logo
‘Nothing's safe anymore': Pakistani expert admits fear over India's 7,500-kg bunker buster missile that can strike 80m deep

‘Nothing's safe anymore': Pakistani expert admits fear over India's 7,500-kg bunker buster missile that can strike 80m deep

Time of India23-07-2025
India is reportedly developing a massive conventional missile based on its nuclear-capable Agni-V platform, designed to destroy underground enemy targets like Pakistan's nuclear command centres. The move, inspired by the US's bunker-busting strikes in Iran, has triggered alarm among Pakistani experts, who warn that it dangerously blurs the line between conventional and nuclear warfare. They argue that such a weapon could provoke miscalculation, spark unintended escalation and unravel the fragile logic that's kept South Asia from crossing the nuclear threshold.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
A powerful new conventional missile under development in India has left Pakistan visibly uneasy. Designed to strike deep underground targets, the 7,500-kg Agni-V-based bunker buster, capable of reaching hardened nuclear command centres, is already provoking a reaction across the border. A top Pakistani strategic affairs expert has sounded alarm over what she sees as a 'dangerous shift' in India's military doctrine that could upend the region's fragile balance.The missile, reportedly under development by India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), is an advanced version of the Agni-V ballistic missile platform. Unlike the nuclear-tipped Agni-V, this version is designed to carry a massive conventional warhead capable of penetrating 80 to 100 metres underground, a weapon meant to target deeply buried command centres, missile storage facilities, and other hardened sites.According to Indian media reports, the missile will have a reduced range of about 2,500 km, compared to Agni-V's intercontinental reach, due to the heavy warhead. However, its destructive potential remains significant. Two variants are believed to be in the works: one that detonates above ground to strike surface targets, and another designed to bore deep into the earth before exploding — similar in function to the US GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator.India's Agni-5 missile, equipped with bunker-busting capabilities, is tailored to address regional threats. It provides a powerful conventional option to pre-emptively neutralise enemy targets. With the ability to strike deeply fortified underground sites, the Agni-5 helps India effectively counter strategic imbalances.The weapon, if operationalised, would be among the most powerful conventional missiles in the world. Its ability to deliver a devastating payload without crossing the nuclear threshold could offer Indian military planners a new option in the event of a high-stakes conflict.But across the border, the development is being viewed with growing unease. Writing in Pakistan's Dawn newspaper, Rabia Akhtar, Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Lahore, warned that such a weapon risks a 'hazardous entanglement' between conventional and nuclear strategies. She argues that a missile capable of destroying command-and-control centres, which may also serve as nuclear command posts, could trigger unintended escalations.India's reported move comes in the wake of the United States' use of similar bunker-busting munitions against Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow and Natanz in June this year. According to Rabia Akhtar, this demonstration of conventional firepower likely influenced Indian strategic thinking, pushing for a missile that could perform a similar role in the region.While India has not officially commented on the new missile, several Indian defence experts have indicated that it could be aimed at deterring adversaries by holding their most secure military assets at risk, all without using nuclear weapons.Pakistan, however, sees a more scary picture. The very idea that a conventional missile could be used to neutralise strategic targets may prompt riskier calculations during a crisis. 'It creates uncertainty around intent,' Akhtar said, adding that Pakistan's early-warning systems might not be able to distinguish a conventional Agni missile from a nuclear one, increasing the chances of an overreaction.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gender equity finds its place in India–UK trade talks
Gender equity finds its place in India–UK trade talks

Hindustan Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Gender equity finds its place in India–UK trade talks

There is a great deal of cheer and celebration surrounding the India–UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), and rightly so. Like most trade agreements, there is a focus on critical areas, including growth in trade volumes, expanded market access, tariff reductions, and deeper bilateral cooperation – all of which contribute to India's ambition of becoming a $5 trillion economy. However, what caught my attention and perhaps not something that would make the front page, but holds a deep potential to shape development outcomes over the long-term, is Chapter 23, dedicated to trade and gender equality. Gender Equality (Pixabay) While one might argue its relevance since the chapter does not include any binding commitments, financial pledges, or even subject to any dispute resolution. In my view, although limited in scope, this chapter highlights a significant step forward as it is the first time India has included a standalone trade and gender equity chapter in any of its agreements. It indicates a marked shift in how India is approaching its external economic engagements with a more intentional alignment with its domestic priorities on women-led development and its broader vision for a Viksit Bharat 2047, where growth is inclusive, sustainable, and equitable. Chapter 23 acknowledges that trade policies do not affect everyone equally, especially women, and discusses gendered economic barriers, including unpaid care work, limited access to finance, and a lack of representation in emerging sectors such as digital trade and STEM, all of which significantly limit women's ability to benefit from trade agreements. It outlines the scope for potential collaborations, including facilitating women's access to trade finance and literacy, enabling participation in global value chains through skilling and digital inclusion, and building capacity in under-represented fields such as STEM, among others. From an Indian context, this chapter creates an international platform to complement what India has been trying to address over the past decade through initiatives and schemes such as the MUDRA Yojana, DAY-NRLM, Stand-Up India and the PM Kaushal Vikas Yojana--creating an enabling ecosystem for more women to access finance, skills, employment and entrepreneurship opportunities to participate more equitably in the domestic, regional, and global economies. In India, most women are engaged in informal sectors, many of which intersect with CETA-linked industries such as textiles, handicrafts, jewellery, seafood and agriculture. An intentional engagement by both countries could help these women to scale up or formalise their operations. To me, this reflects both an intention and a prospect that can enhance the participation and competitiveness of women in business, trade and the economic growth story. Particularly, two areas that stood out to me in the chapter. First, the focus on both countries developing and exchanging sex-disaggregated trade data, analysing that data, and utilising evaluation tools to better understand the effects of trade policies on women. If engaged and implemented effectively, this could be a game-changer in making trade more gender-inclusive. For India, where the availability of such data is limited or inconsistent, this presents a significant opportunity to strengthen data practices across the government and translate insights into meaningful actions to support greater economic participation of women. Second, the recognition of unpaid care work as a key barrier to women's economic participation. There is potential for both countries to explore the integration of social protection policies into trade-related initiatives, a key lever to empower more women to enter formal employment, pursue entrepreneurial opportunities, and engage in value-added trade. To operationalise these commitments, CETA proposes setting up a Trade and Gender Equality Working Group, comprising government representatives, to guide cooperation activities, review implementation, and engage with relevant stakeholders, including women entrepreneurs and civil society organisations. If this working group is made truly functional and action-oriented, this platform could be a valuable opportunity for India to shape the agenda on women's economic participation in global trade. As global trade evolves in tandem with shifting geopolitical realities, a growing consensus is emerging that trade must contribute to broader development goals, including building equitable economies, strengthening supply chain resilience, and promoting inclusion. Gender equity is now becoming a part of that conversation. By including a dedicated chapter on it, India signals that its trade policy can be inclusive and aligned, rather than separate from, its development priorities. Chapter 23 may not be the most visible part of the CETA, but it lays important groundwork. If implemented effectively, it can help make trade more accessible and beneficial for women, who comprise nearly half of India's population. That alone makes it a commitment worth investing in. This article is authored by Suryaprabha Sadasivan, senior vice president, Chase Advisors.

Buffoon-in-Chief: Owaisi tears into Trump over tariffs, doesn't spare PM either
Buffoon-in-Chief: Owaisi tears into Trump over tariffs, doesn't spare PM either

India Today

time17 minutes ago

  • India Today

Buffoon-in-Chief: Owaisi tears into Trump over tariffs, doesn't spare PM either

US President Donald Trump's 25 percent tariff on Indian exports has drawn sharp criticism from Asaduddin Owaisi, with the AIMIM chief calling Trump a "buffoon-in-chief" who is bullying the Indian government for trading with Russia."It's sad to see my country's government being bullied by a buffoon-in-chief in the White House. This tariff will come with a vague 'penalty' for trading with Russia," tweeted the US President for his remarks, Owaisi said that India is a sovereign country that doesn't bow before has announced that Indian exports will now come with a 25% sad to see my country's government being bullied by a buffoon-in-chief in the White House. This tariff will come with a vague 'penalty' for trading with Russia. India is independent sovereign country.— Asaduddin Owaisi (@asadowaisi) July 31, 2025 "India is an independent sovereign country. Not a vassal state that gives salami in the Emperor's court," said Trump for imposing high tariffs on India, Owaisi termed the measures a deliberate attack on India's sovereignty and economy."These measures are a clear and deliberate attack on our sovereignty and economic standing. I've raised the issue of rising hostile trade practices against India in Parliament for years," he further his tweet, Owaisi also mentioned the sectors that would be severely hit due to the high tariffs. He also said that the high tariffs would deter FDIs while damaging exports and jobs."These tariffs will hit Indian MSMEs, manufacturers, IT firms, service providers, and even our farmers. They'll deter FDI, damage exports, and hurt jobs," he also criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his silence on the tariff hikes by the US President."What's worse is our own @narendramodi's silence. Is this the '56-inch chest' we were promised? Or will we only see it if Trump raises tariffs to 56%?" he further from the high tariffs, India will also have to pay additional penalties for buying crude oil from Russia, said the US President on Wednesday. After imposing high tariffs and penalties on India, US President Donald Trump, in a post on Truth Social, called both India and Russia "dead economies" and said that he "does not care" what India does with a dig at the Kremlin, he declared that the US and Russia "do almost no business together" and warned that it should "stay that way".Meanwhile, Iran has come out in India's support and sharply criticised the US for imposing high tariffs on India. The Iranian Embassy in New Delhi said that the US is trying to dictate its will on independent nations and impede their growth and United States continues to weaponise the economy and use #sanctions as tools to dictate its will on independent nations such as Iran and India and impede their growth and development. These coercive discriminatory actions violate the principles of international law and national sovereignty, representing a modern form of economic imperialism," said the Iranian embassy in India in a from imposing high tariffs, the US Department of State has also imposed sanctions on several Indian companies for importing substances such as methanol, toluene, and polyethylene between January 2024 and January the Indian companies named are Kanchan Polymers, Alchemical Solutions Pvt Ltd, Ramniklal S Gosalia and Company, Jupiter Dye Chem Pvt Ltd, Global Industrial Chemicals Ltd., and Persistent Petrochem Pvt. Ltd."These companies have collectively imported tens of millions of dollars' worth of Iranian-origin petrochemicals," the US State Department said, citing their role in transactions that "generate billions of dollars in illicit funds for Iran's destabilising activities".- EndsMust Watch

On Communist icon V.S. Achuthanandan
On Communist icon V.S. Achuthanandan

The Hindu

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

On Communist icon V.S. Achuthanandan

Daily Quiz | On Communist icon V.S. Achuthanandan Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit YOUR SCORE 0 /7 RETAKE THE QUIZ 1 / 7 | Alappuzha is a major production hub for this product. VS worked in this industry and also organised workers of this industry. Name the product. DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Coir SHOW ANSWER 2 / 7 | In 2009, VS was removed from the Politburo for taking a stand against Pinarayi Vijayan in the SNC-Lavlin case. He likened Vijayan to a Soviet leader. Name that leader. DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Mikhail Gorbachev SHOW ANSWER 3 / 7 | In 2014, delivering a blow to VS, the Kerala High Court found fault with his government's decision in 2007 to raze resort buildings which appeared to be built on encroached land in X. Name X, a tea plantation town. DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Munnar SHOW ANSWER 4 / 7 | During the 1962 India-China war, VS was imprisoned for a year because he defied the CPI's stance. What did he do to incur the wrath of the party? DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : He organised blood donation drives for Indian soldiers SHOW ANSWER 5 / 7 | VS deeply admired X. This revolutionary served as Prime Minister and later as President of his country in the Caribbean. VS was also likened to this leader by former CPI(M) general secretary, Sitaram Yechury. Name the leader. DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Fidel Castro SHOW ANSWER 6 / 7 | This celebrity received an offer in the early 2000s to become the face of a soft drink brand. When he agreed, he found himself embroiled in a controversy since a plant of the company was the reason for protests in a village in Kerala. When VS issued an ultimatum to the actor, he withdrew his decision. Name the celebrity and the brand. DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Mammootty; Coca Cola SHOW ANSWER

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store