
Sunita Shekhawat turns meenakari jewellery into home decor objects
Created by the house of Sunita Shekhawat, the 10 collectibles, created using gold and silver, present jewellery in the shape of exquisite home decor pieces. They include 4x4 boxes, decorative spoons, small vanity mirrors, and a pair of earrings with prancing horses—priced within the range of ₹5- to ₹15 lakh—all adorned with intricate meenakari work, a centuries-old Persian technique that continues to flourish in Jaipur and is renowned for its vibrant and intricate designs on metal surfaces like gold and silver.
In an interview with Lounge, Sunita Shekhawat, the force behind the brand and the founder of MOMH, talks about the new collection, the challenges along the way, and why independent jewellery houses need to keep experimenting. Edited excerpts:
Could you talk about the idea behind the collection?
It was not just about creating a collection of objects. It's a way to inform people how versatile meenakari can be. And I would like to give credit to Mrs (Nita) Ambani, who had asked us to make meenakari boxes during the wedding of her son Anant last year. Because of her input, we got the idea to create an entire new vertical.
Investment in jewellery is always a good idea but you often end up keeping it in the locker and taking it out only on some special occasions. We've essentially attempted to turn a piece of jewellery into a home decor object that can be admired every day for hundreds of years.
In this collection, we have used meenakari techniques in a completely different way. Let me explain how. When you talk of meenakari jewellery or any other form of jewellery, one piece is either six or seven inches— and they are created in parts. So, to translate that jewellery craft into an object is a whole different game because the scale changes. It took us a year and a half to come up with this collection.
What were challenges along the way?
Every medium is difficult, whether it's block printing or carpet making. But I think jewellery is more difficult because the process is all re-do. There's no space for correction. You erase it all and then correct it again.
The artisans are also not used to holding so much metal weight (two-three kilgramme) for long. (A necklace weighs about 100-200g.) Then to ensure all the colours are the same, you have to be extra careful about the heating and cooling temperatures. Everything changes with the shape, size and weight of the object you want to create.
Craft is the same, of course, but it's like telling a miniature artist to do graffiti on a big wall, and it should have the quality of a miniature (painting). Or, telling someone who makes a handkerchief to do the same artistry in a wall-to-wall carpet.
Do you have a target audience in mind?
The idea is to take Indian art and craft to Harrods, Bergdorf Goodman, PAD Paris. People should look at Indian craft in a new light; they should look at Indian jewellery as art and art as jewellery.
With the entry of more big corporate houses in the jewellery space, things have become more mass-y. The exclusiveness that was there earlier in jewellery is slowly fading away. I believe it's more important for us, independent jewellery houses, to keep reinventing and experimenting.
We are now working on photo frames and ring boxes.
Consumer demands have also changed…
Yes. We are now talking about functional jewellery, minimal jewellery, contemporising traditional jewellery. The consumer is the same; it's just that they want more variety.
In the morning, when a woman is getting ready for the office, she wants to wear a stud, or a stackable bangle. In the evening, when she's going for a party, she's making small tweaks and wearing something more dressy. For a wedding function, she's opting for something heavier.
So people are looking for jewellery, traditional as well as contemporary, for every occasion. Earlier, people used to wear jewellery even when they were sleeping at night. Now, they remove everything before sleeping. The attitude towards jewellery has changed but the fondness for it has only grown.
What about the growing trend of coloured gemstones?
That's just a trend for now, and trends come and go.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Two Sharp with ET: Retail investors trigger Nifty shakeout, LIC hit big
Retail investors are abandoning India's top Nifty stocks, even high performers like Bajaj Finance and BEL, in favour of smallcaps, triggering major churn in equity markets. Meanwhile, LIC lost ₹66,000 crore in July alone due to the bluechip selloff. In our second story, the Enforcement Directorate tightens its grip on the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group in a ₹17,000 crore loan fraud case. Ambani is summoned. Executives questioned. One arrest made. All the top headlines, only on Two Sharp with ET, with Nisha Poddar Show more Show less


India Today
17 hours ago
- India Today
ED summons Anil Ambani's top aides; probes banks over Rs 17,000 crore loan fraud
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has widened its investigation into the alleged Rs 17,000 crore loan fraud case involving Anil Ambani's after summoning Anil Ambani, the agency has now issued summons to several of his top executives for questioning under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).Among those called are two of Ambani's closest aides, Amitabh Jhunjhunwala and Sateesh Seth. Both are senior figures in Ambani's business empire and are believed to have had key roles in financial operations. According to officials, at least six summons have been issued so far. These executives had already come under the ED's radar earlier during searches carried out at various ED believes these senior executives were actively involved in helping divert funds and defraud banks. Officials suspect that some banks may have received kickbacks for turning a blind eye when the loans given to the group companies became non-performing assets (NPAs).As part of its investigation, the ED has now written to 39 banks. It has asked why these banks did not report the loans as suspicious or raise alerts with the authorities when the accounts began defaulting.'The silence of the banks even after loan defaults raises serious questions. These institutions had a legal duty to alert the authorities, which they failed to do,' a senior official told Aaj Tak/India Today ED is also looking into whether there was a deliberate attempt by bank officials to ignore red flags. Officials believe that illicit payments may have been made to bank staff in return for keeping quiet about the investigation has expanded in recent weeks, with the ED conducting searches in multiple locations, including Bhubaneswar and Kolkata. These searches are connected to a broader fake bank guarantee racket that the agency believes is linked to the same group of fraud case centres around unpaid loans amounting to nearly Rs 17,000 crore, which were taken by various firms linked to Anil Ambani. Officials are now trying to trace where the money went and who all were involved in diverting Ambani is expected to appear before the ED on August 5 for further agency is still gathering documents, financial records, and digital data as it pieces together the entire money trail.- EndsMust Watch advertisement


Time of India
18 hours ago
- Time of India
ED summons top executives of Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group: Report
Live Events Rs 17,000 crore loan fraud: What the case is about? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Monday issued summons to several top executives of the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group in connection with an ongoing money laundering investigation , a day before Ambani himself is slated to appear before the to ET Now, which cited sources familiar with the development, senior group executives including Amitabh Jhunjhunwala and Sateesh Seth are among those summoned. The ED has reportedly issued at least six summons under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) so the executives had previously been subject to searches by the ED as part of its probe. The agency suspects that these individuals played key roles in orchestrating transactions that allegedly defrauded a consortium of ET Bureau exclusive report on Monday revealed that the ED also plans to summon officials from nearly 20 public and private sector banks that had extended loans to various Reliance Group companies. The agency intends to question these officials on the due diligence exercised before sanctioning loans and the steps taken when repayments failed.'We want to ascertain what action the banks took, if any, against the companies which defaulted. Did they lodge a complaint with any investigating agency, seeking registration of a criminal case against the companies?' a senior official told to the ET report, ED's line of inquiry will include understanding the credit assessment processes followed by lenders, many of whom are believed to have issued loans that later turned into non-performing assets The money laundering investigation centres around alleged irregularities in loans worth approximately Rs 17,000 crore extended to three Reliance Group companies—Reliance Home Finance Ltd (RHFL), Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL), and Reliance Communications (RCom). According to ED data cited by the ET report, RHFL owes over Rs 5,901 crore, RCFL Rs 8,226 crore, and RCom nearly Rs 4,105 crore to various from Yes Bank , other financial institutions involved include State Bank of India Bank of India , and Punjab and Sind Bank ET was the first to report on August 1 that the ED had summoned Anil Ambani for questioning. He is expected to appear at the ED headquarters in New Delhi on August a development linked to the case, the ED on Friday arrested Partha Sarathi Biswal, managing director of Odisha-based Biswal Tradelink Pvt Ltd (BTPL), for allegedly arranging a fake bank guarantee worth Rs 68 crore for a Reliance Group entity. The agency informed the court that Biswal had received Rs 5.40 crore from Reliance Power Ltd , parent company of Reliance Nu Bess Ltd, in return for the forged guarantee submitted for a tender floated by the Solar Energy Corporation of India Ltd (SECI).According to the ED, documentary evidence indicates collusion between Biswal Tradelink and Reliance Nu Bess, contradicting the latter's claim of being defrauded. A senior official told ET, 'Documentary evidence reveals that apparently the two parties acted in collusion. The directors of Biswal Tradelink were found to be previous directors of Reliance Group.'The agency also recovered several incriminating documents and digital devices during its August 1 raids. It alleged that BTPL maintained multiple undisclosed bank accounts and conducted transactions disproportionate to its declared turnover, with "dummy directors" used to facilitate Delhi Police FIR in the case was initially based on a complaint by Reliance Nu Bess, accusing BTPL of fraud. However, ED officials now believe the two firms may have been jointly involved in the a statement issued Friday, the Reliance Group maintained that it acted 'bonafidely' and was itself a 'victim of fraud, forgery, and cheating conspiracy.'The group stated it had made due disclosures to stock exchanges in November 2024 and had lodged a criminal complaint against the third party with the Delhi Police's Economic Offences Wing in October 2024.