MP blasted for ‘want you' texts to Ukrainian translator
A BRITISH MP who visited war-torn Ukraine to deliver aid made advances towards his translator - texting her: 'I want you.'
Lib Dem Cameron Thomas has been accused of 'abusing his power' by sending the messages to the Ukrainian translater assigned to his trip.
3
3
The newly-elected MP for Tewkesbury also texted the woman: 'I wish I could stay with you for a few days.'
He sent the messages - seen by The Sun on Sunday - while on an official trip to Kyiv in February this year to mark the third anniversary of the war.
The delegation included other MPs and political aides.
Mr Thomas, 42, then went on to deliver aid to Kharkiv, near the frontline of fighting.
A Tory MP aware of the allegations said: 'Given the courage and sacrifice shown by Ukrainians in the fight for their country's very existence, it is unthinkable that one of our MPs should be treating an official visit to a warzone in this way.
'To abuse his power as an MP by preying on a young woman is disgraceful.
'The Liberal Democrats should remove the whip.'
3
Approached by The Sun on Sunday over the claims his behaviour was 'inappropriate', a spokesman for Mr Thomas said: 'These are private messages between two people who have remained in contact.'
The Sun on Sunday also understands that Mr Cameron was using his UK personal phone in Ukraine.
Other politicians who have visited Ukraine on other trips have said they were advised not to take their UK phone, but to use a burner phone in Ukraine, because of the risk Russia could hack into them.
This raises questions over whether Mr Thomas' phone was compromised on the trip.
A spokeswoman for Parliament refused to say what security advice was given to Mr Thomas for the visit.
Mr Thomas, who used to be in the RAF, has previously spoken about the trip, telling the BBC: 'When we were dropping off aid you can feel the gratitude.
'They regularly cite our finest hour, the Battle of Britain, as a template for what they are doing - standing up to a far superior power and holding their own, and that makes me proud to be British.'
A Parliament spokeswoman said: 'The Parliamentary Security Department provides advice to Members of Parliament on overseas travel which draws on FCDO advice. However, we are unable to comment on specific cases.'
The Lib Dems declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Russia hired African farmers to make shampoo, then sent them to war
The advert for a job in a Russian shampoo factory looked like just what Jean Onana needed. Out of work in the Cameroonian capital of Yaounde and struggling to support a wife and three young children, he leapt at the chance to earn a solid pay packet, he later told Ukrainian interrogators. The 36-year-old saved up for his ticket and flew to Moscow in March, joining many young Africans who end up in Russia to study or seek work. However, far from offering the answer to his financial predicament, his trip instead pitched him into the crucible of Ukraine's eastern front, an ordeal he only narrowly survived. Mr Onana had barely arrived when he was detained along with 10 others from Bangladesh, Cameroon, Zimbabwe and Ghana. The men were told they would not be working and instead would sign a one-year contract to join the Russian military and serve on the front lines of Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Mr Onana is only one of what are estimated to be hundreds, or even thousands, of Africans who have found themselves fighting on the front lines. Many more have been recruited into factories to keep the Kremlin's war machine running. Africans and others from developing countries elsewhere are being pressed into service as Russia looks for huge numbers of recruits to sustain horrific casualty rates in its grinding three-year offensive. Nearly one million Russian troops have been killed or wounded since the assault began, the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a US-based think tank, said last week. While the great majority of recruits are still poor Russians, the relentless need for new manpower has led the Kremlin to recruit elsewhere, as well as import 10,000 soldiers from North Korea. Africans have been lured by the promise of money or have been duped or forced into signing contracts, according to accounts and intelligence reports seen by The Telegraph. Suicidal infantry tactics Cameroon's government is so worried about the numbers of soldiers thought to be deserting its army and travelling to Russia that in March it tightened restrictions on military personnel leaving the West African nation. Many African recruits have not returned, becoming victims of suicidal infantry tactics which are currently seeing Russian forces take an average of more than 1,100 casualties each day for only small territorial gains. One tally of Cameroonian social media obituaries suggests the country has already seen more than 60 men killed in the war. Promised a hefty wage and pressured to sign, Mr Onana was then given five weeks training in Rostov and Luhansk. There were around 10 other foreigners in his training unit, from Bangladesh, Zimbabwe and Brazil. During training he was able to call home, but on his way to the front his phone and documents were taken away. His military career ended almost as soon as it began when he and eight others were told to occupy a bunker at the front in early May. The bunker was shelled and everyone killed except Mr Onana, who lay wounded in the debris for six days. He eventually made his way out and was soon captured. Another recently captured African, 25-year-old Malik Diop from Senegal, this week told a Ukrainian military interview that he had been studying in Russia when he met recruiters in a shopping centre. They told him he could sign up to wash dishes in Luhansk, away from the front, for $5,700 (£4,215) a month. After only a week however, he was given a weapon, grenades and a helmet then driven to the front near Toretsk. Recalling the walk to the front line, he said: 'We started to see dead people in the forest. Lots of dead people in different buildings. It really affected me.' As soon as he could, he threw away his uniform and weapons, and deserted. After two days of walking he was captured. Many are not so fortunate. Cameroonian social media channels have in recent months seen many posts purporting to be from people seeking information about relatives who had joined the Russian military and then stopped communicating. The messages are often accompanied by photographs of African men in Russian uniform. 'My friend went to Russia to join the Russian army, and for nearly four months we haven't heard from him,' explained one typical recent request. 'We'd like to know if he's still alive or dead.' Some posts are then updated to explain the missing relative has been killed. One prominent account collating tributes to soldiers this week estimated 67 Cameroonians had been killed. Messages also gave accounts of relatives being detained at the airport and forced to sign military contracts. The gap between Cameroon's meagre military wages and the promise of hefty Russian pay is thought to have worsened a long-standing problem with desertion in the Cameroonian military. A second-class Cameroonian private's basic monthly salary is around £67, while Russia is said to be offering Cameroonian recruits around £1,500 per month. In one recent social media post, a Cameroonian soldier held up his pay slip and said 'here's why we prefer to go die in Russia'. Raoul Sumo Tayo, who has researched the issue for the Institute of Security Studies, a Pretoria-based think tank, said: 'They say it's better for us to go to fight where we earn enough money to save something for our families. 'I don't think it's about supporting Russia, it's more about what they earn.' Africans recruited by Russia are not only fighting on the front. Last month, a report by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime said a Russian firm was recruiting hundreds of young foreign women, mostly from Africa, to manufacture Iranian Shahed drones. The women had been recruited to the company in the Alabuga special economic zone, an industrial park in Yelabuga, east of Moscow, with promises of good salaries and educational opportunities. They were not told the nature of the work, the report said, nor that the factory had been a military target. Several African workers at the factory are reported to have been wounded in an attack by Ukrainian drones in April 2024.
Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot
Nigel Farage will pledge to reopen Port Talbot's steel blast furnaces if in power in Wales, as his Reform UK party sets its sights on being the government in the Senedd next year. In a speech in Port Talbot later, Mr Farage will outline how next year's Welsh parliament elections will be the primary focus of his party. The MP for Clacton has already ruled out standing at the Senedd elections next year. It is unclear who will lead the Reform party in Wales. Reindustrialising Wales will be at the centre of his speech. Acknowledging the task at hand won't be quick or easy, Mr Farage is also expected to suggest a return to coal mining, if suitable, as part of Reform's "long-term ambition to reopen Port Talbot steel". A Reform source told Sky News: "We have said and say again that we think it's better to use British coal for British steel than imported coal." Port Talbot was the largest steelmaking plant in the UK until the two blast furnaces were switched off in September 2024, which saw the loss of 2,800 jobs as part of the transition to greener production methods. Electric arc furnaces are replacing both blast furnaces and are set to be operational by early 2028. 2:30 Wales is set to head to the polls in May next year and Reform hopes to end the 26-year Labour government reign in Wales. The Reform source said Mr Farage's speech "will tap into the hearts and minds of a deeply patriotic nation that feels betrayed and forgotten about by Labour". Recent polling by Barn Cymru saw the Labour vote share in Wales collapse to 18%, with Reform second in the polls on 25% behind Plaid Cymru on 30%, whereas the Conservatives who are currently the opposition in the Senedd are on 13%. Reform believes the performance of their party in Scotland confirms they can win in Wales next year. The source told Sky News: "We are the main challenger to Labour in Wales. A vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Labour."
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves is about to do more damage to pensions than Gordon Brown
When in 1997, Gordon Brown raided pension funds by removing their tax credit on dividends, it was arguably the most egregious blunder of economic self-harm by any chancellor in history. At that time, pension funds and institutional investors owned almost half of the UK's quoted shares. Now it is only 4pc. To most people, it seemed innocuous and may only have raised around £5bn at the time, but it did more than reduce income for pensioners – more importantly it meant the compounded earnings from reinvested dividends never happened. The cumulative cost has been estimated at £250bn to pension funds over the next 20 years. Now in 2025, we have a Chancellor who is doing her best to be more damaging to pensions than Brown – and with Labour's huge majority she has every chance of doing so. Reeves's first move of her four-step barn dance was to make private pensions subject to inheritance tax. That means in some estates the total tax deducted from a pension could be 72pc for basic-rate taxpayers, 84pc for higher-rate and 87pc for additional-rate payers. The next step Reeves is believed to be considering is to remove any tax incentives that encourage salary sacrifice into pensions. An HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) report has already laid the ground for this move which could cost an extra £500 a year on the average earner's tax bill and reduce the size of their pension pot. That's still not enough to satisfy Reeves's appetite for meddling, next comes asserting state control over where pensions are invested, believing, as she and her comrades do, that the state can pick winners. Although please understand, the intention is not to reward pensions with successful returns but to use pension funds to provide investment in Labour's favoured industries without having to raise taxes further or borrow at high rates in the markets. It is essentially a way of subsidising risky government interventions in the economy. We can see pension funds already seeking to please the Government with Torsten Bell, the pensions minister, congratulating one company for committing 15pc of its investments towards government targets, including 5pc on renewables. This is not Viagra to boost the economy, it's Valium to stupefy it. Finally, Reeves is looking at companies with defined benefit schemes being allowed to spend the surplus. Why? So she can then tax any drawdown by 25pc, of course. The collective impact of these changes, even if they do not happen all at once, will be to make all pensioners poorer through lower returns. People will be discouraged from saving through pension funds for their retirement and find other means of investing – all causing British pension funds and the highly complex superstructure of expertise, services jobs and physical support behind the pension industry to waste away like it is being eaten by a cancer. Instead of making UK equities more attractive, it will hasten their decline because they will no longer be bidding for support in a competitive market. Performance will become less important than geographical location or state favouritism. It is a recipe for disaster that will work its way through our private sector like a monstrous tapeworm. It doesn't have to be this way. The alternative that should have been grasped when the Conservatives won (with Liberal Democrat support) in 2010 will still be available to the next government. Whoever has that task should aim to encourage (never force) greater saving into pensions by providing a more stable and secure pension system for future retirees. Yes, it would be brilliant if a greater percentage of pension funds invested in the UK – but it should be because our private sector becomes world-beating and offers attractive returns, not because of a ministerial Wizard of Oz pulling the wrong lever behind a green velvet curtain. A new chancellor should first reverse Reeves's death tax assault on pensions, making pension investment attractive again. By encouraging private provision for our futures, the state gains from a more dynamic economy (raising tax revenues) but also benefits from lower welfare costs in the future. Next – and this is crucial – the UK should restore the dividend tax credits for pension funds that were abolished by Gordon Brown. For a cost of just a few hundred million pounds, this step will encourage retirement schemes to increase substantially the amounts they allocate to UK equities. It is relatively inexpensive to do because Brown's policy so damaged the pension industry's UK investments it will not cost the £5bn it raised in 1997. Then scrap stamp duty on shares. This 0.5pc charge on every transaction on British capital markets depresses both share values and investment into UK equities. It is a long-overdue reform only held back by outdated class war prejudices. Finally, the country has to face up to the dire need to leave behind our unfunded state pension Ponzi scheme (where current taxes pay today's pensions in the fingers-crossed hope that future taxes will pay future pensions – thus requiring constant mass immigration to outpace the nation's demographic challenges). We need a funded pension system that actually invests in real assets so future generations have pension pots they can rely upon. The British people get a very poor implied rate of return on what they pay into National Insurance. Evidence shows they would be three times better off putting the same money as their National Insurance contributions (NICs) in a private pension fund. Money put into Britain's pay-as-you-go state system is paid out straight away in current benefits. Over the years, those benefits can grow only as fast as the NICs that finance them – roughly the annual growth of real earnings – but this has been negligible in recent years. ONS data for 2024 indicated median weekly pay for full-time employees in the UK was 2pc lower in real terms compared to 2010. By contrast, the real rate of return on invested funds is more than 5pc. Indeed, from 1900 to 2021, UK equities delivered an average annual real return of approximately 5.4pc, while over the same period, global equities achieved around 5.3pc in real annual returns. This difference between state and private systems, compounded over a 40-year working life, means the average worker's NICs would have to be six times higher than the sum required to buy the same benefits privately. A phased change would be required and one-way of helping finance the transition is to tackle the absurdly generous and costly system of public sector pensions – but that story is for another day. Reeves is on a mission; she needs desperately to fund the pepper-pot of black holes she has created in the public finances. By raiding our pensions and decimating the sector with taxes, she will only generate fast-diminishing returns as her scorched-earth policies kill our private sector that generates wealth.
