logo
Major automaker pleads guilty in fraud scheme targeting US customers: 'Will be held criminally accountable'

Major automaker pleads guilty in fraud scheme targeting US customers: 'Will be held criminally accountable'

Yahoo05-04-2025
A subsidiary of Toyota has pleaded guilty to skirting pollution laws and conspiracy to defraud consumers in the United States. The Department of Justice announced that it slapped Hino Motors with a hefty fine, but questions remain about its long-term impact.
On March 19, the DOJ announced it had ordered Hino Motors to serve five years' probation — banning it from importing its diesel engines — as part of a guilty plea after charging the Japanese truck and engine manufacturer with one count of conspiracy to defraud the U.S., to violate the Clean Air Act, to engage in wire fraud, and to smuggle goods into the country.
Hino will also pay more than $1.6 billion in penalties. According to the government, the company submitted false applications for engine certification approvals between 2010 and 2019, conducting improper emissions tests, altering and fabricating data, and failing to disclose software that could impact pollution-control systems.
The company "imported and sold over 105,000 non-conforming engines between 2010 and 2022," per the DOJ. However, Reuters reported Hino falsified emissions data for some of its products as far back as 2003, according to a panel commissioned by the company itself.
"By pleading guilty, Hino Motors, Ltd. has admitted to orchestrating a deliberate and years-long fraud scheme that put profit over principle," James C. Barnacle Jr., acting assistant director of the FBI Criminal Investigative Division, said in a statement.
Hino's business practices not only gave it an unfair advantage over businesses that adhered to U.S. regulations to limit pollution, as explained in the announcement by Adam Gustafson, acting assistant attorney general of the DOJ Environment and Natural Resources Division.
The company's actions also meant buyers likely had skewed perceptions about how much pollution was associated with their purchasing decisions. The misinformation might have set back their sustainability goals without warning, raising questions about the potential long-term impact of the deception on community and environmental health.
Electric vehicles are more eco-friendly than gas-powered vehicles, as they don't spew any tailpipe pollution. However, as the Environmental Protection Agency notes, modern regulations ensure diesel engines are cleaner than they were in years past.
This is particularly important because diesel engines produce ground-level ozone, which can damage crops, and acid rain that can contaminate our waterways and thus enter our food chain. The exhaust is also connected to respiratory problems and heart disease.
According to Reuters, Hino President Satoshi Ogiso said in January that the company reviewed and improved its compliance and oversight practices.
Could America stop using oil and gas by 2050?
For sure
No way
Only certain states could
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
The fact that Hino lost around $1.5 billion in the second quarter to cover litigation costs, along with the hefty fine and lost business in the U.S. during the five-year probationary period, may prove to be a deterrent and push Hino to live up to those promises of improvement.
"Today's plea and sentencing demonstrates that companies who intentionally evade our nation's environmental laws, including by fabricating data to feign compliance with those laws, deserve punishment and will be held criminally accountable," Jeffrey Hall, acting assistant administrator for the EPA Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, said in the DOJ release.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations: source
DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations: source

Fox News

time35 minutes ago

  • Fox News

DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations: source

EXCLUSIVE: Attorney General Pam Bondi directed her staff Monday to act on the criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard related to the alleged conspiracy to tie President Donald Trump to Russia, and the Department of Justice is now opening a grand jury investigation into the matter, Fox News Digital has learned. Bondi ordered an unnamed federal prosecutor to initiate legal proceedings, and the prosecutor is expected to present department evidence to a grand jury to secure a potential indictment, according to a letter from Bondi reviewed by Fox News Digital and a source familiar with the investigation. A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment on the report of an investigation but said Bondi is taking the referrals from Gabbard "very seriously." The spokesperson said Bondi believed there is "clear cause for deep concern" and a need for the next steps. The DOJ confirmed two weeks ago it received a criminal referral from Gabbard. The referral included a memorandum titled "Intelligence Community suppression of intelligence showing 'Russian and criminal actors did not impact' the 2016 presidential election via cyber-attacks on infrastructure" and asked that the DOJ open an investigation. No charges have been brought at this stage against any defendants. A grand jury investigation is needed to secure an indictment against any potential suspects. The revelation that the DOJ is moving forward with a grand jury probe comes after Gabbard declassified intelligence in July that shed new light on the Obama administration's determination that Russia sought to help Trump in the 2016 election. Former President Barack Obama and his intelligence officials promoted a "contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't," Gabbard said during a press briefing of the intelligence. Among the declassified material was a meeting record revealing how Obama requested his deputies prepare an intelligence assessment in December 2016, after Trump had won the election, that detailed the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election." That intelligence assessment stressed that Russia's actions did not affect the outcome of the election but rather were intended to sow distrust in the democratic process. It is unclear who is under investigation and what charges could be in play given statutes of limitations for much of the activity from nearly a decade ago have lapsed. Former Obama intelligence officials, including John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey have drawn scrutiny from Trump officials for their involvement in developing intelligence that undermined Trump's 2016 victory. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations
DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations

Fox News

time35 minutes ago

  • Fox News

DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations

EXCLUSIVE: Attorney General Pam Bondi directed her staff Monday to act on the criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard related to the alleged conspiracy to tie President Donald Trump to Russia, and the Department of Justice is now opening a grand jury investigation into the matter, Fox News Digital has learned. Bondi ordered an unnamed federal prosecutor to initiate legal proceedings, and the prosecutor is expected to present department evidence to a grand jury to secure a potential indictment, according to a letter from Bondi reviewed by Fox News Digital and a source familiar with the investigation. A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment on the report of an investigation but said Bondi is taking the referrals from Gabbard "very seriously." The spokesperson said Bondi believed there is "clear cause for deep concern" and a need for the next steps. The DOJ confirmed two weeks ago it received a criminal referral from Gabbard. The referral included a memorandum titled "Intelligence Community suppression of intelligence showing 'Russian and criminal actors did not impact' the 2016 presidential election via cyber-attacks on infrastructure" and asked that the DOJ open an investigation. No charges have been brought at this stage against any defendants. A grand jury investigation is needed to secure an indictment against any potential suspects. The revelation that the DOJ is moving forward with a grand jury probe comes after Gabbard declassified intelligence in July that shed new light on the Obama administration's determination that Russia sought to help Trump in the 2016 election. Former President Barack Obama and his intelligence officials promoted a "contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't," Gabbard said during a press briefing of the intelligence. Among the declassified material was a meeting record revealing how Obama requested his deputies prepare an intelligence assessment in December 2016, after Trump had won the election, that detailed the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election." That intelligence assessment stressed that Russia's actions did not affect the outcome of the election but rather were intended to sow distrust in the democratic process. It is unclear who is under investigation and what charges could be in play given statutes of limitations for much of the activity from nearly a decade ago have lapsed. Former Obama intelligence officials, including John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey have drawn scrutiny from Trump officials for their involvement in developing intelligence that undermined Trump's 2016 victory. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

DOJ Ends 44-Year-Old Race-Based Consent Hiring Decree
DOJ Ends 44-Year-Old Race-Based Consent Hiring Decree

Epoch Times

timean hour ago

  • Epoch Times

DOJ Ends 44-Year-Old Race-Based Consent Hiring Decree

The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on Aug. 4 that it has ended a decree initiated more than 44 years ago, which imposed across the federal government hiring practices related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) theories. In a court filing on Aug. 1, the DOJ's Civil Rights Division stated that it will eliminate a decree issued under the Luevano v. Ezell case, which was brought by minority job applicants who alleged discrimination in 1979. The decree later came into effect across the federal government in 1981.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store