Margot Robbie and Tom Ackerley Look Loved-Up on Balcony in Italy
The actor and her producer husband were spotted in Naples Friday ... with Margot sipping on what looks like water -- and Tom drinking in Margot's beauty, wrapping his arms around her midriff and giving her a peck on her head.
Margot's looking elegant in a flower ensemble that shows off her long legs ... while Ackerley's keeping it casual in a loose-fitting button-down and a very nice watch.
The two are enjoying a European vacation ... 'cause they were just in London a couple of days ago -- where MR was spotted walking through a restaurant.
It's another break for the star -- who welcomed her first child into the world last year -- and who has kept busy with a couple new projects recently, including "Wuthering Heights" and "A Big Bold Beautiful Journey."
Both movies -- the former based on the famed 19th-century novel of the same name and the latter featuring Colin Farrell and Phoebe Waller-Bridge -- are in post-production, according to MR's IMDb.
Margot's back to saying a quick "arrivederci" to the film industry, it seems ... keeping busy with her better half instead!
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vogue
13 minutes ago
- Vogue
The Highly Collectible Book Valentino, A Grand Italian Epic Has Been Reissued—Giancarlo Giammetti Takes Us Through Its Pages
Couture. Spring-Summer 1969. Ample white organdy tunic embellished with five volants. Audrey Hepburn. Photo Vogue Italia, 1969. © Gian Paolo Barbieri They are indeed. In the hilarious, affectionate tease of a poem Meryl Streep wrote for an award she gave the designer, she lovingly chides Mr. Garavani for claiming he won't dress girls from 'streep malls.' 'But my feelings weren't hurt in the least,' she says. And in an essay recalling an advertising campaign he shot for the designer in 1985, the eternal waspish wit Rupert Everett, writes, 'Valentino's eyes were pale and profound, and surveyed us from inside his physical form like a lady in purdah regards the world through a crack in the palace wall.' (The actor recalls he behaved like a diva on set, and was subsequently barred from a glam, A-List gathering in Gstaad, but was eventually warmly welcomed back into the Valentino fold.) And then there are the oral histories from friends—other designers, aristocrats of both European and Hollywood lineage, models, muses, and cultural types—like these bon mots from author Amy Fine Collins, who wryly observes: 'It is nearly as hard to envision fashion without the house of Valentino as it is difficult to picture the Vatican without the Pope.' The book is in part structured via decades of the designer's life and work, so there is plenty of amazing fashion in here: The all-white collection of 1968, which every designer at the house of Valentino since the founder's departure has riffed on; red dress after red dress, one more spectacular than the other; and decades worth of haute couture, rephotographed in forensic detail, the better to see the craftsmanship. (As Hamish Bowles points out, what set Valentino's couture apart was that as much work went into the clothes actually worn by the house's clients as were on its runways.) What makes the book sing is the running of contemporary interviews and reviews which contextualize the fashion: the verbatim transcript of a lunch conversation with Valentino at Warhol's Factory in the 1970s: 'Why do you talk to him? He's not the star,' Valentino says at one point when attention turns away from him. Or from that same decade, a price-by-price breakdown comparing the cost of Valentino couture and the ready-to-wear, courtesy of The Miami Herald.
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: Will Cain, Dr Drew Pinsky discuss claim Biden was on Ambien during disastrous debate
Link Lauren joins the show to break down why Prince Harry & Meghan Markle Netflix deal will not be renewed.
WIRED
13 minutes ago
- WIRED
A Premium Luggage Service's Web Bugs Exposed the Travel Plans of Every User—Including Diplomats
Jul 24, 2025 12:00 PM Security flaws in Airportr, a premium door-to-door luggage service used by 10 airlines, let hackers access user data and even gain privileges that would have let them redirect or steal luggage. Photo-Illustration:An airline leaving all of its passengers' travel records vulnerable to hackers would make an attractive target for espionage. Less obvious, but perhaps even more useful for those spies, would be access to a premium travel service that spans 10 different airlines, left its own detailed flight information accessible to data thieves, and seems to be favored by international diplomats. That's what one team of cybersecurity researchers found in the form of Airportr, a UK-based luggage service that partners with airlines to let its largely UK- and Europe-based users pay to have their bags picked up, checked, and delivered to their destination. Researchers at the firm CyberX9 found that simple bugs in Airportr's website allowed them to access virtually all of those users' personal information, including travel plans, or even gain administrator privileges that would have allowed a hacker to redirect or steal luggage in transit. Among even the small sample of user data that the researchers reviewed and shared with WIRED, they found what appear to be the personal information and travel records of multiple government officials and diplomats from the UK, Switzerland, and the US. 'Anyone would have been able to gain or might have gained absolute super-admin access to all the operations and data of this company," says Himanshu Pathak, CyberX9's founder and CEO. 'The vulnerabilities resulted in complete confidential private information exposure of all airline customers in all countries who used the service of this company, including full control over all the bookings and baggage. Because once you are the super-admin of their most sensitive systems, you have have the ability to do anything.' Airportr's CEO Randel Darby confirmed CyberX9's findings in a written statement provided to WIRED but noted that Airportr had fixed the vulnerabilities a few days after the researchers made the company aware of the issues last April. 'The data was accessed solely by the ethical hackers for the purpose of recommending improvements to Airportr's security, and our prompt response and mitigation ensured no further risk,' Darby wrote in a statement. 'We take our responsibilities to protect customer data very seriously.' CyberX9's researchers, for their part, counter that the simplicity of the vulnerabilities they found mean that there's no guarantee other hackers didn't access Airportr's data first. They found that a relatively basic web vulnerability allowed them to change the password of any user to gain access to their account if they had just the user's email address—and they were also able to brute-force guess email addresses with no rate limitations on the site. As a result, they could access data including all customers' names, phone numbers, home addresses, detailed travel plans and history, airline tickets, boarding passes and flight details, passport images, and signatures. By gaining access to an administrator account, CyberX9's researchers say, a hacker could also have used the vulnerabilities it found to redirect luggage, steal luggage, or even cancel flights on airline websites by using Airportr's data to gain access to customer accounts on those sites. The researchers say they could also have used their access to send emails and text messages as Airportr, a potential phishing risk. Airportr tells WIRED that it has 92,000 users, and claims on its website that it's handled over 800,000 bags for customers. Within the data CyberX9 accessed in its testing, the researchers found and shared with WIRED examples of passengers traveling with diplomatic passports, for several of which the front-page images were also included in the data. These included four from the UK, two from the US, and three from Switzerland. One of the individuals, the researchers determined, was at the time of their travel a UK ambassador, and another was a US executive branch cybersecurity official. 'This is a premium service,' says Pathak. 'We consider that a good chunk of their users are government officials, and other people of a sensitive nature.' Airportr advertises that it's the 'official bag check in partner' of American Airlines, British Airways, Lufthansa, and Virgin Atlantic, along with half a dozen other major airlines, though it appears to only offer its services on flights to and from airports in the UK, Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. American Airlines, British Airways, and Virgin Atlantic didn't respond to WIRED's requests for comment, but a Lufthansa spokesperson responded in a statement. 'We are dedicated to investigating any indications of a third-party data breach thoroughly and promptly," the spokesperson writes. "We take these matters seriously and are committed to maintaining the integrity and security of our data.' CyberX9's researchers first became curious about Airportr last April, after a member of the team saw the service advertised to him for flights to Europe from the United Arab Emirates, where the company is based, and heard that other staff at the company had used it. 'They're handling such a sensitive task of delivering the baggage and collecting so much sensitive information, I thought we should see where they actually stand in terms of security,' says the research team's lead, who asked to remain anonymous due to privacy concerns. 'When I got some time to actually test it out, I found these vulnerabilities quite quickly.' The researchers found that they could monitor their browser's communications as they signed up for Airportr and created a new password, and then reuse an API key intercepted from those communications to instead change another user's password to anything they chose. The site also lacked a 'rate limiting' security measure that would prevent automated guesses of email addresses to rapidly change the password of every user's account. And the researchers were also able to find email addresses of Airportr administrators that allowed them to take over their accounts and gain their privileges over the company's data and operations. In his response statement, Darby, the Airportr CEO, writes that 'while data exposure could theoretically allow administrative access, the ability to act on such information without triggering alarms would be highly difficult.' He also emphasized that the data the researchers found to be vulnerable was Airportr's alone, not that of its airline partners. 'We do not have any ability to alter or influence airline operations or customers' flight details via our APIs, which are designed with read-only permissions and are tightly restricted to reduce risk to airline systems and customer data,' Darby writes. (CyberX9 points out that the administrative access it gained was not in fact, 'theoretical,' and Airportr didn't appear to be aware of the access until the researchers notified the company.) Darby adds that Airportr didn't tell airlines about the vulnerability at the time. 'Given the low-risk nature of the incident, as determined by our investigation, we did not at the time notify data subjects, airline partners, or supervisory authorities,' he writes. 'Subsequently, and given the potential visibility generated by the publication of the research and subsequent media coverage, we have decided to notify the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) as a precautionary measure.' Airportr's airline partners shouldn't be entirely let off the hook, CyberX9's CEO Pathak says. He argues they, too, are responsible for ensuring the security of their customers' travel plans and other sensitive personal information when they recommend another service to them—a responsibility at which they 'failed miserably," he says. He argues, too, that Airportr's security flaws should serve as a warning about how third-party services, contractors and little-known partner services are often a hidden source of data leakage. 'The real risk isn't always the airline itself but the small add‑on services we overlook which often get promoted to us, as passengers, by the airlines and airports—services we assume are safe because we trust the airline's endorsement,' says Pathak. 'Your data is only as secure as the least‑protected partner that touches it.'
