Mandatory alcohol warning labels could be reconsidered due to tariff impact on industry
Simon Harris
has cast doubt over the planned introduction of mandatory
alcohol
warning labels by next May, due to the potential impact
US tariffs
could have on the drinks industry.
The warnings, messages placed on alcoholic beverage containers or packaging to inform about the potential health risks of drinking, are due to be introduced under the Public Health Alcohol Act in May 2026.
Asked about the timeline for implementation, Mr Harris said this was 'something we do have to give consideration to' in light of the proposed tariffs on alcohol being imported from the
European Union
to the
United States
.
'We find ourselves in a very new trade environment and we always say we have to try and control what we can control. This is certainly something that merits at least considering in that space when we hear the concerns being expressed,' he told the
Dáil
on Thursday.
READ MORE
'I'm not in a position to say today what exact decision the
Government
will make but I can say the timeline around implementation is certainly under consideration.'
Mr Harris's comments come weeks after Minister for Finance
Paschal Donohoe
said the introduction of warning labels on alcohol products would need to be 'carefully examined again'.
Representative groups for the drinks industry have warned the introduction of US tariffs on alcohol from the EU could potentially be 'devastating'.
Sheila Gilheany, chief executive of
Alcohol Action Ireland
, said the organisation was 'absolutely shocked' by Mr Harris's comments.
'Labelling of alcohol products is a health issue and has nothing to do with Ireland's exports as the regulations only apply to products sold in Ireland. While in relation to imports, or home-produced products, the legal onus is on retailers, not producers/manufacturers, to ensure products are labelled,' she said.
'Therefore, a supermarket, or off-licence, can simply add a sticker to the product. Linking labelling to the 'trading environment' is an industry red herring and it should be called out as such by politicians.
She added: 'It is deeply disappointing that Simon Harris, who as Minister for Health steered through the Public Health (Alcohol) Act in 2018, which gave rise to the regulations, now appears to have fallen for industry spin.'
In a
recent interview
with The Irish Times, Prof Mary Horgan, interim chief medical officer, said though she understood Government members were looking at the issue 'from a different perspective', she warned of the importance of labels.
'We've done a lot of work and research in the area; all I can talk about is the public health message about alcohol, and labelling is important to get that across.'
Under the law, once implemented, all bottles, cans and other containers must contain a back label stating: drinking alcohol causes liver disease; there is a direct link between alcohol and fatal cancers; a warning symbol for drinking when pregnant; and the website www.askaboutalcohol.ie.
The label should also state the quantity of grams of alcohol and the energy value expressed in kilojoules and kilocalories. The label must be at least 60mm wide and not less than 30mm high surrounded by a black border.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Minister wants to see 9% Vat rate on energy maintained in budget
The lower 9% Vat rate on gas and electricity should be retained in the upcoming budget to avoid further hiking energy prices for consumers, energy minister Darragh O'Brien has said. The lower rate was originally introduced in 2022 as part of a major cost-of-living package from the Government, with Vat falling from 13.5% to 9%. Speaking yesterday, Mr O'Brien said the reduction in the Vat rate was a 'very important' measure on affordability, and he wanted to see it extended into 2026. However, he said any decision to retain the rate would be made as part of the budget process. The Tax Strategy Group has estimated the total cost of retaining the lower Vat rate is €193.3m — €58.2m for gas and €140.1m for electricity. In previous years, the cut has been extended six months at a time, with the most recent extension coming in April. Each six-month extension has provided estimated savings of €26.60 on electricity and €20.28 on gas for consumers for the duration of the period. Price increases The modest savings have been dwarfed, however, by price increases introduced by the major utility companies. A number of energy providers have again opted to increase their rates in recent months, with Flogas confirming a hike in variable electricity charges by 7% from next month. This is expected to increase bills for Flogas electricity customers by €126 annually. In April, SSE Airtricity hiked electricity bills by 10.5% and gas bills by 8.4%, the latest in a spate of increases since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Mr O'Brien said the prices for energy have 'levelled off' after a spate of surges in recent years, but conceded that Ireland's energy costs remain too high. Households here pay nearly 30% more for electricity than the EU average, costing approximately €350 more annually. Gas prices are approximately 10% above the EU average. Irish householders are paying the third-most expensive prices for electricity in Europe, behind only Germany and Denmark. The Dáil has heard that there are more than 300,000 people in arrears on their electricity bills, while more than 175,000 are in arrears on their gas bills. The minister for energy said this increase was a matter for concern, and anyone in arrears should enter into an arrangement with their provider. Energy Affordability Taskforce Mr O'Brien met with the recently-established Energy Affordability Taskforce on Thursday, and said an interim report would be provided to the Cabinet ahead of the budget in October. However, he ruled out the prospect of energy credits making a return, saying there was a very significant cost associated with the measure. 'That was €3.5bn and that was in the teeth of the cost-of-living crisis, particularly post the outbreak of the war in Ukraine,' Mr O'Brien said. He said the costs for one-off payments were very significant, and reduced the amount of money the Government could funnel into medium- and long-term measures to make energy more affordable.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Letters to the Editor: Why I will not put my name forward for presidency
After a period of reflection, I have decided not to seek a nomination for the presidential election. My thanks to those who encouraged me to answer Ireland's call, not for any leadership skills, values, vision, pride in the jersey, etc, on my part but for the free digs when they're up for the Kerry football matches. The Government has all the executive powers, so I'd be spending my days hosting garden parties and walking the dogs. Micheál, Simon, Mary Lou, and the TDs would have all the fun jostling over housing, health, criminal, and global issues, while I'd be a powerless oddity with a peripheral role. I'd be bored to tears in the opulent 95-room mansion. I'd have servants and military aides-de camp fussing all over me and a vintage chauffeur-driven 1947 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith landaulette and Mercedes-Benz S-Class saloon to transport me to ceremonial events. I'd have to do very little for the outlandish €350,000 salary other than play solitaire or watch day time television. I'd feel uneasy about spending €50m to run the presidential office during the term — an amount which would build 250 family homes. I couldn't go for a drink or to a match without a posse of security personnel for company. OK, I'd get in free to the matches, but I'd probably have to throw in the muddy ball or shake hands with colossal rugby types, whose grip would crush my fingers. I'm far too busy and active to retire to the Áras. I'd be very lonesome in the big smoke, and I'd miss the good life in Kerry. No, like the late Garrett Fitzgerald, my temperament isn't suited to seven years of mundane and innate inactivity. Billy Ryle Tralee, Co Kerry Presidency: Nah, I'll stick to the fishing Having a choice is wonderful, but the opposite can be true too. Right now, I'm on the horns of a dilemma, stuck on the negative side of that equation: I do not know whether to run for the presidency or offer to sit in front of RTÉ's Liveline mic. One position requires dignity, magnetism, political maturity, and perception as well as a generally sunny disposition. Great charm and exceptional empathy are required too. The capacity to bite your lip is essential. The other requires the capacity to exploit and goad, all facilitated by well-disguised cynicism. One offers a life under the unforgiving public eye for the incumbent and their family. The other offers a hurler-on-the-ditch distance from the consequences of their shoot-from-the-hip blathering. One is very well rewarded financially, the other less so. One can be influential, the other is influential. One can be held to account — the other, again, less so. One is seen as a champion of the people — whatever that is today — and the other is derided as a first-class passenger on the perpetual gravy train. One is seen a conduit to vent our spleen the other can too often be an object of that spleen. One is free to pronounce on any subject no matter how bizarre the views offered are. The other is — well, sometimes anyway — constrained by government policies. One is shackled, the other celebrated. To quote a man who once faced a similar dilemma: On mature refection, I think I'll stick to the fishing, or what's left of it in 2025. A pity, as I would have liked a well-made tweed suit. Jack Power Inniscarra, Cork Praise for Higgins Our President, Michael D Higgins ,is to be congratulated on reminding his fellow European presidents of their moral duty to do their upmost to end the genocide being conducted at Gaza by Israel before the eyes of the world. J Anthony Gaughan President Irish PEN Blackrock, Co Dublin Cork losing Lucey As a Corkconian, are we to keep Wellington, Marlborough, etc, emphasise Victoria, and then ditch Bishop Lucey, homegrown and an original thinker and worker for the less privileged of his era? Hugh Lee Kilcoole, Wicklow Obscuring body parts on internet The modern technology which can prevent airport passengers' own private body parts from being seen by members of airport security is something that should, obviously, be welcomed by everyone. But, I think, this same helpful technology — with its ability to obscure parts of the human body — could also be put to great good use everywhere on the internet to prevent illicit images of the human body from being observed by mistake by underage individuals who could then, as a sad consequence, become disturbed by them? Such safety measures that are presently designed to keep the travelling public's modesty intact at many airports could also, I feel, in the near future potentially make the internet of the 21st century a much more safer place for many people to happily grow and develop their talents and their abilities in? Along, too, with less hidden dangers for them to worry about? Hopefully, this should be the happy outcome — most especially for the young and the vulnerable? Sean O'Brien Kilrush, Co Clare
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Reducing Vat rate a blunt and costly policy instrument for hospitality
Less than a week on from its publication, one of the fundamental assumptions underpinning the summer economic statement has changed with the agreement of the EU-US trade deal. This will have implications for October's budget and a potential reduction in the overall budgetary package outlined by the Government just a week ago. Of the total budget package detailed in the summer economic statement, €1.5bn has been allocated to a "tax package". The Government identifies the narrowness of Ireland's tax base as a cause of concern in the summer economic statement, noting that income tax, corporation tax, and revenue make up the bulk of Ireland's tax base. At a time of heightened global economic uncertainty, increased tariffs for Irish exporters, a growing and ageing population, increasing demand for and pressure on services, a further narrowing of Ireland's tax base in the budget would seem at odds with the programme for government commitment to maintain a broad tax base "to guard against the need for counter-cyclical fiscal policy in the event of a downturn" and prepare for demographic change. Much of the subsequent discussion on the so-called "tax package" has been the commitment in the programme for government to support the hospitality sector through changes to Vat and its implications in terms of the space available for any income tax changes in the budget. According to the Department of Finance, a reduction in the Vat rate for the hospitality sector to 9% would cost almost €900m a year This discussion fails to look at the broader context, the impact to date of "tax packages" introduced by the previous government from 2020-2025, and the precariousness of Ireland's tax base. Looking at budgetary policy of the last government, income gaps have opened up between working households, and the gap between people and households at the bottom and middle of the income distribution and those at the top has grown. This has been driven by the skewed nature of income tax reduction choices which prioritised higher earners and provided relatively little to low income workers paying income tax at the standard rate. This was further compounded by the concentration of temporary cost-of-living measures among lower income households, supports that will fade away. The tax packages contained in those budgets are permanent, costly, and have not reached those working households who have been most impacted by rising costs. Ireland's tax base is narrow, dominated by three revenue streams, and our over exposure in terms of corporation tax is a major concern Rather than looking at how to build a broad and sustainable tax base, recent discussion has focused on the "tax package", the cost of the aforementioned Vat reduction for the hospitality sector, which would narrow Ireland's tax base further, and how much this would leave for an "income tax package" which — if modelled on previous budgetary policy — will see the income gaps between working households grow further. Softening demand Looking at Vat, it accounted for 23% of Ireland's total tax revenue last year. At present, the hospitality sector is subject to the reduced 13.5% Vat rate. The sector was subject to the lower rate of 9% from 2011 to 2018, and again from late 2020 to mid-2023 at an estimated cost of €3.6bn. The sector has identified high energy costs, softening demand, labour market challenges, increased cost of inputs, and a lack of hotel capacity as the main challenges facing the industry and the rationale for a return to the 9% VAT rate. However, a recent Department of Finance examination of the Vat reduction for the hospitality sector since 2011 concluded that the reduction was not always passed on to customers in the form of lower prices, it was highly regressive in that it benefitted higher income households more than lower income households, and it was very costly. It is clear that parts of the hospitality sector are under significant pressure, but other parts of it are doing very well Reducing the Vat rate is a very blunt and costly policy instrument. It will not lower energy costs, it will not increase demand, nor will it address the challenge of full employment or produce more hotel capacity — the very issues that the sector itself has identified as major challenges. The Government and the sector must look at other available sustainable measures to support the industry, including measures used in other EU member states to support hospitality and tourism. Calls for new tax breaks, or the return of old ones, are a feature of most periods of economic and social recovery. However, their provision involves great cost to the State and the unequal allocation of these resources to small groups of beneficiaries. Few of these initiatives have proven to be worthwhile in the past — in particular the opportunity cost of using the revenue in a better way is frequently overlooked. As the first of the kites are flown in advance of Budget 2026, the Government should turn its attention to those who have been most impacted by persistent rising prices, and use the resources available to ensure that vulnerable households are protected and supported through adequate social welfare rates, and that growing income gaps between working households are closed. It must deliver on the commitment to progressive budgets and build a broad and sustainable revenue base that can meet the needs of a growing and ageing population This requires developing progressive policies and measures in a fair taxation system, and working with the hospitality sector to identify sustainable ways to fund the maintenance of the hospitality and tourism industry. A reduction in Vat for the hospitality sector is costly and it won't address the challenges the sector faces. It didn't address these core issues in the 124 months that it was applied between 2011 and 2023, and there is no evidence to suggest that it will do so if applied again in Budget 2026. Michelle Murphy is a research and policy analyst at Social Justice Ireland
