Sanlam pays out R6.62 billion in death and disease claims
Sanlam paid out 9.24% more than in 2023, with a sharp increase in cancer claims, while cardiovascular claims showed an uptick.
Sanlam Risk and Savings has paid out R6.62 billion in 2024 for claims for deaths and diseases, with lifestyle-related conditions taking a growing toll. The statistics point to shifting health challenges facing South Africans today, evidenced by increases in claims for illnesses such as heart disease, certain cancers, musculoskeletal disorders and mental health concerns.
Dr Marion Morkel, chief medical officer at Sanlam, says the increase in claims for diseases which have a good prognosis when detected early puts the spotlight on the importance of regular screenings and checks.
'The World Health Organisation recommends that annual health screenings and checks start in our thirties, and we urge South Africans to prioritise these as part of their yearly routine.'
ALSO READ: Liberty pays out R600 million for two-pot retirement system in 2024
What the claims statistics show for deaths and diseases
The claims statistics show that:
R6.62 billion was paid across all claims, including R5.47 billion in death and funeral claims; R501.6 million in disability, loss of income and impairment claims and R650.3 million in severe illness and injury claims.
Over the past six years, the group has paid out more than R36 billion in claims, with 2024 being one of the highest annual claim totals aside from the Covid-19 peak in 2021.
Cancer accounted for 54% of all severe illness claims, up 30% in the number of cancer claims from 2023.
Prostate cancer claims in men doubled, while breast cancer claims in women increased by 33%.
Cardiovascular conditions made up 20% of death claims and 17% of disability claims.
Sanlam paid more than 99% of all death claims. The highest claim was R36.2 million.
Morkel says lifestyle diseases came through very strongly in the claims data, with cardiovascular disease and cancer the top two causes of death and disability.
'Cancer claims under the severe illness category increased by 30%, while prostate cancer claims doubled in men and breast cancer claims increased by 33% in women.'
'These increases, while concerning, are partly the result of the knock-on effect of the Covid-19 pandemic when proactive screenings were delayed for several years.'
ALSO READ: How to ensure that your future life insurance claim is paid out
Claims statistics also show increase in strokes among women
She points out that this year's data also shows an increase in stroke and musculoskeletal disorders among women, including women in the younger age groups under the age of 50.
'While much of the data mirrors that of other countries, South Africa's high blood pressure rate is among the highest in the world, an early indicator of heart disease and stroke.'
'Regular screenings and self-checks, especially for breast cancer, are essential. For heart health, know your numbers: blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose and BMI. And once you reach your mid-40s to early 50s, make regular check-ups a priority.'
The claims statistics also show:
Disability claims skewed male, with 60% filed for men, compared to 40% for women.
Sickness income claims had a higher representation of female clients (61% female vs 39% male), with 20% of total claims for women for being pregnancy and childbirth.
Severe illness claims were relatively gender-balanced (52% female, 48% male), reinforcing the universal health risks across both genders.
ALSO READ: Why trust is so important when it comes to life insurance
Also many claims from younger people
Rhoderic Nel, chief executive of Sanlam Risk and Savings, says currently about 24% of all living benefit claims are from clients younger than 35, with increases in income protection claims (up from 15% in 2022 to around 25% in 2024).'
'It is a sobering reminder that life-changing illness can strike at any age. Being financially prepared is not something to delay but something to start now.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Health funders also heading to court about NHI Act
The Health Funders Association was established in 2015 to represent 20 medical schemes and three administrators in South Africa's private healthcare funding sector. The Health Funders Association (HFA) is also heading to court to challenge the constitutionality of the NHI Act and is asking the Gauteng High Court to set it aside because it is also unaffordable and unworkable. The Medical Association, Board of Healthcare Funders, Private Practitioners Forum and Hospital Association have already initiated legal steps against NHI. Before launching the court case, the HFA also commissioned a study to build a financial and economic model to test the viability of National Health Insurance (NHI) under different assumptions and determine a viable pathway towards a workable NHI. The HFA covers 46% of the private healthcare market, equivalent to approximately 4.1 million beneficiaries. 'South Africa needs a healthcare system that delivers equitable, quality care to all. We fully support that vision. However, in its current form and without private sector collaboration, the NHI Act is fiscally impossible and operationally unworkable, while it also threatens the stability of the economy and health system, affecting all South Africans,' Thoneshan Naidoo, CEO of HFA, says. ALSO READ: SAMA launches most comprehensive constitutional challenge yet to NHI Act Health funders going to court to help ensure national health reform 'HFA is taking this legal step not to delay progress, but to help ensure that national health reform is grounded in constitutional principles, financial realism and patient choice. We continue to advocate for a more inclusive, hybrid funding model that incorporates medical schemes in NHI. We believe such a model would expand access to care while protecting the rights of all South Africans.' The NHI Act centralises control of all healthcare financing in a single, state-run fund, removing the ability of medical schemes to offer cover for healthcare services reimbursable by the NHI. Naidoo says this effectively outlaws the constitutional right of citizens to choose how to access or fund healthcare beyond what the state provides. He points out that independent economic modelling shows that funding the intended benefits in the current NHI framework would require unprecedented increases in tax at levels far beyond South Africa's fiscal capacity. 'The proposed model offers no guarantee of improved outcomes, while restricting the mechanisms that currently drive quality and innovation in healthcare.' ALSO READ: Private hospitals also taking NHI fight to court as Motsoaledi talks 'war' Financial and economic model of NHI HFA commissioned Genesis Analytics, an independent economic consultancy with experience in more than 115 countries, to build a financial and economic model to test the viability of NHI and compare NHI, including its anticipated prohibition of most forms of private health insurance, to systems in other countries, such as South Africa's middle-income peers. Genesis was also requested to identify measures that would improve the affordability of NHI overall and address its negative impact on medical scheme members. The report, released today, unequivocally demonstrates that the NHI Act requires unsustainable tax increases while reducing healthcare access for medical scheme members, Naidoo says. 'Critically, the Genesis analysis also reveals the diverse profile of South Africa's medical scheme membership with more than 68% of members who are black, Indian or coloured and up to 83% earning less than R37 500 per month. 'The proposed NHI would therefore disproportionately impact working-class households who currently rely on medical schemes for quality care.' The Genesis modelling showed that the NHI Act is fiscally impossible and that even under the most optimistic assumptions, it is not possible to raise the funds required for NHI. ALSO READ: Private Practitioners' Forum also disputing constitutionality of NHI Act Health funders warn about 115% increase in tax to fund NHI For NHI to fund a level of care equivalent to what medical scheme members currently receive, as government indicated the intention is, the Genesis model shows that personal income tax would have to increase by 2.2 times (a 115% increase in tax) from the current average rate of 21% to an average of 46% of income. This would push marginal tax rates in the lowest income bracket from 18% to 41% and in the highest bracket from 45% to 68%. While VAT is not mentioned in the NHI Act as a means to raise funding for NHI, HFA estimated for illustrative purposes that VAT would have to increase from 15% to 36%, which is completely unrealistic, Naidoo says. The Genesis model also considered a scenario of pooling existing private and public healthcare expenditure. To enable this, personal income tax would have to increase by 1.5 times its current rate (a 47% increase in tax) from its average of 21% to 31%. Naidoo points out that at the same time, medical scheme members would face a 43% reduction in the level of healthcare services compared to what they currently receive. 'In simple terms, the equation for medical scheme members therefore becomes a matter of 'Pay 1.5 times more tax for 43% less healthcare'. 'Such tax increases are fiscally impossible, particularly given South Africa's narrow personal income tax base of 7.4 million taxpayers. In addition, this would result in healthcare expenditure accounting for 22% to 33% of total annual government expenditure, well above any global standard and with no additional allocation to other critical areas of government expenditure.' ALSO READ: NHI regulations 'prematurely' published with legislation not proclaimed yet Tax to fund NHI will reduce disposable income, health funders say 'The steep tax increases required to fund NHI will reduce disposable income, curb consumer spending across all sectors of the economy and may well trigger an exodus of high-income taxpayers. At the same time, destabilising the private healthcare sector will deter investment, put jobs at risk and slow gross domestic product (GDP) growth in a sector that contributes over 4.3% to South Africa's GDP.' The economic analysis also shows that NHI could reduce the availability of medicines and health services, while it will need more than 286 000 additional healthcare professionals. For members of medical aid schemes, the NHI Act will mean a reduction of access to healthcare for South Africa's 9.1 million medical scheme members because NHI will not offer the same level of access and quality, Naidoo says. 'The NHI Act will prohibit individuals from using their own funds to buy private medical scheme cover for services included in the NHI, removing their right to supplement public provision with private care. 'The NHI Act contravenes the state's obligation in section 27(2) of the Constitution to adopt reasonable measures to achieve the progressive realisation of the constitutional right of everyone to access healthcare services within available resources.' Naidoo says it is important to remember that the analysis shows that this prohibition is not necessary to achieve the equity objectives of the NHI Act, as the prohibition will channel public resources into higher-income population segments and could deliver worse outcomes for uninsured people. ALSO READ: Health minister defends nearly R10 million legal spend on NHI court battles Health funders want a hybrid multi-fund model that includes NHI and medical aid schemes Therefore, the HFA would like to see a hybrid multi-fund model that includes NHI and medical aid schemes. The HFA's proposed hybrid funding model allows the NHI Fund and medical schemes to operate in tandem, preserving individuals' freedom to choose supplementary private cover which is an essential feature of most effective universal health care systems worldwide where public resources are focused on those most in need, while regulated competition supports innovation, efficiency and cost control. The proposed model offers a common benefit package with built-in cross-subsidisation to ensure equitable access for vulnerable populations. Grounded in a strong primary healthcare foundation, the model reflects international best practice and is especially relevant for middle-income countries like South Africa. 'The hybrid multi-fund model is a practical solution for South Africa. It offers a faster, more affordable and lower-risk route to achieving universal health coverage through progressive reform, strengthening public healthcare while leveraging private sector funding and capacity to expand access and drive innovation.'
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Rising cancer claims highlight health challenges in South Africa
Sanlam's latest claims data reveals a worrying trend of rising cancer and cardiovascular claims in South Africa, highlighting the impact of lifestyle diseases and the ongoing effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on health screenings. Cancer remains a leading cause of severe illness claims, accounting for 54% of total payouts in this category- a 30% increase from 2023, according to Sanlam. According to the group, notably, prostate cancer claims among men have doubled, while breast cancer claims among women have risen by 33%. Cardiovascular conditions were responsible for 20% of death claims and 17% of disability claims. Sanlam says the sharp rise in cancer and cardiovascular claims points to shifting health challenges affecting South Africans today, with lifestyle diseases becoming increasingly prevalent. According to the group, conditions such as heart disease, certain cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and mental health issues are contributing to a growing claims burden. Marion Morkel, chief medical officer at Sanlam underscores the knock-on effect of the pandemic, which resulted in delayed screenings and late-stage diagnoses. 'Cancer claims under the Severe Illness category rose by 30% year-on-year – prostate claims doubled in men, and breast cancer claims rose 33% in women. These increases, while concerning, are partly the result of the knock-on effect of the Covid-19 pandemic, with proactive screenings having been delayed for several years.' Sanlam says South Africa's hypertension rates remain among the highest globally, serving as an early warning sign for heart disease and stroke. Stroke and musculoskeletal disorders have risen sharply among women, including those under 50, reflecting a worrying trend. Morkel emphasises the importance of early detection, urging South Africans to take charge of their health metrics, including blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, and BMI. 'Regular screenings and self-checks – especially for breast cancer – are essential. For heart health, know your numbers: blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, and BMI. And once you reach your mid-40s to early 50s, make regular check-ups a priority.' This information is included in Sanlam's claims data which also reveals gender disparities in disability and income protection claims. 60% of disability claims were filed by men, while 61% of sickness income claims were filed by women—20% of whom claimed for pregnancy- and childbirth-related conditions. Severe illness claims were evenly split across genders, reinforcing the universal nature of health risks. The claims data shows that Sanlam Risk and Savings has paid out a staggering R6.62 billion in individual insurance claims in 2024, marking a 9.24% increase from the previous year. 'The World Health Organisation recommends that annual health screenings and checks start in our 30s, and we urge South Africans to prioritise these as part of their yearly routine," Morkel says. Sanlam's claims statistics for 2024 reveal record-high payouts, with R5.47 billion allocated to death and funeral claims, R501.6 million to disability, loss of income, and impairment claims, and R650.3 million to severe illness and injury claims. Over the past six years, the insurer has disbursed more than R36 billion in claims, making 2024 one of the highest payout years outside the Covid-19 peak in 2021. Rhoderic Nel, Sanlam Risk and Savings chief executive points to a troubling trend—more younger individuals filing claims. 'Currently about 24% of all living benefit claims are from clients younger than 35 years old, with increases being seen in income protection claims (up from 15% in 2022 to around 25% in 2024). It's a sobering reminder that life-changing illness can strike at any age. Being financially prepared isn't something to delay – it's something to start now.' Nel stresses that each claim represents more than just a policy number—it's a life, a family, and a future. 'Every claim we pay is a promise kept. Behind each one is more than a name or contract number, it's a family, a story, a future changed. That's why our claims philosophy is rooted in fairness and compassion. People need support quickly, so we're constantly striving to reduce the time it takes to settle claims," says Nel. As health and financial risks evolve, Sanlam's data highlights the importance of financial preparedness. 'This isn't just about payouts. It's about helping people stay on their feet when life takes an unexpected turn," says Nel. PERSONAL FINANCE
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Nearly one in five South Africans lack access to safe sanitation, KwaZulu-Natal households still struggle to fetch water
More than one-third (35,8%) of households in KwaZulu-Natal without piped water in their dwellings or on site took more than 30 minutes to fetch water. Image: Oupa Mokoena Independent Newspapers KwaZulu-Natal continues to face significant challenges in providing basic water and sanitation services to its residents, with new data revealing that many households still spend over 30 minutes fetching drinking water. In addition, nearly one in five South Africans still share sanitation facilities. This is according to the 2024 General Household Survey (GHS) released by Statistics South Africa. The survey found that 35.8% of households in KZN without piped water in their dwellings or on site took more than 30 minutes to fetch water, highlighting ongoing difficulties with access in the province. While 83.3% of households in KZN had access to at least a basic level of drinking water, this is still lower than national leaders such as the Western Cape (99.8%) and Gauteng (99.6%). The GHS also showed that provinces like KZN, Limpopo (86.4%) and the Eastern Cape (87.8%) recorded the highest reliance on surface water, a key indicator of limited or unsafe access. The report distinguishes between levels of water access using what the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) calls the 'water ladder.' The highest level is 'safely managed' water available on premises, when needed, and free of harmful contamination. Basic water requires a collection time of less than 30 minutes; anything longer is considered 'limited.' Nationally, more than two-thirds (67.8%) of households that fetch their water do so in under 30 minutes, but 5% spend over an hour, underscoring the severity of the issue in specific communities, especially in rural areas. The situation is further complicated by sanitation challenges. The survey shows that only 76.3% of South Africans had access to safely managed sanitation services in 2024, those that are improved, not shared, and where waste is treated. Despite being a more urbanised province, Gauteng had the lowest access to safely managed sanitation at 66.1%, while the Eastern Cape (85.3%), Mpumalanga (84.7%), and the Northern Cape (84.4%) topped the list. Nationally, 19.9% of South Africans shared sanitation facilities, but this figure was much higher in urban areas (31.9%) compared to rural areas (13.2%). Urban informal settlements often lack the infrastructure for private toilets, and multiple households are forced to share, creating hygiene and dignity concerns. Interestingly, rural areas surpassed urban areas in access to safely managed sanitation, with 79.6% compared to 74.6%, largely due to space availability for household-level improved facilities, even if they are basic. The GHS explains that, under Sustainable Development Goal 6.2, a sanitation service is only considered safely managed if it is improved, not shared, and waste is properly treated, either on-site, via off-site treatment after collection, or through a sewer system. Only 46.2% of households nationally had sanitation facilities inside their homes, while 3.1% relied on facilities outside their yards. These figures reflect the ongoing infrastructure gaps, particularly in under-resourced or overcrowded areas. THE MERCURY
