Proposed Cho Kuk pardon a two-edged sword for Lee
On Thursday afternoon, the Justice Ministry's Pardon Review Committee convened to discuss recommendations for pardons. Former Rebuilding Korea Party leader Cho Kuk and his wife, former Dongyang University professor Chung Kyung-shim, are widely believed to be included on the list.
Cho was convicted of fabricating official documents to help his children's academic careers, as well as illegally interfering in a government audit. Chung was convicted of several charges related to fraudulently helping her children and financial crimes.
The final call now lies with Lee, but reports that the committee had decided to include Cho has already sparked a significant backlash.
Lee is scheduled to review and approve the special pardon list at a Cabinet meeting on Aug. 12. And Lee will announce the beneficiaries of presidential pardon on Aug. 15, National Liberation Day.
South Korean presidents have issued pardons to commemorate important national holidays, such as the Liberation Day celebrating Korea's 1945 independence from Japanese colonial rule, to reward the good behavior of offenders and foster national harmony.
Cho, who served as a senior aide to former President Moon Jae-in and as justice minister in 2019, began his two-year prison term in December after the Supreme Court upheld his conviction on charges of academic fraud involving his children and unlawful interference in a government inspection.
The mooted pardon for the minor progressive party leader is seen as a double-edged sword.
Should Lee decide to pardon Cho, it could boost support from left-leaning voters.
But clemency toward a man who illegally helped his children get university places could also undermine Lee's commitments to fairness in society, potentially sapping the momentum of his administration in its early stages.
Multiple progressive lawmakers and religious leaders, including the Ven. Jinwoo — president of the Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism — publicly called for the pardon of Cho, as they view him as a victim of prosecutorial manipulation.
Rep. Jeon Yong-gi of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea also backed Cho's pardon, explaining that Cho and his family suffered greatly from a political 'witch hunt' led by former President Yoon, who was prosecutor general at the time of the investigation.
With former President Moon also publicly calling for Cho's pardon after a meeting with Woo Sang-ho, senior presidential secretary for political affairs, on Tuesday, a ruling party official reportedly said that unity among the Democratic Party of Korea and Rebuilding Korea Party could be achieved with the pardon.
And Lee could face significant repercussions if Cho is not pardoned.
The anonymous official was quoted by the Korean-language daily Chosun Ilbo as saying that refusing to grant the presidential pardon was likely provoke strong criticism from the ruling party's support base and that this risk could not be ignored.
Split on Cho Pardon
The main opposition People Power Party's interim leader Song Eon-seog expressed his anger at the suggestion of pardoning Cho.
'We are outraged that Cho, who has been widely condemned by the public, was included in the Liberation Day special pardon (list),' Song told the reporters in a press briefing on Thursday.
Rep. Joo Jin-woo of the People Power Party also put pressure on Lee after posting an online message, claiming Lee's administration will be labeled as unjust government if Cho's pardon is approved.
As Cho's convictions include using his influence to receive academic favors for his children, his rumored inclusion on the ministry list sparked outrage among some parents and students, especially Suneung test-takers. Suneung is South Korea's nationwide college entrance exam.
An online post titled 'They're not going to pardon someone involved in academic fraud, right?' uploaded in a local student-based online community Pnmath Mathematic Lab, received multiple comments opposing Cho's pardon.
A poll on the issue suggests the public sentiment does not lean clearly for or against pardoning Cho.
In a three-day poll conducted by local polling company Jowon C&I and media outlet Straight News from Aug. 2 involving 2,018 participants, 48 percent of the people reportedly supported the special pardon for Cho, while 47.6 percent opposed it.
The presidential office, meanwhile, remained tight-lipped about whether Cho would be granted a pardon.
'It is difficult to know until the president makes his final decision. The special pardon list will likely be available when the list is finalized after the Cabinet meeting,' presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said during a press briefing Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea, Japan coordinating Lee-Ishiba Tokyo summit late August: report
The offices of South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba have been coordinating to hold a summit in Tokyo later this month, a Japanese report said Saturday. The meeting is most likely to take place around Aug. 23, Japan's Asahi Shimbun reported, citing multiple government sources. If realized, it would be Lee's first visit to Japan since taking office in early June and would signal the resumption of "shuttle diplomacy" between the two nations' leaders. Lee and Ishiba last met in person on June 17 on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit in Canada, during which they discussed ways to advance bilateral ties and bolster trilateral cooperation with the United States. Lee is also widely expected to visit Washington for his first summit with U.S. President Donald Trump later this month, though the presidential office has yet to announce the schedule. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea again postpones decision on Google's map data transfer request amid US pressure
The South Korean government on Friday delayed its decision on Google's request to export high-precision map data overseas, the transport ministry said, amid pressure from Washington to resolve the issue, calling it a non-tariff barrier. In February, the US tech giant submitted an application to the state-run National Geographic Information Institute under the ministry, seeking approval for the transfer of 1:5,000-scale high-precision map data to its data centers abroad. The review panel extended the deadline for the decision by 60 days during its May meeting, citing the need for further discussions on national security and the potential impact on domestic industries, and was supposed to reach a decision by Monday. But it decided to extend the deadline by another 60 days, according to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. The review panel is composed of officials from major ministries, including the defense, foreign affairs, industry and science ministries, as well as the National Intelligence Service. Officials said the latest decision was made upon Google's request, as the company sought more time to review ways to address national security concerns related to the data exports. But the Seoul government seems to be cautious on the matter, as reaching a conclusion ahead of possible discussions on the matter at a future South Korea–U.S. summit could be sensitive and influence other agenda items to be discussed during the summit. Consultations are under way between Seoul and Washington to set a date for a summit between President Lee Jae Myung and U.S. President Donald Trump. Some reports have said that the summit will likely take place around Aug. 25. Currently, Google provides South Korean maps using publicly available lower-resolution 1:25,000-scale map data combined with aerial and satellite imagery. The United States has cited the issue as a key non-tariff barrier, though it was excluded from the recent tariff agreement between the two nations under which the U.S. imposes a 15 percent tariff on South Korean imports in exchange for South Korea's pledge to invest US$350 billion in the U.S. It was not known if the data transfer issue will be on the table at the upcoming summit. Google previously made similar requests for the transfer of high-precision map data overseas in 2007 and 2016, but Seoul rejected them due to national security concerns, citing the potential exposure of military bases and other sensitive facilities. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul's bid for leniency on binding plastic cuts in UN treaty faces scrutiny
Despite President Lee Jae-myung's pledge to 'de-plastic' by the end of 2025, South Korea is drawing scrutiny for proposing softer language for a key provision in UN-led treaty negotiations aimed at reducing plastic waste. The South Korean government submitted amendments in tandem with Brazil to a draft provision mandating countries to reduce hazardous plastic products during the resumed fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee tasked with finalizing a legally binding international treaty on plastic pollution. The INC-5.2 began Tuesday in Geneva and will continue until Thursday. The second part of the INC-5 was launched as participating country representatives failed to reach a full consensus on what should and should not be included in a binding agreement against plastic pollution during the first INC-5 at Busan in December 2024. The original text, proposed jointly by Switzerland and Mexico, stated that each supporting state 'shall reduce' harmful plastic products with legally binding force. The definition of harmful plastics included plastics that risk leaking into the environment or human bodies, contain chemicals with potential health or environmental impacts, cannot be feasibly recycled or reused at scale or significantly obstruct circular economy efforts. A total of 77 countries — including all 27 EU member states and 14 Pacific Island nations formally backed the proposal, according to the UN Environment Program. However, the proposal submitted by South Korea and Brazil sought to revise the text to a more suggestive tone — requiring parties to 'take appropriate measures to address, manage, reduce or prohibit' harmful plastic products. In the proposal, two countries also suggested taking each country's 'circumstances, capacities and socioeconomic factors' into consideration when determining what constitutes an 'appropriate measure' to counter plastic waste. This is not the first time Seoul has aligned with Brazil in global plastic negotiations. A similar proposal was made during the first INC-5 meeting last year under the previous Yoon Suk Yeol administration. Local climate advocacy groups sharply criticized the Korean government's stance throughout talks held so far at INC-5.2. 'President Lee made de-plasticization one of his core pledges during his presidential campaign and even promised to come up with a roadmap by the end of this year to combat plastic waste. Introducing a watered-down language during the treaty talks goes directly against that commitment,' said Solutions for Our Climate through an official statement issued Friday. Claiming that a legitimate response to the climate crisis is 'fundamental reduction, the group added that 'managing or addressing plastic pollution is not enough.' 'Korea must step up and lead on real solutions, not backtrack,' the group added. In response to mounting criticism, the Ministry of Environment denied claims that Korea was attempting to block plastic reduction efforts. 'We're not opposed to the reduction of harmful plastics,' a ministry official told The Korea Herald. 'From our knowledge, several countries have expressed difficulty in accepting the proposal presented by Switzerland and Mexico in its current form. Korea's intention was to facilitate dialogue by introducing alternative language that could help break the deadlock.'
