Labor in driver's seat as Aussies go to polls
On the penultimate day of campaigning before Saturday's election, public polling has Labor in the driver's seat to form government with an outside shot at retaining majority.
But the prime minister insists the government isn't getting ahead of itself, after being scarred by an upset defeat to Scott Morrison in 2019.
"I don't take the Australian people for granted. I'm working my guts out to ensure there's a majority government," Mr Albanese told reporters in Brisbane on Friday.
With 76 seats needed to form an outright majority, the major parties' tallies have shifted since the last election because of defections to the cross bench and seat redistributions.
Labor holds 78 seats and the coalition 57.
Despite facing dire polling and a surge in early voting, the opposition leader remained confident the coalition could still pick up seats.
Almost 5.7 million people had cast their vote and more than 1.5 million postal ballots were returned by Thursday night, accounting for about 40 percent of eligible voters.
Mr Dutton said he expected "big surprises" on election night.
The election had the hallmarks of 2019, where polling was different to the outcome, he said, claiming candidates had been receiving "pretty remarkable" feedback on pre-poll booths.
Mr Albanese hit Queensland, Victoria and Tasmania on Friday, while Mr Dutton started in South Australia, where the coalition is looking to win Boothby and sandbag Sturt, before heading to Western Australia to target key seats lost in 2022.
Mr Dutton stood alongside Tangney candidate Howard Ong at a 4WD store in Perth, where he again championed his policies to bring down petrol prices.
Labor won the seat with a 2.8 percent margin in 2022, following a 12 percent swing away from the Liberals.
"It's a significant decision for people to make because this is a sliding-doors moment," Mr Dutton said in Perth.
"I have been coming to WA for 25 years and to watch it at different periods where it's been down ... but when it's booming, when it's racing, it is an exciting place, and it will be racing under a government that I lead."
The prime minister started the day on the attack in Mr Dutton's Brisbane-based seat of Dickson, which Labor contends is winnable because of its less than two percent margin but the coalition is confident will be retained.
Greens leader Adam Bandt cast his ballot in his electorate of Melbourne, where he predicted a "renter rebellion" at the election.
Mr Dutton is working to defy history with no party having formed government after one term in opposition since 1931.
The record is set to stay if national polls are to be believed, with the coalition trailing significantly and a seat-by-seat poll released on Thursday by YouGov predicting it could sink to its lowest seat total since the 1940s.
YouGov predicted Labor was on course for 52.9 percent of the national two-party preferred vote, ahead of the coalition on 47.1 percent, with the government picking up 84 seats against the opposition's 47.
Labor's support was slightly less at 51.5 percent to 48.5 percent for the coalition on a two-party preferred basis in the final Freshwater Strategy Poll published by The Australian Financial Review on Friday.
It gave Labor 74 seats and the coalition 64.
The opposition's campaign has been littered with missteps and backtracks amid a lack of policy clarity and comparisons between Mr Dutton and US President Donald Trump.
Despite Labor's increased electoral fortunes, its primary vote hasn't received a major uptick as Australians increasingly look to minor parties and independents.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
14 hours ago
- 1News
Trial begins for first soldier charged with espionage in NZ
The court martial for the first person charged with espionage in New Zealand's history begins today. The Linton-based soldier was taken into military custody more than five years ago and has remained on open arrest at home since. In 2020, 17 charges were laid against the soldier including four counts of espionage and possessing objectionable material. Espionage is communicating information or delivering an object to a country or organisation with the intention to undermine New Zealand's interests. It carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in a military prison. The court said the case was 'of national significance' when closed-door hearings recommenced earlier this year. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including our first ever espionage trial, the end of an era for Cook Strait crossings, and a surprising survival story. (Source: 1News) At a 2021 hearing, the judge issued several suppressions on case details, including the name of the soldier and the country the accused allegedly tried to share information with. Pre-trial hearings were delayed from March 2022 because the court martial's transcript and recording processes did not meet the country's security requirements for classified information. It took nearly a year for specialised recording devices from overseas to be secured and security procedures to be put in place for the hearing on the disclosure application. In 2023, there was also an unsuccessful bid by the accused to have the charges dropped. 1News has previously reported that the accused was allegedly a member of the far-right Dominion Movement and Action Zealandia groups between 2017 and 2019. A court martial is a military court that tries members of the armed forces for violations of military law. It is in many ways similar to jury trials in civilian courts, and a decision on guilt or innocence is made by a judge and panel of military members.
RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
Hawaiian conservationists win legal battle to protect marine sanctuary
Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument is an area spanning more than 1.2 million square kilometers of ocean. Photo: USFWS A court in Hawai'i has tossed a federal directive allowing commercial fishing in protected Pacific waters, in defiance of orders from the White House. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued a notice on April 2025 authorising commercial fishing within the , an area spanning more than 1.2 million square kilometers of ocean. This notice was pursuant to an executive order from US President Donald Trump, titled "Unleashing American Commercial Fishing in the Pacific", that dismantled fishing protections in certain parts of the monument. Since the NMFS letter was issued, commercial fishing operations quickly began in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles around Johnston Atoll, Jarvis Island, and Wake Island. The action was met with a lawsuit backed by campaign group Earthjustice, on behalf of a group of Hawaiian conservation groups. More than four months later, the US District Court in Hawai'i gave them their first victory , voiding the letter and thus the legal right for commercial fishers. The court asserted that the government had not gone through the correct legal processes, and that the public had not been consulted. Among the groups making up the plaintiffs for the case was the Kapa'a community, a group of Native Hawaiian cultural practitioners from the island of Kaua'i. One of their founding members, Solomon Pili Kaho'ohalahala, has been a prominent environmental activist for decades. His community call him "Uncle Sol". He told RNZ Pacific that this was personal. "When [President Trump] made that announcement, he made no provisions for the care and protection of resources for the generations of children that are going to be the ones to inherit this place." "For me personally, that is an insult to our marine cultural protection as indigenous people, that look at the care for generations, to ensure that our children's children's children will have a place to help to take care of them in their time." Seeing this, he approached Earthjustice's David Henkin, a Honolulu-based lawyer who became the lead attorney. Henkin believes that President Trump's use of the Antiquities Act, which is the statute that President Barack Obama originally used to establish the monument, would open the door to the White House crashing any protected marine area they wanted. "If President Trump were to get away with it and undo protections within a monument, this very important tool for protecting important lands and marine waters for future generations would be taken away. "They cannot lawfully destroy the monument and the ecosystems inside of it." Henkin said that when the NMFS directive was issued, fishing vessels flooded in within hours, according to their tracking efforts. "On April the 27th, two days after the letter came out, the first Hawaii-based long line commercial fishing operations started happening in the monument." According to , as of 12 August, fishing vessels have all but vacated the monument expansion area. Kahoʻohalahala said that indigenous rights were falling victim to Trump's rhetorical belief that the United States needs to dominate in all things. "Evidently the colonizer, the United no support for our generational view and protection of resources, and in fact has now tried to say we want to extract everything we can, because we want to be the biggest and the best." "That is unacceptable to me as a native Hawaiian." Earthjustice filed their lawsuit in May, which centred challenging President Trump's authority to dismantle protections under the Antiquities Act. The order effectively usurped the need for such a move to go through Congress, Henkin said. In June, Henkin motioned for summary judgment, or a ruling without trial, to section out and specifically address the NMFS letter. They argued that NMFS had not followed the rules set out in the Magnuson-Stevens Act, requiring public notice and consultation before any changes to fishing regulations. The court granted the motion. In ruling, Judge Micah W.J. Smith said that fishing operations could not lean on that letter as legal protection to fish in the monument. "The letter did not merely suggest that NMFS would decline to enforce its existing regulations banning commercial fishing there. Instead, the letter took the position that those regulations no longer exist." Judge Smith noted that the NMFS relied on Trump's order in place of existing regulations, which was unlawful in its premise. Further, the plaintiffs argued that their cultural rights and interests in the monument, which is steeped in heritage and ecological importance for the Hawaiian people, were harmed. Judge Smith acknowledge that a "procedural injury" had been caused by the NMFS letter and the executive order, as the plaintiffs had cultural, spiritual, and scientific interests in the monument expansion area. Henkin said there is still work to be done. "I'd say it set a very strong and important precedent for the NMFS that they can't cut corners in that way." "The next steps will be to meet with the court - there's a scheduling conference on 6 October, when we'll be talking about what the schedule will be for resolving those Antiquities Act claims and any other claims that may present themselves."
RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
New Australia-Vanuatu deal won't replicate Falepili-style agreement
Senior ministers from Australia and Vanuatu initialled the Nakamal Agreement at the top of Mount Yasur. (ABC News: Lillyrose Welwel) Photo: ABC News / Lillyrose Welwel A Pacific analyst and commentator says it is unlikely that Vanuatu will agree to any exclusive rights in the new security and economic pact with Australia. Senior ministers of both countries, including deputy prime ministers Richard Marles and Johnny Koanapo, initialled the Nakamal Agreement at the summit of Mt Yasur volcano on Tanna Island, ahead of formal sign-off next month. The two nations have agreed to a landmark deal worth AU$500 million that will replace the previous security pact that was scrapped in 2022. Dr Tess Newton Cain from the Griffith Asia Institute says she does not believe Vanuatu will agree to anything similar to what Tuvalu ( Falepili Union ) and Papua New Guinea ( Bilateral Security Agreement ) have agreed to in recent times. She said that the Australian government has been wanting the deal for some time, but has been "progressing quite slowly" because there was "significant pushback" on the Vanuatu side. "Back in 2022, it took people by surprise that there was an announcement made that a security agreement had been signed whilst Senator Penny Wong, Australia's Foreign Minister was in Port Vila. She and then-Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau had signed a security agreement. "On the Australian side, they referred to it as having not been ratified. But essentially it was totally disregarded and thrown out by Vanuatu officials, and not considered to [be a] meaningful agreement." Tess Newton Cain Photo: ResearchGate However, this time around, Newton Cain said, there has been a significant process of negotiation between Vanuatu and Australian officials. "There has been a lot of high-level engagement. We have had a lot of senior Australian officials visiting Vanuatu over the last six months, and possibly for a bit longer. So, it has been a steady process of negotiation." Newton Cain said the text of the agreement has undergone a much more rigourous process, involving input from a wider range of people at the government level. "And in the last few days leading up to the initialling of this agreement, it was brought before the National Security Council in Vanuatu, who discussed it and signed off on it. "Then it went to the Council of Ministers, who also discussed it and made reference to further amendments. So there were some last-minute changes to the text, and then it was initialled." She said that while the agreement has been "substantially agreed", more details on what it actually entails remain scarce. Vanuatu Prime Minister Jotham Napat said earlier this month that he would not sign the agreement unless visa-free travel was agreed. Newton Cain said visa-free travel between the two countries remains a sticking point. "Prime Minister Napat said he hoped Prime Minister Albanese would travel to Port Vila in order to sign this agreement. But we know there is still more work to do - both Australia and Vanuatu [have] indicated that there were still aspects that were not completely aligned yet. "I think it is reasonable to think that this is around text relating to visa-free access to Australia. There is a circle there that is yet to be squared." Australia is Vanuatu's biggest development partner , as well as the biggest provider of foreign direct investment. Its support covers a range of critical sectors such as health, education, security, and infrastructure. According to Newton Cain, from Canberra's point of view, they have concerns that countries like Vanuatu have a "more visible, diversified and stronger" relations with China. "As we have seen in other parts of the region, that has provoked a response from countries like Australia, New Zealand, the United States and others that want to be seen to be offering Vanuatu different options." However, she said it is not surprising that Vanuatu is looking to have a range of conversations with partners that can support the country. "China's relationship has moved more into security areas. There are aspects of policing that China is involved in in Vanuatu, and that this is a bit of a tipping point for countries like Australia and New Zealand. "So these sorts of agreements with Australia [are] part of trying to cement the relationship [and] demonstrate that this relationship is built on lasting foundations and strong ties."
