sued, arguing the move violated federal privacy laws. Writing for the majority, Judge Richardson said the circumstances of the case mirrored those in a lawsuit involving data that the Supreme Court had weighed as an emergency application this year. In an unsigned order in that case, the Supreme Court intervened to allow the DOGE analysts to continue sifting through the records 'in order for those members to do their work.' Besides sensitive financial data linked to Social Security benefits, the government regularly collects other information on residents such as addresses, employer details and related statistics that could be used to identify individual people. The decision on Tuesday also concerned that kind of data, as well as information on student debt stored at the Education Department, which collects personal financial data on more than 40 million borrowers. Judge Richardson, a Trump appointee, and Judge G. Steven Agee, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, formed the majority. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
