logo
MP urges Government to protect live music venues from new neighbours' complaints

MP urges Government to protect live music venues from new neighbours' complaints

Yahoo2 days ago

Housebuilders should face having their plans blocked if they fail to protect live music venues, an MP has suggested.
Dame Caroline Dinenage has proposed letting decision-makers take into account existing properties, when they grant or refuse permission for new projects.
The Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee chairwoman warned that 'live music's in crisis, the Government needs to be listening' as she proposed a new clause to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill.
Dame Caroline, the Conservative MP for Gosport, told the Commons: 'It isn't about venues versus developers.
'It's about making sure we have a balance right between building enough good homes and making sure the places we're building keep the things that make life worth living.
'In Westminster and our constituencies, everyone agrees that our high streets have been in decline, so it's vitally important that we protect the places that are special to us, our constituents and our communities, the places that provide a platform for our creators and our world-beating creative industries where we can make memories, celebrate and have fun.'
Dame Caroline called on the Government to let town halls and ministers rule on plans 'subject to such conditions that would promote the integration of the proposed development of land with any existing use of land, including such conditions as may be necessary to mitigate the impact of noise on the proposed development'.
A similar principle already exists in national planning rules, known as the National Planning Policy Framework, to ease pressure on existing businesses which 'should not have unreasonable restrictions placed on them as a result' of newer builds.
But the Music Venue Trust's annual report last year warned that, in 2023, 22.4% of venues closed as a result of 'operational issues', compared with 42.1% of its members reporting 'financial issues'.
The Trust identified noise abatement orders or other neighbour disputes as being among the issues which have resulted in permanent closures.
'Consistent application of the 'agent of change' principles will de-risk and speed up planning and development,' Dame Caroline told MPs, and added that her proposal was 'good for venues' and 'good for developers and new neighbours'.
She said the law change could help authorities stop 'expensive and often pointless bun fights' when neighbours complain about noise.
She continued: 'It'll make sure the needs of an existing cultural venue are considered from the start and it will save developers from late-stage objections and lengthy expensive legal disputes down the line.'
Dame Caroline said music venues 'are the foundation of our world-beating creative industries and also very important for our local communities', and that they had been placed 'under threat, including from our disruptive planning system and our onerous licensing regime'.
The Commons select committee recommended last year that the 'agent of change' principle should be put on a statutory footing, to protect grassroots music venues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves takes gamble on patience in an era of impatience
Reeves takes gamble on patience in an era of impatience

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Reeves takes gamble on patience in an era of impatience

The hours, days, weeks and even months after a Spending Review can feel like peeling away the layers of an onion. First, there is the speech from the chancellor in the Commons: the political rhetoric and the numbers often designed to sound big but which are often incomprehensible. Then there are accompanying documents - in this instance in particular a blue-covered, 128-page tome crammed with words, numbers and graphs. The work of months, much of it conducted privately with intermittent blasts of authorised and unauthorised briefing, talking up and grumbling, then suddenly bursts out in public demanding digestion. But that takes time. And as the detail is pored over, elements that were not put up in lights by the chancellor become clearer. A good example is the expectation many, many people in England and Wales will be paying higher council tax to help fund the police - something not set out explicitly by Rachel Reeves at the dispatch box. More details on what is planned are expected in the coming weeks - with the government's infrastructure plans due to be set out shortly. But other elements could take much longer to play out: for example, an obscure budget in a particular department that was culled, only for an outcry in six months time. Or, conversely, a budget that hasn't been culled but is later determined to be a waste of money. Seven ways the Spending Review affects you Winners and losers: Who got what in the review? What has the chancellor has announced? The key points Watch: Where the money is being spent The government is seeking to badge this moment as a turning point. The prime minister told the Cabinet and has now written in the Guardian that "this week we bettered a new stage in the mission for national renewal. Last autumn we fixed the foundations. Today we showed Britain we will rebuild." Let's see. The curiosity here is the standard critique of political leaders is turned on its head with much of this Spending Review. So often the grumble is one of short-termism, the quick win, the lack of strategic long term thought. And yet the gamble the government has taken is a willingness for patience in an era of impatience. Long term, so called capital spending, can - the argument goes - transform the public realm and in so doing transform economic potential. But it doesn't happen quickly and day-to-day spending is limited, even cut in places. And this at a time of volatile politics and a restlessness among an electorate, many of whom feel squeezed and have done for years and years. The Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged to me there was an impatience for change - the very thing Labour promised - and pointed to an expansion of entitlement to free school meals and breakfast clubs in England, for instance. The big bet though remains on economic growth - finding it and sustaining it. The lack of it is the shackle on so much within government and beyond: the national mood, taxes, you name it. And yes the prospect of more tax rises in the autumn will hang in the air all summer. But the big test of this Spending Review is the contribution it can make to delivering growth - and when. Key points at a glance from the Spending Review Reeves boosts NHS and housing as some budgets squeezed

National Park Service adds more projects to NEPA exclusion list
National Park Service adds more projects to NEPA exclusion list

E&E News

time44 minutes ago

  • E&E News

National Park Service adds more projects to NEPA exclusion list

Completing a job initiated by the Biden administration, the National Park Service on Wednesday announced 33 types of projects that will no longer require the most extensive environmental reviews. The so-called categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act are designed to speed work on projects deemed not to have significant environmental impacts. 'The Department of the Interior is focused on streamlining government processes that have slowed progress for too long,' Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. 'These reforms will help the National Park Service act more efficiently while continuing to uphold environmental standards.' Advertisement NPS cited examples that include infrastructure upgrades, communications improvements, rights-of-way authorizations, cultural and natural resource management, recreation access and emergency response efforts.

New Zealand's Willis Criticizes RBNZ Handling of Orr Resignation
New Zealand's Willis Criticizes RBNZ Handling of Orr Resignation

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

New Zealand's Willis Criticizes RBNZ Handling of Orr Resignation

New Zealand Finance Minister Nicola Willis has criticized the Reserve Bank for its handling of former governor Adrian Orr's resignation, saying it should have been more transparent about his reason for quitting. 'It's my expectation that all government agencies comply with their statutory obligations and wherever possible are open and transparent with New Zealanders,' Willis told reporters on Thursday. 'Of course they need to balance that against their legal obligations when it comes to employment discussions and agreements, but on this one I think they could have pulled their socks up.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store