Lincoln residents call for 'eyesore' bridge to be reopened
According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the closure has left residents facing a 20-minute detour on foot, with not all the roads suitable for walkers.Mr Smith said: "It isn't a big deal for motorists, but having it reopened would be really crucial for pedestrians and cyclists."Ms Bliss said many pedestrians used it to get to work or to go shopping."There is another pedestrian bridge, but the steps are very steep and it's definitely not suitable for many people," she said."Sadly, the Titanic Bridge is a bit of an eyesore at the moment, and would look really lovely if it was repainted and reopened."They say they had tried to contact the owner for an update and added: "There's a lot of mystery surrounding it."Temporary fencing was placed across the bridge last year, which Mr Smith said was frequently ignored, and permanent gates were added later.A new sign warning of a "health and safety risk" has appeared recently.A public meeting is being held to discuss the bridge's future on Monday at 18:00 BST at the Monks Road Methodist Church.A bridge was first built over the River Witham there in 1912, and was replaced with the current bridge in the 1990s.
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wolverhampton supermarket hosts breast cancer screening unit
A breast cancer mobile screening unit is currently available outside a supermarket in Wolverhampton for women who are eligible for unit, stationed at Sainsbury's at Bentley Bridge until 15 September, marks the first time one has been located at the registered with GP practices in the local area and who are due a screening will receive an invitation by letter to attend the unit, and organisers hope it will encourage more local women to attend their aged 50 to 74 are eligible for breast screening and are invited every three years. The unit is run by the Dudley, Wolverhampton and South West Staffordshire Breast Screening Programme.A spokesperson for City of Wolverhampton Council said: "Attending screening is vital for early detection of breast cancer, which is strongly linked to reduced mortality."Anyone experiencing symptoms of breast cancer - such as a new lump, changes to the skin of the breast or nipple discharge - should not wait for their screening invitation but should instead contact their GP as soon as possible."Councillor Obaida Ahmed said: "Early detection is the best form of defence against cancer, which is why regular screening is so important. It can detect cancers at an early stage."Breast screening saves around 1,300 lives each year in the UK, and finding cancer early can make it more likely that treatment will be successful."Anyone who is invited for a screening appointment but is unable to attend their allocated time is advised to contact the screening programme's office on 01384 244177 to rebook an appointment at a more convenient time. Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Politicians making mischief over asylum hotels are in for an unwelcome surprise
The High Court's ruling that asylum seekers must be moved out of the Bell Hotel in Epping leaves Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, with a nasty headache. The small boats keep on coming, and, under the law, asylum seekers must be housed somewhere while their cases are assessed. The Home Office was behind the curve on the legal action by Tory-led Epping Forest District Council, issuing a last-minute plea to no avail. There is gloom among ministers, who fear a dangerous precedent has been set; they are privately bemused that the ruling was based on the hotel owner's failure to obtain a change of use permission under planning regulations. Ministers fear the ruling will encourage more protests outside other asylum hotels, creating an opening for the far right. The ruling shines an unwelcome spotlight on the small boats crisis. In fact, the government has had a reasonable run on this nightmarish issue in recent weeks, announcing a raft of initiatives in the fallow summer period, including the potentially game-changing "one in, one out" returns agreement with France. Today, Dan Jarvis, the security minister, hoped to highlight a returns deal with Iraq, but his media round was dominated by asylum hotels. He struggled to spell out what his 'other more appropriate accommodation' for migrants might be if more have to leave them. The Conservatives and Reform UK are making mischief, encouraging other local authorities to take legal action aimed at closing asylum hotels in their areas. Tory-run Broxbourne is already following Epping Forest's lead. The 10 authorities run by Reform will doubtless do the same. Nigel Farage has called for 'peaceful protests' outside the hotels to 'put pressure' on councils to go to law. This is divisive and irresponsible: if the far right again exploits such demonstrations, it will be nothing to do with Farage, of course. The Tories are enjoying the government's embarrassment, and their hypocrisy knows no bounds. The number of asylum hotels peaked at 402 under the Sunak government, when up to 56,000 people were housed in them. Today, 210 of the hotels house 32,000 people at a cost of about £5m a day. Labour has pledged to close them all by 2029, but the short-term pressures have now suddenly got worse. Sensible Tories know their party is guilty of double standards. A revealing WhatsApp exchange leaked to ConservativeHome shows that some Tory MPs complained about their party's anti-Labour attack ad criticising the 'huge list of freebies and perks' allegedly enjoyed by people in asylum hotels – because asylum seekers enjoyed the same standards under the Tory government. Lewis Cocking, the new MP for Broxbourne, wrote: 'This makes us look silly as we gave them all this too, which is why we are in the mess we are in today.' Kevin Hollinrake, the Tory chair, agreed with the criticism but didn't withdraw the ad. This goes to the heart of an intense Tory debate about how far the party should apologise for its mistakes in power on issues like immigration and the economy. Some party figures think the Tories will not get a hearing from voters until Kemi Badenoch makes a big bang mea culpa. But Rachel Maclean, the party's director of strategy, claims: 'We've done the mea culpas, we've done the apologies, we've done all that.' I hadn't noticed, and, more importantly, neither has the public. There is little sign the Tories have learnt lessons. Incredibly, Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, responded to the Epping ruling by calling on Labour to bring back the Tories' discredited Rwanda scheme. He is flogging a dead horse that would never have run even if last year's general election had not intervened. It's not easy for Badenoch. A messy tit-for-tat dispute ensued after she distanced her party from the Liz Truss mini-Budget by claiming Labour was making 'even bigger mistakes.' This half-hearted apology didn't stop the ever-unrepentant Truss from accusing Badenoch of repeating 'spurious narratives' to 'divert from the real failures of 14 years of Conservative government in which her supporters are particularly implicated.' Badenoch herself was not entirely absent from the scene of the crime: at the time, s he praised the Truss mini-Budget. I don't think the Tory leader will be taken seriously by voters until she makes a fuller admission of the party's mistakes in 14 years in office. Saying ad nauseam that her party is 'under new leadership' won't cut it. Nor can the Tories rely on an anti-Labour tide to sweep them back to power because voters have somewhere else to go – to Farage.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Short-term fix to a bigger crisis': Readers react to Epping asylum hotel ruling
Independent readers are divided over the High Court ruling that asylum seekers must be moved out of The Bell Hotel in Epping, with many seeing it as a fraught and short-term fix to a wider housing and migration crisis. Many argued the judgement sets a dangerous precedent, effectively rewarding protests and unrest by closing hotels, and leaving asylum seekers displaced without proper alternatives. Others warned that the decision risks emboldening far-right groups, who would see disruptive tactics as a way to influence local planning and policy. But some commenters backed the court's decision, saying local people had been ignored for too long while their towns and services absorbed sudden changes without consultation. 'Ordinary UK citizens are sick of being ignored while resources are stretched thin,' said one reader, echoing widespread frustration that communities feel powerless over decisions made in Westminster. Meanwhile, however, several readers stressed that immigration is essential to the UK's economy, especially in an ageing society, while others called for safe and legal asylum routes to end the small boats crossings. Critics of Reform and Nigel Farage accused them of exploiting the crisis for political gain, while pointing out that both Tory and Labour governments had failed to address the backlog. Here's what you had to say: This is no victory for Epping The government are now actively fast-tracking migrants from hotels to HMOs all across the country. As a landlord with two of these types of property, the temptation of a lease from Serco is getting far too hard not to take. I approximate that landlords will get an extra £2,000–£5,000 per year to lease to the government. Not only that, you don't have to ever find a tenant or look after the property as Serco completely take over the management and maintenance duties. These properties have a great value to society, as they are frequently used by split families, where fathers can't afford a full-price rent or mortgage. These places give them time to get back on their feet and live well, whilst paying maintenance. Also, young single people who don't have a strong family network – it's their only way to afford any accommodation. These people are being squeezed out as more properties are turned over to the government. 227detius Ordinary UK citizens are sick of being ignored People in towns like Epping are exhausted. They never asked for their local hotel to be turned into an asylum hostel, never got a say, and yet they're the ones left living with the consequences – rising tension, fear, and the sense their community is being changed without their consent. Ordinary UK citizens are sick of being ignored while resources are stretched thin and foreign nationals are prioritised over them. This isn't about hate – it's about fairness, safety, and respect for the people who actually live here. The High Court ruling is a rare moment where local voices have finally been heard, and many feel it's long overdue. RFA They are asylum seekers, not migrants They are asylum seekers and cannot be called migrants. I have seen some people in hotels where they seem lost. What they need is a place to sleep and be able to eat their nation's dishes, and hotels are not aware of what food they eat. On top of that, hotels hire people who speak their language to learn their taste. If they can buy stuff themselves, that will reduce costs for government considerably. Once their case is finalised, they can start work and won't be a burden to government. TotiCalling The far-right create the problems they rail against So, right-wingers who voted in a right-wing party to stop asylum seekers being housed in run-down empty homes across the country that locals didn't want to live in, and house them in hotels instead, have won a victory against the policy they created. It's endless. The far-right create a problem, then rail against it, then by their actions create a new problem that they then blame on others and rail against that. If the UK stops accepting asylum seekers, which is what the anti-immigrant groups want, countries that border conflict zones may also reject their international obligation, leading to many times more asylum seekers heading to the UK where they will just go underground and untracked. It could also potentially damage our relationships with trading partners that do take asylum seekers and undermine our moral position that supports our global trading and strategic interests. But hey, why look at potential problems when you can raise a pitchfork and kick off. BrotherChe Farage is stirring up the crisis Professional agitator Farage is stirring up the crisis for political gain! Reform has NO policies but 'stop the boats' – a problem Labour inherited from the Tories. However, it seems the right-wing media are pushing Farage and Reform as they are the party of the establishment, who would deregulate Britain – only an advantage for the richest few. The small boats crisis also, as giving Farage a single-issue rhetoric, masks the large legal migration that happened under the TORIES – and we are not told how large it is now! Mintman Questionable judgement A questionable judgement. It says to local communities if you don't want these asylum hotels/refugees in your communities, you can protest on the grounds it might make it unsafe for your children on their way home from school, and you get the council to shut them down. You just have to make a fuss on behalf of your children. chrish Playing a very dangerous game The left-wing political establishment is playing a very dangerous game, bringing people into the country in this way and planting them in the middle of settled communities – and at great expense. The political establishment might think they are provoking the far-right, but in reality they are provoking ordinary people, many of whom have fallen on hard times. If they carry on like this, it could get very ugly. Mark Reform don't do solutions I see Reform claiming credit for this judgement. I don't see any practical solutions from Reform as to how to tackle this problem. In fact, it seems Reform don't do solutions. While the number of asylum seekers held in hotels etc is now one for Labour to solve, it should be remembered who was responsible for this backlog to build – the last government. JRiley Immigration is here to stay Some people blame Tony Blair for embracing a policy of high immigration. However, the truth is that during the Blair years, net migration was generally small but increased to between 200,000 and 300,000 per year in 2004 (Migration Policy Institute). However, in the post-Brexit years net migration rose to between 600,000 to 900,000 per year (ONS). The UK is a rapidly ageing country and cannot function without immigrants. So, immigration is here to stay and people should be grateful for that, especially pensioners and those on benefits, because immigrants pay taxes that allow the government to pay pensions and benefits. Pomerol95 Kicking the can down the road So the far-right start to riot, and their targets are punished and moved away? Makes sense. I'd rather we get rid of the far-right that are ruining the town. Good job on kicking the can down the road a bit. Bobertson If you don't like immigration, don't cheer invasions A large proportion of recent asylum seekers come from countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya – all countries which have been reduced to ruin by invasions which most of these people enthusiastically supported. If you don't like immigration, don't vote for people like Tony Blair or Lord Snooty Cameron, don't cheer on "Our Boys" when they go rampaging around the world! envious Safe routes are needed Genuine refugees need SAFE routes that the last Tory government took away, and a reintroduction of such routes would probably eliminate the small boats problem. Christopher1959
