logo
Sussan Ley says she's a ‘zealot' on recruiting more women to Liberal party – but stops short of endorsing quotas

Sussan Ley says she's a ‘zealot' on recruiting more women to Liberal party – but stops short of endorsing quotas

The Guardian5 hours ago

Sussan Ley has declared herself a 'zealot' on action to recruit more women to the Liberal ranks, but stopped short of endorsing quotas or other formal mechanisms to boost gender equity ahead of the next election.
Promising a second review on the future of the party in the wake of its 3 May drubbing by Labor, the opposition leader told the National Press Club development of a new energy and emissions policy, and reconsideration of net zero by 2050 commitments, would be led by a working group chaired by frontbencher Dan Tehan.
Ley will convene meetings of the shadow ministry and the Liberal party room this week, allowing MPs to air grievances about the election loss and contribute to a policy review being led by former Howard government minister Nick Minchin and former NSW state MP Pru Goward.
Queensland Liberal-Nationals senator James McGrath is expected to lead a second review on the party's future, including 'existential issues' facing the Liberal movement, its state and territory divisions and declining membership.
The first woman to lead the Liberal party and Australia's first female opposition leader, Ley said she was personally agnostic about whether quotas were needed to get more Liberal woman elected, insisting management of preselection processes was the responsibility of state divisions.
'Our party must preselect more women in winnable seats so that we see more Liberal women in federal parliament,' she said.
'Now, I'm agnostic on specific methods to make it happen, but I am a zealot that it does actually happen.
'Current approaches have clearly not worked, so I am open to any approach that will.'
Ley said she would personally work to recruit more women, part of her plan for the Coalition to better reflect modern Australia.
'If some state divisions choose to implement quotas, that is fine.
'If others don't, that is also fine. But what is not fine is not having enough women.'
Labor has easily outperformed the Coalition on gender representation in parliament for decades, after implementing the first quotas for female representation in the mid-1990s. A review of the Coalition's 2022 election loss recommended quotas be considered but the plan went nowhere under former leader Peter Dutton.
Only about 20% of lower house Liberal MPs are women, the same level as in the previous federal parliament. Labor has passed 50%.
Ley stopped short of endorsing net zero by 2050 emissions policies, amid a push by conservative Coalition MPs to ditch the plans. She has personally backed net zero in the past, saying there are 'huge advantages' from lowering carbon emissions.
A new working group led by the shadow energy and emissions reduction minister Tehan will including deputy leader and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien, and frontbenchers Susan McDonald, Angie Bell, Alex Hawke, Dean Smith and Andrew Willcox.
Ley said policy parameters for the group require any plan to promote a stable energy grid, affordable and reliable power for households and businesses, and a cut to emissions 'so that we are playing our part in the global effort.'
Dutton refused to address the Press Club during his three-years leading the opposition. A large group of Liberal MPs were in the audience in Canberra for Wednesday's speech.
Asked the about Labor's plans to consider tax reform after the August productivity roundtable being convened by the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, Ley said she was unlikely to support increases, including to GST.
'As soon as you say there's a case for raising tax, my instinctive answer is 'no',' Ley said.
'In terms of the detail, we want to examine the proposals the government brings forward … Right here, right now in opposition, we need to hold them to account.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NSW MP Gareth Ward likened to ‘vampire running a blood bank' by alleged sexual assault victim, court hears
NSW MP Gareth Ward likened to ‘vampire running a blood bank' by alleged sexual assault victim, court hears

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

NSW MP Gareth Ward likened to ‘vampire running a blood bank' by alleged sexual assault victim, court hears

A court has heard a New South Wales state MP's alleged sexual abuse victim was spurred to action after learning the politician had been appointed as families minister, which he likened to a vampire running a blood bank. The Kiama MP, Gareth Ward, 44, is on trial in the NSW district court after pleading not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and indecent assault charges. He is accused of inviting a drunk 18-year-old man – who was 17 when they met – to his south coast home in February 2013. The man told the jury Ward plied him with drinks before indecently assaulting him three times in one night. He said he had been prompted to report the assaults to police in 2020 after he realised Ward had been appointed the NSW minister for families. 'I felt basically that a vampire was running the blood bank and that I had a responsibility that I needed to get it on the record,' the complainant said. He told the jury he was 'very distressed' by Ward's ministerial role and found it 'very inappropriate'. But the complainant said he was also scared of Ward's power and feared there could be 'significant consequences' if he spoke out. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The jury heard his decision came years after he confided in a friend about the alleged assaults, only to be told he should have expected it when he went to Ward's house. '[The friend] said something to the effect of 'that was obviously going to happen' and … I must be gay for wanting to go there,' the complainant recalled. He told the jury he thought the incident was probably his fault so he decided he needed to put it aside, pretend it never happened, and 'just go on with being Gareth's bro'. The alleged assault was sparked when the 18-year-old – who had been drinking and was in a 'jocular mood' – decided to play a prank on Ward by pretending to be passed out. He alleges Ward tried to wake him up before sliding his hands into the teen's shorts, and touching his buttocks and scrotum. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The heavy breath and the [feeling of] skin on skin are the two things that have stuck with me about that moment,' the complainant said during his emotional testimony. 'I felt like I shrivelled up inside myself. It was the most awkward feeling ever.' Later, he said he had been lying facedown on the bed when Ward allegedly 'mounted' him without his permission and massaged his lower back. Despite asking Ward to get off and stop, the complainant alleged the MP continued while explaining he had masseur training. Upon reflection, he said he believed Ward's unwelcome touching contributed to his subsequent drug and alcohol abuse issues. Ward is also accused of sexually assaulting a drunk political staffer after a NSW Parliament House event in 2015. The man, who was 24 at the time but is now in his 30s, alleged Ward climbed into bed with him, groped his backside and sexually assaulted him despite him repeatedly saying 'no'. Ward was charged in 2022 over the claims, which he denies.

Contempt proceedings against SMH and Age staff in Lattouf case ‘probably doomed', Nine's lawyers argue
Contempt proceedings against SMH and Age staff in Lattouf case ‘probably doomed', Nine's lawyers argue

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Contempt proceedings against SMH and Age staff in Lattouf case ‘probably doomed', Nine's lawyers argue

A request by pro-Israel lobbyists to launch contempt proceedings against editors and reporters from Nine for allegedly breaching a suppression order in Antoinette Lattouf's unlawful termination case is 'probably doomed', Nine's lawyers have argued in the federal court. The editors of the Sydney Morning Herald and the Age, Bevan Shields and Patrick Elligett, are among eight individuals, including lawyers, named in the request. The pro-Israel lobby group have alleged the newspapers breached a suppression order in Lattouf's unlawful termination case against the ABC in four articles, the court heard. The suppression order was made to protect pro-Israel individuals who had contacted the ABC to complain about Lattouf's employment. The hearing on Wednesday began immediately after Rangiah had found Lattouf was unlawfully sacked by the ABC after an 'orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists'. Nine's lawyer Tom Blackburn SC told the hearing that the primary article in dispute was not in breach of the suppression order because it was published months before Lattouf took legal action, and therefore had no connection to the case. The article, written by Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan in January 2024, exposed a coordinated campaign to have Lattouf removed from the ABC. The court heard the names of people who had complained to the ABC about Lattouf were removed from the article in March, after Lattouf's trial took place in February. Blackburn told the court that Nine newspapers were never told the identities of the the nine people – who were part of the 157 members of the Lawyers for Israel group – named in the suppression order. 'We didn't know which ones were applicants,' Blackburn said. 'We couldn't be expected to just pull the articles down. 'Any contempt prosecution is very probably doomed, because the registrar would have to think we knew the identities of the protected parties.' Sue Chrysanthou SC, acting for the pro-Israel group, said that the registrar should prosecute the application for contempt to demonstrate the importance of such orders. Chrysanthou reminded the court that the order was made on the grounds of safety for her clients. She pointed to an article published in the Australian which detailed how those named had faced 'death threats'. The court heard four articles were in dispute – three of which were published before the suppression order was imposed by the court. One article was published by the Nine-owned Pedestrian. Chrysanthou argued one article, which was published the day the suppression order was made, was in breach of the order because it had an embedded hyperlink to an earlier story that had named her clients. She said that link was removed after her instructing solicitor contacted the journalist, Jaspan. The court heard that the article was then amended. The update included that members of the pro-Israel lobby had had their names suppressed. Chrysanthou argued this amendment showed Jaspan and his editors understood the 'import of the orders'. Crysanthou told the court that over half a dozen letters were sent to the Nine papers claiming they were in breach of the order, but they received no reply. 'No acknowledgment of receipt, no response, nothing,' she told the court. Blackburn said the lawyers acting on behalf of the pro-Israel group failed to inform them in these letters the exact identities of who fell under a suppression order, and also referred to a 'male' as one individual under the order. Blackburn argued the mention of a male cast 'further doubt' over claims the story breached a suppression order, given the lawyers from Nine were aware the suppression order related to nine Jewish women. The hearing will continue on 18 July.

Antoinette Lattouf's 18-month legal saga is over – but the crisis at the heart of it still hasn't been resolved
Antoinette Lattouf's 18-month legal saga is over – but the crisis at the heart of it still hasn't been resolved

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Antoinette Lattouf's 18-month legal saga is over – but the crisis at the heart of it still hasn't been resolved

In the end, Antoinette Lattouf found out she had won her case against the ABC not from the judge who decided in her favour, but from her junior barrister Philip Boncardo. Boncardo – and all the lawyers for both Lattouf and the ABC – were handed Justice Darryl Rangiah's written reasons for the judgment at the start of proceedings on Wednesday, as he started speaking to the packed courtroom. While Rangiah was still laying out the context and background of the case, the lawyers were frantically riffling through the pages to find out what the judge had decided. It took Boncardo less than a minute to find the crucial paragraphs. He turned in his chair and nodded to Lattouf smiling. 'We won,' he mouthed. Lattouf looked incredulous. She turned to her husband, sitting in the public gallery behind her, smiled and nodded. Then she turned to hug the two lawyers sitting beside her, bowed her head and sobbed. Over the next 30 minutes in courtroom 18A of the federal court in Sydney, Rangiah went on to lay out how the ABC had acted unlawfully when it terminated Lattouf, three days into a five-day casual presenting contract on ABC Radio Sydney in December 2023. He ordered the broadcaster to pay Lattouf damages of $70,000 and said it could face further financial penalties, which will be the subject of a future hearing. Rangiah concluded that despite its arguments to the contrary, the ABC had terminated Lattouf for reasons including that she held a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza, and in doing so breached the Fair Work Act. Lattouf was removed from the ABC program after she shared an Instagram post from Human Rights Watch that said Israel had used starvation as a 'weapon of war' in Gaza – and Rangiah found that was 'bound to be controversial'. He said it was 'ill-advised and inconsiderate of her employer', in light of previous advice she had been given by a manager to refrain from posting anything controversial on social media during the term of her contract – but that taking her off air as a result was unlawful. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Rangiah also found the ABC contravened its own enterprise agreement by failing to follow its own procedures – by not informing Lattouf of the allegation of misconduct made against her, or allowing her a reasonable opportunity to defend herself. The decision marked the end of an 18-month-long legal saga which, despite hanging on detailed points of industrial relations laws and editorial policy and protocol, had garnered huge amounts of attention. But the costs of the case – financial and reputational for the ABC, and emotional and professional for Lattouf – are likely to reverberate for a long time. Financially, the ABC's legal fees have run to more than $1m, something that Lattouf's lawyer Josh Bornstein was scathing about as he addressed media outside the court. Bornstein said the ABC rejected a settlement offer from Lattouf's team of $85,000 last July. 'The amount of money spent on a case it could've settled for $85,000 is self-evidently ludicrous, and has been in aid of nothing except to discredit the ABC,' he said. Hugh Marks, the ABC's managing director, who took the role from David Anderson – one of the key figures and witnesses in the Lattouf case – said after the decision that the case was 'certainly not a good use of our funds' and reiterated the apology issued by the ABC in the wake of the judgment. It is, one imagines, convenient for the ABC today that none of the three ABC bosses at the heart of this case are still employed at the broadcaster. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Ita Buttrose had already announced she would not seek another term as chair of the broadcaster before the Lattouf drama happened; but the Lattouf case was believed to be a factor in David Anderson resigning a year into his second five-year contract, and Chris Oliver-Taylor resigning after his role was substantially downgraded by the new ABC chair, Kim Williams. The events at the heart of the case happened at a critical political moment – just two months after the October 7 attack in Israel and two months into the bombardment of Gaza – as community tensions in Australia escalated and instances of antisemitic and Islamophobic violence were reported across the country in increasing numbers. The judge found that Oliver-Taylor had taken the decision to remove Lattouf from her on-air role in part 'to appease the pro-Israel lobbyists who would inevitably escalate their complaints about the ABC employing a presenter they perceived to have antisemitic and anti-Israel opinions'. Rangiah said that complaints to the broadcaster about Lattouf from when she first started broadcasting 'were an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists' which 'caused great consternation amongst the senior management of the ABC'. Lattouf's termination, and the subsequent peek-behind-the-curtains afforded by the court case, went to the heart of a question being asked across Australia: who is allowed to speak on Israel-Gaza, and whether the ABC has the right to dismiss a contractor for expressing an opinion on the matter. Lattouf has previously had much to say about freedom of the press and the huge emotional toll the case had taken on her. On the last day of court proceedings in February, an emotional Lattouf addressed the media, composure cracking: 'I could not have done this alone. There were days I could barely get out of bed. The public's unwavering support kept me standing … From the bottom of my heart, I thank you. You gave me strength when I felt that I was drowning from the weight of this.' But on Wednesday, speaking outside the court, she barely mentioned the case, and didn't mention freedom of the press or the personal cost of the case. Instead, she ended in the same place this whole saga began – by talking about the suffering of the people of Gaza. 'In December 2023, I shared a Human Rights Watch post,' she said. 'This Human Rights Watch post found that Israel was using starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza. It is now June 2025, and Palestinian children are still being starved. We see their images every day, emaciated, still lethal, scavenging through the rubble of scraps.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store