Is this tick season going to be America's worst yet? Here's what to know
But, is it the worst ever?
University of Rhode Island entomologist Dr. Thomas 'The TickGuy' Mathers told The Independent that it's too early to call it but the numbers are looking worrying — he's received more submissions of nymphal blacklegged ticks, which carry Lyme disease, to the university's TickSpotters platform so far this month than the weekly average for the same period over the last decade.
'I don't know the answer just yet, if it's a trend going up – but I suspect it is, just based on the number of nymphal blacklegged ticks I've seen in the past couple of weeks,' he explained.
Mathers noted that federal data shows emergency room visits related to ticks are up this year, with visits nearly doubling from 70 in April, to 131 in May.
Other researchers who also count ticks are noticing a significant jump in specimens.
Dr. Saravanan Thangamani, a professor at New York's SUNY Upstate Medical University who runs the Upstate Tick Testing Laboratory, has warned that more ticks are being sent to the lab than at the same time last year, marking a 217 percent increase.
'Based on the trend in tick submission I have observed thus far, I expect a tick season that is worse than the previous years,' he cautioned.
But, Rutgers University professor and entomologist Dina Fonseca is not ready to make that call quite yet. She's a part of the submission project called New Jersey Ticks 4 Science!
She said people say it's the worst year for ticks every year, noting there's no standardized tick surveillance. They're seeing more submissions, as well, but they don't know if it's just because more people are reporting them.
'Frankly, we don't have enough data over time to be able to say, 'Is it a worse year than normal or a better year than normal?' We don't know,' explained Fonseca.
Whatever the case may be, the heightened activity between June and July leaves Americans exposed to 90 species of ticks and the diseases they can carry. Although ticks are on both coasts, they're largely found in the eastern U.S. Some, like brown dog ticks and blacklegged ticks, are located more widely.
Not being prepared for ticks while doing outside activities and camping could carry a death sentence — although that's an extremely rare outcome.
People bitten by ticks may be exposed to Powassan virus, Babesiosis, Anaplasmosis, Tularemia, Lyme disease, and other pathogens that can cause human disease. People can be affected by multiple diseases at once.
The nymphal blacklegged ticks are the ones Fonseca says people really need to worry about, as they can be infected with four different disease agents. That includes Lyme disease, which may lead to facial paralysis and irregular heartbeat if untreated.
Although larger than larval ticks, nymphal ticks are only the size of a poppy seed. They may be hard to spot – even for people who are aware of their region's ticks and where they live.
'Look at the bowtie of Lincoln on a penny; that's the size of a nymphal blacklegged tick, Fonseca said.
While it's easy to miss ticks, it can take about two days for any transmission to occur after a bite. People who find ticks on their skin should remove them with tweezers as soon as possible. Those who develop a rash or fever after removal should consult a doctor.
As far as prevention goes, knowledge is power. Reducing exposure is the best way to avoid negative health outcomes. Mather advises that people follow what he calls the 'three Ts.' Wear tight clothing, tuck in shirts and pants legs, and wear clothes treated with 0.5 percent permethrin repellent.
'If you don't apply repellent, they can be ruthless,' Fonseca said, recalling a time when she picked 30-to-40 ticks out of her hair. Mathers remembers a trip to Fire Island that resulted in the exposure to 'literally hundreds' of fast-crawling ticks.
Unfortunately, with a changing climate comes additional chances to pick up the blood-sucking hitchhikers. With a warmer atmosphere comes a wetter world, and parasites thrive in those conditions, and ticks have been observed moving north. Southern aridity is their enemy.
'One of the easiest ways to kill a tick is to dry the heck out of them,' said Fonseca.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


TechCrunch
a minute ago
- TechCrunch
NASA has sparked a race to develop the data pipeline to Mars
For decades, NASA built and flew its own relay orbiters and spacecraft to ferry valuable data back to Earth. Now, the agency is shifting to buying connectivity as a service, much like it does for launch and astronaut transport. That pivot has sparked a race, with major contenders pitching ways to keep Mars missions online. What's at stake isn't a single contract: it's the data pipe to Mars. This new approach, which will mix NASA assets and commercial infrastructure, would gradually replace the patchwork relay network the agency relies on today. Generally, that works by orbiters like Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and MAVEN that pickup data from rovers and landers, and transmit it to the Deep Space Network's (DSN) giant antennas on Earth. NASA's relay spacecraft are still healthy, but they were never meant to be a permanent backbone. The agency's latest senior review on planetary missions calls out MAVEN's critical role as a relay and provides steps to keep it available into the early 2030s. But eventually, this hardware will decay. At the same time, NASA's Space Communications and Navigation (SCaN) program, which manages the DSN, is looking for solutions to augment these aging assets. The aim, according to an RFP released in July and due today, is to create an interoperable marketplace where NASA can be one of many customers instead of the owner-operator. The current request is specifically for capability studies, not immediate hardware buys. The ask is two-fold: a 'lunar trunkline' between the Moon and Earth, and end-to-end Mars communications that move data from assets on the surface, through Mars orbit, and to operations centers on Earth. It's a formidable challenge. Any architecture must contend with the vast distance between Earth and the Moon and Mars, long latency, periodic solar interference and Earth visibility windows, and high requirements for fault-tolerant systems. That's why NASA is asking for plans, to gauge how industry might solve these puzzles, rather than immediately jumping to procurement. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW While TechCrunch can't confirm which companies are submitting concept proposals, a handful have already staked their place in the race. Blue Origin just unveiled a Mars Telecommunications Orbiter built on its Blue Ring platform, pitched as maneuverable, high-performance spacecraft to support NASA missions to Mars as soon as 2028. Rocket Lab has touted its own Mars telecom orbiter concept, which the company says is a core element of its proposed architecture for the Mars Sample Return campaign. In 2024, NASA's Mars Exploration Program separately funded 12 short commercial services studies, including a trio of studies for next-gen relay services, to SpaceX, Lockheed Martin, and Blue Origin. SpaceX's proposal to 'adapt Earth-orbit communication satellites for Mars' will likely be derived from its Starlink internet satellite constellation. The long-term goal is to transform the agency's planetary exploration agenda from pure-science missions to a permanent human presence on the moon and, eventually, Mars.


Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
Fei-Fei Li Challenges Silicon Valley's Obsession With AGI
Dr. Fei‑Fei Li sees AI not as a runaway superintelligent force but as a partner in human potential. Speaking with CNN's Matt Egan at the Ai4 conference in Las Vegas, she sketched a future where learning, spatial reasoning, and immersive digital worlds grow together. Empathy, curiosity, and responsibility, she said, should be the drivers. That's a very different tone from Geoffrey Hinton, who told the same audience just a day prior that our survival might one day depend on giving AI something like a mother's protective instinct. Li's focus stays on human decision-making, not on machines 'caring' for us. Reframing the Discussion of Superintelligence For Dr. Li, the quest for the superintelligent machine, or AGI, is not really separate from the concept of AI. She explained, 'I don't know the difference between the word AGI and AI. Because when Alan Turing and John McCarthy and Marvin Minsky, the founding fathers and thinkers of AI, when they dared humanity with this possibilities of machines that they can do, in my opinion, they didn't say that machines that think narrowly and non-generally. They literally just had the biggest imagination." To Li, AI isn't a race or a looming contest of strength. It's another step in building systems that work alongside people and protect the things we value. Hinton, in contrast, warns that machines could surpass human intelligence within a couple of decades and that keeping control will be nearly impossible. His proposal is to design them with an ingrained sense of care, modeled on a parent's concern for a child. However, Li doesn't think safety comes from simulating affection. For her, the safer path is to build strong oversight, good design, and values that put people first. Hinton often frames the challenge in terms of survival: keeping a powerful AI from harming or leaving us behind. Li puts her energy into making sure it improves the spaces we live and work in. Her concern is less about keeping pace with an adversary, more about shaping a collaborator. Hinton is less certain that human control will be possible at all if AI reaches superintelligence. That's why he argues for programming in care instincts from the start. Li's answer is to shape an AI's goals early, through design, oversight, and a clear sense of its role in serving people. Education as a Living Conversation Li reframed AI's role in education as an extension of the Socratic method, urging educators and parents to champion curiosity over shortcuts. Li talks about AI in classrooms the way some teachers talk about Socrates: a tool for asking questions that make you think harder. She wants students encouraged to probe and explore, not to lean on AI for quick answers. 'Prompting' in her view should be the start of an investigation, not the end of it. She pushes back against the reflexive link between AI and academic dishonesty. Too much energy, she says, goes into banning and blocking, and not enough into asking how the technology could make people better learners. Clear-Eyed About the Risks Li's optimism doesn't mean blind faith. She worries about AI being used to spread false information, the disruption of jobs, the huge amounts of energy needed to train the biggest models, and the risk that only a few benefit from gains in productivity. She doesn't think those outcomes are inevitable. They're problems to be solved starting with how we set goals, who gets to decide them, and how they're carried out. In her view, it's not enough to 'teach' AI to care. What matters is aligning its purpose with strong governance, fair access, and uses that make life better for people. That means designing from the ground up with those aims in mind. Through her startup World Labs, Li is working on what she calls 'spatial intelligence', which is AI that understands and creates three-dimensional spaces. The uses range from surgical teams working with greater precision to far-flung families celebrating together in virtual rooms. These aren't just fantasy backdrops. They're designed to improve real-world life by blending the physical and the digital in ways that feel natural. For Li, the point of technology is to give people more control over their own choices. AI, she says, should make decisions more transparent, not less. She believes everyone should keep their dignity and their right to question what they're told. Li talks about AI as a piece of global infrastructure, something that could change how we learn, create, and connect. She wants the story of this century to include the ways AI helped expand creativity, rethink education, and keep people at the center of the story, not just the ways we avoided catastrophe. Her vision casts AI as a partner in curiosity and progress, not as a ruler. It's aimed at building immersive worlds, richer conversations in classrooms, and tools that fit into human lives with respect for our choices. Dr. Li and Hinton have known each other for decades. She would agree with him on one point: intelligence, human and machine, will grow. Where they part ways is in the plan for that future. He would give AI the instincts of a caregiver. She would anchor it in the creativity, care, and shared purpose that humans bring. And she keeps coming back to the same idea: we decide how to live in the world we're building.


CNET
a minute ago
- CNET
Top 100 Channels on Live TV Streaming Services: A Look at YouTube TV, Hulu Live and More
Want to switch from being a cable customer to a cord-cutter? It doesn't need to be a stressful process, but a little research is needed. As TV costs increase, there are plenty of alternatives you can consider, like live TV streaming services or skinny bundles. Cord-free live services come with perks like a broad mix of channels, DVR and no long-term commitments. You can stream sports and more, and these services offer wider channel options than antennas but also let you watch on your laptop or phone. Choosing a service can be tricky because of pricing and regional sports networks, but there are six main platforms to consider (we're not including smaller ones): Sling TV, DirecTV, YouTube TV, Hulu Plus Live TV, Fubo and Philo. It really boils down to the channels, right? We've looked at who carries the top 100 channels in their main lineups to help you decide which one could be the best for your household. Read more: Best Sports Streaming Service for 2025 The Big Chart: Top 100 channels compared (updated Aug. 2025) The main difference between the services is their channel selection. All of them offer different lineups of channels for various prices. Below, you'll find a chart that shows the top 100 channels across all six services. Note that not every service has a worthy 100. There are actually seven listed because Sling TV has two "base" tiers, Orange and Blue. And if you're wondering, I chose which "top" channels made the cut. Sorry, AXS TV, Discovery Life, GSN and Universal HD. DirecTV offers signature cord-free packages and its basic plan starts at $90 a month with fees and no promotional rates. YouTube TV, Sling, Fubo and Hulu Plus Live TV's plans all cost more now, affecting the value of these services based on their channel lineups. Don't forget Fubo's big loss of Warner Bros. Discovery channels such as Animal Planet, Cartoon Network, Discovery Channel, Food Network, HGTV, Magnolia Network OWN and TLC, which may make it less appealing. However, there are numerous live TV streaming choices available. Sling TV's basic monthly packages are $46 in most cities and Philo offers a small roster but packages AMC Plus access with it. But costs continue to go up and those changes are reflected in the chart below where applicable. Some more stuff to know about the chart: Yes = The channel is available on the cheapest pricing tier. That price is listed next to the service's name. = The channel is available on the cheapest pricing tier. That price is listed next to the service's name. No = The channel isn't available at all on that service. = The channel isn't available at all on that service. $ = The channel is available for an extra fee, either a la carte or as part of a more expensive package or add-on. = The channel is available for an extra fee, either a la carte or as part of a more expensive package or add-on. Regional sports networks -- local channels devoted to showing regular-season games of particular pro baseball, basketball and hockey teams -- are not listed. DirecTV's $130 tier MySports package for $70 and Xfinity's sports and news offering. MySports package for $70 and Xfinity's sports and news offering. Local ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC, MyNetworkTV and The CW networks are not available in every city. Because the availability of these channels varies, you'll want to check the service's website to verify that it carries your local network. Local PBS stations are only currently available on DirecTV, Hulu Live and YouTube TV. Again, you'll want to check local availability. Sling Blue subscribers Sling's site to see which local channels are available in your area. Sling's site to see which local channels are available in your area. Fubo subscribers may find that the ACC Network and SEC Network are included with their package at no extra cost. Check availability for your state. The chart columns are arranged in order of price, so if you can't see everything you want, try scrolling right. Overwhelmed? An easier-to-understand Google Spreadsheet is here. Philo vs. Sling TV vs. Fubo vs. YouTube TV vs. DirecTV vs. Hulu: Top 100 channels compared Channel Philo ($28) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) YouTube TV ($83) Hulu with Live TV ($83) Fubo ($85) DirecTV ($90) Total channels: 42 24 35 78 75 46 55 ABC No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes CBS No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fox No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NBC No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes PBS No No No Yes Yes No Yes CW No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes (limited) MyNetworkTV No No No Yes Yes No Yes Channel Philo ($28) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) YouTube TV ($83) Hulu with Live TV ($83) Fubo ($85) DirecTV ($90) A&E Yes Yes Yes No Yes No $ ACC Network No $ No Yes Yes Yes $ Accuweather Yes No No No No Yes Yes AMC Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Animal Planet Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes BBC America Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes BBC World News Yes $ $ Yes No No $ BET Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Big Ten Network No No $ Yes Yes Yes $ Bloomberg TV No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Boomerang No $ $ No $ No Yes Bravo No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Channel Philo ($28) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) YouTube TV ($83) Hulu with Live TV ($83) Fubo ($85) DirecTV ($90) Cartoon Network No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes CBS Sports Network No No No Yes Yes Yes $ Cheddar Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Cinemax No No No $ $ No $ CMT Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes CNBC No No $ Yes Yes Yes Yes CNN No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Comedy Central Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cooking Channel Yes $ $ No $ $ $ Destination America Yes $ $ No $ $ $ Discovery Channel Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Disney Channel No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Disney Junior No $ No Yes Yes Yes Yes Disney XD No $ No Yes Yes Yes Yes E! No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ESPN No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes ESPN 2 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes ESPNEWS No $ No Yes Yes $ $ ESPNU No $ No Yes Yes $ $ Channel Philo ($28) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) YouTube TV ($83) Hulu with Live TV ($83) Fubo ($85) DirecTV ($90) Food Network Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Fox Business No No $ Yes Yes Yes Yes Fox News No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes FS1 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes FS2 No No $ Yes Yes Yes $ Freeform No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes FX No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes FX Movies No No $ Yes Yes $ $ FXX No No $ Yes Yes Yes Yes FYI Yes $ $ No Yes No $ Golf Channel No No $ Yes Yes Yes $ Hallmark Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes HBO/Max No No No $ $ No $ HGTV Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes History Yes Yes Yes No Yes No $ HLN No $ Yes Yes Yes No Yes IFC Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Investigation Discovery Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Lifetime Yes Yes Yes No Yes No $ Lifetime Movie Network Yes $ $ No Yes No $ Channel Philo ($28) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) YouTube TV ($83) Hulu with Live TV ($83) FuboTV ($85) DirecTV ($90) Magnolia Network Yes $ $ Yes Yes No $ MGM+ $ $ $ $ No No $ MLB Network No $ $ No Yes $ $ Motor Trend Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes MSNBC No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes MTV Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes MTV2 Yes $ $ Yes $ $ Yes National Geographic No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Nat Geo Wild No No $ Yes Yes $ $ NBA TV No $ $ Yes No $ $ NFL Network No No Yes Yes Yes Yes $ NFL Red Zone No No $ $ $ $ No NHL Network No $ $ No No $ $ Nickelodeon Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Nick Jr. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes $ Nicktoons Yes $ $ Yes $ $ $ OWN Yes No No Yes Yes No $ Oxygen No No $ Yes Yes Yes $ Paramount Network Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes Science Yes $ $ No $ $ $ Channel Philo ($28) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) YouTube TV ($83) Hulu with Live TV ($83) FuboTV ($85) DirecTV ($90) SEC Network No $ No Yes Yes $ $ Showtime No $ $ $ $ $ $ Smithsonian Yes No No Yes Yes Yes $ Starz $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Sundance TV Yes $ $ Yes No No Yes Syfy No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Tastemade Yes $ $ Yes No Yes $ TBS No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes TCM No $ $ Yes Yes No $ TeenNick Yes $ $ Yes $ $ Yes Telemundo No No No Yes Yes Yes $ Tennis Channel No $ $ No No $ $ TLC Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes TNT No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Travel Channel Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No $ TruTV No $ Yes Yes Yes No $ TV Land Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes USA Network No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes VH1 Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes Vice Yes Yes Yes No Yes No $ WE tv Yes $ $ Yes No No Yes Channel Philo ($28) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) YouTube TV ($83) Hulu with Live TV ($83) FuboTV ($85) DirecTV ($90) James Martin/CNET YouTube TV With an excellent channel selection, easy-to-use interface and best-in-class cloud DVR, the $83 per month YouTube TV is one of the best cable TV replacements. It offers a 4K upgrade add-on for an additional price, but the downside is there isn't much to watch at present unless you watch select channels. If you don't mind paying a bit more than the Sling TVs of the world, or want to watch live NBA games, YouTube TV offers a high standard of live TV streaming. Read our YouTube TV review. See at YouTube TV Sarah Tew/CNET Sling TV If you want to save a little money and don't mind missing out on local channels, Sling TV is the best of the budget services. Its Orange and Blue packages start at $46 per month, and you can combine them for a monthly rate of $61 ($66 in some regions). The Orange option nets you one stream, while Blue gives you three. It's not as comprehensive or as easy to navigate as YouTube, but with a bit of work, including adding an antenna or an AirTV 2 DVR, it's an unbeatable value. We'll also add that the service offers local channels such as ABC and CBS in some regions where the monthly rate is $51. Read our Sling TV review. See at Sling TV Sarah Tew/CNET DirecTV DirecTV's base signature streaming package costs more than all the other platforms on this list and its stiffest competition is still Hulu Plus Live TV and YouTube TV. With its channel selection, it's ideal for sports fans who want to watch local or national games. The service does have its pluses, though -- for example, it includes the flipper-friendly ability to swipe left and right to change channels. Additionally, it includes some channels that some other services can't, including nearly 250 PBS stations nationwide. The $90 Entertainment with sports package may suit your needs with its 75-plus channels. But for cord-cutters who want to follow their local NBA or MLB team, DirecTV's pricier Choice package is a more robust live TV streaming pick because it has access to more regional sports networks than the competition. Nonetheless, you'll want to make sure your channel is included here and not available on one of our preferred picks before you pony up. Read our DirecTV streaming service review. See at Directv Ty Pendlebury/CNET Fubo There's a lot to like about Fubo -- it offers a wide selection of channels and its sports focus makes it especially attractive to soccer fans or NBA, NHL and MLB fans who live in an area served by one of Fubo's RSNs. It's also a great choice for NFL fans because it's one of three services, alongside YouTube TV and Hulu, that offer NFL Network and optional RedZone. As of February 2025, Fubo is charging more for its service and access to Bally Sports RSNs. The biggest hole in Fubo's lineup is the lack of Warner Bros. Discovery networks, including Cartoon Network, CNN, Food Network, HGTV, TBS and TNT -- especially as the latter two carry a lot of sports content, in particular MLB, NBA and NHL. Those missing channels, and the $85 price tag for the base plan, make it less attractive than YouTube TV for most viewers. Read our Fubo review. See at Fubo