logo
Martyn Cornell obituary

Martyn Cornell obituary

The Guardian4 hours ago
My friend Martyn Cornell, who has died suddenly aged 72, was a renowned historian of beer. His book Porter and Stout: A Complete History, which had taken him seven years to write, was published three days later.
It covers 300 years and 56 countries, and caps an impressive output of entertaining, informative and myth-debunking books. They include Beer: The Story of the Pint (2004); Amber, Gold & Black: The History of Britain's Great Beers (2010); Strange Tales of Ale (2015); and Around the World in 80 Beers: A Global History of Brewing (2024). He won several awards from the British Guild of Beer Writers.
Born in Hampstead, Martyn grew up in Stevenage. His father, Arthur, was a bricklayer and his mother, Daphne (nee Donno), a shorthand typist. Martyn went to Alleyne's grammar school in Stevenage, then studied politics at Sussex University, followed by a diploma in journalism at the City of London Polytechnic. In 1995 he gained an MBA from Thames Valley University.
Starting out as a reporter in Hitchin on the Stevenage Comet, he was an editor on the Informer stable of newspapers in Surrey and west London, which is where we were fellow journalists and became friends. Later Martyn was a subeditor on the Times, the Daily Telegraph and the South China Morning Post.
At the Times he rose to the challenge brilliantly when asked to write a four-line headline across a single column width for a story about Michael Foot, the then Labour party leader, leading a committee looking at nuclear disarmament. Martyn said: 'I certainly wasn't going to get 'nuclear' or 'disarmament' or 'committee' to fit, so after a struggle I decided on 'Foot chairs arms body', then thought 'Foot heads arms body' would at least give a laugh to the revise sub. To my astonishment, the headline was printed.'
In 2007, Martyn launched a popular, award-winning blog, Zythophile – the word, derived from Greek, means 'a lover of beer'. The range of categories – nearly 60, from ageing beer to yeast – demonstrated his sweep of knowledge. There are 105 posts alone on beer styles.
Martyn's writing packed a punch. 'If I read once more that porter got its name because it was 'popular with the porters of Covent Garden, Smithfield and Billingsgate', I am going to slap someone with a malt shovel,' he wrote, in what turned out to be his last post. A lover of books and music, Martyn was affable, modest and humorous, and in demand at conferences and beer-judging competitions worldwide. The University of Gastronomic Sciences in Pollenzo, Italy, used his writing for course work.
Martyn is survived by his wife, Emer, from whom he separated four years ago but with whom he remained great friends, their daughter, Mara, and his younger brother, Dave.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Perverted liberalism has led to neo-Marxism, perverted patriotism may yet lead to neo-fascism
Perverted liberalism has led to neo-Marxism, perverted patriotism may yet lead to neo-fascism

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Perverted liberalism has led to neo-Marxism, perverted patriotism may yet lead to neo-fascism

It is, on balance, helpful, that the current American president and vice-president are both interested in Britain. We are one of the few allies not deliberately antagonised by the Trump administration. This is a Brexit benefit. Yesterday, Donald Trump had things to do in Anchorage, Alaska, but last month he was in Aberdeenshire, and next month he will be over here for his second state visit. JD Vance, the vice-president, ended the week staying on an estate in Ayrshire, after spending a few days near Adlestrop in the Cotswolds, scene of Edward Thomas's much anthologised pastoral poem about a summer railway station where nothing happens. What draws these two powerful men here? Mr Trump likes – and owns – golf courses, and his mother came from the Hebrides. He seems to prefer her Scottish roots to his father's German ones, and he is in love with the British monarchy. Mr Vance has Scottish roots, too, but his quest seems more cultural, intellectual and political. He was mixing a family holiday (accompanied by a few non-political old mates) with discussions about ideas with his English friend, Dr James Orr, a Cambridge theologian, and Danny Kruger, the Conservative MP who recently made a powerful parliamentary speech in favour of Christianity in Britain. He saw the billionaire businessman Sir Paul Marshall, owner of The Spectator and patron of several conservative and Christian causes. The vice-president entertained and was entertained by Tom Skinner – patriotic Essex man, former market trader and star of The Apprentice, whose catchword is 'Bosh' – and a much more famous public entertainer, currently from Clacton, called Nigel Farage. Through the good offices of George Osborne, a surprising ally, given Mr Osborne's Remainer, globalist views, Mr Vance also met assorted Conservatives – Robert Jenrick, Chris Philp, Laura Trott and the rising star of the party's new intake, Katie Lam. It was a mark of how even Tory centrists feel the need to trim to the Atlantic wind that the journalist Daniel Finkelstein was among the guests. Lord Finkelstein's column this week was a fine read for Kremlinologists, as it sidled cautiously closer to Mr Farage. There is something attractive about Mr Vance's quest for ideas. Although it can be tactless (and may be intended to be), his readiness to propagate them is refreshing too. Since the days of Theodore Roosevelt, who invented it, the 'bully pulpit' has been the property of the US president. Mr Trump, however, is more bully than pulpit, and Mr Vance, a Catholic convert, is a most articulate preacher. He is searching, like so many, for a conservatism which goes deeper than economics and pays greater heed to those left behind by social change and discriminated against by modern public doctrine. He is influenced in this by the National Conservatism movement in the United States. In developing these views, Mr Vance and Maga allies identify 'woke' as their main internal opponent. They see woke doctrines, advancing under the camouflage of liberal tolerance, as neo-Marxist attempts to set different groups, tribes and classes against one another and to dissolve the proud historical identity of the nation state. This is an even more incendiary subject in America than in Britain but, goodness knows, it is hotting up here, chiefly because of this century's huge increase in immigration encouraged under both main parties. Mr Vance has expressed this vividly: 'I think the people whose ancestors fought in the Civil War have a hell of a lot more claim over America than the people who say they don't belong today.' He seeks allies for a comparable message here and, in more directly political terms, for the best political vehicle. He is contemplating a different party configuration on the Right. At present, he sees Reform, if allied with 'sound' Tories, as the likelier means than the present Conservative Party. I have my doubts about the practicality of that, and the wisdom of foreign politicians, Anglophile though they may be, getting involved. But what I want to discuss today is not party-political manoeuvring. It is the philosophical and moral ways in which the Vance Anglosphere crusade – given the militant Christian roots involved, the word 'crusade' may be apposite – could all go wrong. I write as someone who wants it to go right. The first danger – though I agree that Christianity is the most important single root of our institutions, our civil society and our shared culture – arises because there is usually something unscrupulous about using Christianity as a political weapon. Look at how politics in the Muslim world is corrupted by Islamist ideology and you will see the analogy. The second danger is that the anti-wokeists may replicate on their side what they so dislike about their opponents. Just as woke people try to smear all conservatives as racists, so some conservatives smear all wokeists as unpatriotic traitors. Many Maga supporters are doing this already, especially online. They lament how the 'mutual loyalty' of American society has been gashed by political correctness, but they are not doing much to bind up the wounds. Like that of woke, their rhetoric attracts people who enjoy hating other people. If perverted liberalism leads to neo-Marxism, could not perverted patriotism lead to neo-fascism? Take, for example, Dr Orr's recent advocacy of the slogan 'Faith, Flag and Family'. All three are indeed good things, but he, an intelligent and well-educated man, must know how similar are these words to the propaganda of Vichy France (' Famille. Travail. Patrie '). One well-known Vichy poster contrasted an attractive, well-built house founded on these principles with a crumbling one built on 'capital', 'Jewishness', 'democracies' and other supposed evils. Does that not worry him? It should. In the United States, sometimes assisted by people as prominent as Tucker Carlson, anti-Semitism, which in the past 30 years has become increasingly the property of the Left, is being reclaimed by elements on the Right. A good index of bad trends of thought is what some on the Right say about Ukraine. There are, of course, reasonable arguments to make for peace talks, but note the omissions. Neither President Trump nor his vice-president ever says that Putin's invasion struck against the 80-year peace of all Europe, which depends on inviolable borders. Neither draws attention to Putin's more minor but significant provocations and infiltrations in most other eastern European nations. Note, too, the shifting of blame – most strikingly on to President Zelensky himself, whose crime seems to have been to refuse to run away as the Russian tanks rolled towards Kyiv – and also on to the West in general (a persistent claim made by Nigel Farage). Finally, note how the wilder attacks on wokeism in the West invoke Putin almost as the goodie. On the BBC in May, Dr Orr appeared with the Liberal Democrat MP, Max Wilkinson. Complaining (rightly) about growing free speech restrictions in this country, Dr Orr said, 'A lot more people have got into trouble in the UK for free speech offences than in Putin's Russia.' When challenged for this astonishing statement, he 'gladly' promised to send Mr Wilkinson the evidence to back it up. He has never done so. If Maga people are sincere, as I believe they are, in wishing to reassert the self-determination of independent nation states and disapproving of imperial 'forever wars', why do they excuse Putin's Russia and disparage Ukraine's battle to maintain the rights of nationhood? How did the national conservatism of Edmund Burke get muddled up with the Putinist opportunism of Viktor Orban's government in Hungary?

Britain to put boots on ground in Ukraine within week of a ceasefire
Britain to put boots on ground in Ukraine within week of a ceasefire

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Britain to put boots on ground in Ukraine within week of a ceasefire

Britain is poised to put boots on the ground in Ukraine within a week of a ceasefire being declared, The Telegraph understands. Plans have been made for hundreds of British military trainers and engineers to enter the country if fighting pauses to help rebuild Ukraine's armed forces. Sir Keir Starmer has also signed off on the use of Royal Air Force fighter jets to help police the skies over Ukraine with allies to ensure Russia does not breach any truce. On Friday, John Healey, the Defence Secretary, stressed the UK's willingness to send in British soldiers and declared they would fight back if attacked. It would mark a significant escalation in Britain's role in helping Kyiv see off the Russian threat towards Ukraine, bringing with it risks for those deployed. The plans have been worked up for months with European allies in a drive dubbed the 'Coalition of the Willing', but have taken on renewed urgency this week. Donald Trump's meeting with Vladimir Putin, the Russian leader, in Alaska on Friday to scope out the chance of a peace deal, left Kyiv and other European capitals watching from the sidelines. The US president offered few clues about his genuine hopes before the talks, framing the meeting as a listening exercise and downplaying the chances of a deal being struck. On his way to Alaska, Mr Trump said Putin 'wants a piece' of American economic success in a sign that the incentive of lifting tariffs is being dangled by the White House. Speaking ahead of the talks, Mr Healey, who has been closely involved in military planning about what would follow a ceasefire declaration, reiterated that the UK was prepared to deploy soldiers. Mr Healey said on BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'As the Prime Minister has said, in the circumstances of a ceasefire, we are ready to put UK boots on the ground in Ukraine. 'That is, in part, to reassure Ukrainians, but it is also in part to secure the safe skies, safe seas and to build the strength of the Ukrainian forces. 'Because in the end, the best, the strongest deterrent against Russia re-invading or regrouping and relaunching their aggression against Ukraine is the strength of Ukraine to stand for itself, to defeat and deter and to defend itself.' Hours before Mr Trump and Putin were due to meet, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) released defence intelligence that piled pressure on the White House not to give away more land. It showed the slow progress Russia was making on the battlefield in taking four areas of Ukraine that Putin is targeting: Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson. The MoD said that on the speed of Russian gains seen this year it would take Putin 4.4 years or 1.9 million extra casualties to fully seize all four areas. The intervention appeared to be an attempt to publicly urge Mr Trump not to give Ukrainian-held land to Russia in talks that it has little hope of taking soon by force. It came hours after Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the head of Britain's Armed Forces, wrote in The Telegraph that the West 'should not be cowed' by Putin and that Nato must be 'assertive in every domain'. The Telegraph understands the UK would act quickly if a ceasefire was agreed between Ukraine and Russia and put into place. The first British soldiers would go into Ukraine within the week, with deployments likely to be declared in public to show Russia the West was not turning its back on Kyiv. It would take many more weeks from there for the full scale of what is being planned to be put in place, including sending Typhoons and F-35s on patrols in the skies above Ukraine. The Prime Minister first declared Britain was willing to put boots on the ground in Ukraine to help oversee any ceasefire back in February via this newspaper. In the months since, military planners have been regularly discussing behind the scenes the practicalities of how the 'coalition of the willing' would work if the fighting were paused. The original thinking was that a land army of Western allies tens of thousands strong could be sent in to help Ukraine police a new border with Russia after a ceasefire had faded. Instead, three areas of immediate focus have emerged: Sending in Western soldiers to help rebuild Ukraine's armed forces; Using Coalition jets to police the skies above Ukraine; and using naval vessels to clear landmines more quickly from the Black Sea. It is the first of these - rebuilding Ukraine's military - that is considered the most urgent priority by UK government insiders in deterring another Russian invasion and is expected to see rapid action. Since the outbreak of the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Britain has taken the lead in training Ukrainian soldiers on UK soil in what was dubbed 'Operation Interflex'. After a ceasefire is declared, British military experts would be sent into Western Ukraine instead to train troops there, speeding up the process and improving efficiency. British military engineers - both inside the government and from the private defence sector - are judged by the UK to be some of the best in the world. So the UK will send engineers into Ukraine if fighting pauses to repair drones and tanks. More weaponry, machines and equipment are also expected to be donated. Sir Keir publicly said this week that the coalition's operational plans, which include the setting up of a joint headquarters in France, are ready to go. The push to clear the Black Sea of mines would accelerate the work already being done by the Black Sea Task Force formed by Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria last year. The focus of coalition land troops on strengthening Ukraine's military, not manning any new frontline declared in the ceasefire, would reduce the danger posed to British soldiers deployed. Yet the new approach would still bring significant risks. It remains unclear what security guarantees - if any - Mr Trump has offered should the European troops in Ukraine get attacked by Russia after a ceasefire is declared.

Stop heavy-handed treatment of Palestine protesters, equality watchdog warns
Stop heavy-handed treatment of Palestine protesters, equality watchdog warns

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Stop heavy-handed treatment of Palestine protesters, equality watchdog warns

Britain's human rights watchdog has warned police against using 'heavy-handed' tactics on pro-Palestine protesters. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has written to Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, and Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, about 'blanket policing approaches' that risk having a 'chilling effect' on protest rights. The EHRC's warning comes as protesters continue to take to the streets across the UK in almost weekly demonstrations against the war in Gaza. The letter, from Baroness Kishwer Falkner, the commission's chairman, raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced reports about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act in July for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. She said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Kent Police confirmed it had 'received correspondence from a legal firm representing a person spoken to by officers in Canterbury on July 14 2025' after the Guardian reported the woman is taking legal action against the force. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She said: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store