Zelensky prepares to woo Trump one last time
Ahead of Zelensky's summit with Trump and Vance, the Ukrainian president and Merz will first convene a virtual meeting with his strongest European allies. Scheduled for 2pm Berlin time, they will be joined by British PM Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italy's Giorgia Meloni, EU and Nato chiefs Ursula von der Leyen and Mark Rutte, as well as the leaders of Poland, Finland and the European Council.
The aim of this preliminary meeting is to agree on a joint position on how best to present Ukraine's case to Trump ahead of his meeting with Putin in two days' time. The American President's declaration earlier this week that he would be discussing 'land swaps' with his Russian counterpart has caused alarm with Zelensky and his allies, who are concerned that Trump could sign away Ukrainian territory to the Kremlin without consultation or permission.
Ukraine's European allies are said to be weighing up an attempt to extract a promise from the President not to do so – although given his volatile nature, any such promise from Trump, even if it did materialise, would bear little weight. They reportedly also plan to warn Trump not to trust any promises made by Putin to stick to a ceasefire, as well as discuss how best to prepare Ukraine for eventual full peace negotiations. Merz and Zelensky will then debrief on the meeting with Trump and Vance alongside the other members of the 'Coalition of the Willing' – those countries, pulled together by Starmer and Macron, who have expressed a desire to back Ukraine financially and militarily in the event of a peace deal with Russia.
The public won't have long to wait to hear how today's discussions go: Merz and Zelensky will hold a joint press conference at 4pm local time. Nevertheless, with the notoriously thin-skinned Trump holding Ukraine's fate in his unpredictable hands, don't expect either Merz or Zelensky to air any disagreements with the President that may surface in the coming hours.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mirror
Trump's fate in Epstein scandal decided, says Prince Andrew biographer
Donald Trump's fate over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is already decided, according to a biographer of Prince Andrew, who says the disgraced Duke of York's association with the paedophile billionaire was his undoing The new explosive book about Prince Andrew could potentially have implications reaching as far as the White House. Andrew Lownie's latest work, The Rise and Fall of the House of York, dedicates a whole chapter to the paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Lownie suggests that Andrew's connection with Epstein was the royal's downfall. In 2022, the Duke of York - the youngest son of the late Queen Elizabeth - faced US civil proceedings over sexual assault allegations, which led to his military honours and Royal patronages being "returned to the monarch". It comes as Royal couple secretly welcome second baby and reveal tot's adorable name. Andrew also agreed to stop using his Royal Highness title and ceased all public duties. However, Trump might escape the same fate as the disgraced Duke of York, Mr Lownie tells Express US in an interview, reports the Express. Prince Andrew and Trump Epstein was the cause of Prince Andrew's downfall, says the biographer. In relation to Andrew's ties with Epstein, Lownie revealed that the Royal Family are still fearful of future disclosures. When asked about Andrew's alleged ongoing worries, Lownie agreed, saying: "Yes, and so does the rest of the Royal Family." Prince Andrew and Trump were once connected, or at least on friendly terms, as they were pictured together at a Mar-A-Lago event on February 12, 2000, where Epstein and Maxwell were also in attendance. Trump adamantly claimed in 2019 that he didn't "know Prince Andrew" - despite the enduring photograph from that occasion. We asked Lownie about their relationship and whether Trump did, in fact, know Andrew. 'Trump was partying' The author confirmed, "Yes, there's photographic evidence of them together." However, Lownie isn't certain if a friendship ever blossomed despite the Duke and the future president's close proximity. Lownie clarified: "I'm not aware of a relationship, I mean, there's no reason for them to continue a relationship, that was when Andrew was partying in the States, and Trump was partying." Lownie added: "Maybe on official terms, a few years ago, Andrew did show Trump around to various places in London on a tour because he knew him. "Trump will get away with it, as he always does". Outrage erupted When asked if the same fate fall from grace was in store for Trump as Prince Andrew and if it could be the source of the President's downfall, Lownie responded: "No, I think Trump will get away with it, as he always does." Outrage erupted across America after Trump reneged on a campaign pledge to release all government documents relating to Epstein. Numerous observers have highlighted how the promise was abandoned following Elon Musk's assertion that the president's name featured in the files. The Epstein scandal, six years after his prison cell suicide, has rocked Trump's MAGA fan base, sparking internal strife with many withdrawing their support and even burning their red 'Make America Great Again' caps. Neither Trump nor Prince Andrew have been implicated in any criminal activity by law enforcement in relation to Epstein, nor have they ever been identified as the subject of an investigation connected to Epstein.
Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Ukraine peace push stirs oil market limbo: podcast
Follow on Apple, opens new tab or Spotify, opens new tab. Listen on the Reuters app., opens new tab As President Trump prepares to meet Vladimir Putin, an effort to punish Indian purchases of Russian crude complicates a delicate post-war supply balance. In this week's Viewsroom, Breakingviews columnists discuss how traders view this crucial pincer moment. Follow Aimee Donnellan on LinkedIn, opens new tab. Follow Jonathan Guilford on X, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab. (The hosts are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are their own.) Trump's India bullying will yield short term wins Trump's India trade slap misses Russian oil target US-India standoff is about more than Russian oil Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement, opens new tab for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit opens new tab to opt-out of targeted advertising.
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Putin faces ‘very severe consequences' if no Ukraine truce agreed, Trump says
Vladimir Putin will face 'very severe consequences' if he does not agree a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine at his summit with Donald Trump in Alaska, the US president said on Wednesday. Speaking after a call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders, including Britain's Keir Starmer, Trump also suggested he would push for a second summit if his meeting with Putin goes well – this time including his Ukrainian counterpart. 'If the first one goes OK, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump told reporters in Washington. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' Trump did not provide a timeframe for a second meeting. He is to meet Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. The meeting will reportedly be held at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson, a military facility crucial to countering the Soviet Union during the height of the cold war. Asked if Russia would face consequences if Putin did not agree to stop the war after the Alaska meeting, Trump said: 'Yes, they will … very severe consequences.' The president's remarks followed what he described as a very good call with European leaders in which he consulted about the goal and strategy for his summit. He pleased Europe's leadership by giving reassurances that a ceasefire was his priority and he would not make any territorial concessions without Kyiv's full involvement. Trump's approach at the video conference, as described by France's Emmanuel Macron, appeared to reassure some of the leaders, who were making a final collective plea to the unpredictable US president that he had a duty to protect Ukraine's sovereignty – and European security – at the talks. The European leaders spoke to Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, in a hastily convened one-hour meeting in an effort to shape Trump's negotiating strategy. Zelenskyy and European leaders have been excluded from the summit and fear that Trump, intent on fulfilling his election campaign guarantee that he could easily end the bloodshed in Ukraine, will make concessions that compromise Ukraine's future sovereignty. But Trump underlined his promise that the summit was not in itself a substantive negotiation and was what he described as a 'feel-out' to test Putin's terms to sign a temporary ceasefire that would then lead to talks with Kyiv. Trump said it had been a very good call, and that he rated it 10 out of 10. Britain, France and Germany, co-chairs of the so-called 'coalition of the willing', later laid out their position on the talks, reiterating that international borders must not be changed by force, and insisting that Ukraine must have 'robust and credible security guarantees to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity'. The three countries repeated that meaningful negotiations could happen only with a ceasefire in place, and called for Russia to face further economic sanctions if it did not agree to cease hostilities at the summit. Speaking alongside Zelenskyy in Berlin, the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said Europe wanted Trump to be successful in Alaska but that it had made clear to the US president that Ukrainian and European interests had to be protected at the summit. Merz called for a 30-day ceasefire, and then substantive talks. Putin has resisted a ceasefire for months. Setting out the key principles on which Europe is united he said: 'Negotiations must be part of a common transatlantic strategy. Then they can ultimately be most likely to succeed. This strategy must continue to rely on strong support for Ukraine and necessary pressure against Russia. This also means, if there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska, then the United States and we Europeans should … increase the pressure.' He added that there could not be any Russian legal ownership of Ukrainian territory. 'President Trump knows this position, he shares it very extensively and therefore I can say we have had a really exceptionally constructive and good conversation with each other.' Macron said no serious discussions had taken place about Russian-Ukrainian land swaps involving the ceding of Ukrainian territory, and Trump had anyway underlined that any such discussions could only be negotiated with Kyiv. He said Trump would fight for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the US and Russia and that such a meeting would be held in Europe. One European diplomat said: 'Overall the meeting was reassuring in that our points came across, but the question remains whether Trump will stick to the agreed script when he gets into the room with Putin.' Trump met heads of state and government leaders from Germany, the UK, France, Italy, Poland and Finland, as well as the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen. The issue of security guarantees for Ukraine was raised in the call with Trump, but no breakthrough was made in the US offering to provide practical support to the coalition. But the Europeans' main objective had been to seek reassurances from the notoriously fickle Trump that he would not be lured into making irretrievable pledges requiring Ukraine to make concessions of land as the price for securing Putin's agreement to a ceasefire. They also tried to extract assurances that Trump was still prepared to deploy as yet unused economic levers that could damage Russian revenues. European leaders have been careful in public to welcome Trump's summit but in private fear Trump is bent on improving US-Russia relations and sees a loss of Ukrainian sovereignty as a necessary and unavoidable price to secure that objective. Trump has been vague about his strategy, including the terms he will offer to induce Putin to agree to a ceasefire. Zelenskyy has vowed that the Ukrainian military will not voluntarily surrender territory in Donetsk and Luhansk, but Russia is insisting at least four Ukrainian regions will become Russian either at the negotiating table or through force. Earlier on Wednesday, Trump vented his fury at media reporting of his meeting with Putin, writing on Truth Social: 'The media is being really, really unfair about my meeting with Putin. They keep quoting fired losers and really stupid people like John Bolton, who just said that even though the meeting is on US soil, 'Putin has already won'. What the hell is this? We win EVERYTHING.' The treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said further sanctions or secondary tariffs could yet be placed on Russia's trading partners if the Alaska meeting did not go well. A confident Moscow dismissed the importance of Europe's consultation with Trump. The foreign ministry spokesperson Alexei Fadeyev said: 'We consider the consultations requested by the Europeans to be politically and practically insignificant actions. Verbally, the Europeans support the diplomatic efforts of Washington and Moscow to resolve the Ukrainian crisis, but in reality the European Union is sabotaging them.' Russia says the Alaska meeting is likely to address the full gamut of Russian-American bilateral relations, and not just Ukraine. 'We hope that this meeting will allow the leaders to focus on the full range of issues, from the crisis in Ukraine to the obstacles that hinder normal and constructive dialogue, which is crucial to ensuring international peace and stability,' the spokesperson said. The veteran Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, will be present at the talks.
