GOP rep says she'll refer sanctuary city mayors for criminal prosecution
A Republican congresswoman said she is referring the Democratic sanctuary city mayors who testified before Congress on Wednesday to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., said that the mayors who testified during a House Oversight Committee hearing on sanctuary cities were in violation of Title 8, U.S. Code § 1324, a federal law that makes it illegal to bring in and harbor unauthorized aliens. It also prohibits the unlawful employment of aliens.
"I just referred the sanctuary city mayors to the Department of Justice for CRIMINAL investigations based on evidence from their own comments and policies, proving that they were breaking federal law," Luna wrote on X with a video accompanying her announcement.
"Open borders ideologies hurt people on both sides. If you hold federal office and are breaking the law, you'll be criminally investigated by the DOJ."
Anna Paulina Luna To Lead Task Force On Declassification Of Jfk Assassination Records, Epstein Client List
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Boston Mayor Michelle Wu all defended their respective city's sanctuary policies at the fiery hearing. They defended their communities as welcoming and called on Congress to pass immigration reform.
Read On The Fox News App
Republican members of Congress hammered the mayors for their sanctuary city policies, accusing them of endangering Americans and threatening to prosecute local officials.
Luna told the mayors that their policies were hurting citizens as well as migrants.
Denver Mayor Grilled Over Area's Tren De Aragua Problem As Gop Lawmaker Says Policies To Blame
"I do not think you guys are bad people, but I do think you are ideologically misled," Luna said.
"Which is why, unfortunately, based on your responses, I'm going to be criminally referring you all to the Department of Justice for investigation," she said, holding up copies of the referrals.
"As soon as I leave here, these will be going over to [Attorney General] Pam Bondi."
A congressional criminal referral does not require the DOJ to initiate a prosecution and does not hold as much weight as a referral from an entire chamber.
Republicans, the mayors said, were trying to paint their cities as overrun by criminal immigrants even as crime was falling. The mayors said a key to safety is creating cities where residents feel comfortable reporting crimes and working with police.
Illegal immigration was a key plank of Trump's presidential campaign, and he has repeatedly pressed on the theme since coming to office, including a Tuesday night speech to Congress where he vowed to "complete the largest deportation operation in American history."
Luna, a member of the House Freedom Caucus, also leads the House Oversight Committee's Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, a new task force focused on the declassification of federal secrets – including records related to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and other documents in the public interest.
She has also been pressing the Justice Department for the release of classified records related to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Original article source: GOP rep says she'll refer sanctuary city mayors for criminal prosecution
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
What are stablecoins? Everything to know about the crypto being debated in Congress
Stablecoins are on the verge of going mainstream, analysts say, as a landmark regulatory bill makes its way through Congress. The Senate is deliberating the GENIUS Act, which would provide a framework for regulating stablecoins. The bill last week passed a major procedural hurdle in the Senate after initial resistance from some Democrats. Stablecoins are a type of crypto asset that is tied to the value of another currency, such as the US dollar or gold. They were initially created as a way for crypto investors to store their money but have grown in popularity in recent years for their use in digital payments. The landmark bill would provide a boost of legitimacy to the crypto industry and is another example of how cryptocurrencies have had a major revival under President Donald Trump's second term. Proponents of crypto have welcomed the focus on advancing stablecoin regulations. Yet critics have pointed to the Trump family's ties to the crypto industry: For example, World Liberty Financial, a company tied to the Trump family, has issued its own stablecoin. 'Stablecoins seem (to be) here to stay,' analysts at JPMorgan Chase said in an April note. 'A few years ago, we probably would have debated the accuracy of that sentence. Not today.' While cryptocurrencies are known for being volatile and fluctuating in value, stablecoins are supposed to be, as their name suggests, stable. This is because stablecoins are pegged one-to-one to another asset. They are most often linked to the US dollar, making one stablecoin worth $1. Companies that issue stablecoins hold other assets to back their coins and assure buyers about their value. For example, a company issuing stablecoins pegged to the US dollar could buy and hold high-quality assets like US government bonds. Two of the major stablecoin issuers are Tether, which issues USDT, and Circle, which issues USDC — and both of these stablecoins are pegged one-to-one to the dollar. Tether accounts for 62% of the total stablecoin market, according to analysts at Deutsche Bank. The total market value of stablecoins surged from $20 billion in 2020 to $246 billion in May 2025, according to analysts at Deutsche Bank. Stablecoins emerged in 2014 as way for crypto investors to park their money while buying and selling other more volatile cryptocurrencies like bitcoin. Since then, Stablecoins have ballooned in popularity particularly for their potential use in digital payments, said Darrell Duffie, a professor of finance at Stanford University. Stablecoins, given their stable value, can serve as a medium of exchange and function as a digital currency. The crypto coins have emerged as useful in helping speed up payments. 'Cross-border payments are providing the most exciting new use cases,' Duffie said. 'Making a payment, such as a remittance or a vendor payment to or from an emerging-market country, can now be made faster and at lower cost than a conventional correspondent banking payment.' While stablecoins are significantly less volatile than other crypto coins, they are not without risks. If the assets backing the coin drop in value and the one-to-one peg falls apart, it could cause the equivalent of a bank run, said Duffie. Stablecoins gained notoriety in 2022 when TerraUSD, an obscure type of coin called an algorithmic stablecoin, crashed in value and caused a panic among investors. There are also security risks like people forgetting the pass-code to their crypto wallet. The GENIUS act stands for 'Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025.' Circle would likely benefit from increased regulation more than Tether as Circle is a US-based company while Tether is based in El Salvador, Del Wright, a professor at Louisiana State University Law School who specializes in crypto, told CNN. If the legislation passes, it could usher in mainstream adoption of stablecoins for digital payments and spur growth in the stablecoin industry, said Christian Catalini, founder of the cryptoeconomics lab at MIT. He added that traditional Wall Street firms and startups would also compete to offer stablecoins. Visa (V) in May announced a partnership with Bridge, a stablecoin company owned by fintech startup Stripe, to enable payments using stablecoin in countries across Latin America. 'Stablecoins are on the cusp of mainstream adoption in 2025 as the US pushes forward with landmark legislation,' analysts at Deutsche Bank said in a May note. Despite the resistance in the Senate, 'we still expect progress this year.'
The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
Morning Report — Trump agenda takes on water in sea of red ink
Editor's note: The Hill's Morning Report is our daily newsletter that dives deep into Washington's agenda. To subscribe, click here or fill out the box below. Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here In today's issue: The nation's rising debt, barely more than a talking point in the Capitol in recent years, suddenly poses an ominous risk to President Trump's sprawling legislative agenda. Republican debate in Washington about deficits, debt and lower taxes took a new turn on Wednesday after the Congressional Budget Office released its finding that the mammoth House bill backed by Trump and now pending in the Senate would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over a decade. Some Senate Republicans insist they cannot support a bill that explodes the debt, which currently totals nearly $37 trillion. Others balk at spending reductions that impact Medicaid and food assistance for the poor to pay for GOP-favored tax cuts. Such legislation, if enacted, would raise annual deficits and pile up levels of debt that, on paper, at least, swallow America's economic output and drag down the economy, according to fiscal hawks and Wall Street investors. Nonpartisan budget experts, examining the House-passed version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' have yet to gauge what the Senate has in mind for its own version of legislation this summer. Some Republicans are trying to discredit economists and budget experts who warn that Trump's agenda would inflate the debt by trillions of dollars over nine or 10 years, while others are rattled by the potential election risks of failure to deliver a measure Trump can sign. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) told reporters as he departed a White House meeting among Trump and GOP leaders on Wednesday that assertions the bill would increase deficits are 'absolutely wrong.' The self-imposed Senate legislative deadline is a month away, on July 4, and the clamor to cut federal spending more deeply to trim the long-term budgetary costs of tax cuts shifted lawmakers' conversation on Wednesday to Medicare, a program Trump promised voters he would not touch. 'I won't do it,' he told NBC's 'Meet the Press' in December. Some Senate Republicans make a distinction between cutting benefit payments and what they call Medicare 'waste, fraud and abuse.' Complicating the endeavor is a GOP plan to use a budget reconciliation procedure that relies solely on Republican votes to simultaneously allow up to $4 trillion in borrowing to cover existing U.S. obligations. The Treasury Department wants Congress to raise the debt limit before August or September, but Trump on Wednesday called for the statutory limit to be abolished altogether, throwing in with progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who also wants to revoke it. The president's newest debt ceiling argument: 'It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect.' SMART TAKE with NewsNation's BLAKE BURMAN: With the focus on the White House's tariff talks with China, you might have missed an issue between the two countries that's playing out in our backyards — U.S. land owned by citizens of our adversaries. The Texas Legislature just passed a bill that would prevent Texas land sales to people from certain countries. Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham told me the state took up the issue when a Chinese official purchased property too close to a U.S. military site. 'We realized that that was really a mechanism for destabilizing our grid, causing problems for our bases,' Buckingham told me. Think this concern is bipartisan? Not necessarily. A couple states away in Arizona, Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs just rejected a similar bill. While we watch President Trump deal with Chinese President Xi Jinping, this is a reminder that issues involving China rest in the states, as well. Burman hosts 'The Hill' weeknights, 6p/5c on NewsNation. 3 THINGS TO KNOW TODAY: ▪ Individuals from a dozen targeted countries in the Middle East and Africa are banned from traveling into the U.S. beginning Monday, Trump announced, citing national security concerns amid his immigration crackdown. Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen were listed in Wednesday's order. Travelers from seven other nations face restrictions. The Supreme Court in 2018 upheld an amended Trump travel ban. ▪ The administration is considering a premium service fee of $1,000 to fast-track tourist and nonimmigrant visas to jump to the head of the line. The hitch? Supreme Court precedent. ▪ The Trump administration returned a Guatemalan migrant to the U.S. who was wrongly flown to Mexico. And separately, deported Venezuelan migrants held in a Salvadoran megaprison must be allowed to contest U.S. assertions they are gang members, a U.S. federal judge ruled on Wednesday. LEADING THE DAY © Associated Press | J. Scott Applewhite MEDICAID CUTS: Senate Republicans on Wednesday discussed the need to cut out 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Medicare to achieve more deficit reduction in Trump's landmark bill to extend the 2017 tax cuts, provide new tax relief, secure the border and boost defense spending. The House-passed bill would cut more than $800 billion from Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, but some GOP lawmakers argue that other mandatory spending programs, such as Medicare, should also be reviewed for 'waste' to further reduce the cost of the bill. 'There's a legitimate debate about, 'Can we do more with Medicaid? Are we doing too much with Medicaid? How much waste, fraud and abuse is there in Medicare? Why don't we go after that?' I think we should,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said after meeting with colleagues to discuss changes to the House-passed bill. 'Some people are afraid of the topics. I'm not. In my view, this is our moment as Republicans in control of all three branches and we ought to be going after more fiscal responsibility.' Talk of cuts comes after Trump campaigned that he would not 'cut one penny' from Medicare, which currently benefits 68.2 million people 65 and older, but the White House has tried to argue that going after 'waste, fraud and abuse' is not the same as cutting benefits. Members of the Senate Finance Committee — including Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) — met with Trump at the White House on Wednesday to discuss the budget bill. Thune said his colleagues are moving 'in the same direction' and agree 'failure is not an option.' Meanwhile, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), a harsh critic of the bill, said Wednesday that the legislation needs to be overhauled and won't get through the Senate by Trump's July 4 deadline. 'It won't happen,' Johnson said of Trump's goal. SALT: Senate Republicans held a special conference meeting this afternoon to hash out their disagreements over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Senate conservatives, led by Johnson, will use the session as an opportunity to demand deeper spending cuts. The big problem, however, is that they have yet to agree on what deficit reduction measures need to be added. An obvious target is the deal the Speaker struck with blue state Republicans to raise the state and local tax deduction, or SALT, cap. The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports there's growing momentum in the Senate GOP conference to roll Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) and other members of the SALT Caucus. The Hill: House Republicans warn Senate not to touch the SALT deal. MUSK'S DIGS: Republicans perceive a threat as they push Trump's megabill: Musk — who contributed hundreds of millions of dollars in 2024 to bolster GOP political fortunes — is now a prominent critic of the president's centerpiece second-term legislation. The tensions press Republican lawmakers to toggle between Trump's instructions and debt-focused critiques of the endeavor by the world's richest man, who claims his own public following. Musk, who recently departed the administration with Trump's good wishes, rubbed a number of senior administration officials the wrong way with his criticism of the bill, which he dubbed an 'abomination.' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Wednesday that Trump is 'not delighted' with Musk's shift to oppose the megabill. 'He's not delighted that Elon did a 180 on that,' Johnson said. The Wall Street Journal: Musk's attacks on Trump's tax bill are fraying his relationship with the president. WHERE AND WHEN ZOOM IN © Associated Press | Carolyn Kaster TRANSGENDER TROOPS: Transgender active-duty service members must decide whether to leave the military on their own or be forced out by June 6 under a Pentagon policy announced last month by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a life-altering decision that trans troops interviewed by The Hill's Brooke Migdon said felt nearly impossible to make. 'It's crushing,' said Cmdr. Emily Shilling, who has served in the Navy for almost two decades. 'It's heartbreaking.' CBS News: This Army document outlines plans for expelling transgender troops from the military. MALE VOTERS: Democrats are increasingly frustrated by their party's approach to luring back men who supported Trump in November's election. In more than a dozen interviews with The Hill's Amie Parnes, Democrats griped that while it's still early, they have been underwhelmed by the initial efforts of their party to understand what went wrong and how they can rebuild. 'We have to refocus the party on what it once was and the reason I joined it 30 years ago which was because it was the party of the working class and working families,' said Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha, who served as a senior adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) during his 2020 presidential campaign. 'When you're not talking about the working family, you're never going to get these men back.' 🚨HIGHER ED: The Education Department on Wednesday said Columbia University in New York appears to have failed to meet an accreditation standard by violating federal antidiscrimination law, which puts it at risk of losing federal student loans and Pell Grants. The Education Department's Office for Civil Rights and the Department of Health and Human Services's (HHS) Office for Civil Rights 'determined that Columbia University acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students, thereby violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,' according to a department statement. The university in April conceded to a $400 million deal with the administration to try to dodge additional discord focused on last year's student protests on campus about the war in Gaza, described by the administration as antisemitic. 📚 HARVARD: Trump wants to prevent Harvard University's international students from entering the country, he said in a Wednesday proclamation. Trump urged Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider revoking current visas for Harvard's international students, who make up nearly a quarter of enrollment. Stay or go? Trump has aggressively sought to punish Harvard after it publicly refused several of his administration's demands, with the White House targeting the school's federal funding and launching a slew of investigations, writes The Hill's Lexi Lonas Cochran. Two students interviewed by The Hill say Harvard should do more to make international scholars feel safe on campus, pointing out that some of those involved have gotten crucial information from the media or court filings instead of from administration communication. 💉 HHS TURNSTILE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lost the co-leader of a working group on Tuesday when pediatric infectious disease expert Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos resigned as co-leader that advises outside experts on COVID-19 vaccines. Her departure from the agency came a week after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a long-time vaccine skeptic, said the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women had been removed from the CDC's recommended immunization schedule. 🔬Health research grants cancellation tracker: The New York Times compiled a list of the thousands of research grants ended or delayed by the Trump administration to date, actions that erased $1.6 billion in support for research on Alzheimer's disease, cancer, substance abuse and many other diseases and conditions. The changes impact public institutions across the country, including in red states that backed Trump in the 2024 election. ELSEWHERE © Associated Press | Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik UKRAINE: Trump said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin plans to retaliate against Kyiv for drone strikes that targeted Moscow's strategic bomber fleet. Following a call with Putin, Trump said on social media that the two leaders had a good conversation, 'but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' The call comes as Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky traded accusations just days after heavy strikes by both sides — as well as a second round of peace talks on Monday, during which a truce remained far out of reach. Ukraine's audacious drone attack on Russian warplanes has shown Kyiv has a few cards up its sleeve to combat Moscow's aggression, even as Trump pressures hard concessions to achieve a ceasefire. But it's not yet clear whether Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb achieved new leverage with Trump, who views the country as on the brink of defeat. ▪ The Wall Street Journal: The U.S. is redirecting critical antidrone technology from Ukraine to U.S. forces. ▪ NBC News: Satellite images of destroyed and damaged military aircraft on Russian bases have provided fresh detail into Ukraine's unprecedented drone attack. ▪ The Washington Post: A drone strike devastated Russia's air force. The U.S. is vulnerable to unconventional, asymmetric warfare, too. GAZA: The Israeli military announced roads leading to Gaza's aid distribution centers were considered 'combat zones' Wednesday, shortly after the controversial organization tasked with running the sites announced they would close for the day. Meanwhile, the Israeli military launched strikes on weapons belonging to the Syrian government in southern Syria, hours after two projectiles were fired from Syria into the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. ▪ NBC News: Israeli forces have recovered the bodies of two hostages with dual Israeli-U.S. citizenship, Judith Weinstein-Haggai and Gad Haggai. ▪ CNN: The U.S. on Wednesday vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution demanding an immediate and permanent Gaza ceasefire because it was not linked to the release of hostages or disarming Hamas. ▪ Reuters: What could happen if Israel's parliament votes on dissolution next week? OPINION ■ A $4.5 trillion tax increase, or not? by The Wall Street Journal editorial board. ■ The GOP budget courts disaster, and for what? by Mark Mellman, opinion contributor, The Hill. THE CLOSER © Associated Press | Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Maxwell Orlosky, U.S. Navy Take Our Morning Report Quiz And finally … It's Thursday, which means it's time for this week's Morning Report Quiz! Alert to the Pentagon's proposal to change the names of some Navy ships, we're eager for some smart guesses about White House renaming policies. Be sure to email your responses to asimendinger@ and kkarisch@ — please add 'Quiz' to your subject line. Winners who submit correct answers will enjoy some richly deserved newsletter fame on Friday. Hegseth ordered one Navy ship to be renamed, and the Pentagon is 'considering renaming multiple naval ships named after civil rights leaders and prominent American voices.' Which ships are on the lists? Trump made waves in the first few days of his second term when he renamed which body of water the Gulf of America? Trump wants North America's tallest peak, Denali, to revert to its prior name, which honored what president? Trump proposed — and then the White House said the suggestion was abandoned — renaming Veterans Day, observed on Nov. 11, as what? Stay Engaged We want to hear from you! Email: Alexis Simendinger (asimendinger@ and Kristina Karisch (kkarisch@ Follow us on social platform X: (@asimendinger and @kristinakarisch) and suggest this newsletter to friends.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump asks Congress to make (some of) DOGE's illegal cuts legal
President Donald Trump sent Congress a memo Tuesday night asking lawmakers to sign off on his administration's demand for roughly $9.4 billion in immediate spending cuts. If Congress passes that rescissions package, funding to NPR, PBS and a slew of foreign aid programs would be officially slashed. If this idea sounds familiar, it's because Trump is asking Congress to take back money for programs that he and Elon Musk have illegally refused to spend. The request is a nod to the way things are supposed to work under the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, a law that makes it clear that the president has no authority to unilaterally withhold, or 'impound,' money the legislature has appropriated. Thus, the request itself is a tacit admission from the Trump administration that its refusal to spend money Congress has appropriated is against the law. If an administration doesn't want to spend money that has been budgeted, a 1974 law requires the White House to submit what boils down to a request for Congress to take its money back. Only after both chambers approve would the budget authority granted to specific departments and agencies be rescinded. Congress now has 45 days to pass the package before it expires and the administration is once again legally required to spend that money. In the memo passed on to Congress, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought laid out 22 specific cuts to be made. The largest single item in Vought's request would fully eliminate $1.07 billion allocated over the next two fiscal years to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The CPB, as those of us who grew up watching 'Sesame Street' know, is the biggest source of funding for many PBS stations. Trump signed an executive order to slash the CPB's funding last month, but NPR and PBS have called the order unconstitutional and sued to have it overturned. But the bulk of the requested cuts are focused on drawing down funding to various international projects the Trump administration has decided 'do not align with an America First foreign policy agenda.' They apparently include such controversial concepts as promoting democracy ($83 million rescinded from the Democracy Fund), helping children ($437 million in contributions to UNICEF and other United Nations programs terminated), fighting HIV/AIDS ($400 million cut from programs like the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR), and saving lives after natural disasters ($496 million withdrawn from the International Disaster Assistance account). Among the smaller but pettier cuts requested is $125 million of the U.S. Agency of International Development's operating budget. It has been months since the Department of Government Oversight de facto shuttered USAID, which Musk famously boasted had been fed 'into the woodchipper,' with most of its contracts illegally cut and its employees fired. Many of those laid-off employees are also suing the administration for circumventing Congress in trying to shut down an agency Congress established by law. As with many things budget-related, several things are true at once here. On the one hand, the money that would be clawed back would undoubtedly have major, catastrophic impacts on the work it's funding. On the other, the $9 billion package is a drop in the bucket compared to the $2 trillion in savings that Musk originally promised to find with DOGE and a drop in the ocean compared to the annual $6.8 trillion federal budget. Getting the package through Congress would require only Republican votes, but that doesn't mean it will succeed. There has historically been little appetite from Congress for rescission requests; many lawmakers are aware of the political risk that comes with publicly voting to cut specific programs, especially popular ones. As Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, recently noted to reporters, 'there hasn't been a successful rescission package in many, many years.' But Musk has been unhappy with the lack of enthusiasm from Congress for codifying DOGE's cuts. The Tesla CEO, who just left his quasi-official government role, slammed the House's megabill as a 'pork-filled ... abomination.' Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he called Musk to talk to him about the bill but got no answer. Even if congressional Republicans balk at the relatively small package, Vought has a backup plan: keep breaking the law. The OMB director recently appeared on CNN not only to say this was 'the first of many rescission bills,' but also to insist that impoundment remains on the table. He also echoed a truly absurd claim from his former think tank that as long as you illegally withhold money within the 45-day window before a fiscal year ends, you can do an end-run around Congress. To repeat, in presenting congressional Republicans with the chance to place a veneer of legality on DOGE's actions, the White House is tacitly admitting that the power of the purse still lies in Congress' hands. But Vought's attitude makes it clear this is a 'heads I win, tails you lose' proposition. If Congress doesn't go along with its rescission package, the Trump administration will simply continue to do as it has done and usurp the power of appropriation for itself. The sad thing is there are surely plenty of GOP lawmakers who, to avoid risking difficult votes, are willing to surrender their awesome power. This article was originally published on
