logo
Netanyahu Has Decided On Full Occupation of Gaza Strip: Reports

Netanyahu Has Decided On Full Occupation of Gaza Strip: Reports

Newsweek4 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided on Monday evening, local time, that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will fully occupy the besieged Gaza Strip, including operating in areas where hostages are being held, according to multiple media reports.
Netanyahu also conveyed a message to Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, the army's chief of staff, saying, "If this does not suit him, you should resign," according to EuroNews.
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza Takeover Plan Exposes Constraints on Israeli Military
Gaza Takeover Plan Exposes Constraints on Israeli Military

Wall Street Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Gaza Takeover Plan Exposes Constraints on Israeli Military

Israeli authorities say the occupation of the entire Gaza Strip threatened by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to start with a narrower goal—seizing control of Gaza City—reflecting serious resource constraints that are likely to limit the pace and scope of military operations. After nearly two years of intense conflict sparked by an assault on southern Israel by Palestinian Islamist militant group Hamas that killed around 1,200 people, Israel's troops are exhausted, and a large majority of citizens say they want a deal to end the war and free hostages still held by Hamas.

Key Putin Ally Says He Will Not Seek Reelection
Key Putin Ally Says He Will Not Seek Reelection

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Key Putin Ally Says He Will Not Seek Reelection

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko on Friday said during a video interview with Time magazine that he does not plan on running for another term in office. "No, I don't intend to do that," Lukashenko, 70, told the outlet, a move that would end three decades in power, during which time he closely aligned himself and his country with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Newsweek reached out to the U.S. State Department by submission form outside of normal business hours on Friday evening for comment. Why It Matters Lukashenko, known as "Europe's last dictator," took power in 1994 and has since become one of Putin's closest allies, playing a major role assisting Russia's invasion of Ukraine. He is the only post-Soviet leader Belarus has ever had. While Lukashenko's troops haven't directly joined the war in Ukraine, Russian troops have used Belarusian territory to stage exercises since the beginning of it, and Belarus helped Russia launch its invasion. Belarus has periodically tried to make efforts to create stronger ties with the West, but Lukashenko's ties to Russia have long acted as an impediment. In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko is pictured in Minsk, Belarus, on June 27. In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko is pictured in Minsk, Belarus, on June 27. Sergei Bobylyov/POOL/AFP via Getty Images What To Know The Belarusian leader has ended a period of speculation and scrutiny by making clear he will not seek another term in office. While acknowledging that his successor may chart a different course for the country, he suggested that they "shouldn't just throw things overboard straight away." This follows victory in an election earlier this year, with his current term not set to end until 2030. Lukashenko moved the election up by six months from its usual summer time frame. His 2020 reelection sparked the largest protests in Belarus' history, lasting months and prompting a severe crackdown resulting in more than 65,000 arrests and sanctions from the West. Many have maintained that the election was rigged. Lukashenko last year hinted that he could be leaving office, saying that the public might need to "get used to the idea that there will be a different president" in response to queries at that time about his intention to remain in power. In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, and Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko visit the Valaam Monastery on Valaam island in the northern portion of Russia's Lake Ladoga... In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, and Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko visit the Valaam Monastery on Valaam island in the northern portion of Russia's Lake Ladoga on August 1. More Gavriil Grigorov/POOL/AFP via Getty Images Where Is Belarus? Belarus is a post-Soviet state that borders Russia and covers the northern border of Ukraine. It also edges Poland, Lithuania and Latvia and is a landlocked country, with only some lakes scattered across it. Why Did Belarus Split From Russia? Belarus left the Soviet Union as part of the union's broad dissolution in 1990, and declared total independence shortly thereafter when Russia survived the failed August Coup, when Communists tried to seize control of the remnant union.

Trump administration seeks $1 billion settlement from UCLA, a White House official says

time4 hours ago

Trump administration seeks $1 billion settlement from UCLA, a White House official says

The Trump administration is seeking a $1 billion settlement from the University of California, Los Angeles, a White House official said Friday, weeks after the Department of Justice accused the school of antisemitism and other civil rights violations. UCLA is the first public university to be targeted by a widespread funding freeze over allegations of civil rights violations related to antisemitism and affirmative action. President Donald Trump's administration has frozen or paused federal funding over similar allegations against elite private colleges. In recent weeks, the administration has struck deals with Brown University for $50 million and Columbia University for $221 million but has explored larger settlements, such as in its ongoing battle with Harvard University. The White House official did not detail any additional demands the administration has made to UCLA or elaborate on the settlement amount. The person was not authorized to speak publicly about the request and spoke on condition of anonymity. The Trump administration had suspended $584 million in federal grants for UCLA, the university said this week. The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division issued a finding that UCLA violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 'by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.' The university had drawn widespread criticism for how it handled dispersing an encampment of Israel-Hamas war protesters in 2024. One night, counterprotesters attacked the encampment, throwing traffic cones and firing pepper spray, with fighting that continued for hours, injuring more than a dozen people, before police stepped in. The next day, after hundreds defied orders to leave, more than 200 people were arrested. Later, Jewish students said demonstrators in encampments blocked them from getting to class. The University of California's president, James B. Milliken, said Friday the university had 'just received' a document from the Department of Justice and would review it. He said the size of the proposed settlement would 'devastate' the University of California, whose campuses are viewed as some of the top public colleges in the nation. 'Earlier this week, we offered to engage in good faith dialogue with the Department to protect the University and its critical research mission,' said Milliken, who started as president last week. 'As a public university, we are stewards of taxpayer resources and a payment of this scale would completely devastate our country's greatest public university system as well as inflict great harm on our students and all Californians.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday accused Trump of trying to silence academic freedom in his attack on such a prestigious public university system. 'He has threatened us through extortion with a billion-dollar fine unless we do his bidding,' Newsom told reporters. Apparently referencing the settlements with Columbia and Brown, he added: 'We will not be like some of those other institutions that have followed a different path.' The $1 billion demand in the UCLA settlement is linked to Newsom's status as one of Trump's most outspoken foes, said Peter McDonough, vice president and general counsel at the American Council on Education, an association of college presidents. 'Anyone who thinks this appalling demand is not blatantly political and ideological has their head in the sand,' McDonough said. 'Of course it's influenced by the fact that UCLA sits within the California system and the California system sits within the state of California.' The Trump administration has used its control of federal funding to push for reforms at elite colleges that the president decries as overrun by liberalism and antisemitism. The administration also has launched investigations into diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, saying they discriminate against white and Asian American students. Last month, Columbia University agreed to pay $200 million as part of a settlement to resolve investigations into the government's allegations that the school violated federal antidiscrimination laws. The agreement also restored more than $400 million in research grants. The Trump administration is using its deal with Columbia as a template for other universities, with financial penalties that are now seen as an expectation. For instance, the administration is pressing for a deal that would require Harvard to pay far more than Columbia's $200 million. Harvard leaders have been negotiating with the White House even as they battle in court to regain access to billions in federal research funding terminated by the Trump administration. UCLA has already reached one settlement about the 2024 protests. The university agreed last week to pay $6 million to settle a lawsuit from three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who argued the university violated their civil rights by allowing pro-Palestinian protesters to block their access to classes and other areas on campus in 2024. UCLA initially had argued that it had no legal responsibility over the issue because protesters, not the university, blocked Jewish students' access to areas. The university also worked with law enforcement to thwart attempts to set up new protest camps. But in a preliminary injunction a year earlier, U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi disagreed and ordered UCLA to create a plan to protect Jewish students on campus. The University of California has since created systemwide campus guidelines on protests, with an Office of Campus and Community Safety at UCLA. As part of the settlement, UCLA said it will contribute $2.3 million to eight organizations that combat antisemitism and support the university's Jewish community. UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk, whose Jewish father and grandparents fled Nazi Germany to Mexico and whose wife is the daughter of a Holocaust survivor, also launched an initiative to combat antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store