logo
73 offenders detained under Goondas Act in Coimbatore this year

73 offenders detained under Goondas Act in Coimbatore this year

Time of India24-04-2025

COIMBATORE: The Coimbatore city police have detained 73 offenders, mostly
rowdy elements
and chain snatchers, under the
Goondas Act
from January to April 24 this year.
People who have been detained under the Goondas Act include those who were arrested under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and those who were involved in the sale of drugs and banned tobacco products.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The 73 people detained under the Goondas Act include 26
drug offenders
, 16 property offenders, 20 law & order offenders, seven sexual offenders and four cybercrime offenders.
City police commissioner A Saravana Sundar said such detention would create fear among the criminals, and they would spend at least nine months to one year in jail. It would help reduce crimes and prevent law and order issues.
Sundar said that when the notorious criminals and other offenders were detained under the Goondas Act, at least their activities would be prevented for a maximum of one year.
'We are mostly detaining the repeated offenders under the Goondas Act,' said Saravana Sundar.
The Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act of 1982 is commonly referred as the Goondas Act. Legal professionals call it Act 14 of 1982.
S Balamurugan, a national secretary of the People's Union for Civil Liberties, said the preventive detention law was used against the economically and socially poor background people. 'Before commencing the judicial trial, how can a district magistrate or a commissioner of police detain the offenders for a period of one year without any trial. This system should be abolished,' said Balamurugan.
He said some of the offenders were spending their days behind the bars under the goondas detention.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Some of them managed to come out from the detention after approaching the
. However, it would take at least six months period to quash the detention.
'It is a common right for every individual for a fair trial. There is no govt policy to detain the offenders under the Goondas Act. The chance for a fair trial should be given to everyone,' he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Punjab govt struggles to translate central laws into Punjabi
Punjab govt struggles to translate central laws into Punjabi

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Punjab govt struggles to translate central laws into Punjabi

1 2 3 Patiala: The Punjab govt's prolonged struggle to translate key central laws into Punjabi has come under fresh scrutiny, with activists and rural workers voicing frustration over years of delay. Despite repeated demands and official commitments, critical legislation such as the Building and Other Construction Workers (BOCW) Act and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) remain untranslated, creating barriers to legal clarity and access for Punjabi-speaking citizens. The issue gained renewed attention after a group of rural labourers from Nabha encountered confusion over the interpretation of the English word "may" in the MGNREGA Act during a dispute with the local administration. Their request for a Punjabi version of the Act was denied, prompting them to file a Right to Information (RTI) application. With no response, the matter is now scheduled for hearing before the Punjab State Information Commission on June 25. This is not the first time the commission has intervened on such issues. Activist Vijay Walia, who was advocating for the Punjabi translation of the BOCW Act since 2022, revealed that multiple hearings were held over the years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo "Every time, the govt claims the Act is being translated by the Language Department and universities, but nothing concrete has emerged," Walia said. At one point, the language department even issued a written statement citing staff shortages as the reason for the delay. In 2023, the Estimates Committee of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha pressed for an expedited translation, prompting the labour department to seek assistance from Punjabi University. However, the translation is yet to be completed. In a response submitted in March 2024, the BOCW Welfare Board — chaired by the chief minister — told the Commission that once the translation is ready, it will be reviewed by the Vidhan Sabha's Legal Cell and then presented to the Cabinet for approval before being officially notified in Punjabi. Despite these assurances, there was no official notification to date. Meanwhile, the Democratic MGNREGA Front has also entered the fray and is set to begin its own hearings on the lack of a Punjabi translation of the MGNREGA Act starting June. For many, this delay underscores a broader systemic neglect toward Punjabi as an administrative and legal language in Punjab itself. With legal interpretations hanging in the balance, stakeholders are now hoping that pressure from civil society and the Information Commission will push the govt toward swift action. MSID: 121440669 413 |

HC: Only civil courts can try land ownership or title disputes
HC: Only civil courts can try land ownership or title disputes

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

HC: Only civil courts can try land ownership or title disputes

1 2 Cuttack: In a significant ruling, the Orissa high court has held that revenue authorities cannot adjudicate disputes involving ownership or title to land, emphasising that such matters fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts. The vacation bench of Justice S K Panigrahi issued the order on May 30, setting aside an eviction order passed by the tehsildar of Dhamnagar under the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (OPLE) Act, 1972. The case pertains to Dinabandhu Behera, who challenged the eviction proceedings initiated against him on the grounds that the state had erroneously recorded the disputed land in its name during the hal settlement. Behera claimed that his father had legally come into possession of the property after an 'ekpadia' (a written recognition) was issued by the ex-intermediary post-estate abolition. His father's name was subsequently recorded in the tenant ledger and rent was regularly paid to the govt. Upon his death, Behera came into possession of the land. But, despite these records, the tehsildar initiated eviction proceedings treating Behera as an encroacher. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Walgreens Keeps Quiet About This '9 Pills for $7' Generic Cialis Deal Friday Plans Get Offer Undo The sub-collector and collector of Bhadrak later upheld the eviction order. The HC, while setting aside all these orders, stated that the existence of a bona fide dispute over ownership and title renders summary eviction proceedings under the OPLE Act is inappropriate. "The revenue authorities, who conduct summary procedures, are not competent to adjudicate such complex disputes of title," Justice Panigrahi observed. The court further noted that Behera had already approached the civil judge, junior division, Dhamnagar, seeking declaration of his right, title and interest in the suit land. He had also prayed for a declaration that the encroachment proceedings were unsustainable, given the pending civil suit. Reaffirming the supremacy of civil courts in deciding title-related matters, the court ruled that "summary proceedings by revenue authorities cannot constitute the proper forum for adjudication where a bona fide dispute exists over title".

Double murder: Goon among two killed
Double murder: Goon among two killed

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Double murder: Goon among two killed

Nagpur: Two persons were killed in separate incidents on Sunday late evening, including a known criminal with a history of offences. Rahul Pande, a history-sheeter in his 40s, was stabbed to death near Ayachit Temple in what appears to be an old rivalry. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He had previously been booked under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities (MPDA) Act. The Kotwali police were in the process of registering an offence at the time of going to press. In another incident, a vagabond in his 40s was stoned to death by another near Lal Imli Chowk. The victim, identified as Shailendra, through a tattoo on his left hand, was found with severe injuries to his head and neck. A blood-stained cutter was discovered near the body. Police said Shailendra was often seen with another vagabond known as Anna, who is now missing. The duo frequented the area between Agrasen Chowk and Lal Imli Chowk, surviving on menial jobs and alms from passers-by. Sources suggest a drunken brawl may have escalated into the fatal attack, though the exact motive remains unclear. Tehsil police registered a and launched a manhunt for Anna, who is considered the prime suspect. Senior inspector Shubhangi Deshmukh stated that investigations are ongoing to ascertain the circumstances leading to the killing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store