Tejon Ranch Co. Successfully Executing Proven Value-Creation Strategy For Our Shareholders
Urges Shareholders to Vote 'FOR' ONLY Tejon's Highly Qualified Director Nominees on the Company's WHITE Proxy Card TODAY
Bulldog's Short-Sighted Campaign Risks Derailing Decades of Important Work and Shareholder Investment and is Not Aligned with the Best Interests of Shareholders
TEJON RANCH, Calif., April 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Tejon Ranch Co. (NYSE:TRC), ('Tejon' or the 'Company'), a diversified real estate development and agribusiness company, today mailed a letter to shareholders in connection with its upcoming Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 'Annual Meeting') to be held on May 13, 2025.
Tejon Ranch urges shareholders to vote 'FOR' the Company's director nominees only, which are located on the Company's WHITE proxy card, and withhold votes from Bulldog Investors' nominees. The full text of the letter follows:
Dear Fellow Tejon Ranch Shareholders,
We are reaching out to you directly because your vote on the Company's WHITE proxy card ONLY 'FOR' Tejon's 10 director nominees is critical to preserving the value of your investment.
By voting, you have the power to protect your investment from Bulldog Investors' ('Bulldog') short-sighted, self-serving and last second campaign. Despite attempting to take control of nearly 30% of the Tejon Board of Directors ("Board"), Bulldog has presented shareholders with nothing but questions. Even more concerning, Bulldog appears to have no plan beyond choking off investment to Tejon's highly valuable residential development projects – putting at risk years of entitlement and execution progress by the Company on behalf of our shareholders. Bulldog's failure to articulate a value creation plan demonstrates a lack of the planning, analysis and thoughtfulness that is required to successfully oversee the execution of California real estate development, including the interconnected operations of Tejon.
Bulldog's nominees have no meaningful experience in real estate, land development, or California-specific regulation, which are disciplines essential to governing a company like Tejon. Bulldog's nominees also lack understanding of the Company's many separate business assets, unlike the Company's recommended Board nominees. Phillip Goldstein and Andrew Dakos have built their careers in closed-end funds, not at operating companies or land-based businesses. Their track record, even in that narrow field, is mediocre, with the funds they oversee regularly trading at discounts to net asset value1. Mr. Goldstein himself has publicly admitted that Bulldog's involvement at Emergent Capital was a failure.2
Bulldog's third nominee, Aaron Morris, is closely tied to Bulldog. He has repeatedly acted as Bulldog's litigation counsel and appears to have been nominated primarily to serve Bulldog's interests, not the interests of all shareholders,3 on which the Company-recommended nominees are focused.
Electing the Bulldog nominees would hand over strategic oversight of your Company, which is located in the most complex business climate in the U.S., to individuals with a history of poor shareholder outcomes. That's a risk Tejon's shareholders should not accept.
Tejon's Proven History of Success in Development and Obtaining Key Land Use Entitlements Creates Long-Term Value
In stark contrast, our shareholders made their investments in Tejon because the Company is executing the right, long-term strategy to maximize the value of the unique asset that is the Ranch. One of our differentiating core competencies is our impressive track record of securing and defending land use approvals and then executing development, especially in California's challenging regulatory environment. The Company's recommended nominees understand that the barriers of entry into California real estate are only becoming more pronounced and, as a result, the Company's achievements to date are extremely valuable for Tejon's shareholders going forward. Bulldog's nominees appear to disregard this basic California principle.
For real estate assets like Tejon, the value differential between raw land and fully entitled commercial, industrial and residential land is immense. Tejon has been deliberately investing the time, effort and resources to entitle Tejon's land holdings into valuable master planned communities ('MPCs') over many years. This includes, after proceeding through the difficult and unique California entitlement process, successfully executing construction, sales, leasing and developing cash generating assets for our shareholders. In other words, Tejon's Board and executive team have been taking the right steps to realize that immense value differential for our shareholders. What Tejon's investors understand – and Bulldog seems to not understand – is that in real estate, a finite short-term focus can destroy compounding long-term value.
Tejon has a decades-long track record of creating value by entitling MPCs and successfully defending them against litigation in an extremely challenging California regulatory environment. Furthermore, our success in progressing our MPCs – including the highly successful Tejon Ranch Commerce Center ('TRCC') – has been due in large part to our strong working relationships with local, state and federal decision makers. Investors know that 'all real estate is local,' and Bulldog's proposal to cease investment in the MPCs not only jeopardizes future value creation — it risks undermining the trust, goodwill and brand equity we've built with the very stakeholders who have supported our projects and risked their reputations on obtaining approvals for Tejon Ranch master plans and projects. The Board strongly believes that introducing Bulldog's nominees and their lack of the necessary qualifications, relationships or real estate experience would put our Company at risk.
Long-Term, Strategic Approach to Development Drives Virtuous Value Cycle
Tejon shareholders are already benefiting from our focused efforts. Our proven value creation strategy is generating recurring revenues and cash flows from our successful TRCC MPC. TRCC was created using the same land use entitlement process as our other MPCs – Mountain Village, Grapevine and Centennial. Now Bulldog wants Tejon to cease our investments in the very assets that are the building blocks of our strategic plan for future shareholder value creation and cash flow generation. The 10 years of securing approvals at TRCC have produced more than $110 million of cumulative cash flow from commercial and industrial development.
MPC development requires long-term, strategic planning to optimize the value and interconnectivity of all assets. Tejon takes a measured and purposeful approach to strategic reinvestment in our landholdings as we advance our projects. To this end, Tejon has reduced discretionary land use entitlement spending for its MPCs by 38% over the past five years as our MPCs have secured entitlements and we have successfully defended them against litigation which our shareholders understand is capital intensive. We have been successful in spreading our risks across different investments and by utilizing partnerships. Moreover, we were 2½ times oversubscribed in a 2017 rights offering and have continued to advance our approval efforts without requiring additional shareholder equity due to our prudent capital allocation. Additionally, Company headcount has decreased by nearly half over the past ten years as Tejon has outsourced portions of its business, while still building internal execution knowledge and becoming more efficient. All of this is being accomplished by maintaining very low debt on our balance sheet.
Tejon's Board is Best Positioned to Continue our Value Creation Strategy
Tejon's directors are best equipped to oversee our unique and complex business strategy, and the very difficult land use entitlement process required to derive value from it. Our directors bring skills and expertise that are crucial to our business, particularly as it relates to California's commercial and residential real estate industry. Their leadership, knowledge and commitment are exactly what Tejon needs to thrive going forward into a great execution and development phase of our business.
If Bulldog succeeds in its misguided campaign, the long-term value of Tejon will be significantly compromised.
Bulldog has only recently accumulated shares in Tejon, with the aim of making a quick return. We believe Bulldog's short-term focus would erase decades of hard work, shareholder investment and value over the long-term and delay shareholder returns.
Since Bulldog can cumulate votes at the shareholder meeting, it has an outsized influence compared to its position in Tejon. We urge you to vote ONLY in favor of Tejon's 10 nominees on the Company's WHITE proxy card and withhold all votes from Bulldog's nominees. Your support is essential to preserving Tejon's ability to drive long-term value for shareholders and create a real path forward for real returns back to shareholders upon the future implementation of all our MPC's.
Thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
The Tejon Ranch Co. Board of Directors
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT, NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES YOU OWN. YOU MAY VOTE BY THE INTERNET OR MAIL BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE WHITE PROXY CARD. WE URGE YOU TO VOTE TODAY!If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, please contact:D.F. King & Co., Inc.48 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005Banks and Brokers: (212) 390-0450All Others: (866) 796-7184Email: TRC@dfking.com
Vestra Advisors is serving as financial advisor to Tejon and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP is serving as the Company's legal advisor.
About Tejon Ranch Co. (NYSE: TRC)
Tejon Ranch Co. is a diversified real estate development and agribusiness Company whose principal asset is its 270,000-acre land holding located approximately 60 miles north of Los Angeles and 30 miles south of Bakersfield. For more information on the Company, please go to www.tejonranch.com.
Forward Looking Statements
This communication contains forward-looking statements about future events and circumstances. Generally speaking, any statement not based upon historical fact is a forward-looking statement. In particular, statements regarding Tejon's plans, strategies, prospects and expectations regarding its business and industry are forward-looking statements. They reflect Tejon's expectations, are not guarantees of performance and speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, Tejon does not undertake to update such forward-looking statements. You should not rely unduly on forward-looking statements. Tejon's business results are subject to a variety of risks, including business conditions and the general economy, future commodity prices and yields, market forces, the ability to obtain various governmental entitlements and permits, interest rates and other risks inherent in real estate and agriculture businesses. For further information on factors that could affect Tejon's business results, refer to Tejon's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and subsequent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Additional Information and Where to Find It
Tejon has filed a definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A and WHITE proxy card with the SEC in connection with its solicitation of proxies for its 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS THERETO) FILED BY TEJON AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC AS THEY CONTAIN OR WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Shareholders may obtain copies of these documents and other documents Tejon files with the SEC free of charge at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. Copies of the documents filed by Tejon are also available free of charge by accessing Tejon's website at www.tejonranch.com.
Participants
Tejon, its directors, certain of its executive officers, and other members of management and employees may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies with respect to a solicitation by Tejon. The identity of individual participants and information about their direct and indirect interests in the solicitation is available in Tejon's definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 3, 2025 under 'Supplemental Information Regarding Participants in the Solicitation' in Appendix A, which is available free of charge at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov._______________________________
[1]All data as of April 17, 2025, via CEF Connect: 12.5% average discount at Special Opportunities Fund, Inc. over the last 52 weeks (Dakos and Goldstein are directors); 13.7% average discount at Total Return Securities Fund over the last 52 weeks (Dakos and Goldstein are directors); 8.6% average discount at High Income Securities Fund over the last 52 weeks (Dakos and Goldstein are directors); 26.3% average discount at Mexico Equity & Income Fund over the last 52 weeks (Goldstein is a director).[2] The Deal: Bulldog Investors' Goldstein Calls Emergent Worst Activist Campaign (August 3, 2017)[3] Press Release: Special Opportunities Fund Provides Update On FAST Acquisition Corp. Settlement (May 6, 2024); Press Release: Bulldog Investors Sues To Prevent 'Claw Back' Lawsuits Against Public Stockholders of Bankrupt SPAC (February 16, 2024); Law 360: First Trust Sued For Denying Activist's Trustee Nominees (May 10, 2023)
Contacts:
Investors Nicholas OrtizTejon Ranch Co., Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications & Public Affairs661-663-4212nortiz@tejonranch.com
Media Eric Brielmann / Jed RepkoJoele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher(212) 355-4449
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sitio Royalties downgraded after Viper Energy agrees to acquire co for $19.41/shr
-- Texas Capital has downgraded Sitio Royalties Corp (NYSE:STR) to Hold from Buy after the company agreed to be acquired by Viper Energy (NASDAQ:VNOM) in an all-stock transaction valued at $19.41 per share. The downgrade comes as analysts no longer see material upside following the announced deal, which values Sitio at about $4.1 billion. Texas Capital also cut its price target on Sitio to $20 from $29, in line with the proposed merger terms. 'We are positive on the transaction,' analysts wrote, citing strategic fit, increased scale, low leverage, and an attractive base dividend breakeven below $20 per barrel WTI. 'The combination creates a must-own Minerals company.' Texas Capital does not expect any competing bids given the lack of well-capitalized public rivals in the space. Viper Energy said the deal will make it the largest public mineral and royalty company in the U.S., with positions in the Permian and other key basins. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2025, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals. Related articles Sitio Royalties downgraded after Viper Energy agrees to acquire co for $19.41/shr Tesla shares gain as Trump wishes Musk 'well' GFL weighs sale in infrastructure arm valued at C$5 billion - Bloomberg Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsmax Stock: A Cautionary Tale for IPO Investors?
Newsmax conducted its initial public offering at the end of March. Its share price has seen massive upward and downward movements. Investors can glean important lessons. 10 stocks we like better than Newsmax › Initial public offerings (IPOs) can get a lot of attention from the press and investors. This is the first time the public can buy shares in a company, and the share price can move up or down quickly. Newsmax (NYSE: NMAX) completed its IPO at the end of March. In the company's short life as a public company, the share price has been on a wild ride. It's good to take a look at the events and glean lessons. Perhaps it can even serve as a cautionary tale for the next flashy IPO that captures people's attention. Newmax's IPO raised $75 million by selling 7.5 million shares at $10. However, most investors weren't able to purchase shares at that price. On the stock's first day of trading, the share price shot up to close at $83.51. The following day, April Fool's Day, the shares closed at $233. There's no reliable way to predict short-term share price movements, however. Those who feared missing out and jumped in at these elevated prices have seen a massive downslide. The share price closed at $16.19 on June 5. A key lesson is not to buy into a stock's hype merely because the price has gone up a lot. Granted, it's not easy to ignore the hype and massive price movements. However, the best investing strategy is to look at the business and assess its long-term prospects. A media company, Newsmax generated more than three-quarters of its revenue from its broadcasting business. This includes cable channels and a streaming service that produces news and other content. Newsmax has a history of producing losses, however. Last year, the company lost $72.2 million compared to losses of $30.4 million and $41.8 million in 2022 and 2023, respectively. The wider losses came despite revenue increasing from $35.7 million to $171 million during this time. The company reported first-quarter results in May that showed a $17.2 million loss. Granted, it's heading in the right direction since that's narrower than the $50.7 million loss a year ago. While it's positive to produce revenue gains, profitability is what counts. When looking at newly public companies, ideally, investors should see them operating in the black. That's particularly true for Newsmax given it faces large and well-entrenched competitors. Newsmax currently has a $1.5 billion market capitalization. However, when the stock price reached $233, its market cap was about $21 billion. That might not mean much in isolation. But putting the figure into context could send a warning signal. Since the company doesn't report a profit, investors can't use the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. However, you can look at price-to-sales (P/S). Newmax's 2024 sales were $171 million in 2024. Dividing the $21 billion market cap by the sales figure equals a P/S multiple of 122 after its second day of trading. The company's revenue grew by 26% in 2024, but that valuation still seems excessive. The shares currently trade at a P/S ratio of 9. The Russell 2000 index, which encompasses small capitalization stocks, typically has a P/S ratio of about 1 to 2. There should be a compelling reason why a stock has a so much higher valuation than the benchmark index. It's natural to forget about unpleasant experiences. But you need to remember so you can learn and become better-educated investors. The next time you hear about a high-flying IPO, think about Newsmax and whether people are making short-term trades or investing because they believe the company has strong long-term fundamentals. After all, it's wise to think about investing as a marathon rather than a sprint. Before you buy stock in Newsmax, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Newsmax wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Lawrence Rothman, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Newsmax Stock: A Cautionary Tale for IPO Investors? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UnitedHealth Group received multiple bids for Latin American operations
-- UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH) is considering several offers for its Latin American operations, according to a Reuters report on Monday. The move comes as the largest U.S. health insurer faces challenges that include the departure of its CEO and an alleged criminal accounting investigation. The insurer has been attempting to leave Latin America since 2022, with the sale of its Banmedica subsidiary becoming more urgent in recent months due to increasing pressures on multiple fronts, the report said. So far, UnitedHealth has reportedly received four preliminary bids for Banmedica, which operates in Colombia and Chile, with an estimated value of about $1 billion. In May, UnitedHealth's shares dropped 25.5%, and the year-to-date decline stands at 40%. The company withdrew from Brazil in 2023 and from Peru in March 2025. It aims to secure around $1 billion for Banmedica's operations in Colombia and Chile. The company anticipates setting a deadline for final proposals as early as July. The bids reportedly include offers from Washington, D.C.-based private equity firm Acon Investments, Sao Paulo-based private equity firm Patria Investments, Texas non-profit health organization Christus Health, and Lima-based healthcare and insurance provider Auna. The report mentioned that Auna is currently in discussions with a financial partner. Related articles UnitedHealth Group received multiple bids for Latin American operations Tesla shares slip after double downgrade amid Trump feud fallout What are the three big things in markets now? RBC weighs in