ANZAC services held across Pacific
Photo:
Gouvernement de la Nouvelle-Calédonie
The ANZAC Day Dawn service ceremony in New Caledonia this Friday was attended by a larger-than-usual number of representatives from the region.
This included the two main participants, Australia and New Zealand, its diplomatic representatives and visiting soldiers.
But due to the regional military exercise Southern Cross, currently under way in New Caledonia and Wallis-and-Futuna, several defence force members from Vanuatu, Tonga or Papua New Guinea were also present at the dawn service, in downtown Nouméa.
Southern Cross 2025 was launched earlier this week, with key regional inter-operational components based in Nouméa and another operational part being in distant Wallis-and-Futuna.
New Caledonia President Alcide Ponga lays wreath at ANZAC Day dawn service in Nouméa – 25 April 2025
Photo:
Gouvernement de la Nouvelle-Calédonie
The exercise, this year, brings together around two thousand soldiers from up to 19 countries.
It is designed to simulate humanitarian relief following a devastating cyclone on Wallis island.
New Caledonia's government was represented by its President Alcide Ponga while the French government was represented by High Commission Secretary-General Stanislaw Alfonsi.
Another ceremony is scheduled to take place on Saturday, at the New Zealand cemetery in Nesssadiou, on the north-western coast of the main island.
1000 men from the Pacific Islands served in World War I, including 500 men from the Cook Islands and 150 from Niue.
ANZAC Dawn service in Niue
Photo:
Broadcasting Corporation of Niue
New Zealand's Veterans' Minister said the effects of war are deeply felt in a small Pacific Island like Niue.
Chris Penk attended commemorations in Niue including a national remembrance service today.
New Zealand's Veterans' Minister Chris Penk attended ANZAC Day commemorations in Niue including a national remembrance service today
Photo:
Broadcasting Corporation of Niue
150 men from Niue volunteered to serve in the New Zealand expeditionary force during World War One.
At least 15 of those were killed in action.
ANZAC Day service in Rarotonga, Cook Islands
Photo:
Australian High Commission, Cook Islands
In Rarotonga, people gathered to this morning reflect on the contribution and sacrifices made by those who have served their nation, and those who continue to serve across Australia, New Zealand and Cook Islands.
ANZAC Dawn service held in Rarotonga, Cook Islands with Prime Minister Mark Brown leading dignitaries
Photo:
Australian High Commission, Cook Islands
An ANZAC service was also held on Atiu.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Cancelling The Ethnic Cleansers: Australia Revokes Simcha Rothman's Visa
It is a curious feeling to see a government, let alone any politician, suddenly find their banished backbones and retired principles. The spine, on being discovered, adds a certain structural integrity to arguments otherwise lacking force and credibility. The recent spat between Israel and Australia suggests that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's often insecure, and often overly cautious administration, is starting to show some muscle and certitude. The cancellation of Simcha Rothman's visa by the Albanese government was something of a minor revelation. Rothman is a member of Mafdal-Religious Zionism, a party led by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich that has made its position on Palestinians unmistakably clear. (Smotrich became the subject of sanctions by Australia along with Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom in June for 'inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.') As a certain garden variety shrub of hate he decries countries for not taking in Palestinians as part of an approved ethnic cleansing program, accusing them of 'aiding and abetting a terrorist organisation using them as human shields'. In an interview with Australia's national broadcaster, Rothman made his primary colour position clear: 'I think the government of Australia needs to decide, do they want to be on the side of Hamas, or do they want to be on the side of Israel?' Advertisement - scroll to continue reading The letter of revocation stated that he would be engaged in events that would 'promote his controversial views and ideologies, which may lead to fostering division in the community'. Being in Australia 'would or might be a risk to the good order of the Australian community or a segment of the Australian community, namely, the Islamic population'. Adduced examples of demerit included arguments that Palestinian children were not perishing to hunger in the Gaza Strip, that those children, in any case, were enemies of the Israeli state, along with the notion that the two-state solution had 'poisoned the minds of the entire world'. The nature of such 'inflammatory statements' might, were Rothman to enter Australia licensed by the government, 'encourage others to feel emboldened to voice any anti-Islamic sentiments, if not to take action to give effect to that prejudice'. Far from engaging these reasons, Rothman's enchantingly shrunken worldview was clear in its chiselled simplicity: Australia was behaving undemocratically, its government falsely claiming to argue against 'hate and division' despite permitting protestors 'to shout on the streets calls for genocide of the Jewish people.' Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar was quick in response, revoking the residency visas of Australia's diplomatic representatives responsible for affairs concerning the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah. 'I also instructed the Israeli Embassy in Canberra to carefully examine any official Australian visa application for entry to Israel,' Sa'ar fumed on X. In this apoplectic reaction, no one seemed to recall that Australia had already revoked the visa of a former Israeli justice minister, Ayelet Shaked, at the end of October last year over what Australia's Home Minister Tony Burke described as 'concerns she would threaten social cohesion'. Shaked had been slated to attend events organised by the Australia Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). Admittedly, she was a former politician rather than a sitting member of the Israeli parliament. In an interview with the Erin Molan Show, an otherwise underwhelming program, Sa'ar recapitulated his cranky position. 'This is the opposite of what should be done,' he objected. 'Instead of battling antisemitism in Australia, the Australian government is doing the opposite – they are fuelling it.' The Palestinian Authority surprised nobody in calling the measure to cancel visas 'illegal and in violation of the Geneva Conventions, international law, the United Nations resolutions, which do not grant the occupying power such authority.' The statement went on to stress 'that such actions reflect Israeli arrogance and a state of political imbalance, and will only strengthen Australia's and other countries' determination to uphold international law, the two-state solution, and recognition of the State of Palestine as the path to peace.' Australia's foreign minister, Penny Wong, also thought this all a bit much. Calling the decision to cancel the visas of Australia's diplomats in the West Bank an 'unjustified reaction' to Canberra's decision to recognise Palestine, Wong felt confident enough to retort that the Israeli decision had been foolish. 'At a time when dialogue and diplomacy are needed more than ever, the Netanyahu Government is isolating Israel and undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution.' This messiness was appropriately crowned by that grand figure of demagoguery himself, the Israeli Prime Minister. 'History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews,' came the scornful blast from the office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli PM is certainly not wrong about Albanese being weak but mistaken about what he has been weak about. Most intriguingly, Albanese has found some courage on this front, albeit the sort of courage fortified by allies. But that's something.
The Spinoff
10 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Secondary teachers walk off the job as government digs in
Teachers say an offer of 1% a year is an insult. Ministers say they should be at the negotiating table, not on the picket line, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. A full-day walkout Secondary teachers are off the job today, with classes around the country cancelled as members of the Post Primary Teachers' Association stage a one-day strike. As Lyric Waiwiri-Smith explains in The Spinoff this morning, the action follows teachers' rejection of the government's offer of a 1% annual pay rise over three years – an increase the union described as 'the lowest in a generation'. Teachers had sought a 4% yearly rise to cover inflation and stem the loss of staff overseas. Today's walkout is just the beginning: rolling strikes are scheduled for mid-September, when teachers will refuse to teach particular year levels on successive days. Meanwhile, primary teachers are holding paid union meetings this week to consider their next steps, after also voting to reject the 1% offer. Teachers say they're worth more For many teachers, the issue is about more than headline figures. In a widely shared essay for The Spinoff, Auckland teacher Connor Murphy describes the government's offer as 'an insult disguised as an offer', pointing out that 'teachers entered into these negotiations with a set of very reasonable demands. Instead of making a reasonable counteroffer, the government ignored our requests and crafted an offer seemingly purpose-built to make things worse.' Teachers argue their pay has fallen far behind comparable professions, with Australian starting salaries now up to $31,000 higher than New Zealand's. Murphy says that while prime minister Christopher Luxon has talked about keeping New Zealanders at home with good, well-paying jobs, the government hasn't followed the rhetoric with action, and teachers are instead eyeing better pay across the Tasman. Ministers dig in Education minister Erica Stanford has urged the union to return to negotiations, calling today's strike 'premeditated' and 'deeply unfair' for parents and students. Public service minister Judith Collins went further, labelling the walkout a 'political stunt' and accusing unions of having 'little tantrums' and using children 'like their shuttle boards' [sic]. The government has tried to highlight what it says is a strong deal: public service commissioner Sir Brian Roche said the latest offer came 'on top of a further 3.9% to 7.7% in pay increases already built-in for each of the next three years' and that the package would deliver pay rises of between $2,500 and $7,000 a year, when annual progression is included. But Collins herself was forced into a rare backtrack yesterday after she wrongly claimed that teachers with 10 years' experience earned $147,000 a year. As Stuff's Bridie Witton and Glenn McConnell report, she later admitted she had 'mixed up [her] messages', clarifying that only a small number of senior deputy principals in large schools would reach that figure. The gaffe further inflamed teachers already sceptical about the government's grasp of their pay and conditions. What teachers actually earn So what do teachers really take home? As Nik Dirga writes in a comprehensive explainer for RNZ, the base salary for a newly qualified teacher begins at just over $61,000, rising step by step each year to $103,000 at the top of the scale. The Ministry of Education puts the average secondary teacher salary at around $101,000. Extra responsibilities – such as running a subject department or serving as deputy principal – attract management units and allowances, which can boost pay into the $110,000–$140,000 range. But only a handful of teachers reach the $147,000 Collins cited, and most are in senior leadership rather than classroom roles. For new teachers, the current offer of 1% a year translates to an increase of less than $12 a week. That, say striking teachers, is why they're on the picket lines today, and why more disruption is on the way unless the government comes back with an offer they can live with.
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Warmongering Astrologers: Sky News And The War Cabinet
Twenty-four-hour news networks have demonstrated that surfeit kills discretion. The search for fillers, distractions and items that will titillate, enrage or simply sedate, is an ongoing process. Gone are the days when discerning choices were made about what constituted worthy news, an admittedly difficult problem that would always lead to priorities, rankings and judgments that might well be challenged. At the very least, news could be kept to specific time slots during the day, meaning that audiences could, at the very least, be given some form of rationing. Such an approach culminated in that most famous of occasions on April 18, 1933 when the BBC's news announcer declared with a minimum of fuss that 'There is no news.' This was followed by piano music playing out the rest of the segment. On the pretext of coming across as informed and enlightened, such networks have also bought into astrology masquerading as sound comment. The commentators are intended to lend an air of respectability to something that either has not happened, or something they have little idea about. Their credentials, however, are advertised like glitzy baubles, intended to arrest the intelligence of the viewing audience long enough to realise they have been had. Sky News Australia is one such cringing example. The premise of The War Cabinet, which aired on August 11, was clear: those attending it were simply dying for greater militarism and war preparedness on the part of the Australian government, while those preferring diplomacy would be treated like verminous denialists yearning for some sand to bury their heads in. The point was less a matter of news than prediction and speculation, an exercise of mass bloviation. To lend a war time flavour to proceedings, the event was staged in the Cabinet Room of Old Parliament House, which host Chris Uhlmann celebrated as the place Australia Prime Minister 'John Curtin and his ministers steered the nation through World War II.' Former ministers, defence leaders, and national security experts were gathered 'around the Cabinet table to answer a single question: is Australia ready for war?' The stale view from Alexander Downer, Australia's longest and, in many ways, most inconspicuous foreign minister, did little to rustle or stir. Liberal democracy, to be preserved in sacred glory, needed Australia to be linked to a 'strong global alliance led by the United States'. That such an alliance might itself be the catalyst for war, notably given expectations from Washington about what Australia would do in a conflict with China, was ignored with an almost studious ignorance. Instead, Downer saw quite the opposite. 'If this alliance holds, if it's properly cemented, if it is well-led by the Americans… and if we, as members of the alliance, are serious about making a practical contribution to defence through our spending and our equipment, then we will maintain a balance of power in the world.' His assessment of the current Albanese government was one of some dottiness. 'I think the government here in Australia has made a major mistake by playing, if you like, politics with this issue of the dangers of the region and losing the balance of power because they don't want to be seen as too close to President Trump.' Any press briefing from Defence Minister Richard Marles regarding the anti-China AUKUS pact would ease any anxiety on Downer's part. Under the Albanese government, sovereignty has been surrendered to Washington in a way so remarkable it could be regarded as treasonous. While the Royal Australian Navy may never see a single US nuclear powered submarine, let alone a jointly constructed one, US naval shipyards are rolling in the cash of the Australian taxpayer. Former Labor Defence Minister, Joel Fitzgibbon, lamented that Australia's strategic outlook in the Indo-Pacific was 'deteriorating rather markedly,' a formulation utterly vague and a mere parroting of just about every other hawkish analyst that sees deterioration everywhere. Thankfully, we had Strategic Forum CEO Ross Babbage to give some shape to it, which turned out to be that ragged motif of the Yellow Horde to the North readying to strike southwards. The Oriental Barbarians with a tinge of Communist Red were primary reasons for a worsening strategic environment, aided by their generous military expenditure. With almost a note of admiration, Babbage felt that China was readying for war by adjusting its economy and readying its people 'for tough times that may come'. The venal, ever noisy former Home Affairs Department Secretary Mike Pezzullo, who has an unhealthy appetite for warring matters, drew upon figures he could not possibly know, along with everybody else who have tried to read the inscrutable entrails of international relations. Chances of conflict in the Indo-Pacific by 2027, for instance, was a '10 to 20 per cent' likelihood. Sky News, living down to its subterranean standards, failed to mention that Pezzullo had misused his position as one of Canberra's most powerful bureaucrats to opine on ministerial appointments via hundreds of private text messages to Liberal Party powerbroker Scott Briggs. The Australian Public Service Commission found that Pezzullo had, among other things, used his 'duty, power, status or authority to seek to gain a benefit or advantage for himself' and 'failed to maintain confidentiality of sensitive government information' and 'failed to act apolitically in his employment'. His employment was subsequently terminated, and his Order of Australia stripped in September last year. Fine credentials for balanced commentary on the strategic outlook of a state. Other talking heads were keen to push spine tingling prospects of wicked regimes forming alliances and making mischief. Oleksandra Molloy, billed as an aviation expert, thought the 'emerging axis' between Russia, North Korea and Iran 'quite concerning'. Former naval officer and defence pundit Jennifer Parker urged the fattening of the defence budget to 'develop a degree of autonomy'. Retired Australian Army major general Mick Ryan was most unimpressed by the 'zero risk' mentality that seemed to pervade 'pretty much every bit of Australian society'. The Department of Defence needed to take greater risks in terms of procurement, innovation and reducing 'the amount of time it takes to develop capability'. His fantasy was positively Spartan in its military totalitarianism: an Australian state nurturing 'a spirit of innovation that connects military, industry and society'. The cry for conscription must be just around the corner. Chief war monger and think tanker Peter Jennings aired his all too familiar views on China, which have become pathological. 'It is utterly false for our government to say that somehow they have stabilised the relationship with China. Things may have improved on the trade front, but that is at the expense of ignoring the strategic developments which all of our colleagues around the table have spoken about, which is China is positioning for war.' And there you had it: an hour of furious fretting and wailing anxiety with all figures in furious agreement, with a resounding boo to diplomacy and a hurrah for astrology. Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures at RMIT University. Email: bkampmark@
