6 ‘Bunker Buster' bombs, 30 Tomahawk missiles: How US struck Iran's key nuclear sites; key details
On Thursday, President
had warned Iran that it had a fortnight to consider its next steps. By early Sunday morning, he had authorised a series of precision airstrikes on three of Iran's most fortified nuclear facilities, Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, pushing the United States into direct military conflict with Tehran for the first time in over four decades.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The strikes were kept so tightly under wraps that even as B-2 stealth bombers dropped 30,000-pound bunker busters on Iranian soil, cable news broadcasts were still reporting that Trump was 'weighing his options.' Hours earlier, he had quietly returned to the White House from New Jersey for what was described as a high-level national security briefing.
Then, without warning, he posted the news himself: 'We have completed our very successful attack… All planes are safely on their way home.'
With that, Trump not only made history but also sent shockwaves through a region already teetering on the edge.
The attack was carried out by American B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, the only aircraft capable of deploying the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator—a 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bomb. One US official, speaking anonymously, confirmed that multiple GBU-57s were dropped on Fordow, the most heavily fortified site, and said damage assessments suggested it had been 'taken off the table.'
From Missouri to Fordow
On Friday night between 10:09 and 10:30 pm Central Time, eight KC-135 Stratotankers took off from Altus Air Force Base in Oklahoma, heading towards Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri—the home of the B-2 fleet, the Washington Post reported. Flight trackers picked up the tankers, using the call sign 'Nitro,' refuelling bombers flying under the call sign 'Mytee'—a known identifier for B-2 aircraft.
Fox News host Sean Hannity, citing a personal conversation with President Trump, revealed that six Massive Ordnance Penetrators, commonly known as 'bunker buster' bombs, were dropped on Iran's Fordow nuclear facility by multiple B-2 bombers.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In addition, he said the United States launched 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles from submarines positioned roughly 400 miles offshore. 'Everyone is out of harm's way for now,' Hannity said during his broadcast.
After completing the mission, the tankers returned home, indicating the bombers were now fully fuelled and en route. Open-source analysts confirmed the pattern matched standard procedures for heavy payload missions.
As per CBS News, US officials had informed Iran via diplomatic channels that the strikes were limited in scope, with no plans for regime change. Trump had earlier rejected proposals to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to the same report.
Though Trump signalled the operation's end with a call for peace, US forces remain on high alert. The Pentagon has moved additional naval assets into position. The USS Carl Vinson remains in the Arabian Sea, while the USS Nimitz heads toward the region. Ballistic missile-defence-equipped destroyers have also been deployed across the Mediterranean.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
22 minutes ago
- NDTV
How US Airstrikes Created Win-Win Chance For Iran, Diplomatic Fix For Trump
New Delhi: With the US carrying out precision airstrikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran, all eyes are now on Tehran's response. Iran now faces a tough choice: a strong retaliation may lead to further escalation, but a meek response may result in the national leadership losing popular support. There is another possibility: Iran may not strike back at the US now. Trump Throws A Bait The Donald Trump administration struck three nuclear installations in Iran -- Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. This is the first time the US has attacked facilities in Iran since the 1979 Iranian Revolution. However, the precision nature of the strike suggests that Trump has, in effect, thrown the ball into Iran's court. "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier," the US President said after the airstrikes. The US has thrown a bait. If Iran chooses to respond by targeting US facilities, Washington DC would then step up its offensive and push the "we didn't start the war" narrative. What Iran Said After the Attacks Iran's Foreign Affairs Ministry has condemned the US' "brutal military aggression" and termed it a "grave and unprecedented violation" of the fundamental principles of the UN Charter and international law. "The US military aggression against the territorial integrity and national sovereignty of a UN member state - carried out in collusion with the genocidal Israeli regime - once again laid bare the depth of depravity that governs American foreign policy and revealed the extent of hostility harbored by the US ruling establishment against the peace-seeking and independence-loving people of Iran." "The Islamic Republic of Iran is resolved to defend Iran's territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means against the United States' criminal aggression," Iran has said, urging the UN Security Council to step in. Why Iran May Not Target the US It would be reckless of Iran to launch a direct attack on the US at this point. The unequal military capabilities aside, such an attack would give Trump exactly what he wants -- a reason to launch a massive offensive. What Iran may do instead is let Trump have this symbolic victory and continue its attacks against Israel. Doing this keeps Washington out of the war and puts more pressure on Tel Aviv. If the US still targets Iran, it would seem like the aggressor going to war on Israel's behalf. Diplomatic Dilemma For Trump In joining the war against Iran, US President Trump has played a major gamble. For long, Trump has spoken against "forever wars" fought by former US Presidents abroad, but his escalation today flies in the face of that rhetoric. While the Democrats in the US have stepped up their political attacks following the airstrikes, Trump also runs the risk of alienating a section of his Republican supporters. If the US manages to get Iran to capitulate, Trump can still claim a major win. But if that doesn't happen, he will be blamed for drawing Washington into another protracted conflict. This is also bad optics for brand Trump, especially at a time when Pakistan has backed him for the Nobel Peace Prize, stressing that his intervention in the India-Pakistan conflict last month "stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker". India has repeatedly emphasised that the ceasefire was the result of direct diplomacy between New Delhi and Islamabad, with the latter reaching out after India targeted key military installations in Pakistan. A Win-Win Option For Iran Today's airstrikes in Iran provide a big opportunity for Iran to shift its nuclear strategy. Iran had signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968 and ratified it in 1970 as a non-nuclear-weapon state. Amid the spiralling conflict with Israel, Tehran had earlier said its lawmakers are preparing a bill for withdrawal from the NPT. The US airstrikes provide it with a better option. It can now simply say it does not know what has happened to its enriched uranium supplies due to wartime conditions. This would create a strategic ambiguity, and this alone could deter future attacks and keep Western powers guessing. This approach offers Iran three advantages: (1) it can delay a direct confrontation with the US (2) provide a justification to step away from nuclear transparency (3) provide leverage in any post-war negotiation.
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
From Bahrain To Qatar, A Look At Key US Military Bases In Middle East
Tehran: Amid tensions spiralling in the Middle East, Iran has warned of "severe consequences" for the United States after the US military joined Israeli forces to strike three nuclear sites in Iran early on Sunday. Iranian state television said "every American citizen or military personnel" in West Asia was now on Tehran's "target" after US airstrikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities. Hossein Shariatmadar, a close aide of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and managing editor of the hard-line Kayhan newspaper, wrote an editorial on Sunday calling on Iranian forces to strike the US naval fleet in Bahrain and close the Strait of Hormuz for American, British, German, and French ships. "It is now our turn to act without delay. As a first step, we must launch a missile strike on the US naval fleet in Bahrain and simultaneously close the Strait of Hormuz to American, British, German, and French ships," he wrote. Shariatmadari's editorial followed a warning from Khamenei himself, who earlier cautioned the United States of "severe consequences" for its military intervention. While Iran plans its next move, NDTV looks at key US military bases in the Middle East that could be on Iranian target as the Pentagon braced for almost-certain retaliation against American forces in the region. Across the Middle East, the US has reportedly stationed over 40,000 troops on American bases and warships in the region-- which fall under the US military's Central Command (CENTCOM). The major concentrations of US forces in the region are in Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, Syria, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Key US Bases In The Middle East Bahrain: The US Navy's Fifth Fleet and US Naval Forces Central Command are headquartered in Bahrain-- a tiny Gulf kingdom that remains the United States' critical asset in the Persian Gulf. Bahrain's deep-water port can dock some of the largest US military vessels, including aircraft carriers. It is home to America's four anti-mine vessels and two logistical support ships. The US Coast Guard also has vessels in the country, according to The Times OF Israel report. The base has been used by the US Navy since 1948, when the facility was operated by Britain's Royal Navy. Qatar: Al Udeid Air Base, the largest US military base in the Middle East, is in Qatar. The base reportedly includes the forward components of CENTCOM, as well as its air forces and special operation forces in the region. It also hosts America's rotating combat aircraft, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing. Iraq: The United States has various troop installations in Iraq, including the Al Asad Air Base in Al-Anbar Governorate and Al Harir Air Base in Erbil. Baghdad is not only Washington's close ally since after 2003 war, but also Tehran's arch enemy in the region. The Middle Eastern nation houses some 2,500 US troops as part of the international coalition against the Islamic State jihadist group. Iran targeted the Al Asad Air Base in 2020 after the killing of Quds Force leader Qasem Soleimani. The Al Harir Air Base has also been on the receiving end of Iranian proxy group drone attacks Syria: For years, the US has maintained a military presence at various installations in Syria as part of international efforts against the Islamic State group, which rose out of the country's civil war and overran large parts of Syria and neighbouring Iraq for years. America's Al Tanf Garrison is housed in southern Syria, near the borders of Iraq and Jordan. Kuwait: Kuwait has several US bases, including Ali al-Salem Air Base, located about 20 miles from the Iraqi border, that houses members of the Air Force's 386th Air Expeditionary Wing. The base is the "primary airlift hub and gateway for delivering combat power to joint and coalition forces" in the region. It also has Camp Arifjan, the location of the forward headquarters for the US Army component of CENTCOM. The US Army reportedly also stocks prepositioned materiel in the country. UAE: America's Al Dhafra Air Base is located in the United Arab Emirates. The installation is home to the Air Force's 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, which operates F-22 Raptor fighter jets and several kinds of surveillance planes and drones, including MQ-9 Reapers. Al Dhafra also hosts the Gulf Air Warfare Centre for air and missile defence training.
Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
US committed great crime: Iran slams strike on its nuclear sites, calls for UN action
Iran has strongly condemned the United States strikes on its nuclear facilities, calling it a 'brutal military aggression' and gross violation of international law and the UN Charter. In the aftermath of coordinated US airstrikes on three nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, Iran has urged the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to take immediate action. In its official statement, Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared, "The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran condemns in the strongest terms the brutal US military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities, which was committed in flagrant and unprecedented violation of the most fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter and the rules of international law, and holds the warmongering and law-breaking US government responsible for the extremely dangerous effects and consequences of this great crime." Iran further claimed the attack was carried out with the 'criminal complicity and cooperation of the genocidal Zionist regime,' referring to Israel, which it accused of orchestrating the broader escalation. According to Tehran, the attack occurred on the tenth day of Israeli military aggression against Iran and reveals 'the criminal complicity and participation of the US with the Zionist regime.' The Iranian government said the strikes were not only a violation of Article 2, Paragraph 4 of the UN Charter, but also of Security Council Resolution 2231, the resolution that endorsed the 2015 nuclear deal. Iran emphasised that the targeted nuclear facilities were under IAEA safeguards and strictly peaceful in purpose. The statement continued, 'The Islamic Republic of Iran recognises its right to resist with all its might the US military aggression and the crimes committed by this rogue regime and to defend Iran's security and national interests.' Iran has now called for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council and demanded the IAEA Board of Governors address the situation. The Ministry accused the IAEA Director General of showing 'clear bias' and blamed him for 'providing the basis and excuse for the recent disaster.' 'It has now become clear to everyone that a country that considers itself a permanent member of the Security Council does not adhere to any rules or ethics and will not refrain from any lawbreaking or crime to advance the interests of a genocidal and occupying regime,' the statement concluded.
