
Labour Day in the digital age: Should we still be celebrating the 9-to-5?
EVERY year, as Labour Day rolls around, we pause to honour the contributions of workers and reflect on the struggles that shaped today's workplace.
It's a tradition built on the fight for fair hours, safe working conditions, and the right to a decent living—victories earned by generations before us.
But here's a question worth asking in 2025: in a world where our jobs follow us home, to our phones, and even into our weekends, what exactly are we celebrating? More importantly, is the 9-to-5 work model still something worth preserving?
The simple answer is no—and it's a reality many young workers, particularly those from Gen Z, are quietly but firmly reshaping.
For decades, the standard workday was seen as the gold standard of employment. Eight hours a day, five days a week. Anything outside those hours was either a luxury or a hustle.
But the digital age blurred those neat boundaries. Technology promised us efficiency, yet it tethered us to our jobs like never before. The office might close at five, but the emails, Slack notifications, and Teams pings keep rolling in long after dinner.
And while some workers have long accepted this as the price of modern employment, Gen Z—those born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s—aren't buying it.
Raised on the internet and entering adulthood in the aftermath of a global pandemic, this generation sees the 9-to-5 not as a sacred institution but as a system in desperate need of rethinking.
It's not laziness, it's life
Let's get one thing straight: Gen Z's pushback against rigid work hours isn't a rejection of hard work. It's a rejection of outdated structures that fail to account for how people actually live and work today.
Flexibility, autonomy, and meaningful output have replaced time-clock punching as the new measures of productivity.
This generation values balance, mental health, and personal growth alongside career ambition. They've seen firsthand how burnout devastates morale and how performative busyness often masks inefficiency.
So instead of chasing overtime for its own sake, many young professionals prefer roles where they're judged by the quality of their work—not by how many hours they log or how often they stay late.
The pandemic cracked open conversations about remote work, hybrid models, and the value of asynchronous schedules. It turns out you don't always need to be in an office from 9 to 5 to get things done.
In fact, many employees, across all generations, reported increased productivity and job satisfaction when given the freedom to structure their workday around when they're at their best.
Gen Z didn't start this conversation, but they are refusing to let it die quietly.
They are asking tough, necessary questions, like 'Why should creative, knowledge-based work be confined to fixed hours?', 'Why should success be measured by desk time rather than outcomes?', 'And if technology allows for smarter, faster, more collaborative work—why are we still clinging to models designed for factory floors in the 1920s?'
Now, this isn't a rebellion for the sake of it. It's an opportunity for companies to evolve. Forward-thinking organisations are already experimenting with four-day workweeks, results-only work environments (ROWE), and outcome-based KPIs.
And unsurprisingly, they're seeing gains not just in employee wellbeing, but in innovation, retention, and business performance.
The truth is, whether leaders like it or not, the traditional 9-to-5 is becoming less relevant — and clinging to it risks alienating not just Gen Z, but the broader workforce craving a healthier relationship with work.
Labor Day should evolve too
If Labor Day was once about fighting for the eight-hour day, perhaps its modern meaning should expand to fighting for autonomy, dignity, and balance in a digital world.
It should honour not just the right to work, but the right to rest, disconnect, and be valued for contribution rather than availability.
In 2025, maybe what we should be celebrating isn't the 9-to-5 itself, but the courage to question it.
Because here's the thing: work will always matter. It shapes our societies, identities, and futures. But how we work—and how we value one another in that process—is long overdue for a rethink.
And if Gen Z has taught us anything, it's that old models aren't sacred, and better ones are possible. And really—isn't that the kind of labour movement worth cheering for? – May 1, 2025
The author is CEO and Founder of HESA Healthcare Recruitment Agency and serves on the Industrial Advisory Panel for the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Main image: HRM Asia
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Focus Malaysia
4 days ago
- Focus Malaysia
Labour Day in the digital age: Should we still be celebrating the 9-to-5?
EVERY year, as Labour Day rolls around, we pause to honour the contributions of workers and reflect on the struggles that shaped today's workplace. It's a tradition built on the fight for fair hours, safe working conditions, and the right to a decent living—victories earned by generations before us. But here's a question worth asking in 2025: in a world where our jobs follow us home, to our phones, and even into our weekends, what exactly are we celebrating? More importantly, is the 9-to-5 work model still something worth preserving? The simple answer is no—and it's a reality many young workers, particularly those from Gen Z, are quietly but firmly reshaping. For decades, the standard workday was seen as the gold standard of employment. Eight hours a day, five days a week. Anything outside those hours was either a luxury or a hustle. But the digital age blurred those neat boundaries. Technology promised us efficiency, yet it tethered us to our jobs like never before. The office might close at five, but the emails, Slack notifications, and Teams pings keep rolling in long after dinner. And while some workers have long accepted this as the price of modern employment, Gen Z—those born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s—aren't buying it. Raised on the internet and entering adulthood in the aftermath of a global pandemic, this generation sees the 9-to-5 not as a sacred institution but as a system in desperate need of rethinking. It's not laziness, it's life Let's get one thing straight: Gen Z's pushback against rigid work hours isn't a rejection of hard work. It's a rejection of outdated structures that fail to account for how people actually live and work today. Flexibility, autonomy, and meaningful output have replaced time-clock punching as the new measures of productivity. This generation values balance, mental health, and personal growth alongside career ambition. They've seen firsthand how burnout devastates morale and how performative busyness often masks inefficiency. So instead of chasing overtime for its own sake, many young professionals prefer roles where they're judged by the quality of their work—not by how many hours they log or how often they stay late. The pandemic cracked open conversations about remote work, hybrid models, and the value of asynchronous schedules. It turns out you don't always need to be in an office from 9 to 5 to get things done. In fact, many employees, across all generations, reported increased productivity and job satisfaction when given the freedom to structure their workday around when they're at their best. Gen Z didn't start this conversation, but they are refusing to let it die quietly. They are asking tough, necessary questions, like 'Why should creative, knowledge-based work be confined to fixed hours?', 'Why should success be measured by desk time rather than outcomes?', 'And if technology allows for smarter, faster, more collaborative work—why are we still clinging to models designed for factory floors in the 1920s?' Now, this isn't a rebellion for the sake of it. It's an opportunity for companies to evolve. Forward-thinking organisations are already experimenting with four-day workweeks, results-only work environments (ROWE), and outcome-based KPIs. And unsurprisingly, they're seeing gains not just in employee wellbeing, but in innovation, retention, and business performance. The truth is, whether leaders like it or not, the traditional 9-to-5 is becoming less relevant — and clinging to it risks alienating not just Gen Z, but the broader workforce craving a healthier relationship with work. Labor Day should evolve too If Labor Day was once about fighting for the eight-hour day, perhaps its modern meaning should expand to fighting for autonomy, dignity, and balance in a digital world. It should honour not just the right to work, but the right to rest, disconnect, and be valued for contribution rather than availability. In 2025, maybe what we should be celebrating isn't the 9-to-5 itself, but the courage to question it. Because here's the thing: work will always matter. It shapes our societies, identities, and futures. But how we work—and how we value one another in that process—is long overdue for a rethink. And if Gen Z has taught us anything, it's that old models aren't sacred, and better ones are possible. And really—isn't that the kind of labour movement worth cheering for? – May 1, 2025 The author is CEO and Founder of HESA Healthcare Recruitment Agency and serves on the Industrial Advisory Panel for the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: HRM Asia


The Star
4 days ago
- The Star
Boomers, Gen Z, Gen X: Do generation labels make any sense
First there were the baby boomers, then Generation (or Gen) X, followed by Y, Z and Alpha. This year, a new cohort has emerged: Gen Beta. This generation, expected to span from 2025 to 2040, is already being discussed by demographers and sociologists, with the term gaining traction in English-language media. But how meaningful are these generational labels and what do they really tell us about the people they define? 'They are more of a popular science category,' says generational researcher Rudiger Maas, author of the book Konflikt der Generationen (Generational Conflict). Sociologist and youth researcher Klaus Hurrelmann says: 'The classifications have become very common in marketing and advertising, but also in science.' Boomers and millennials A new generation emerges on the scene roughly every 15 years: the numerous and self-confident baby boomers – those born after World War II up until 1964, were followed by Gen X, for people born from 1965 to 1979. Gen Y, also known as the millennials, from 1980 to 1994, or sometimes seen as those born until the end of the 1990s, depending on the classification. They were the first generation not to experience the East-West conflict during their formative teenage years, but they did experience the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001 and the financial crisis. Those born between 1995 and 2010 belong to Gen Z, a group often stereotyped as having a poor work ethic. However, it has been reported that Gen Z's approach to work is shaped by their values, priorities and desire for work-life balance. Perceptions of 'laziness' may, in fact, be rooted in generational misunderstandings rather than reality. Participants chant slogans during a climate strike demonstration organised by the international movement Fridays for Future. Photo: EBRAHIM NOROOZI/AP Adhering to generational classifications arbitrary Of course, the classifications are somewhat arbitrary – children born at the beginning of this year are no different than those born at the end of 2024. 'It's more like the zodiac signs,' says Maas. In other words – some people put stock into this – and others not. In addition, phenomena are sometimes associated with a particular age group, even though they are not characteristic of it as a whole. Maas cites the equation of Gen Z with Fridays for Future and sustainability. A study by his Institute for Generation Research showed that only about 15% of young people identified with their so-called generation. Wars and technical innovations shape personalityHowever, it is undisputed that there are generational differences. This can be seen in everyday things: older people ring doorbells instead of sending a WhatsApp message telling a person they are visiting that they are 'downstairs.' And they like to make phone calls often – instead of sending voice messages. 'The core idea of age cohorts is plausible,' says Hurrelmann in an interview with dpa. 'Wars, upheavals, technical innovations leave traces in people's personalities, and this is especially true in adolescence, when people are shaped for their entire lives. Of course, everyone is unique, but there are also many similarities.' Those who went through puberty around 2020 were very strongly influenced by the coronavirus pandemic, for example. Are today's teenagers a 'coronavirus generation? 'Studies show that this has led to considerable uncertainty. You could almost speak of a 'coronavirus generation.'' says Hurrelmann. However, it is important to note that not everyone has had the same experiences. 'It makes a huge difference whether you experienced the coronavirus pandemic in a stable family home, where your parents earned well and were able to switch to working from home, or whether you had parents who had economic problems and were really thrown off course as a result.' 'And these differences are easily obscured by the cliched division into generations,' he adds. Hurrelmann says generational labels such as baby boomers and Gen X, Y and Z have become very common, not only in marketing and advertising, but also in science. — BRITTA PEDERSEN/dpa-Zentralbild/dpa What's expected for Gen Beta 'You can always speak of a new generation when there is a noticeable change in circumstances,' said Maas, the generational researcher and book author. The famous Gen Z – born between about 1995 and 2010 – is, for example, the first generation to have grown up with social media and cyberspace as a matter of course. The consequences of this development can hardly be overestimated. 'Members of Gen Z touch their smartphones about 4,000 to 5,000 times a day and unlock them several hundred times,' says Maas. 'It's fair to say that never before in human history has an object been touched and used so often.' Maas expects that those who have been labelled as Generation Beta will be even more digitalised and, above all, influenced by artificial intelligence (AI). 'The majority of them will work in jobs that don't even exist yet. They will encounter a labour market for which they provide all the experience, and no one to train them, because they are the first.' It's also a world in which it will become increasingly difficult to know which data can be trusted. What is really true, what is AI-generated, and what is not? Maas is convinced that 'AI will not make the reality of life easier and more convenient for today's babies, but much more complex and challenging.' Hurrelmann believes that it is not yet possible to say much about Gen Beta with any certainty – except for one thing: It will in all likelihood be a very small generation, because the birth rate is currently falling. – dpa


The Star
16-05-2025
- The Star
QuickCheck: Is the term 'mayday' related to the month of May?
PETALING JAYA: There are several celebrations held in May: Labour Day, Mother's Day, and Wesak Day are among them. But what about mayday? Does the term hold any relation to the fifth month of the year? Verdict: False While you need 'may' to spell 'mayday', it does not relate to the month. In the past, the SOS was most commonly used in telegraphic communications. The Morse code for SOS is represented by three dots, three dashes and another three dots (...---...). This was easy to remember and decipher and was used predominantly by ships in distress. On the other hand, aircraft use radio and not telegraph as their primary means of communication. And when in distress, a pilot wouldn't have time to clarify to anyone listening that they meant S as in "Sam" and not F as in "Frank." A short, easily understood word that couldn't be mistaken for something else was necessary. In 1923, there was a lot of air traffic between England and France, and there were enough international problems over the English Channel that both parties wanted to find a good distress signal, other than SOS, that everyone would understand. It was then that a senior radio officer, Frederick Mockford of the Croydon Airport in London, came up with the idea for 'mayday" because it sounded like the French word "m'aider", which means 'help me." The call spread well beyond the Channel; the new distress signal's use was reported as far away as Singapore. The term mayday became an international distress call, and in 1927, the United States formally adopted it as an official radiotelegraph distress signal. And the rest is history. Anyway, if you're not in any distress or emergency, you can find out a bit more about SOS here: news/true-or-not/2022/09/28/ quickcheck-is-it-true-that- sos-means-save-our-souls References: com/wordplay/mayday-meaning- origin wonder/what-does-mayday-mean