logo
Board cuts $280 million from revenue forecast, warns of more fiscal harm from fed uncertainty

Board cuts $280 million from revenue forecast, warns of more fiscal harm from fed uncertainty

Yahoo07-03-2025

Treasurer Dereck Davis (right) said most people did not vote for the kind of economic chaos a new revenue estimates report forecasts for Maryland. (Photo by Bryan P. Sears/Maryland Matters)
A key fiscal panel cut another $280 million from the state's revenue projections Thursday, warning of an impending 'unnecessary negative shock' to the state's economy driven by expected federal budget and employment cuts.
The updated projections from the Board of Revenue Estimates — lower than in December — come amid increased concern about federal budget and employment cuts and a looming potential shutdown.
Treasurer Dereck Davis, one of three members of the board, stopped short of a profane summation.
'Madam Comptroller told me I couldn't swear, so I won't say what kind of show we have going on, but if you think about it, you can figure it out,' Davis said.
The treasurer said he believed chaos was not what people voted for in November.
'They just wanted grocery prices to come down. They just want to be able to afford their electric bill. They just want to be able to handle the basic necessities,' Davis said. 'And what we seem to have is just utter chaos right about now. From one day to the next, we don't know what's going to happen.
'We get a lot of criticisms here in Maryland about our business climate, but the one thing … that we've always heard is that businesses, above all else, value certainty. They want to know what's going to happen from one day to the next,' he said. 'And we can't provide that at the state level, because they can't provide that from the federal level.'
The board's $280 million cut in revenue projections over two years includes a loss of nearly $400 million in personal and corporate income taxes over two years,that are offset by small gains in other areas.
In a normal year, a reduction equal to about 1% of the general fund budget — would not generate much angst.
It's not a normal year.
The report is the final revenue forecast before the 90-day session ends. It also serves as an early warning of the fiscal impact of federal budget actions.
Republicans pointed to the report as more proof of the state's outsized reliance on federal jobs and policies that make it difficult for private businesses.
'Maryland's financial picture has gone from bad, to worse to abysmal,' said Senate Minority Leader Sen. Stephen S. Hershey Jr. (R-Upper Shore). 'No matter who has been in the White House, economists have warned for at least 20 years that our economy is too dependent on federal jobs. Despite repeated calls for economic diversification, Maryland remains highly dependent on federal employment, contracts and grants, making budget planning challenging when federal spending fluctuates.'
State fiscal leaders are struggling to develop a way to balance state finances while projecting federal changes that will affect the budget, but Comptroller Brooke Lierman (D) said, 'No accurate economic model exists to predict President Trump's behavior.'
'Our revenue forecast reflects a write down for FY '25 and FY '26 compared to the (December) forecast. But these write downs, or at least the FY 26 write down, is almost entirely a preemptively defensive move. To date, we have not seen reductions in our withholding revenues, but we know they are coming, and therefore this write-down is the fiscally prudent approach. We do expect a negative shock to our economy within the year,' said Lierman, who chairs the board that includes state Budget Secretary Helene Grady.
Lierman called the new forecast 'sobering.'
Robert Rehrmann, director of the Bureau of Revenue Estimates, said the updated forecast is based on data from other shutdowns, sequestration more than a decade ago and what is publicly known about expected reductions in federal employment. He characterized the effort as a conservative approach.
There are roughly 161,000 federal employees in the state. In tax year 2023, 252,000 households reported some form of federal wages, accounting for about 9% of total gross income.
All told, Rehrmann said the projections Thursday included the expectation that almost 30,000 federal workers in Maryland will lose their jobs and the $3 billion in wages in tax year 2025 that come with it.
'This is really a floor, because it doesn't include contractors or grant-supported jobs as well,' Rehrmann said. 'This is just direct federal employment. But it's clear, you know, the importance of the federal government to our labor force and our economy.'
Lawmakers in the House and Senate continue work on Gov. Wes Moore's fiscal 2026 budget, which included plans to cover a $3 billion projected deficit.
The latest combined revenue estimates for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 are $280 million lower than projections issued in December, which Rehrmann said had already baked in some assumptions about federal cuts.
'Now, however, I think it's safe to say, compared to what our expectations were in December, a worst-case scenario has developed,' he said. 'These cuts are materializing quicker than anticipated, and they're as bad or worse than what we feared in December.'
The panel lowered current-year personal income tax collection estimates by $143 million. Corporate income tax collections expectations fell almost $22 million from the December estimate.
Those changes are not affected by the current federal cuts, Rehrmann said.
The panel also lowered its expectations for the coming fiscal year.
The new forecast shows personal income tax collections decreasing by almost $201 million. Early projections set personal income tax growth at 4.1 %. That estimate would assume no federal actions. In December, the board forecast a 3.1% growth in withholding.
The March update lowers that growth projection to 2.1%.
'These are based largely upon 30,000 jobs lost or anticipated to be lost, and the contracting associated with that,' said Senate Budget and Taxation Chair Guy Guzzone (D-Howard) 'Let me just say that it doesn't include things like the tariff actions that are going on right now, and it doesn't include the grant monies and federal dollars that we are accustomed to receiving for various things like Medicaid. So, before us right now is … the seriousness of what is going on in Washington and what it means to Maryland.'
House Appropriations Chair Ben Barnes (D-Prince George's and Anne Arundel) predicted more budget 'cuts that we look at as we move forward' as well as increased revenues.
The budget proposed by Moore increases taxes on high earners while providing modest reductions — $173 on average — to six in 10 taxpayers. The plan also includes the elimination of itemized deductions.
The House and Senate appear intent on altering Moore's plan.
On Thursday, a late-filed proposal to impose a 2.5% sales tax on some business-to-business services cleared a key procedural hurdle. The identical House and Senate bills now move to full public hearings.
The House Ways and Means and Senate Budget and Taxation committees could hold those hearings on that proposal as early as next week. House and Senate leaders expressed interest in the tax.
Barnes told reporters 'it's important to recognize that we are not the goods economy that we once were, that we are becoming more of a services economy. And so, I think it works in tandem with. governor's plan of [tax] reform.'
House and Senate Republicans voiced opposition to the proposed business-to-business sales tax.
'While my Democratic colleagues will make the case that these revenue numbers are further evidence of a need for new or higher taxes, I would submit that this is the last thing our state needs,' House Minority Leader Del. Jason C. Buckel (R-Allegany) said in a statement. 'Maryland has got to get control of its spending. We have to take a hard look at how we are spending money and realize we cannot afford a Mercedes government with a Honda economy.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel
Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel

Associated Press

time15 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel

WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress are calling other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform posted a video ahead of the hearing highlighting crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally and pledging that 'sanctuary state governors will answer to the American people.' The hearing is to include testimony from Govs. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. There's no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but the term generally refers to governments with policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Courts previously have upheld the legality of such laws. But Trump's administration has sued Colorado, Illinois, New York and several cities — including Chicago and Rochester, New York — asserting their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Illinois, Minnesota and New York also were among 14 states and hundreds of cities and counties recently listed by the Department of Homeland Security as 'sanctuary jurisdictions defying federal immigration law.' The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. As Trump steps up immigration enforcement, some Democratic-led states have intensified their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting cooperation with immigration agents. Following clashes between crowds of protesters and immigration agents in Los Angeles, Trump deployed the National Guard to protect federal buildings and agents, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of declaring 'a war' on the underpinnings of American democracy. The House Oversight Committee has long been a partisan battleground, and in recent months it has turned its focus to immigration policy. Thursday's hearing follows a similar one in March in which the Republican-led committee questioned the Democratic mayors of Chicago, Boston, Denver and New York about sanctuary policies. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades. In 2017, then-Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed legislation creating statewide protections for immigrants. The Illinois Trust Act prohibits police from searching, arresting or detaining people solely because of their immigration status. But it allows local authorities to hold people for federal immigration authorities if there's a valid criminal warrant. Pritzker, who succeeded Rauner in 2019, said in remarks prepared for the House committee that violent criminals 'have no place on our streets, and if they are undocumented, I want them out of Illinois and out of our country.' 'But we will not divert our limited resources and officers to do the job of the federal government when it is not in the best interest of our state, our local communities, or the safety of our residents,' he said. Pritzker has been among Trump's most outspoken opponents and is considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate. He said Illinois has provided shelter and services to more than 50,000 immigrants who were sent there from other states. A Department of Justice lawsuit against New York challenges a 2019 law that allows immigrants illegally in the U.S. to receive New York driver's licenses and shields driver's license data from federal immigration authorities. That built upon a 2017 executive order by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that prohibited New York officials from inquiring about or disclosing a person's immigration status to federal authorities, unless required by law. Hochul's office said law enforcement officers still can cooperate with federal immigration authorities when people are convicted of or under investigation for crimes. Since Hochul took office in 2021, her office said, the state has transferred more than 1,300 incarcerated noncitizens to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the completion of their state sentences. Minnesota doesn't have a statewide sanctuary law protecting immigrants in the U.S. illegally, though Minneapolis and St. Paul both restrict the extent to which police and city employees can cooperate with immigration enforcement. Some laws signed by Walz have secured benefits for people regardless of immigration status. But at least one of those is getting rolled back. The Minnesota Legislature, meeting in a special session, passed legislation Monday to repeal a 2023 law that allowed adults in the U.S. illegally to be covered under a state-run health care program for the working poor. Walz insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, ___ Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Mo. Also contributing were Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y.; Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn.; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago.

The $11 trillion gap between White House and economists on Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill
The $11 trillion gap between White House and economists on Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The $11 trillion gap between White House and economists on Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill

An array of economists — from the Congressional Budget Office to the Tax Foundation to the Penn-Wharton Budget Model — have reached a similar conclusion: Trump's signature legislation comes with a price tag in the neighborhood of $3 trillion over the next decade. They're all wrong, the White House says. And not just by a little. President Trump and his aides have instead offered claims that the bill will make money and that the final tally for both the tax-cutting legislation and other parts of the Trump agenda will usher in a new golden age not just for the US economy but also for government debt. The claims from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue go as high as $8 trillion in black ink (an $11 trillion chasm with the experts) in claims that go beyond what even Capitol Hill Republicans are projecting. As for reconciling the two, some economists essentially throw up their hands. "You can't square it because it's ridiculous," Erica York of the Tax Foundation said. "The bill unambiguously will increase deficits, it will not contribute that much to economic growth," she added, noting that the bill is largely focused on extending current tax rates that would not be expected to push the economy significantly upward from current levels. Yet the White House has remained steadfast even as this gap has led to increased tensions as the bill goes through another round of adjustments on Capitol Hill. A Wednesday appearance before Congress by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was marked by lawmakers — mostly Democratic, but some Republicans as well — raising the debt issue. In one colorful moment, Democratic Rep. Mike Thompson of California asked Bessent to point to an independent expert "not on the payroll of this administration" who says this bill will not add to our debt. Bessent then cited Arthur Laffer, the former Reagan official and longtime Trump supporter who received the Presidential Medal of Freedom during the president's first term. The comment led to laughter in the chamber, with Thompson shooting back, "I don't think that one counts." It was a hearing where Bessent declined to repeat some of the administration's most aggressive claims, saying instead that "it remains to be seen" whether the bill will add to the national debt. Others have not been so restrained about the impact of Trump's overall agenda. "We're going to cut the deficit by $8 trillion over the next 10 years," press secretary Karoline Leavitt offered recently on Fox News. And a recent White House memo offered a slightly lower figure of about $6.7 trillion to $6.9 trillion in deficit reductions over the coming decade. One issue is that White House projections rely on a set of assumptions that are often internally contradictory, such as taking credit for taxes spurring economic growth while simultaneously saying they have no cost. Other parts of the bill would enact temporary tax cuts — and then take credit for lower costs there — while also claiming other permanent cuts are free. That's in addition to an overriding assumption at the White House that, essentially, things break historically right for the US economy and sustained 3% economic growth is in the offing. That's above even what House Republicans are projecting, as lawmakers there have rallied behind a lower (but still very aggressive) assumption of 2.6% growth. Both projections are unlikely, Marc Goldwein of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said. "Some people are at 2%, some people are at 1.6% ... that is the neighborhood," he said of a series of projections for growth that hover around 1.8%. He added in an interview that even if sustained 3% growth were to happen, "it would have very little to do with this tax bill." Yet the White House has repeatedly dismissed the experts. Trump budget chief Russ Vought recently told reporters that everything "is part of a coherent fiscal agenda" and that the combination of tax cuts, tariffs, additional promised spending cuts, and "reforms we can do ourselves" to programs like Medicaid will lead to good outcomes for the US bottom line. White House projections also fully embrace recent CBO projections of $2.8 trillion in tariff revenues over the coming decade. But that embrace appears to ignore a prediction in the same report that tariffs will "reduce the size of the U.S. economy" and also lead to a potential inflation increase of 0.4 percentage points in 2025 and 2026. York has calculated that even two seemingly minor adjustments — taking the slightly lower but still very aggressive House estimate of 2.6% economic growth and factoring in the economic costs of tariffs — means the bill "is basically a wash or even negative for GDP." "They're picking and choosing," she added. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet And few are expecting tariffs to stay steady in the coming months, not to mention the coming years. Tariff levels are under active negotiation — two fronts this week are duties on goods from China and India — as the CBO report assumed rates remain steady not just during Trump's term, but also years after he is scheduled to leave office. The tariffs are also under a considerable cloud of legal uncertainty, with an appeals court ruling on Tuesday that Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs could stay in force for now while it considers whether they are legal. "Even if they are upheld by the courts, it still seems like the Trump administration is willing to negotiate them down somewhat," York noted, "and then what happens in four years when a new administration comes in?" Ben Werschkul is Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. David Foster is a graphic artist for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid
House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid

Washington Post

time26 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid

WASHINGTON — House Republicans are moving to cut about $9.4 billion in spending already approved by Congress as President Donald Trump's administration looks to follow through on work by the Department of Government Efficiency when it was overseen by Elon Musk . The package to be voted on Thursday targets foreign aid programs and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides money for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service, as well as thousands of public radio and television stations around the country. Republicans are characterizing the spending as wasteful and unnecessary, but Democrats say the rescissions are hurting the United States' standing in the world. 'Cruelty is the point,' Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said of the proposed spending cuts. The Trump administration is employing a tool rarely used in recent years that allows the president to transmit a request to Congress to cancel previously appropriated funds. That triggers a 45-day clock in which the funds are frozen pending congressional action. If Congress fails to act within that period, then the spending stands. The benefit for the administration of a formal rescissions request is that passage requires only a simple majority in the 100-member Senate instead of the 60 votes usually required to get spending bills through that chamber. So, if they stay united, Republicans will be able to pass the measure without any Democratic votes. The administration is likening the first rescissions package to a test case and says more could be on the way if Congress goes along. Republicans, sensitive to concerns that Trump's sweeping tax and immigration bill would increase future federal deficits , are anxious to demonstrate spending discipline, though the cuts in the package amount to just a sliver of the spending approved by Congress each year. They are betting the cuts prove popular with constituents who align with Trump's 'America first' ideology as well as those who view NPR and PBS as having a liberal bias. In all, the package contains 21 proposed rescissions. Approval would claw back about $900 million from $10 billion that Congress has approved for global health programs. That includes canceling $500 million for activities related to infectious diseases and child and maternal health and another $400 million to address the global HIV epidemic. The Trump administration is also looking to cancel $800 million, or a quarter of the amount Congress approved, for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and sanitation, and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country. About 45% of the savings sought by the White House would come from two programs designed to boost the economies, democratic institutions and civil societies in developing countries. The Republican president has also asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it's slated to receive during the next two budget years. About two-thirds of the money gets distributed to more than 1,500 locally owned public radio and television stations. Nearly half of those stations serve rural areas of the country. The association representing local public television stations warns that many of them would be forced to close if the Republican measure passes. Those stations provide emergency alerts, free educational programming and high school sports coverage and highlight hometown heroes. Advocacy groups that serve the world's poorest people are also sounding the alarm and urging lawmakers to vote no. 'We are already seeing women, children and families left without food, clean water and critical services after earlier aid cuts, and aid organizations can barely keep up with rising needs,' said Abby Maxman, president and CEO of Oxfam America, a poverty-fighting organization. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said the foreign aid is a tool that prevents conflict and promotes stability but the measure before the House takes that tool away. 'These cuts will lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, devastating the most vulnerable in the world,' McGovern said. 'And at a time when China and Russia and Iran are working overtime to challenge American influence.' Republicans disparaged the foreign aid spending and sought to link it to programs they said DOGE had uncovered. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said taxpayer dollars had gone to such things as targeting climate change, promoting pottery classes and strengthening diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Other Republicans cited similar examples they said DOGE had revealed. 'Yet, my friends on the other side of the aisle would like you to believe, seriously, that if you don't use your taxpayer dollars to fund this absurd list of projects and thousands of others I didn't even list, that somehow people will die and our global standing in the world will crumble,' Roy said. 'Well, let's just reject this now.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store