logo
Colorado joins lawsuit against ATF over deal ending ban on rapid-fire triggers for rifles

Colorado joins lawsuit against ATF over deal ending ban on rapid-fire triggers for rifles

Yahoo10-06-2025
DENVER (KDVR) — Colorado is one of 16 states that have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners.
The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland.
Governor signs bill requiring training for semiautomatic guns, banning rapid-fire conversion devices
'It's hard enough for our local law enforcement officials to protect Colorado communities from gun violence without the federal government willfully ignoring the law,' said Attorney General Weiser. 'The law is clear: machine guns, and devices that turn a semiautomatic weapon into a machine gun, are illegal. We're suing to stop the ATF and the administration from making our communities more dangerous by distributing thousands of devices that turn firearms into weapons of war. These weapons have no place in our communities, and I will continue to fight to keep Coloradans safe from gun violence.'
The Colorado law banning the sale of rapid-fire conversion devices, including forced-reset triggers, was signed into law in April and will go into effect on Aug. 1, 2026. Second Amendment supporters have called on the U.S. Attorney General to investigate the measure as an infringement on the U.S. Constitution.
Weiser said in a release announcing the state's participation in the lawsuit that machine gun conversion devices like the forced-reset triggers are frequently used in violent crimes and mass shootings. The state attorney general said that by using these devices, firearms can exceed the rate of fire of many military machine guns.
'ATF has noted a significant rise in the use of these types of devices, leading to incidents of machine-gun fire increasing by 1,400% from 2019 through 2021,' Weiser said in a press release.
There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. The ATF previously classified the triggers as machine guns, but under a directive from the Trump Administration, the bureau signed the settlement agreement that promises to stop enforcing federal law against the devices.
New requirements begin July 1 for Colorado concealed carry permits
Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration.
The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month with Rare Breed Triggers to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers. The company was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel.
Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government.
The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia. The attorneys general in those states are all Democrats, though the office in Hawaii is technically nonpartisan.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trio of MS-13 migrants busted in Nassau County in joint ICE operation face 14 attempted murder charges
Trio of MS-13 migrants busted in Nassau County in joint ICE operation face 14 attempted murder charges

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trio of MS-13 migrants busted in Nassau County in joint ICE operation face 14 attempted murder charges

Three MS-13 migrants who allegedly terrorized Nassau County were busted last week in a joint operation between ICE, local police and the FBI — and charged with a spate of violent crimes including 14 counts of attempted murder and 49 counts of assault, The Post has learned. The Aug. 8 arrests of the baby-faced gangbangers — two of whom sources say crossed into the US illegally during the Biden administration — was confirmed by Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman, who vowed to keep supporting the feds in their immigration crackdown. 'As a result of a joint operation between the Nassau County Police Department and ICE, three alleged dangerous gang members charged with murder and other serious crimes were apprehended and are now incarcerated pending trial or deportation, making us an even safer county and region,' Blakeman told The Post in a statement. Advertisement 3 Gang member Jeffrey Bladimir Valladares Archaga, 20, from Honduras was charged with fourth-degree possession of a firearm, third-degree aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle and driving without a license. Obtained by NY Post 'We will continue work with our federal and local partners to ensure we remain the safest county in America.' Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has lodged immigration detainers against all three gang members, sources said. Advertisement None of the migrants taken into police custody last Friday are older than 21, and between the three of them, they face the attempted murder and assault raps — along with 7 weapon possession charges, according to the sources. Two of the three gang members entered the US illegally during the Biden administration. In a departure from the Big Apple's sanctuary city policies — which tie the hands of federal immigration authorities seeking to detain and deport illegal immigrants who commit crimes — Nassau County has pledged to work with ICE to get violent criminal migrants off the streets. Since February, Nassau County has detained more than 1,400 illegal immigrants for ICE at Nassau County Correctional Center in partnership with the feds, even setting aside 50 cells in the facility specifically to hold migrants awaiting deportation, Blakeman announced earlier this year. Advertisement 3 Ellias Wilfredo Serrano Bonilla, 21, was hit with eight counts of attempted murder, first-degree assault with intent to cause serious injury with a weapon, and a host of other alleged assaults and robberies. Obtained by NY Post 'America is no longer a dumping ground for foreign criminals and gang members,' acting ICE Director Todd M. Lyons told The Post. 'ICE will continue to find, arrest and remove MS-13 and other terrorists who come here to wreak havoc on communities and destroy this nation.' The rap sheets of the three Central American migrants netted during the Aug. 8 joint operation read like a laundry list of violent criminal acts. Advertisement Ellias Wilfredo Serrano Bonilla, 21, a criminal alien from El Salvador, illegally entered the US sometime prior to December, 2016, sources said. 3 Edras Daniel Velasquez Giron, 19, an illegal alien from Honduras, was hit with six accounts of attempted murder, and 20 more counts including assaults and robberies. Obtained by NY Post On Jan. 8, 2020, Nassau County cops arrested and charged him with first-degree assault and first-degree gang assault. Then during the Aug. 8 bust, he was slapped with dozens of additional charges including eight counts of attempted murder, first-degree assault with intent to cause serious injury with a weapon and first-degree gang assault causing serious injury, as well as a host of other robberies and assaults, according to sources. Also arrested was Edras Daniel Velasquez Giron, 19, an illegal alien from Honduras who illegally entered the US before June, 2022, the sources said. Fifteen months later, in September, 2023, a New York immigration judge ordered him removed to Honduras in absentia. After the joint operation, he was charged with six accounts of attempted murder, first-degree assault with intent to cause serious injury with a weapon, first-degree gang assault with intent to cause serious injury with a weapon and an additional 18 counts of assault and robberies, sources said. The third criminal migrant snagged during the joint operation was Jeffrey Bladimir Valladares Archaga, 20, from Honduras, who sources said entered the US unlawfully near Calexico, Calif. in 2022. Advertisement On July 17, he was arrested in Nassau County and charged with fourth-degree possession of a firearm, third-degree aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle and driving without a license. Valladares Archaga is not facing any attempted murder or assault charges. So far, similar joint efforts between federal immigration authorities and local law enforcement have seen over 1,600 criminal aliens taken off the streets of Long Island, an ICE spokesperson told The Post.

White House scrapped Biden ship tour after learning ‘how many steps were involved,' emails show
White House scrapped Biden ship tour after learning ‘how many steps were involved,' emails show

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

White House scrapped Biden ship tour after learning ‘how many steps were involved,' emails show

The White House opted against having former President Joe Biden board a vessel during a July 2023 visit to a Philadelphia shipyard after learning 'lots of steps' were required to get on board, newly released emails show. The records, obtained by watchdog group Protect the Public's Trust via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and first reported by Fox News, show Department of Transportation staffers attempting to gather information about Biden's July 20, 2023, trip to the Philly Shipyard and what the president would be doing during his visit. The DOT's Maritime Administration (MARAD) had awarded the Philly Shipyard a contract to build a massive National Security Multi-Mission Vessel (NSMV) years earlier – but the agency learned days before Biden's trip that the White House would not allow the then-80-year-old president to inspect the boat. Advertisement 3 White House officials would not allow Biden, who was 80-years-old at the time, to board a vessel at a Philadelphia shipyard in 2023. AFP via Getty Images 'No visit to the NSMV vessel is planned after the WH realized how many steps were involved to get on the ship,' a MARAD official notified members of Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST), quoting a contact the agency had at that shipyard. 'True – lots of steps on grating,' the message continued in a parenthetical note. Advertisement Biden's visit to the Philly Shipyard (PSI), where he met with apprentices and attended a steel-cutting ceremony for an offshore wind farm construction vessel, came just weeks after he took a hard fall at an Air Force Academy graduation ceremony in Colorado. Since the fall, the president had been observed boarding Air Force One using the aircraft's shorter set of stairs. Seven days before the Philadelphia shipyard visit, Biden stumbled on Air Force One's short staircase as prepared to depart Helsinki-Vantaan International Airport in Finland. 3 Biden took a hard fall less than two months before the Philly trip. AP Advertisement 3 The National Security Multi-Mission Vessel being built at the shipyard had too many steps for Biden, according to an email sent to DOT staffers from a MARAD official. Bloomberg via Getty Images The White House's refusal to let Biden board the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel in Philadelphia may not have been the only time the president wasn't allowed to get on a boat over concerns about the number of steps involved. Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson claimed in his autobiography, 'Unleashed,' that the White House would not allow Biden to board the British Navy's flagship aircraft carrier – the HMS Prince of Wales – ahead of the 2021 G7 summit in Cornwall. Advertisement The decision left Johnson questioning Biden's 'physical fitness.' 'His staff told us that he would not in fact be boarding our vast aircraft carrier — which we had proudly stationed in the bay — because it had so many steps; and we wondered what that meant about his physical fitness,' Johnson said, according to an excerpt from the former prime minister's book obtained by The Telegraph.

Why did Miami lose $60 million for a park that promised so much?
Why did Miami lose $60 million for a park that promised so much?

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Why did Miami lose $60 million for a park that promised so much?

Thanks to the Big Beautiful Bill — passed with help from Miami's own Republican members of Congress — the city just lost $60 million in federal grant money that was supposed to pay for a park. It wasn't just any park. It was a 33-acre expanse known as the Underdeck that, if successful, would have helped heal some of the damage to our community caused by construction of Interstate 95 in the 1960s, when the highway was built right through the once-thriving Black community of Overtown. Overtown was never the same after that. Constructing this park — officially named the Rev. Edward T. Graham Greenway after after the former Mt. Zion Baptist Church pastor and civil rights activist — was an effort to right an old wrong. That's especially important in a place like Miami, where we struggle with civic engagement. Reunifying land once divided in the name of progress would be a step in the right direction. The park is supposed to be a key component of the Signature Bridge road project, that never-ending construction zone where Interstates 95 and 395 meet, north of downtown, that's been tying up traffic for more than six years — so far. We just learned from the Florida Department of Transportation that completion has been pushed back yet again, this time to late 2029, and the cost has risen to an estimated $866 million. (When construction began in 2019, the Signature Bridge project — the one with those enormous decorative arches designed to evoke a fountain — was supposed to be finished in 2023 and cost about $800 million. Anyone want to bet on when it will actually get done and what it will cost by the time it is finished?) It remains to be seen how much these seemingly endless road improvements actually help our famously bad traffic. Unfortunately, weeks of requests by the Editorial Board for more information from FDOT about the project were fruitless. Even if the Signature Bridge isn't a game changer for Miami traffic and even if the 'iconic' arches don't really improve Miami's iconic skyline — we have our doubts — the park proposal felt like something different, something tangible for taxpayers who too often are sidelined in big government projects. The park was a reward for suffering through the road improvements. The land, carved from reclaimed and forgotten property under roadways set to be elevated when construction is complete, could be a wonderful park. It would stretch from Overtown to Biscayne Bay and include a mile-long Heritage Trail. With this park, residents would have that all-too-rare thing in Miami: open space in the heart of the city. Done right, it could have echoed the successes of the similarly named but unrelated Underline, a 10-mile linear park that has partially opened under Metrorail tracks south of the Miami River. That stretch, with native plants and a bike and walking trail, has been a real win for Miami-Dade County. Just last year, prospects for the Underdeck park looked bright. The funding was included in a Biden administration initiative called called the Neighborhood Access and Equity (NAE) program, aimed at reversing damage done by highways built decades ago. It was part of a $3 billion 'Reconnecting Communities' program. Then came the fervor among Republicans to undo all things related to former President Biden. The Big Beautiful Bill pushed by President Trump was passed. And so a park that could have been a rare and much-needed asset for Miami became another sad casualty of politics. There is still a little hope. A spokesperson for the city of Miami told the Editorial Board that the 'unexpected loss of funding' poses a significant challenge but the city is 'exploring alternative funding options to move forward without delay.' And Miami Commission Chair Christine King, whose district includes the park site, told the Board that she is 'committed to seeing this project through to completion, even if that extends beyond the expected 2026 finish date.' South Florida, she said, has a strong track record of 'public-private partnerships coming together for the benefit of our community, especially in times of great need.' 'Giving up,' she added, 'is not an option.' For some, the loss of a park we never had won't seem like much to bother about. But building a community is about more than roads and high-rises and sports arenas. It's about quality of life. It's about how the place makes you feel. And this park, for what it symbolizes and for the rare physical asset it could be, is worth fighting for.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store