
Trump told cops to do ‘whatever the hell they want' to fix DC. Here's why that's ‘extremely dangerous'
Trump, seizing on images of a beaten former Department of Government Efficiency staffer to justify his takeover, announced a 'crime emergency' to put the Metropolitan Police Department under the administration's control.
'See, they fight back until you knock the hell out of them, because it's the only language they understand,' Trump said from the White House on August 11.
'You spit and we hit,' the president said. 'And they're standing there and people are spitting in their face and they're not allowed to do anything. But now they are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.'
Civil rights groups and legal experts fear the president's remarks will embolden police officers to abandon constitutional guardrails — and signal to Americans that those protections are meaningless.
'It's very scary that the president felt the license to say this,' said Insha Rahman, vice president of advocacy and partnerships at the Vera Institute of Justice and the director of Vera Action.
His remarks appear to endorse police 'running roughshod over constitutional rights and due process protections,' she told The Independent.
That language is 'extremely dangerous' and shows a 'blatant disregard to the constitutional mandates that the president and every government entity is bound to,' according to Kristin Henning, Georgetown Law professor and director of the Juvenile Justice Clinic and Initiative.
No, police cannot do 'whatever the hell they want,' Rahman added. But officers 'will feel emboldened to do things that we know are not only legally unsound and questionable but also unpopular — like sweep away people and forcibly move people who are homeless, or tell people that they can't be in certain public places.'
Civil rights groups fear the administration is using the city's police force for a political power grab, while putting American troops on the ground as an occupying force that's not trained to perform basic law enforcement tasks like responding to 911 calls.
Instead, D.C. has become 'political theater' using 'blatantly phony justification for abuse of emergency powers,' according to Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of the District of Columbia.
Trump is 'using the word 'emergency' as a blank check for asserting federal control whenever it suits his agenda – abusing emergency powers while militarizing our communities and endangering the very people he is sworn to protect,' according to Mike Zamore, national director of policy and government affairs at the ACLU.
The Independent has requested comment from the Metropolitan Police Department.
Trump has a vivid history of dogwhistle calls to action. Proud Boys were inspired by Trump's call to 'stand back and stand by.' His call for a 'big protest' that 'will be wild' fueled a mob of his own supporters on January 6, 2021, when he encouraged a crowd to 'fight like hell' before they stormed the Capitol.
He also routinely threatens heavy-handed tactics in other Democratic-majority cities. At his White House press conference this week, he singled out Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and Oakland — all of which have Black mayors and large minority populations that have overwhelmingly voted against him.
In his remarks, Trump suggested teenagers were 'randomly attacking' citizens and called for trying children as young as 14 as adults to 'lock them up for a long time.' Jeanine Pirro — the former Fox News personality recently confirmed as U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. — raged against 'young punks' and demanded laws be changed to send teenagers to adult prisons.
Those threats are 'counterproductive and ineffective,' according to Henning, author of The Rage of Innocence: How America Criminalizes Black Youth, which draws on her experience representing young Black people in Washington's juvenile courts.
'They don't use these words, but they are definitely blaming all Black kids in the city for these problems,' Henning said. '[Residents] are living with a state of fear that has been concocted, and that's all a part of a larger strategy. … It's not even that deeply veiled, because it's been done over and over again.'
The Independent has requested comment from the White House.
Black and Latino youth are facing 'extraordinary psychological trauma in contact with police,' with reported high rates of fear, anxiety, depression and hopelessness, according to Henning.
'When they go out on the streets and they encounter police, they see these federal agents, the anxiety is real, and the reaction is an adolescent response,' she said. 'They might assert their First Amendment right to say, 'I don't want your presence.' All of the things that teenagers do … They can go from zero to 100 in an instant.'
Thousands of people flooded streets across the country throughout the summer of 2020 for daily demonstrations against police brutality and racism, including in the streets of Washington, D.C.
'Can't you just shoot them?' Trump said at the time, according to his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper. 'Just shoot them in the legs or something?'
Trump also demanded law enforcement officers 'crack skulls' and 'beat the f*** out' of protesters, according to the book Frankly, We Did Win This Election: The Inside Story of How Trump Lost by The Wall Street Journal' s Michael Bender.
In his second administration, Trump is no longer moored by a handful of advisers who could curb his impulses. He was surrounded by the nation's top law enforcement officials as he announced 'liberation day' for D.C. this week.
Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which grants the federal government authority to run the locally controlled police department. He needs congressional authority to extend that control beyond 30 days.
On August 13, Trump said he wants 'long-term extensions' of his federal occupation.
'I don't want to call a national emergency. If I have to, I will,' he said.
Trump also called for Congress to pass a 'crime bill' that's 'going to initially pertain to D.C.' but serve as a 'very positive example' for other cities.
Despite the administration's claims that crime is 'out of control' in D.C., the data shows the opposite: 2024 saw the lowest violent crime rates in the capital in more than 30 years, while reports of violent crime within the first seven months of 2025 have plunged 26 percent from last year.
Those rates mirror national downward trends, according to FBI crime data released during Trump's administration.
'Trump has a long history of weaponizing fear about crime,' according to Rahman, highlighting the president's campaign rhetoric of American cities under siege and an 'invasion' at the U.S.-Mexico border.
'People are supportive of police, but they want police to focus on responding to the most serious cases, being responsive, and investigating and solving serious crime,' she said. 'What they do not want — that we have had a long history of seeing in this country — is police overreach.'
Henning fears that the city's Metropolitan Police Department is under 'undue pressure' to boost arrests and 'put numbers on the board,' she told The Independent.
'That pressure is going to be there, whether they admit it or not,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hunter Biden gives blunt two-word response to Melania Trump's threats of $1 billion defamation lawsuit
Hunter Biden has refused to apologize to First Lady Melania Trump after she threatened him with legal action for 'over $1bn in damages' if he failed to retract comments he made linking her to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'F*** that! That's not going to happen,' Biden laughed during a new interview with British journalist Andrew Callaghan, the same person he was speaking to in July when he made the allegations that apparently enraged the first lady. 'First of all is that, what I said was what I have heard and seen reported and written, primarily from Michael Wolff but also dating back all the way to 2019 when The New York Times – I think Annie Carney and and Maggie Haberman – reported that sources said that Jeffrey Epstein claimed to be the person to introduce Donald Trump to Melania at that time,' Biden continued. 'But the primary source was the interviews that Michael Wolff has been conducting, in which he has actually tapes of, I think, hours and hours and hours of interviews with Jeffrey Epstein directly. 'So, you know, fact of the matter is that, you know, I don't think that these threats of a lawsuit add up to anything other than a designed distraction because it's not about who introduced whom to who. I don't know how that in any way rises to the level of defamation to begin with.' Lawyers for Trump had objected to two statements made by Biden, the son of former president Joe Biden, in a YouTube interview he gave to Callaghan last month. In the sprawling discussion in question, Biden alleged that it was Epstein who first introduced Melania to Trump in the late 1990s, when she was a fashion model and he a luxury property magnate with no known political aspirations. The statements are false, defamatory, and 'extremely salacious,' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in the letter to Biden. His remarks were widely disseminated on social media and reported by media outlets around the world, causing the first lady 'to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm,' Brito wrote. The letter demands that Biden walk back the claim and apologise or face legal action for 'over $1bn in damages'. It also accuses the former president's son of having a 'vast history of trading on the names of others' and repeating the claim 'to draw attention to yourself.' Biden made the Epstein comments while also lashing out at 'elites' like the Hollywood actor George Clooney and others in the Democratic Party whom, he said, had undermined his father before he dropped out of last year's presidential campaign, also revealing that Biden Sr had been on Ambien when he suffered a disastrous debate defeat to Trump in Atlanta last June. 'Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep,' Biden said in one of the comments Trump disputes. As he suggested again on Thursday, Biden attributed the claim at the time to Wolff, whom the president disparaged in June as a 'third-rate reporter' and accused of making up stories to sell books. The first lady's threats echo a favored strategy of her husband, who has aggressively used litigation to go after critics. Public figures like the Trumps face a high bar to succeed in a defamation lawsuit. The president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modeling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998. The letter to Hunter Biden is dated August 6 and was first reported on Wednesday by Fox News Digital. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer who has represented Biden in his criminal cases and to whom Brito's letter is addressed, did not immediately respond to a request for comment late Wednesday. President Trump continues to face questions about his past friendship with Epstein, but has not been accused of any wrongdoing and is currently suing The Wall Street Journal for reporting that he once sent the sex offender a 'bawdy' doodle for his birthday. The uproar over the disgraced financier has raged ever since the Justice Department and FBI ruled in early July that he left behind no 'client list' and died by suicide in August 2019, a verdict that enraged the president's supporters, who continue to demand answers and allege a 'cover-up' to protect influential people. It has been reported that the president was briefed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, who stated that his name appears in the government's files on Epstein, but that does not imply misconduct. Trump is known to have become increasingly frustrated at the story's continued dominance of the news agenda over the past six weeks and has even rebuked members of his conservative coalition for obsessing over it. Additional reporting by agencies.


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump and Putin are set to meet Friday afternoon in Anchorage. Its mayor says the summit can ‘showcase the city'
The Alaskan city of Anchorage, surrounded by dramatic peaks, will provide the backdrop for the highly anticipated summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. As all eyes will be on the southern-central city Friday afternoon as the two men are set to meet for a one-on-one meeting. A press conference could happen after, but it's unclear if both world leaders will be involved. The run-up to the summit sparked guesses about which world city would host the meeting, until Alaska was announced as host for the summit aimed at ending the war with Ukraine. Now, Alaska officials say it's an opportunity for Anchorage to show the world just how important it is. 'Alaska is the crossroads of the world,' Anchorage Mayor Suzanne LaFrance said this week. 'We are a strategic global location in so many ways. For our closeness to the Arctic, for our military presence, we have like 25,000 active duty personnel here in Alaska, for trade, for cargo, our cargo airport is one of the busiest in the world.' 'As far as what this means for Alaska, what it means for Anchorage, it's an opportunity to highlight our city, and to show the world how important we are,' LaFrance added. Alaska's GOP Senator, Lisa Murkowski, said it was 'another opportunity for the Arctic to serve as a venue that brings together world leaders to forge meaningful agreements,' though added she was 'deeply wary of Putin and his regime.' Anchorage is the Last Frontier state's 'biggest small town,' and with a population of around 300,000, and it is Alaska's most populous city, according to the National Park Service. During the summer, residents experience about 19 hours of sunlight a day as the sun barely dips below the horizon. In the winter, when thick snow caps the mountains surrounding the city, it's only daylight for around 5 hours. Presidents have met with world leaders and notable figures at the base in Anchorage in recent history, partly due to its convenient location to refuel. Former President Ronald Reagan briefly stopped by the base in 1983 en route to Japan and Korea, where he praised the 'beauty of this wonderful land' and shared his 'admiration' of the state. Reagan visited Alaska the following year to meet with Pope John Paul II in the city of Fairbanks. In 1971, former President Richard Nixon met with Japanese Emperor Hirohito in Anchorage, hailing him 'the first reigning monarch in Japan's long history to step on foreign soil.' The meeting was extremely brief, with the monarch touching down at 10 p.m. local time and departing for his final destination of Europe by 11.40 p.m., according to the Richard Nixon Foundation. Former President Barack Obama also dropped by Anchorage in 2015 on a three-day trip to highlight the impacts of climate change in the region. Anchorage's military base was crucial to countering the Soviet Union during the height of the Cold War. Throughout its long history, the base hosted large numbers of aircraft and oversaw operations of a variety of early warning radar sites that were aimed at detecting Soviet military activity and any possible nuclear launches. It earned the motto 'Top Cover for North America' at this time, according to the base website. As preparations for the Anchorage summit continue, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov stated that the meeting will be a one-on-one between Trump and Putin, with translators present, and that 'sensitive matters' will be discussed. Both leaders will take part in a news conference once the summit is concluded, he added, as well as wider talks with their delegations and a working breakfast. Trump warned that Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to a ceasefire but hinted that a follow-up meeting could be swiftly arranged if Friday's summit proves a success.


BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
US President Donald Trump to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska
US President Donald Trump is due to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin for talks in Alaska on Friday. The main reason is for both leaders to discuss the war in officials on both sides have met in recent years, this will be the Presidents' first meeting since 2016, and the first since Russia invaded Ukraine. But what do we know about the meeting and what we can expect to happen? Read on to find out. When and where are President Trump and President Putin meeting? US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin are due to meet in Anchorage, the largest city in the US state of Alaska. The venue for the high-profile meeting is the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson - Alaska's largest military base. The summit will take place on Friday 15 August 2025 and is scheduled to begin at 11:30 local time (20:30 UK time).Did you know: The USA bought Alaska off Russia in 1867. Why are President Trump and President Putin meeting? The main reason that the two men are set to meet is to discuss how to end the war in war started on 24 February, 2022, when Russia invaded conflict has caused a lot of destruction to towns and cities, with many buildings in Ukraine damaged, and millions of people forced to leave their both Russia and Ukraine have said that they want the war to end, both countries want different things from any peace leaders have been looking for a path to end the conflict, and Donald Trump has often spoken about how he can be the person to make it can read more about the history between Russia and Ukraine here. Who is attending the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska? As it stands, only President Trump and President Putin - as well as a small group of officials from both countries - are due to President Volodymyr Zelensky is not expected to attend. Earlier this week, President Trump said: "I would say he could go, but he's been to a lot of meetings."He added however, that President Zelensky would be the first person he would call thought that President Putin has requested that President Zelensky not be invited, although the White House has previously said that President Trump was willing to hold talks in which all three leaders were present. What will happen at the meeting between President Trump and President Putin? Even though Ukraine will be the main topic of the meeting, the two leaders are also expected to discuss other such as US-Russia cooperation and trade between the two countries are due to be debated to officials, President Trump and President Putin will first hold one-to-one talks with interpreters present.A group lunch will also take place, as well as a press conference after the joint news conference will be attended by both President Trump and President Putin and will serve to "summarise the results of the negotiations" according to Russian officials. When did President Trump and President Putin last meet? The summit in Alaska will be the first known face-to-face meeting between the two leaders in six pair are believed to have last met at the G20 summit in 2019, which took place in the city of Osaka in Japan. It'll also be their first meeting since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and President Trump's return to office as US President earlier this year. What have world leaders said ahead of the meeting between President Trump and President Putin? On Thursday, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Downing Street. In a post on social media, the Ukrainian leader says the pair spoke of their expectations for Friday's Alaska meeting and the security guarantees Ukraine has been calling for to ensure long-lasting a statement after their meeting, Sir Keir said that there is a chance for "progress" at the Alaska summit "as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious about peace".Earlier this week, President Trump met with European leaders to discuss his upcoming meeting with President Putin. Afterwards, Trump said that Russia would face "very severe" consequences unless it stopped its war in House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt added that President Trump is hoping to use "diplomacy and negotiation" to end the war in Ukraine."There are sanctions and many other measures that the president can use if he has to," she of their meeting in Alaska, President Putin praised Trump's "sincere efforts" to end the Ukraine war - with the Kremlin saying the leaders will discuss the situation in "one-on-one" talks.