State lawmakers want to sue over TABOR's constitutionality
DENVER (KDVR) — Lawmakers are in the process of approving tough cuts to keep this year's budget balanced. Some are now questioning if a constitutional amendment known as TABOR could be key to freeing up some more funding.
The Taxpayer Bill of Rights has been in the state's constitution since voters put it there in 1992. Now, some lawmakers are asking if it's constitutional.
New budget introduced at Colorado state Capital that addresses deficit
'We can be fiscally sound, we can make proper investments, we can have a strategy for pushing this state forward but currently we can't do that because of tabor. We all deserve an answer on whether or not it's constitutional or whether or not we are allowed to govern,' said state Representative Sean Camacho.
The freshman representative is a prime sponsor of a new joint resolution at the state capitol.If enough representatives and senators approve it, it would allow the Committee on Legal Services to file a lawsuit to explore the constitutionality of TABOR.
'We are elected representatives and we need the power to set fiscal policy for the state because, ultimately, we need to fund housing, healthcare, infrastructure, all the things that we are currently unable to do because of TABOR. A tax policy from 1992 that is not equipped for the challenges we face in 2025,' Camacho said.
'Have you seen our state budget? Those days are over, that is not happening, that is not the reality that we have anymore. And I think all of us as elected officials, our number one duty is to follow the law. The constitution is our supreme law of the land,' Camacho continued. 'We all deserve a question whether or not TABOR violates it. That's what this lawsuit is doing.'
FOX31 political analyst and TABOR advocate Michael Fields said a federal court battle over TABOR already highlights potential obstacles to the effort.
At least 4 international student visas revoked at the University of Colorado
'The door is closed and you are going up the 10th Circuit (court) because they already weighed in on this. So this is kind of the only other option: Is to go to state court. It's kind of ironic that they are challenging the constitutionality of a constitutionally passed measure, right? So it's a very interesting challenge that they are trying to do. I think they went this route because a lot of the other routes are already closed off to them,' said Fields.
Reports of lawmakers weighing other proposals impacting TABOR, like one that would get rid of the state's flat income tax system in favor of a graduated system, are making their way around the capitol. Fields believes some of the ideas are symbolic of a desire for change.
'They want to try to do a progressive income tax but they need republican support which is never going to come to get it on the ballot,' Fields said. 'They can't get signatures, the polling isn't good. So they just say, 'you know what, we're going to throw this into the court's hands and throw it out totally, it's really popular, people won't side with us, so let's just hope the courts do this and overturn it.' I don't think that's likely to happen.'
'They keep complaining but the people are out there looking and saying, 'We like having TABOR. We like having a limit that government can only grow population plus inflation, that we get to weigh in on tax increases,' So I can understand how you are a legislator and you are frustrated that you can't raise taxes whenever you want but that's how it's been here for 33 years now,' Fields said.
Because the legislation is a resolution and not a bill, lawmakers would not need the governor's signature to get the process going. The public will have a chance to weigh in on this once it gets to the committee.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' protest to go on in Parker despite town's requested cancellation
DENVER (KDVR) — After the town of Parker tried to cancel a 'No Kings' protest due to the Parker Days Festival on Saturday, the event is taking place anyway. On Saturday, June 14, a group known as 'No Kings' is planning a 'nationwide day of defiance' against the Trump administration on President Donald Trump's birthday. The group said during Trump's birthday festivities, they're planning on showing up around the country to say 'no thrones, no crowns, no kings.' No Kings: 'Activist fair' planned at Colorado Capitol on Trump's birthday, DC parade day Protests will be held in Colorado and all over the country, including Parker, even after the town of Parker said it had to be canceled due to a scheduling conflict. The town said the Parker Days Festival, which is hosted by the Parker Chamber of Commerce, is a permitted event that takes place the same weekend every June, with an estimated 350,000 people attending the event. Because of the festival, the town said resources and staffing are limited. 'Unfortunately, due to the large nature of the festival, the Town would not have sufficient staffing and resources, including those of the Police Department and other departments, to ensure the safety of any individuals participating in protests or rallies or any other person within the Town,' the town said in a statement. More than a dozen arrested in Denver Tuesday during ICE protest; police use smoke, pepper balls The town said it spoke with the No Kings Day event organizer last week, and the organizer reportedly agreed to cancel the event. However, the town was 'disappointed to hear' that the event was taking place anyway. The town said it offered to help find another date to host the event, but as of Wednesday morning, No Kings said the event was still on, and the protest is still listed to take place on Saturday from 10 a.m. until noon, but at a 'private' address in Parker. 'The Town of Parker absolutely recognizes individuals' First Amendment rights but must balance those rights with the rights and safety of all other individuals. The Town is truly unable to accommodate another event during the weekend of Parker Days, as it will negatively impact its ability to safety and properly respond to the routine matters within the community, as well as any incidents that may occur due to the number of people anticipated to attend the No Kings rally,' the town said. FOX31 reached out to the Parker Days Festival about the scheduled events and is awaiting a response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aurora City Council will not hold in-person meetings until Kilyn Lewis lawsuit concludes
DENVER (KDVR) — Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman announced Tuesday that the city's council meetings will be held virtually to prevent disruptions while a lawsuit filed on behalf of a man shot and killed by police works its way through the court system. The message was echoed on the council's webpage. The webpage includes instructions for how members of the public can view the meetings or provide public comment on agenda items. However, all public comment listening sessions have been canceled until further notice. Family of man killed by Aurora police last May files suit against city, officer who fired deadly shot The measure was voted on during the June 9 council meeting, with seven in favor, three against, and two members in debate. In May, the council addressed a resolution that would change how it accepts public comment. 'As of right now, criminally, Michael Dieck did not murder Kilyn Lewis,' said councilwoman Danielle Jurinsky. 'It's in the court's hands now, and I would like to suspend this to be virtual until we have an official ruling from the court as to whether or not the city is liable in any way, shape or form for the death of Kilyn Lewis. Because if we are not in fact liable in any way, shape or form for the death of Kilyn Lewis, there is nothing left to discuss, and there's no reason for you to come back.' Jurinsky added that if the ruling takes years to reach, then she's on board with having virtual meetings until the ruling. Family and friends of Kilyn Lewis have held protests during several Aurora City Council meetings. The group has been seeking justice after the 37-year-old was shot and killed by an Aurora police officer in May 2024. In October, the district attorney ruled that an officer who shot Lewis would not face charges. In late May, Lewis' family filed a lawsuit seeking accountability from the Aurora Police Department in their loved one's death. It discusses excessive force, wrongful death and violations of the family's constitutional rights. 'This lawsuit is not just about a dollar amount. It's about truth. It's about making sure that the life of a Black man like Kilyn Lewis is not so easily discarded,' said MiDian Shofner, CEO of the Epitome of Black Excellence and Partnership and lead advocate for the family, in the May 28 announcement of the case filing. 'No amount of money can bring him back, but since America has made money the metric for justice, the family is rightfully pursuing every legal remedy available.' Coffman wrote on Facebook that he believes the group is simply looking for a check, and then they will 'go away.' Deadly shooting of Kilyn Lewis leads to new Aurora police SWAT policies: Report 'Until then, they will continue to disrupt our meetings. They have no choice but to continue disrupting our meetings because their lawsuit is meritless. This is why we have no choice but to stop all in-person council meetings, and go virtual, until their lawsuit has been concluded,' Coffman wrote. He noted that an Arapahoe County Grand Jury was also asked to review the case and declined to pursue charges against the officer. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Colorado joins lawsuit against ATF over deal ending ban on rapid-fire triggers for rifles
DENVER (KDVR) — Colorado is one of 16 states that have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners. The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland. Governor signs bill requiring training for semiautomatic guns, banning rapid-fire conversion devices 'It's hard enough for our local law enforcement officials to protect Colorado communities from gun violence without the federal government willfully ignoring the law,' said Attorney General Weiser. 'The law is clear: machine guns, and devices that turn a semiautomatic weapon into a machine gun, are illegal. We're suing to stop the ATF and the administration from making our communities more dangerous by distributing thousands of devices that turn firearms into weapons of war. These weapons have no place in our communities, and I will continue to fight to keep Coloradans safe from gun violence.' The Colorado law banning the sale of rapid-fire conversion devices, including forced-reset triggers, was signed into law in April and will go into effect on Aug. 1, 2026. Second Amendment supporters have called on the U.S. Attorney General to investigate the measure as an infringement on the U.S. Constitution. Weiser said in a release announcing the state's participation in the lawsuit that machine gun conversion devices like the forced-reset triggers are frequently used in violent crimes and mass shootings. The state attorney general said that by using these devices, firearms can exceed the rate of fire of many military machine guns. 'ATF has noted a significant rise in the use of these types of devices, leading to incidents of machine-gun fire increasing by 1,400% from 2019 through 2021,' Weiser said in a press release. There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. The ATF previously classified the triggers as machine guns, but under a directive from the Trump Administration, the bureau signed the settlement agreement that promises to stop enforcing federal law against the devices. New requirements begin July 1 for Colorado concealed carry permits Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration. The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month with Rare Breed Triggers to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers. The company was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel. Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government. The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia. The attorneys general in those states are all Democrats, though the office in Hawaii is technically nonpartisan. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
