logo
Tricky politics will greet Louisville's first Black school superintendent

Tricky politics will greet Louisville's first Black school superintendent

Yahoo10-06-2025
Brian Yearwood speaks during a community forum in Louisville in May. (Kentucky Lantern photo by McKenna Horsley)
LOUISVILLE — As Brian Yearwood becomes the first Black superintendent of Kentucky's largest school system next month, he must navigate an already strained relationship between the district and the Republican supermajority in the state's legislature.
'It is no secret that Frankfort, for whatever reason, is hyper-concerned with the going-ons of Louisville. Doesn't always make sense to most of us, but it is a reality,' said Lyndon Pryor, the president and CEO of the Louisville Urban League, a civil rights organization. 'Whoever the new superintendent was going to be, was going to have to go out and be able to build relationships with legislators in Frankfort.'
Besides educating the most students — 94,000-plus — Jefferson County Public Schools (JCPS) also is Kentucky's most racially and ethnically diverse school district.
In the current political climate, Yearwood and other Louisville educators face an especially narrow and slippery path — between meeting the needs of their diverse student population and satisfying anti-diversity mandates from the Trump administration and possibly Republicans in Frankfort.
Statewide just 11% of students in Kentucky public schools are Black and 10% are Hispanic or Latino. More than 70% are white.
In Jefferson County, Black and white students each account for a little over a third of the enrollment in public schools. Hispanic or Latino students make up 19% and Asian students about 5%. About 6% are students of two or more races, according to Kentucky Department of Education data from 2023-24. About 21% of JCPS students are multilingual.
Louisville is also a high-poverty district. About 65% of students in the public schools are economically disadvantaged, slightly higher than the 61% statewide. Students are classified as economically disadvantaged based on eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. By contrast, in neighboring Oldham County, where many residents commute to jobs in Louisville, just 24% of students are economically disadvantaged and fewer than 3% are Black, according to state data.
One Republican lawmaker, Sen. Lindsey Tichenor, is already anticipating a fight with the Louisville district over her plans for banning diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in Kentucky's public schools.
The legislature banned DEI from Kentucky's public universities and colleges earlier this year. Tichenor's bill to end DEI in K-12 schools did not get a committee hearing in the 2025 session but she plans to introduce it again next year.
Tichenor, who represents Oldham and Trimble counties and part of northern Jefferson County, pointed to recent refusals by Jefferson County Public Schools and Fayette County Public Schools in Lexington to sign a form from the U.S. Department of Education to certify their compliance with the Trump administration's anti-DEI interpretations of civil rights law. Superintendents of Jefferson and Fayette instead provided documents saying they are in compliance with federal and state laws.
Said Tichenor: 'The fact that the board has also said they will not change course on DEI tells us they they need to be forced to stop these practices because they're discriminatory, they're unconstitutional, they're against the Civil Rights Act, and we need to focus on equal opportunities for our students, and anything outside of that that's contrary, that's discriminatory, needs to stop.'
Tichenor said the district's academic performance also points to the need for change. 'We've seen that across JCPS, their focus on DEI over the decades has not improved educational outcomes for their students,' Tichenor said. 'It just hasn't. More of the same will get more of the same results.'
According to KDE data from 2023-24, a smaller share of JCPS students than those statewide scored proficient or distinguished on state academic assessments. Among third-graders, 36% of Jefferson County students scored proficient in reading compared with 47% statewide. Among eighth-graders, 24% of Jefferson County students were proficient in math compared with 37% statewide.
Meanwhile, a Democratic lawmaker from Louisville said she hopes Yearwood and the district will challenge Republican efforts to uproot DEI programs from public schools. 'We need to do whatever we can to help every student be successful,' said Rep. Tina Bojanowski, who is also a teacher in the school district. She is concerned that some of the tools to provide that help may become illegal — ultimately impacting student success.
'What is the end goal? Is it to take away any additional supports that a certain group of students end up needing?'
Bojanowski said the diversity and needs of Louisville students require a full array of teaching tools and resources.
'We've got so many more kids in poverty, so many kids who've experienced trauma — are we going to have tools taken away that help us try to mitigate whatever concerns the kids have that then impact their ability to learn?'
'We need to stay in the frame of what our ultimate goal is — to make the district the best district in the nation for every child who attends the district, including kids in poverty, including kids who've experienced trauma, including kids who walked 1,000 miles in order to come to the U.S. and are afraid their parents are going to be picked up and not home when they get home,' Bojanowski said.
The school district declined to make Yearwood available for an interview for this story. However, he has spoken publicly about how he would work with lawmakers while also protecting Louisville schools from attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion.
In a community forum on May 20, Yearwood said he would focus on asking lawmakers for support to build up the district's academic success.
'They'll be my best friend. I will be in Frankfort, knocking on the doors, talking, inviting (them) to breakfast, lunch, whatever it takes, so that they can understand the great things happening here in JCPS,' he said.
Asked how he would protect DEI, Yearwood said he did not view education as 'one size fits all' because students can have unique personalities and learning styles.
'If you don't have a diversity lens, if you don't have equitable practices within your school district, then there will be the haves and the have nots,' he said. 'And that's not happening.'
Yearwood moved to the United States when he was 17 years old. He was born in Scarborough, Trinidad and Tobago to parents who were both educators.
'Success isn't defined by where you start but how hard you are willing to work and how deeply you truly believe in your own potential,' he said in a recent district press release.
Yearwood, who was formerly the superintendent of Columbia Public Schools in Missouri, will replace Superintendent Marty Pollio starting July 1. Yearwood left the district after taking a separation agreement from the school board, which included a clause to not publicly criticize the school district.
Pollio announced he planned to retire from JCPS in September in a letter to school district employees. In recent years, JCPS has seen increasing oversight from Republican lawmakers, including an interim session task force that focused on the governance of the school district.
'Although there have been challenges over my tenure, no one can ever question my passion, fight, and love for Jefferson County Public Schools,' Pollio wrote at the time.
Ivy Tech Community College in Indiana said in April that Pollio would become the institution's next president following his retirement from JCPS.
Michael Frazier, the executive director of the Kentucky Student Rights Coalition who testified in favor of this year's bill to eliminate DEI in higher education, told the Lantern that he viewed Yearwood's answer on DEI to be 'the same goal as the state.'
Frazier said the board's choice to appoint Yearwood over Ben Shuldiner, superintendent of Lansing School District in Michigan, was 'more intentional than what people are giving credit.' Frazier added that choosing Shuldiner would have been 'intentionally antagonistic' to Frankfort. Shuldiner, when asked about DEI in his forum, fiercely defended such initiatives, saying that the key to having DEI is 'making it part of everything you do so you actually can't just get rid of it.'
Surveys conducted by JCPS' search firm and the Jefferson County Teachers Association found that community members and staff favored Shuldiner over Yearwood.
Pryor, the Urban League leader, said that Yearwood has 'to do everything that he can to protect' DEI initiatives and ultimately the desired educational outcomes. Otherwise, 'he's going to be deemed a failure by everybody.'
'He's going to have to have to be innovative in this new world order,' Pryor said. 'He's going to have to be thoughtful and considerate. He's going to have to be collaborative to make it happen because of these attacks. But it's still doable, and it is a worthy and necessary cause for our kids and, quite frankly, for our community.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Capitol Crime Busters - Inside Politics with Dana Bash and Manu Raju - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Capitol Crime Busters - Inside Politics with Dana Bash and Manu Raju - Podcast on CNN Podcasts

CNN

timea few seconds ago

  • CNN

Capitol Crime Busters - Inside Politics with Dana Bash and Manu Raju - Podcast on CNN Podcasts

CNN Inside Politics 40 mins First: President Trump says his unprecedented takeover of the Washington, DC police could extend to other cities across the country. But is the new White House push. about public protection or political posturing? Or maybe both? Plus: The Texas House just failed to meet a quorum for the fifth time in a row as the Republican governor warns redistricting is inevitable. And: The president picks a MAGA loyalist to run the nation's most important economic statistics agency, leaving Wall Street questioning whether crucial data can still be taken at face value.

Zelensky refuses to cede Donbas, says doing so would give Putin ‘springboard' for future offensives
Zelensky refuses to cede Donbas, says doing so would give Putin ‘springboard' for future offensives

CNN

time2 minutes ago

  • CNN

Zelensky refuses to cede Donbas, says doing so would give Putin ‘springboard' for future offensives

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky vowed on Tuesday not to give eastern Ukrainian land to Russia, saying that abandoning the Donbas region would open the door for Russian President Vladimir Putin to 'start a third war' in Ukraine. Zelensky's warning comes ahead of Putin's meeting with US President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday, where the Russian president is expected to demand Ukrainian land as part of a peace deal. While there is confusion over Putin's reported conditions for a ceasefire, most versions stress that the Russian president will demand that Ukrainian forces withdraw from all parts of Ukraine's Donbas, which includes parts of the Donetsk region it still holds. 'For the Russians, Donbas is a springboard for a future new offensive. If we leave Donbas of our own accord or under pressure, we will start a third war,' Zelensky said in a meeting with journalists. Russia illegally annexed the Crimean peninsula in 2014, and went on to launch its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. 'I am not going to surrender my country because I have no right to do so,' he added. 'If we leave Donbas today, our fortifications, our terrain, the heights we control, we will clearly open a bridgehead for the preparation of a Russian offensive.' Zelensky and Ukrainian military officials have warned that Russia is building up troops for a new offensive, ready to launch by September. 'I haven't heard anything — not a single proposal that would guarantee that a new war won't start tomorrow and that Putin won't try to occupy at least Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv,' the Ukrainian president told reporters. 'The exchange of territories is a very complex issue that cannot be separated from security guarantees for Ukraine, for our sovereign state and our people,' Zelensky added, noting that the European Union's involvement in peace talks is also crucial because 'no one except Europe is giving us security guarantees.' A conversation between the US, Ukraine and 'all of Europe' will take place on Wednesday, according to the Ukrainian president. Trump has signaled Zelensky would not participate in Friday's summit, though the US president previewed his plans to phone Kyiv immediately after the meeting, along with other European leaders, to brief them. Trump said his goal is ultimately to get Putin and Zelensky in the same room to hash out their differences, and surmised only they would be able to find a way to end the war with some 'land swapping' between them. 'I'm not going to make a deal,' Trump said. 'It's not up to me to make a deal. I think a deal should be made for both.' Zelensky also gave further details on Tuesday about the diplomatic talks that have been taking place behind the scenes, as well as his take on the outcome of US special envoy Steve Witkoff's meeting with Putin. 'Witkoff said that there should be territorial concessions on both sides. That's how it sounded. And that Putin probably wants us to leave Donbas. So it didn't sound like America wants us to leave,' Zelensky said. 'I do not believe that Putin's proposal is Trump's proposal. I believe that Trump represents the United States of America. He acts as a mediator, he is in the middle – not on Russia's side.' CNN's Kevin Liptak contributed to this report.

Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that
Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that

Los Angeles Times

time2 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that

On May 1, 2003, George W. Bush announced, 'Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.' He was standing below a giant banner that read, 'Mission Accomplished.' At the risk of inviting charges of understatement, subsequent events didn't cooperate. But it took a while for that to be widely accepted. We're in a similar place when it comes to President Trump's experiment with a new global trading order. 'Tariffs are making our country Strong and Rich!!!' proclaims Trump, making him not only the first Republican president in living memory to brag about raising taxes on Americans, but also the first to insist that raising taxes on Americans makes us richer. MAGA's mission-accomplished groupthink relies primarily on three arguments. The first is that Trump has successfully concluded a slew of beneficial trade deals. The truth is that some of those deals are simply 'frameworks' that will take a long time to be ironed out. But Trump got the headlines he wanted. The second argument is a kind of populism-infused sleight of hand. The 'experts' — their scare quotes, not mine — are wrong once again. The White House social media account crows, 'In April, 'experts' called tariffs 'the biggest policy mistake in 95 years.' By July, they generated OVER $100 BILLION in revenue. Facts expose the haters: tariffs WORK. Trust in Trump.' But the high-fivers are leaving things out. The most-dire predictions of economic catastrophe were based on the scheme Trump announced on April 2, a.k.a. 'Liberation Day.' Trump quickly backed off that plan ('chickened out' in Wall Street parlance) in response to a bond and stock market implosion. Saying the experts were wrong under those circumstances is like saying experts opposed to defenestration were wrong when they successfully convinced a man not to jump out a window. The third argument, made by the White House and many others — that tariffs are working because they're raising money — is a response to a claim no one made. To my knowledge, no expert claimed tariffs wouldn't raise money. The estimates of these revenues from Trump world are stratospheric. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expects somewhere between $700 billion and $1 trillion per year. Last month, the government collected $29 billion. It's likely this number will significantly increase as more tariffs come online and businesses run down the inventory they stockpiled earlier this year in anticipation of more tariffs to come. Normally, Republicans don't exult over massive revenues from tax hikes. But Trump's defenders get around this problem by insisting that money is 'pouring' and 'flowing' into America from someplace else. It's true that tariff revenue is pouring into the Treasury, but that money is coming out of American bank accounts, because American importers pay the tariff. Even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cannot deny this when pressed. So yes, tariffs are 'working' the way they're supposed to; the problem is Trump thinks tariffs work differently than they do. It's possible some foreign exporters might lower prices to maintain market share, and some American businesses might absorb the costs — for now — to avoid sticker shock for inflation-beleaguered consumers, but what revenue is generated still comes from Americans. Ultimately it means higher prices paid here, reduced profits for businesses here or reduced U.S. trade overall. Sometimes, when pressed, defenders of the administration will concede the true source of the revenues, but then they say the pain is necessary to force manufacturers and other businesses to build and produce in the United States. It's backdoor industrial policy masquerading as trade policy. That, too, might 'work.' But all of this will take time, no matter what. And, if it works, that will have costs, too. Manufacturing in America is more expensive — that's why we manufacture so much stuff abroad in the first place. If this 'reshoring' happens, our goods will be more expensive, and less money will 'pour in' from tariffs. It's difficult to exaggerate how well-understood all of this was on the American right until very recently. But the need to grab any argument available to declare Trump's experiment a success has a lot of people not only abandoning their previous dogma but leaping to the conclusion that the dogma was wrong all along. Maybe it was, though I don't think so. The evidence so far suggests that problems are looming. The dollar is weakening. Prices continue to rise. The job market is reeling. The stock market (an unreliable metric, according to MAGA, when it plummeted after Liberation Day) is holding on, thanks to tech stocks. The truth is we won't have real evidence for a while. It's worth remembering that Americans don't live by headlines and press releases and they don't live in the macro economy either. Declaring 'Mission Accomplished' for the macro economy won't convince people they're better off in their own micro-economies when they're not. @JonahDispatch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store