Imane Khelif must undergo mandatory sex testing to compete, World Boxing says
Imane Khelif must undergo what World Boxing describes as 'mandatory sex testing' if she wishes to compete in any women's event organised or sanctioned by the governing body.
Gender-row boxer Khelif won gold in the women's 66kg category at last summer's Olympic Games, having been cleared to compete despite being disqualified from the 2023 World Championships organised by the International Boxing Association for allegedly failing to meet eligibility criteria.
World Boxing announced on Friday it was introducing the testing 'to determine the eligibility of male and female athletes that want to take part in its competitions'.
The body – which will oversee boxing at the next Olympic Games in Los Angeles in 2028 – said it had written to the Algerian boxing federation to say that until Khelif had undergone the test, she would not be able to compete in next month's Eindhoven Box Cup or any other women's event under its authority.
World Boxing said it was introducing the rules as part of a new policy on sex, age and weight 'to ensure the safety of all participants and deliver a competitive level playing field for men and women'.
The letter stated that in the event of a challenge by the federation or by World Boxing to Khelif's sex certification, Khelif would remain ineligible to compete until the dispute was resolved.
Speaking to ITV News in March about the row over her involvement at the Olympics, Khelif said: 'I see myself as a girl, just like any other girl. I was born a girl, raised as a girl and have lived my entire life as one.
'I have competed in many tournaments, including the Tokyo Olympics and other major competitions, as well as four World Championships. All of these took place before I started winning and earning titles. But once I began achieving success, the campaigns against me started.'
All athletes over 18 wishing to compete in a World Boxing owned or sanctioned event will need to undergo a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) genetic test to determine their sex at birth and their eligibility to compete.
Sign up to The Recap
The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action
after newsletter promotion
Athletes deemed to be male at birth, as evidenced by the presence of Y chromosome genetic material (the SRY gene) or with a difference of sexual development (DSD) where male androgenisation occurs, will be eligible to compete in the male category, World Boxing said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Ivanka Trump blasted for surfing as LA burns after split with Donald over immigration - as celeb pals like Kim Kardashian slam ICE raids
Ivanka Trump is facing sharp criticism for posting surfing snaps on Instagram while Los Angeles was being torn apart by rioting over her father's immigration policies. The First Daughter has been thrust into an awkward position as she juggles loyalty to family and a blossoming alliance with A-list influencers who have slammed her father's efforts to hunt down and deport illegal immigrants. Trump's provocative decision to deploy Marines to help wrangle protesters rioting against his immigration policies in LA prompted a wave of celebrity condemnation, led by Ivanka's close friend Kim Kardashian. The decade-long friendship is well documented and Ivanka is largely credited with helping Kim lobby her father during his first presidency. But Kim's decision to speak out against Trump's immigration policies has left Ivanka in a tough spot and opened her up to vile criticism for failing to address the saga. Her latest two Instagram posts have been inundated with cruel comments condemning her silence. 'Ivanka Antoinette. While America burns, she surfs,' one said on a picture of Ivanka holding a surfboard at the beach. 'How ''let them eat cake'' is this post?,' another said. Trump's provocative decision to send military reinforcements into LA to wrangle protesters who are rioting in the streets against his immigration policies prompted a wave of celebrity condemnation, led by Ivanka's close friend Kim Kardashian 'Ivanka should be mortified, humiliated and embarrassed by her father's heartless actions,' a third wrote, while countless others urged her to 'get her dad under control.' Back in 2018, a year into her father's first term and when she was a crucial player in the administration, Ivanka addressed Trump's tough-on-borders approach. 'That was a low point for me,' she admitted. 'I felt very strongly about that and I am very vehemently against family separation and the separation of parents and children.' But Ivanka was quick to point out that immigration matters were out of her remit. Now that she's got no formal involvement in her father's administration, she appears even less inclined to wade into discussions on the controversial topic. But Kim K's decision to slam the tactics is likely to put Ivanka in an awkward spot. 'When we witness innocent, hardworking people being ripped from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up. We have to do what's right,' Kim wrote. The decade-long friendship is well documented and Ivanka is largely credited with helping connect the A-lister with her father during his first presidency 'Growing up in LA, I've seen how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city. They are our neighbors, friends, classmates, coworkers, and family. 'No matter where you fall politically, it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants. We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely.' The Department of Homeland Security hit back hours later, with a post on X which read: '@KimKardashian, which one of these convicted child molesters, murderers, drug traffickers and rapists would you like to stay in the country.' The post was accompanied by photos of four individuals ICE arrested in recent days from the City of Angels. Kim is one of many celebrities using their platforms to condemn what they consider the heavy-handed approach to tightening border restrictions. Trump gave the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents instructions to ramp up detention activities across the nation as part of his mass deportation agenda. But raids across the nation have sparked furious backlash, most apparent in LA where rioters have spent six days tearing the city apart in protest against the policies. Trump responded by authorizing the deployment of 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. But Kim appears to be the first celebrity from Ivanka's inner circle to publicly comment on the controversy. Since stepping back from politics, Ivanka has been embraced by Miami socialites and A-listers, seen mingling with the likes of Camila Coelho, Isabela Grutman and Jeff Bezos' fiance Lauren Sanchez. Ivanka has also developed close friendships with her sister-in-law Karlie Kloss and supermodel Gisele Bündchen, both of whom have been vocal in the past about their political affiliations and support of immigrants. In 2020, Kloss told Bravo host Andy Cohen, 'I voted as a Democrat in 2016 and I plan to do the same in 2020', meanwhile Bündchen once replied to a fan's comment on Instagram asking if she was supporting Trump in 2016 with a simple but firm 'NO!' In 2017, shortly after Trump's first foray into nationality-based immigration bans, Bündchen penned an Instagram post celebrating the diversity of immigrants, tagged: 'weareallimmigrants.' And Kloss, who is married to Ivanka's husband Jared's billionaire brother, Joshua Kushner, criticized Trump's immigration policies in 2018, urging her fans to call their local congress member to voice their concerns. 'It's not the time to say 'there are no words', there are many. Politicizing the lives of these defenseless children and ripping them from their parents is heartless,' she wrote. 'We have to be the voices for these kids, and I support anyone standing up to do right by them. No matter what side of the aisle you are on - speak up.' The relationship between the sisters-in-law was initially rumored to be frosty, sources told back in April that relations had thawed since Ivanka took a step back from politics. 'Ivanka's views have changed and after she revealed she hates politics. Since then, her and Karlie have gotten very close and Karlie and Gisele have been close for over a decade,' a source close to Ivanka said. 'They formed a trio and love spending time with each other. Both Karlie and Gisele - who have been friends for years - have revealed that they are not Trump supporters.' 'Karlie has been very vocal about her political beliefs. Gisele revealed to her fans on social media that she does not support Trump.' She famously said in January that she 'hated politics', telling The Skinny Confidential podcast: 'I hate politics. It's very dark, negative. And some people love like the gladiator aspect of it: the fight. That was never me.' From 2016 to 2020 Ivanka was a senior advisor during her father's first term, giving up her life as a socialite and fashion designer and moving her young family from New York City to Washington DC. But when Trump announced he was running again in 2022, Ivanka took a step back. 'I love my father very much,' she said in a statement at the time, 'I am choosing to prioritize my children and the private life we are creating as a family. I do not plan to be involved in politics.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Opetaia-Zurdo, Fundora-Murtazaliev and more - unification bouts we need to see
For many boxers, simply having one belt is not enough. Thanks to the machinations of sanctioning bodies, multiple world champions can co-exist in a weight class – but both fighters and fans alike love to see titleholders converge in unification bouts. Two belts are always better than one, whilst boxers that claim champion status with two sanctioning bodies also boast bragging rights over their rivals. Some champions even manage to negotiate the politics of the sport to combine all four major belts to become undisputed at their weight, a dream shared by many fighters over the decades. Unification bouts constantly capture the attention, but these five champion-versus-champion fights could produce blockbuster nights. Jai Opetaia - Gilberto 'Zurdo' Ramirez The cruiserweight division, perhaps unfairly, has largely been seen as a stepping stone weight, with fighters learning their trade before assaulting boxing's most-glamorous class, heavyweight. Only three fighters have ever reigned as undisputed champion at 200lbs, Evander Holyfield, O'Neil Bell, and Oleksandr Usyk. Holyfield instantly moved up to heavyweight; Usyk defended his titles once before following in the footsteps of his predecessor. Unified champions are also quite rare, with current WBO and WBA champ Gilberto 'Zurdo' Ramirez just the sixth example in the four-belt era, after Murat Gassiev (WBA, IBF), Denis Lebedev (WBA, IBF), Oleksandr Usyk (Undisputed), David Haye (WBA, WBC, WBO), and Jean-Marc Mormeck (WBA, WBC). Both Ramirez and IBF belt holder Jai Opetaia have not been shy about discussing a unification bout. Last November, Ramirez became the first man to unify two titles in the division since Usyk after beating then-WBO champion Chris Billam-Smith. Opetaia successfully defended his IBF crown earlier in June, whilst Ramirez is in action at the end of the month against challenger Yuniel Dorticos. If the Mexican navigates his first defence of his unified status, a bout with Opetaia could – and should – be on the cards for later this year. Both fighters appear keen on the prospect, but it remains to be seen whether we will see a cruiserweight with three straps by the end of 2025. Janibek Alimkhanuly - Carlos Adames Kazakh Janibek Alimkhanuly is another two-belt champion, holding the IBF and WBO titles at middleweight. Owning half of the belts in the division, Alimkhanuly is the man to beat, especially for WBC champion Carlos Adames. That is because the Dominican refuses to face stablemate Erislandy Lara, who holds the WBA crown at 160lbs. Whilst Adames has ruled out a bout with Lara, he wants to fight Alimkhanuly. The two have exchanged barbs for some time, with Alimkhanuly petitioning Turki Alalshikh to organise a bout between the pair for the undercard of Canelo-Crawford later this year. Reports suggest that negotiations have taken place between both champions' camps, implying that we could see a unification bout at middleweight sooner rather than later. Nick Ball - Rafael Espinoza Conversation around Nick Ball has focused on a potential bout with undisputed super bantamweight champion Naoya Inoue for some time, but it appears both fighters are happy to keep that fight on the back burner. WBA champion at featherweight, Ball looks set to face a different super bantamweight in his next fight, with a defence against Australian Sam Goodman scheduled for a Riyadh Season card in August. Inoue himself seems content to bide his time before moving up to featherweight, the Japanese fighter instead waiting for his compatriot Junto Nakatani to step up to super bantamweight for an all-Japan fight. That is a view shared by Ball, who has suggested that while he waits for Inoue to join the featherweight ranks, he will look to add more belts to his collection. The Liverpudlian could have potentially been a two-belt champion, missing out on the WBC crown after a controversial draw with Rey Vargas in 2024. Current WBC champion Stephen Fulton will move up to face the organisation's super-featherweight titleholder O'Shaquie Foster in August, nixing a bout with Ball. Having previously spoken about liking a fight with Fulton, diminutive scouser Ball has also discussed fighting WBO champion Rafael Espinoza. Aside from being a unification bout, the difference in height would add a certain level of intrigue to the fight. Ball stands at around 5' 2', whilst the lanky Espinoza has been measured at 6' 1', despite both operating at 126lbs. The difference in styles – and wingspans – would throw up a very interesting bout. Sebastian Fundora - Bakhram Murtazaliev Sebastian Fundora became a unified champion in his first full world title shot, defeating Tim Tszyu by split decision to take the WBO and WBC belts at super welterweight. After making a defence against Chardale Booker in March, Fundora faces Tszyu in a rematch this July. It was after Fundora's victory over Booker that IBF champ Bakhram Murtazaliev announced his desire to face the American, but it would only unify two belts. That is because Fundora vacated the WBO's title, deciding to honour a rematch clause with Tszyu, rather than face mandatory Xander Zayas. Murtazaliev has been dormant since defeating Tszyu himself in October, with the California-based fighter waiting for a unification shot. With the future of Terence Crawford, holder of the WBA belt and the interim WBO title, uncertain at super welterweight, the winner of a potential Fundora-Murtazaliev bout would be well placed to establish themselves as top dog of the 154lbs division. Oscar Collazo - Pedro Taduran There are still big fights to be made in boxing's lightest division. Oscar Collazo reigns as champion of both the WBA and WBO, with the IBF belt held by Pedro Maduran, and Melvin Jerusalem in possession of the WBC strap. Puerto Rican Collazo and Filipino Taduran are both 28-years-old and arguably in the primes, making a unification bout a tasty prospect. Collazo defeated the division's other champion, Jerusalem, in 2023, taking the Filipino's WBO strap. Jerusalem has done well to bounce back and earn the WBC belt, but a rematch with undisputed status on the line has a better ring to it than a unification bout. As such, rather than see Collazo and Jerusalem run it back, it would be interesting to see who comes out on top of a potential bout between the Puerto Rican and Taduran.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Insults and gestures exchanged between Richardson Hitchins and George Kambosos Jr in face-off ahead of bout
Richardson Hitchins and George Kambosos Jr proved they are hardly the best of friends ahead of their IBF super lightweight clash, exchanging insults at the Empire State Building. The pair met at the iconic New York Venue to face-off for the first time during fight week, with Hitchins defending his title against challenger Kambosos Jr on Saturday, June 14, live on DAZN. It will be Hitchins' first defence after winning the belt off Liam Paro in December 2024, taking a split decision win away from home in Puerto Rico. Kambosos Jr said that he aims to spoil Hitchins' Big Apple homecoming, pointing out his two previous wins at the Garden. The Australian defeated American Mickey Bey in 2019 before shocking Teofimo Lopez to claim the WBA, IBF, and WBO lightweight titles in 2021. Highlights of the pair's lowbrow conversation included Hitchins trying to set a wager with Kambosos, initially betting $50,000 that he was going to win at Madison Square Garden before raising the stakes to $100,000. Kambosos' mind games centred on claiming that Hitchins lacked oral hygiene, telling his opponent on multiple occasions that 'your breath stinks'. Hitchins claimed: 'You know I ain't going nowhere. Run from you? You ain't got nothing for me. I promise I'm gonna stop you. Right in your face all night. Easy work, easy f*cking work. 'I've been here a billion times, (I'm) world champ for a reason. This sh*t ain't going nowhere, it's saying in New York. He don't believe in himself. I bet you I stop you, you bum. F*ck you. He's getting knocked the f*ck out.' Enjoy 185+ fights a year on DAZN, the Global Home of Boxing Never miss a fight from top promoters. Watch on your devices anywhere, anytime. See Schedule ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent. Kambosos Jr's response had slightly fewer swears, stating: 'I know where you're going – run, run, run, run, run. Your breath stinks bro, you stink. That talk's easy, brother. I'm smarter than you.' After first meeting in the bowels of the Empire State, the duo renewed their war of words on the rooftop shortly after. This time Kambosos Jr started the insults, beginning: "Look at ya, you skinny-looking thing. You look scared. I can't talk with this guy; this guy's breath stinks." Hitchins was undeterred, replying: "I promise you, you will not be saying what you're saying after the fight. I promise you, bro. I'm not Lomachenko." The reigning champion then pressed Kambosos Jr about their wager, saying his opponent had shaken on it. He restarted: "Bet that $50,000 then. How (do) you shake on it and then take it back?" Kambosos Jr stated that he instead planned to stake the same amount with the bookies, who have priced the contender at 7/1. "I spoke to my financial advisor - why the f*ck would I bet $50,000 on you, one-on-one, when I could put my $50,000 on $7 odds? "That's $350,000 bro." When Hitchins pointed out that they had already shaken hands, Kambosos made a vulgar gesture with his nether regions, telling his opponent to 'shake on that'.
