Mandatory alcohol warning labels could be reconsidered due to tariff impact on industry
Tánaiste
Simon Harris
has cast doubt over the planned introduction of mandatory
alcohol
warning labels by next May, due to the potential impact
US tariffs
could have on the drinks industry.
The warnings, messages placed on alcoholic beverage containers or packaging to inform about the potential health risks of drinking, are due to be introduced under the Public Health Alcohol Act in May 2026.
Asked about the timeline for implementation, Mr Harris said this was 'something we do have to give consideration to' in light of the proposed tariffs on alcohol being imported from the
European Union
to the
United States
.
'We find ourselves in a very new trade environment and we always say we have to try and control what we can control. This is certainly something that merits at least considering in that space when we hear the concerns being expressed,' he told the
Dáil
on Thursday.
READ MORE
'I'm not in a position to say today what exact decision the
Government
will make but I can say the timeline around implementation is certainly under consideration.'
Mr Harris's comments come weeks after Minister for Finance
Paschal Donohoe
said the introduction of warning labels on alcohol products would need to be 'carefully examined again'.
Representative groups for the drinks industry have warned the introduction of US tariffs on alcohol from the EU could potentially be 'devastating'.
Sheila Gilheany, chief executive of
Alcohol Action Ireland
, said the organisation was 'absolutely shocked' by Mr Harris's comments.
'Labelling of alcohol products is a health issue and has nothing to do with Ireland's exports as the regulations only apply to products sold in Ireland. While in relation to imports, or home-produced products, the legal onus is on retailers, not producers/manufacturers, to ensure products are labelled,' she said.
'Therefore, a supermarket, or off-licence, can simply add a sticker to the product. Linking labelling to the 'trading environment' is an industry red herring and it should be called out as such by politicians.
She added: 'It is deeply disappointing that Simon Harris, who as Minister for Health steered through the Public Health (Alcohol) Act in 2018, which gave rise to the regulations, now appears to have fallen for industry spin.'
In a
recent interview
with The Irish Times, Prof Mary Horgan, interim chief medical officer, said though she understood Government members were looking at the issue 'from a different perspective', she warned of the importance of labels.
'We've done a lot of work and research in the area; all I can talk about is the public health message about alcohol, and labelling is important to get that across.'
Under the law, once implemented, all bottles, cans and other containers must contain a back label stating: drinking alcohol causes liver disease; there is a direct link between alcohol and fatal cancers; a warning symbol for drinking when pregnant; and the website www.askaboutalcohol.ie.
The label should also state the quantity of grams of alcohol and the energy value expressed in kilojoules and kilocalories. The label must be at least 60mm wide and not less than 30mm high surrounded by a black border.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
29 minutes ago
- Irish Times
US health secretary Kennedy guts vaccine advisory committee
US health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has fired all 17 members of a panel of vaccine experts and is in the process of replacing them, his department said on Monday, drawing protest from many scientists. The move is the most far-reaching in a series of actions by Mr Kennedy, a long-time vaccine sceptic, to reshape US regulation of vaccines, food and medicine. Scientists and experts said the changes to the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention vaccine advisory panel, which recommends how vaccines are used and by whom, would undermine public confidence in health agencies. Mr Kennedy promised the move would raise public confidence. READ MORE 'Today we are prioritising the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda,' he said in a statement. Mr Kennedy has for years sowed doubt about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, but he pledged to maintain the country's existing vaccine standards to secure his appointment in US president Donald Trump's administration. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is overseen by his department, has approved a number of vaccines during his tenure despite concerns over his stances. Even so, at least one senior Republican member of Congress expressed doubts about the changes in the panel. Mr Kennedy said the advisory panel is rife with conflicts and has never turned down a vaccine, even though the decision to approve vaccines rests with the FDA. 'That's a tragedy,' said former FDA chief scientist Jesse Goodman. 'This is a highly professional group of scientists and physicians and others ... It's the kind of political meddling that will reduce confidence rather than increase confidence.' The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America called Mr Kennedy's action concerning for public health. 'Upending the [panel's] membership increases uncertainty and vaccine scepticism, undermining the health gains achieved through vaccination,' the industry body said in a statement. Shares of vaccine makers Moderna and BioNTech fell more than 1 per cent, while Pfizer was down marginally in extended trading on Monday. Mr Kennedy said most panel members receive funding from drug companies, although members are required to declare any potential or perceived conflicts of interest that arise in the course of their tenure and any relevant business interests, positions of authority or other connections with organisations relevant to the committee's work. Mr Kennedy provided no specific evidence of industry conflicts of interest among departing panel members. All 17 panel members were appointed under former president Joe Biden's administration, including 13 in 2024. Without their removal, the Trump administration would not have been able to choose a majority of the committee until 2028. – Reuters
Irish Times
30 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Rent pressure zones set to be extended across entire country
It's been almost a decade since rent pressure zones (RPZs) were introduced to curb sharp spikes in rent and cap increases at 2 per cent or the rate of inflation, whichever is the lower. Initially they were confined to Dublin and other big cities but have since been extended across the State, to 24 of the 31 councils, and 111 of the 166 local electoral areas. Castlebar, Co Mayo, and Tullow, Co Carlow, were the latest to be added to the list in May. After a three-hour-long meeting of leaders last night, it was decided that a proposal be put at Cabinet today that RPZs would be extended to the whole country. READ MORE As well as Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris , the meeting was attended by Minister for Housing James Browne, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers. Pat Leahy reports it was also confirmed that landlords would not be allowed to reset rent between tenancies, unless tenants have left voluntarily or have breached the tenancy agreement. In other words, a notice to quit will not be sufficient to allow a rent review. As the report states : 'Housing advocates had warned the Government that allowing landlords to reset the rent between tenancies would result in many tenancies being terminated by the landlords in order to increase the rents.' The import is that the extension of the RPZs plus the new clause on rent review will be seen to favour tenants rather than landlords. For the first time also, landlords will be classified according the number of properties owned. At present, all landlords are treated the same regardless of how many properties they own. Now, smaller landlords will be categorised as such if they own three properties or less. Here is Pat Leahy's analysis of the proposed changes. 'Modest' increases in local property tax from 2026 There is also another big property-related article in The Irish Times this morning setting out the expected increases in local property tax (LPT) from next year. There has been an increase of over 20 per cent in property prices since 2021, the last time changes to LPT were made. The report has a preview of a memo Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe is expected to bring to Cabinet this morning: 'Fearing substantial hikes in tax bills, the Government is expected to change the way the tax is calculated in advance of the next date for revaluation on November 1st of this year.' The implications are that houses valued at under €240,000 will see their LPT bill increase by only €5 a year. Properties valued between €420,000 and €525,000 will see increases of €23, still relatively modest. At the top tier there will be more substantial hikes. Those with properties valued between €1.995 million and €2.1 million will pay an extra €389 a year. Israel war bonds to be debated again in Dáil The last week in May in the Dáil was dominated by an intense debate over the role played by the Central Bank in authorising for the European markets bonds that have been issued by the state of Israel. The Government has argued it is a technical process that has fallen on our Central Bank to do for Europe and that Ireland has never bought bonds. The Opposition has said the bonds are war bonds and the State or its institutions should have no part whatsoever in dealing with the bonds. A Sinn Féin Private Members' Bill to effectively stop the Central Bank from dealing with them was defeated in the Dáil, but not before two Government TDs, Barry Heneghan and Gillian Toole, voted with the Opposition. Now, after the week's recess, the same issue is being debated in the Dáil this week, on foot of a Private Members' motion being tabled by the Social Democrats. The four big Opposition parties have combined again to back it and held a press conference on the plinth. Part of the strategy is to put more pressure on Government backbenchers to abstain or vote against an issue where not all are comfortable with the Coalition's position. There are more details of the motion here . Best Reads Fintan O'Toole focuses on a statistic that shows that some students sitting State exams this week went to bed hungry last night . We should be mortified, he writes. Eoin Burke-Kennedy writes that the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council has predicted another surge in corporation tax. Joe Humphreys's great Unthinkable column asks should we be quite so smug about Trump's tariffs? Playbook The Cabinet meets this morning with a big agenda, including Government concern over what retaliatory tariffs the EU will impose on the US; almost 500 new places in higher education to address key shortages of health and social care professionals; a new incentive scheme to retain air traffic controllers in the Air Corps; and a new antiterrorism Bill. Full details are to be found in this preview of the meeting . Dáil 14:00: Leaders' Questions 14:34: Order of Business 15:04: Bills for Introduction: Taxes Consolidation (Rights of Performers and Film Workers) (Amendment) Bill 2025 – First Stage 15:10: Taoiseach's Questions 15:55: Government Business: Statements on Housing 19:27: Private Members' Business (Sinn Féin): Motion re Urgent action on vacant Council Housing 21:27: Parliamentary Questions: Oral – Minister for Environment, Climate and Communications Darragh O'Brien 00:03: Dáil adjourns Seanad 14:30: Commencement Matters 15:30: Order of Business 16:30: Government Business: Statements on Breast Cancer Services 18:45: Private Members' Business: Motion re Insurance Reform 20:45: Seanad adjourns Committees 11.30: Artificial Intelligence Research Ireland: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence 12.05: Comhchoiste na Gaeilge An Plean Náisiúnta um Sheirbhísí Poiblí Gaeilge 2024-2030 15.00: Housing Discussion on the Report of Housing Commission 15.00: Justice Engagement on Policing Matters 18.00: Arts, Media, Communications Prelegislative Scrutiny of revised General Scheme of the Broadcasting (Amendment) Bill
Extra.ie
an hour ago
- Extra.ie
Construction workers in Ireland are a third less productive than elsewhere, report warns
Irish construction workers are one-third less productive than their international peers, partly because of poor uptake of modern methods of construction (MMC), a new report warns. While the Government is now set on developing MMC as a core means of addressing the housing crisis, a new report from the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) today indicates that Irish construction workers lag behind their peers in productivity. The report notes that a shortage of infrastructure is a 'legacy' of the financial crisis. It says: 'Much of the capacity in the construction sector was lost thereafter. Many construction firms went bust, and many of the workers emigrated. Construction employment quickly fell from almost 240,000 to 85,000. 'Although employment has gradually recovered since then (up to 170,000 workers), investment in new construction methods has lagged behind other countries. As a result, output per hour worked is 33% lower than in peer countries. Pic: Getty Images 'This partly reflects the low uptake of modern methods of construction, such as off-site manufacturing. 'This low level of investment may be due to the boom-bust nature of the construction sector in Ireland. 'When firms see how quickly things can change, they may be more reluctant to invest for the long term.' The report says that in order for Ireland to catch up it needs to do three things. Firstly, it will need to sustain high levels of investment in key areas. It states: 'Some of the infrastructure deficits are in areas where the State is the biggest provider, for example healthcare. Government capital investment in healthcare is already at high levels. If this can be maintained in the coming years, this will help address infrastructure shortfalls in that area.' Pic: Getty Images Secondly, the Government will need to boost productivity in the construction sector if it is to make the need for additional workers less acute. And thirdly, the planning and objection system for construction will need to be streamlined. The report states: 'Delays and uncertainty created by the system are impacting projects. 'The new Planning and Development Act may help but it is too soon to tell. 'Most investment is carried out by the private sector, so this needs to be facilitated as much as possible. 'This is particularly important now, as investment tends to be delayed during periods of uncertainty.' The report also notes that Ireland's infrastructure continues to lag behind other high income European countries, citing research that shows Ireland's infrastructure is about 25% behind that of our peers. Pic: Shutterstock The report states: 'Significant shortfalls in housing, health, transport and electricity are evident. 'These challenges can only be addressed through sustained high levels of investment in these areas. 'Regardless of what happens to the international environment, these infrastructure deficits need to be addressed. 'If the economy weathers the changing environment, it will have high levels of employment and high demand for infrastructure.'
