
DoJ backs ending Delta, Aeromexico venture
NEW YORK: Delta Air Lines Inc and Grupo Aeromexico should lose antitrust protection that allows the carriers to plan and price flights jointly, the US Justice Department (DoJ) says in a filing.
The agency cited evidence it said suggested that restrictive and possibly discriminatory policies by the government of Mexico have limited competition.
The federal agency supported a tentative recommendation from the US Transportation Department (DoT) that President Donald Trump's administration should revoke antitrust protection for the long-standing alliance, according to the comments dated Aug 8 and filed on Monday.
The DoT warning was made last month under a new set of orders demanding Mexico act to address anti-competitive behaviour.
Practices by Mexico's government 'have limited entry and expansion by certain carriers' at Benito Juarez International Airport 'and thereby undermined competitive conditions in Mexico, thwarting open market access on routes between Mexico and the United States', the DoJ said.
The alliance 'fosters enhanced competition' with other US and Mexican carriers, Delta and Aeromexico said in a filing on Monday. The venture holds 20% of the US-Mexico market measured by seat share.
American Airlines Group Inc has 21%, United Airlines Holdings Inc 16% and Volaris 16%.
It is also an economic boon, they said, generating 4,000 US jobs, more than US$310mil of economic benefit and more than US$200mil in annual tourism spending in the United States.
Ending the venture's antitrust immunity 'would punish a US company and US consumers, not the government of Mexico', the two airlines said.
'Other, superior measures are available to remedy the situation with the government of Mexico without harming the US economy, the Department should pursue those alternatives instead.'
The initial approval of antitrust immunity for the airlines was conditioned on the creation of a 'liberalised' bilateral air service agreement between the United States and Mexico which would have fostered open competition on routes between the two countries, the DoJ said.
The airline alliance no longer 'serves the public interest' the United States said on July 19.
The DoT alleges that Mexico has been acting outside of a 2015 agreement since 2022, taking slots away from US carriers at Mexico City's Benito Juarez airport and restricting air cargo flights there.
The move was part of Mexican efforts to drive cargo traffic to the newly built airport outside Mexico City.
Mexican airlines will now be required to file schedules with US authorities and seek approval for large charter flights, under an order issued by Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy last month.
Delta and Aeromexico could still maintain their partnership through arms-length activities, he said at the time.
The United States is also looking into agreements between US and European carriers, he said.
Mexico's infrastructure, communications and transport ministry didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Atlanta, Georgia-based Delta warned last month that an end to the partnership 'would cause significant harm to consumers travelling between the United States and Mexico, as well as US jobs, communities and transborder competition.' — Bloomberg

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysian Reserve
an hour ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Yonder Media Mobile Sues FuboTV, Seeking Tens of Millions in Damages
Lawsuit Accuses FuboTV of Using Disney Merger as 'Pretext' to Abandon Partnership NEW YORK, Aug. 13, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Yonder Media Mobile Inc. ('YMM') announced today it has filed a lawsuit against FuboTV, Inc. ('FuboTV') (Case No.: 654014/2025 Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York). The lawsuit alleges that FuboTV's senior executives engaged in a pattern of false promises and misleading assurances for over six months, fraudulently inducing YMM into a strategic partnership and investment only to unilaterally and abruptly abandon the deal. The complaint asserts that FuboTV's abandonment of the deal came after FuboTV entered into a separate agreement with Disney, and that FuboTV cited the approvals required by that agreement as a pretext for its withdrawal from the YMM partnership. FuboTV's actions have caused YMM significant financial and reputational damage. In reliance on FuboTV's repeated representations that the strategic partnership and a substantial equity investment would be consummated, YMM dedicated millions of dollars in capital and resources to develop a FuboTV-branded mobile application and service and secured critical modifications to its pre-existing agreement with a major wireless carrier. The lawsuit asserts that FuboTV's actions, including its misrepresentation and the subsequent summary withdrawal of a compensation offer to YMM, were carried out with reckless disregard for the harm inflicted upon YMM. As a direct result of FuboTV's conduct, YMM is seeking damages exceeding tens of millions of dollars. 'We are, of course, deeply disappointed by FuboTV's misleading conduct, which caused substantial damage and a major setback for our company,' said Adam Kidron, CEO of YMM. 'This lawsuit is a necessary and resolute action to hold them accountable. Our focus remains squarely on our future, which shines brightly. We are more committed than ever to protecting our company and fulfilling our mission to provide people everywhere the next generation of mobile experiences, while delivering value to our stakeholders.' About Yonder Media Mobile Inc. YMM is a US-based mobile technology company founded in 2018. Our mission is to connect communities across borders through intuitive, intelligent mobile applications that add real value to people's lives, delivering the next generation of mobile experiences to the widest possible audience. Backed by a diverse group of prominent investors, our team of dedicated developers, creators, and entrepreneurs is focused on delivering innovative mobile services that bridge geographical and digital divides for our global customer base spanning over 200 countries. Disclaimer: This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding Yonder Media Mobile Inc.'s business and legal proceedings. The information contained in this press release is based on the allegations contained in the filed complaint. The complaint is not a finding of fact or law, and the claims alleged therein are subject to proof in a court of law. This press release is not intended to provide legal advice, and Yonder Media Mobile Inc. encourages readers to consult with a qualified legal professional for advice on any legal issues.


New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow
THE crude oil market's rather sanguine reaction to the United State s' threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen. President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India on Aug 6, which is due to take effect on Aug 28. If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50 per cent, a level high enough to effectively end US imports from India, which totalled nearly US$87 billion in 2024. As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots. It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this. Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil. But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices. Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as US$65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade on Monday, the lowest level in two months. This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market. Are these reasonable assumptions? The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling towards US$150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude. But within four months, the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply rerouted the now discounted Russian oil to China and India. In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same. But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine. There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China. China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given US and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil. India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries, which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies. India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler. About 90 per cent of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports, mainly Urals grade. There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes. If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a reshuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants. Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the US and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to two million bpd of Russian supplies. But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply. For now, the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another TACO, the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. The writer is from Reuters


New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Solitary cell with mattress on the floor for South Korea's once powerful ex-first lady
SEOUL: South Korea's former first lady Kim Keon Hee will spend her first day in jail on Wednesday in a cell much like the one her husband and ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol occupies as prosecutors pursue the once high-flying couple in a widening criminal probe. Kim was formally booked into the Seoul Nambu Detention Center on the western edge of the capital, a comparatively new correctional facility that opened in 2011 and one of the few run by a female warden. She will be treated in the same way as other inmates but will receive minor adjustments in her daily routine given her status as a high-profile figure, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters. Kim was imprisoned after a court approved a warrant for her arrest late on Tuesday on the grounds that she might destroy evidence amid an ongoing investigation into allegations of bribery, stock fraud and influence peddling. Kim's lawyers have denied the accusations against her and dismissed as groundless speculation news reports about some of the gifts she allegedly received in return for favours. Kim apologised for causing concern in the country and called herself "a nobody" as she appeared for questioning last week. Her solitary cell has a small table that can be used as a desk and for eating meals and a floor mattress to sleep on, said the source, who asked not to be identified because he was not authorised to speak to the media. Kim will have separate access to a common shower room and be allowed to exercise outdoors for an hour every day except on Sundays, the time staggered to avoid overlap with other inmates, the source said. Prison will be an entirely new experience for Kim, unlike for her husband who has already spent about 100 days in jail. Yoon is on trial over his botched attempt to impose martial law, on charges of insurrection, an accusation he denies. He has been imprisoned at the Seoul Detention Center, which despite its name is outside the capital to the south. 'POLITICAL MIND' The former first couple had lived in a spacious apartment in an upscale district of Seoul before Yoon's election as president in May 2022 and had returned there after his ouster for the martial law decree that resulted in a political disaster for him, his party and now for his wife. Kim is a wealthy businesswoman in her own right and most of the couple's assets including the apartment belong to her, according to a government database. Now, Kim will receive the same food as the average inmate, usually traditional Korean fare prepared at a cost of about 1,500 won (US$1.08) per meal. On Wednesday, toast with strawberry jam, sausages and salad were on the menu for breakfast. Kim had not eaten since late Tuesday and was not in good health, one of her lawyers told Reuters. It was unclear whether she would appear for questioning by prosecutors on Thursday, the lawyer said. A fine art expert who founded and ran a successful curation agency, Kim has been embroiled in a number of scandals before and after her husband's election in 2022, with the controversies at times overshadowing Yoon's turbulent presidency. Her fashion choices and policy lobbying in areas like promoting a ban on eating dog meat made her controversial in a country where a first lady has typically kept a low profile. Han Dong-soo, a former judge and a prosecutor who worked with Yoon, said Kim had "a politically strategic mind" and was a driving force behind her husband's ascent to top office. After she married Yoon when he was 52, Kim became the main influence of practically all of his thinking and decisions, Han said. Kim was 39 when they wed.