logo
Bob Jones Trail wins final, critical approval from state — clearing way for construction

Bob Jones Trail wins final, critical approval from state — clearing way for construction

Yahoo22-03-2025
After a long and bumpy road, the missing link of the Bob Jones Trail received its last required approval on Friday, setting the stage for construction to finally start next year.
The trail's redesigned connection was approved by the California Transportation Commission, guaranteeing the $48 million project will keep its state funding.
Efforts to close a 4.5-mile gap in the path, connecting San Luis Obispo to the sea at Avila Beach, have been in the works for over a decade.
The project has been stalled due to funding issues and opposition from property owners with land along the planned pathway.
'There are many reasons we have not given up on the Bob Jones Trail,' public safety being one of the biggest, SLO County Supervisor Dawn Ortiz-Legg said at the commission meeting.
On Friday, all of that patience and perseverance paid off when the state transportation commission voted unanimously to approve the decision.
With all the approvals and funding in place, construction can begin next year.
'Now the work really begins,' Ortiz-Legg told The Tribune.
Three items relating to the Bob Jones Trail came before of the Transportation Commission on Friday — two brought forward by SLO County, and one by the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments.
The county asked for both approval of the new Bob Jones Trail alignment — which was redesigned to avoid property owned by Ray Bunnell, a SLO County rancher who opposed the project going through his land — and approval for its plan to build the trail in segments.
SLOCOG asked the commission to allocate $5.7 million in State Transportation Improvement Program funds for the project.
All items required approval in order for the county to keep its $18 million state Active Transportation Program grant, which was necessary to keep the project alive.
All three items passed unanimously.
'It's such a huge hurdle,' county Public Works Department project manager Aaron Yonker told The Tribune. The decision 'advances this worthwhile and community-based project ... to create a safe, multi-modal access for all users,' he said.
Nerves were high leading into Friday's meeting.
SLO County Public Works staff waited to hear the result of their hard work, and SLO County residents in attendance — either in person or online — spoke passionately in support of the project.
'It has been a long time coming that we've been working on this project,' one SLO County resident and mother said during public comment. 'This trail segment is essential for full inclusion of people with disabilities.'
Her daughter, now a freshman in high school, has been waiting for the trail to be built since she was just a girl, her mother said.
Even though its been years since the project began, 'it's still so important,' she told her mother, she said.
California Sen. John Laird also expressed his support in a letter submitted to the commission.
Brian Manning, a legal representative, spoke at the meeting on behalf of Bunnell, who has been in negotiations with the county over his public safety concerns with the trail's current design.
'I want to be clear: He is not an opponent to the project, never has been,' Manning said of his client. Bunnell only opposed the trail interacting with his own property, the lawyer said.
Manning said it was 'not entirely accurate' to represent the trail as being fully separated from traffic, as the county had.
He pointed to a 600-foot stretch near the south end of Clover Ridge Lane, a dead-end road that runs next to Bunnell's property, where the bike path would share the road with drivers.
However, the county said the entire trail will function effectively as a fully separated trail, despite the sections shared with the road.
Though Bunnell and his agricultural tenant who lease his land say they use the road end daily, the county holds that it is a low traffic road with no through traffic.
'It is important to note that there is no vehicular throughput provided on this section of the road due to the road being a dead end road,' Yonker told The Tribune. 'As a result there is almost zero vehicular traffic on that southerly section.'
Manning, cut off by the time limit, ended his comment with a request that approval be contingent on the addition of safety features requested by Bunnell, such as security fences along his property.
The Bob Jones Trail was redesigned in October to avoid Bunnell's property after efforts to acquire his land failed.
The new design will reroute onto a strip of Caltrans-owned land next to Highway 101 for a stretch between Clover Ridge Lane — near Bunnell's property — and Ontario Road, county civil engineer John Waddell previously told The Tribune.
Caltrans originally committed to paying for construction on the land, but after it pulled out, the SLO Council of Governments allocated $7.8 million of its state transportation funds to cover the gap.
The bookends on either end of the Caltrans corridor will be built in two phases.
Phase one will complete the northern end from the Octagon Barn to Clover Ridge Lane using the rest of the $18 million ATP grant. Construction is expected to begin in 2026.
Construction on phase two, which will finish the southern bookend from the Caltrans right-of-way to the Ontario Road staging area, will likely start in 2027-28. It will be paid for with the $9.6 million in contributions from the council of governments and the county's $5 million.
To keep trail users safe along the highway segment, Caltrans will likely install a protective barrier between the highway and the path, built 10 to 12 feet away from the roadway, Waddell said.
At current levels, the project will cost $48 million in total, SLO County Public Works Director previously told The Tribune.
'We're finally going to have something that we've been working for for so many years,' Supervisor Ortiz-Legg said. 'It feels really good to keep the promises that were made to the community.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AT&T salaries revealed: How much the telecom giant pays designers, software engineers, and other tech workers
AT&T salaries revealed: How much the telecom giant pays designers, software engineers, and other tech workers

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

AT&T salaries revealed: How much the telecom giant pays designers, software engineers, and other tech workers

AT&T is hiring hundreds of tech workers as it overhauls its network for the age of fiber and 5G. For example, a software engineer can make a base salary of $207,000, per filings. Work visa data shows how much the telecom giant pays for roles in software, data, and networking. AT&T helped shape the modern telecommunications industry — now it has to reinvent itself. "It's kind of a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, honestly, or at least once-in-a-career opportunity to be able to rebuild networks like that," the company's technology chief, Jeremy Legg, said Monday at a KeyBanc tech conference. For more than a century, AT&T built and maintained a vast network of copper wires and dedicated switches that carried voice and data across the us. But that legacy infrastructure is no longer suited to 21st-century demands for speed and mobility that are better served by fiber optic networks and wireless spectrum. AT&T is now running enough fiber each month to reach from New York to Los Angeles, Legg said. The new network architecture is less hands-on and instead involves software-based solutions that are more centrally managed, like remotely administered computers, devices, or cloud servers. "If we're going to be competitive in the markets of the future, we have to change the infrastructure that we have today," he said. Salary data shows how much AT&T is paying some of the employees behind its tech transformation. Company filings with the US Department of Labor show AT&T sought to hire 345 workers through the US H-1B visa program in the first half of this reporting year, largely in software development, IT, and network engineering. That number is up from about 266 for the same period last year and well above 69 from two years ago. By comparison, Walmart looked to hire around 1,750 workers H-1B program this year. Business Insider analyzed how much money companies from Apple to Walmart are paying for tech jobs and other roles. Explore salary data from America's biggest employers. This publicly available work visa data — which companies are required to disclose — only refers to foreign hires and doesn't include equity or other benefits that employees may receive in addition to their base pay. Still, the reported pay rates are benchmarked against industry averages for US workers. That can shed light not just on how much employees earn in certain roles, but where a company is looking to grow. AT&T lists nearly 1,700 open jobs on its careers website as of August 14, with 360 openings in US-based corporate and technology roles. All of those are full-time in-office positions, with about half based in Texas or Georgia. Most of the positions listed in the H-1B data are in Dallas-area offices, while about 15% of the jobs are in the Atlanta area. Here's a deeper look at some of the roles: Software engineers can earn as much as $207,000 a year Senior Software Engineer: $132,700 to $158,000 Lead Software Engineer: $143,800 to $185,000 Lead System Engineer: $139,750 to $180,000 Principal Software Engineer: $167,098 to $207,425 Big data and AI engineers can make around $197,000 a year Senior Data/AI Engineer: $138,699 Lead Data/AI Engineer: $145,447 to $162,932 Principal Data/AI Engineer: $163,737 to $197,464 Senior IT project managers make upward of $124,000 a year Senior Tech Product Manager: $124,689 to $156,000 Lead Tech Product Manager: $143,800 to $155,432 Principal Tech Product Manager: $162,839 to $200,000 Network architects can make $102,000 or more a year Senior Specialist Wireless Translations: $102,325 Senior Network Technology Support: $116,251 Principal Solution Architect: $162,617 Data scientists and analysts can make over $208,000 annually Senior Data Analyst: $134,322 Senior Data Scientist: $148,043 Lead Data Analyst: $130,714 to $145,010 Lead Data Scientist: $171,600 to $190,660 Associate Director - Data Science: $208,600 Directors can earn as much as $275,000 a year Associate Director - Tech Product Management: $198,950 Associate Director Data Science: $199,771 Associate Director - Technology II: $211,000 Associate Director - Data Science: $221,652 Director Engineering eCommerce: $275,000 Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Letters: Corporations follow talent, not taxes
Letters: Corporations follow talent, not taxes

Chicago Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Letters: Corporations follow talent, not taxes

The Tribune's recent editorial about corporations leaving Chicago due to high taxation misses the mark when it comes to explaining company motives for locating in or leaving Chicago ('Brandon Johnson and friends think it's 'a privilege to do business in Chicago.' Wrong,' Aug. 7). Let's look at some of the examples: Boeing moved to Washington, D.C. to be closer to the Pentagon (its primary customer) and the Federal Aviation Administration (its regulator) as well as seeking engineering talent. Citadel leader Ken Griffin cited rising crime in the city as the primary reason for the company's departure. (Since the departure, this administration's investments in violence prevention, youth jobs and mental health programs have produced one of the lowest crime rates of major cities). Caterpillar (actually headquartered in Deerfield) was attracted to the luxury lifestyle in suburban Irving, Texas where 'a lot of celebrities live, and there are also a lot of gated communities that C-suite level executives find attractive.' In this same time period, Google greatly expanded its Chicago workforce, purchasing the Thompson Center, Kellogg moved a division to Chicago, and Abbott moved 450 jobs to Willis Towers. In all, 111 firms expanded or relocated to Chicago in 2022. So what brings, and keeps jobs in this city? Our people and our infrastructure. Quality of life that people feel and can afford. Things like reductions in crime when we invest in violence prevention, stability when residents are able to access affordable housing, improved well being through access to mental health care from city clinics, investments in small businesses that make our neighborhoods thriving. Being a world class talent hub. Having such a diverse array of colleges, universities and ongoing education that brings people into this city and invests in their growth. Building unrivaled logistics and infrastructure. This infrastructure makes Chicago a logistical powerhouse, critical for businesses that rely on supply chains and global connectivity. We can't do these things without this city investing in its people and its infrastructure. With groceries and rent prices through the roof, and the federal government folding in front of our eyes, everyday Chicagoans cannot afford an even higher cost of living from increased property taxes — the foregone conclusion without asking more from businesses. Taxing large corporations to support investments in quality of life for Chicagoans makes life better for you, me and the talent that businesses hope to Donald Trump named Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni as head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, replacing Erika McEntarfer, whose last jobs report was unfavorable to Trump and got her fired. The only surprising thing about this was the immediate panning of the appointment by a number of conservative economists on the basis that Antoni was not a competent economist, that he would be in over his head in this position. Interesting, but beside the point. Antoni was not appointed for his economic credentials. The real reason was noted by other — again, conservative — economists. For example, Stan Verger, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute stated that Antoni's work at Heritage has included errors that 'bias his findings in the same partisan direction'. Dave Hebert, an economist at the American Institute for Economic Research stated that 'I've been on several programs with him at this point and have been impressed by two things: his inability to understand basic economics and the speed with which he's gone MAGA.' Economist Justin Wolfers said that he is a '1,200%, 1,300%, maybe 1,400% in-the-tank Trumper, with few credentials beyond a long history of misrepresenting or misunderstanding basic economic statistics.' If Antoni is confirmed by the Senate, the analysis of him by conservative economists and the history of Trump appointees tells us that the next jobs report will show not only a marked improvement in August, and that the July report will be revised from negative to positive. That is the point of his nomination. Results seems Jed Hoyer is more concerned about the Cubs of 2032 than this year's ballclub. For those of us who remember the Cub's 1945 World Series appearance, and more importantly, the team's dramatic victory in the 2016 Series, maybe just maybe, we should remind Hoyer that there's nothing like the present to ring up a 2025 World Series championship. There's where his focus should be; otherwise he might not be around much longer to worry about op-ed ''Made in America' is alive, well and misunderstood' (Aug. 14) presented a good argument for entrepreneurship and the amount of patents that are issued in the United States. But, the notion that universities are responsible for the issuances of these patents is statistically true, but overlooks the number of ideas brought to life by the end users in the field. Not noted in this article are the advances made years ago in manufacturing by the workers on the line seeing better and more efficient ways to produce products. Relying on universities is fine; if you have ever assembled a product with instructions written by these university minds you may have a change of heart. Assembly instructions written by the users are more easily understood and straightforward as they are the ones using the product and are more familiar with it than a university mind. Products are made overseas because the labor rate is substantially lower than American labor and as Americans we want the best of everything but do not expect to pay high prices. Automobiles may be assembled in America but approximately 40% of the parts are made overseas. Nippon has purchased United States Steel with the promise of maintaining union jobs in the new facility. Reviewing history, the likelihood is the antiquated blast furnaces and systems in place will be demolished and replaced with modern technology involving robotics or they will simply be demolished to eliminate competition. With respect to universities, the costs have become prohibitively expensive and there are thousands of American kids who would love to go to school and contribute but unfortunately cannot afford the high cost. Coupled with a college education oftentimes not providing a large enough advantage in the job market, we are producing a generation who tread water and live in their parents' basements. As a kid growing up in the 1960s we always looked at the tag on clothing to make sure the item was made in America. It made a difference then because the manufacturing techniques in foreign countries produced an inferior product. Today? If we had to rely on 'made in America' we would have bare shelves in our closets and we would be wearing hand me downs that are 'made in America' of course. Along with the 'made in America' label was a strong sense of pride. Pride in workmanship. Pride of place. Pride in our schooling. Pride in government. As we are now scratching to remain competitive in a global economy, perhaps dismounting our high horse, rolling up our sleeves and getting down in the dirt and working will reinvigorate the pride we once had. Then we can focus on patents and making goods in America.

AT&T salaries revealed: How much the telecom giant pays designers, software engineers, and other tech workers
AT&T salaries revealed: How much the telecom giant pays designers, software engineers, and other tech workers

Business Insider

time2 days ago

  • Business Insider

AT&T salaries revealed: How much the telecom giant pays designers, software engineers, and other tech workers

AT&T is hiring hundreds of tech workers as it overhauls its network for the age of fiber and 5G. For example, a software engineer can make a base salary of $207,000, per filings. Work visa data shows how much the telecom giant pays for roles in software, data, and networking. AT&T helped shape the modern telecommunications industry — now it has to reinvent itself. "It's kind of a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, honestly, or at least once-in-a-career opportunity to be able to rebuild networks like that," the company's technology chief, Jeremy Legg, said Monday at a KeyBanc tech conference. For more than a century, AT&T built and maintained a vast network of copper wires and dedicated switches that carried voice and data across the us. But that legacy infrastructure is no longer suited to 21st-century demands for speed and mobility that are better served by fiber optic networks and wireless spectrum. AT&T is now running enough fiber each month to reach from New York to Los Angeles, Legg said. The new network architecture is less hands-on and instead involves software-based solutions that are more centrally managed, like remotely administered computers, devices, or cloud servers. "If we're going to be competitive in the markets of the future, we have to change the infrastructure that we have today," he said. Salary data shows how much AT&T is paying some of the employees behind its tech transformation. Company filings with the US Department of Labor show AT&T sought to hire 345 workers through the US H-1B visa program in the first half of this reporting year, largely in software development, IT, and network engineering. That number is up from about 266 for the same period last year and well above 69 from two years ago. By comparison, Walmart looked to hire around 1,750 workers H-1B program this year. Business Insider analyzed how much money companies from Apple to Walmart are paying for tech jobs and other roles. Explore salary data from America's biggest employers. This publicly available work visa data — which companies are required to disclose — only refers to foreign hires and doesn't include equity or other benefits that employees may receive in addition to their base pay. Still, the reported pay rates are benchmarked against industry averages for US workers. That can shed light not just on how much employees earn in certain roles, but where a company is looking to grow. AT&T lists nearly 1,700 open jobs on its careers website as of August 14, with 360 openings in US-based corporate and technology roles. All of those are full-time in-office positions, with about half based in Texas or Georgia. Most of the positions listed in the H-1B data are in Dallas-area offices, while about 15% of the jobs are in the Atlanta area. Here's a deeper look at some of the roles: Software engineers can earn as much as $207,000 a year Senior Software Engineer: $132,700 to $158,000 Lead Software Engineer: $143,800 to $185,000 Principal Software Engineer: $167,098 to $207,425 Big data and AI engineers can make around $197,000 a year Senior Data/AI Engineer: $138,699 Senior IT project managers make upward of $124,000 a year Senior Tech Product Manager: $124,689 to $156,000 Lead Tech Product Manager: $143,800 to $155,432 Principal Tech Product Manager: $162,839 to $200,000 Network architects can make $102,000 or more a year Senior Specialist Wireless Translations: $102,325 Senior Network Technology Support: $116,251 Principal Solution Architect: $162,617 Data scientists and analysts can make over $208,000 annually Senior Data Analyst: $134,322 Senior Data Scientist: $148,043 Lead Data Analyst: $130,714 to $145,010 Lead Data Scientist: $171,600 to $190,660 Associate Director - Data Science: $208,600 Directors can earn as much as $275,000 a year Associate Director - Tech Product Management: $198,950 Associate Director Data Science: $199,771 Associate Director - Technology II: $211,000 Associate Director - Data Science: $221,652

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store