How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies.
Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them.
A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in.
Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'.
But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision.
Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences.
He said he was in favour of the injunction.
Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here.
'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone.
'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels.
'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle.
'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.'
In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go?
'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away.
'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative?
'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle.
'There are extremists at these protests every week.'
Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision.
He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere.
'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.'
Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened.
'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are.
'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full.
'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.'
Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe.
'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction.
'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Spectator
The Epping ruling is the last thing Yvette Cooper needs
It is another scratchy, difficult week for the government. Inflation is up, to 3.8 per cent in July – the highest level since January 2024. Asylum applications are now at record levels with 111,000 applying during Keir Starmer's first year in office. But the real body blow is the interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at The Bell Hotel in Epping. Unsurprisingly, dozens of councils of the country are now poised to launch similar action. That creates a very difficult dilemma for Yvette Cooper. The Home Secretary has sought to downplay and depoliticise the housing of asylum seekers, pointing, not unfairly, to the industrial scale under which this occurred for many years under the Tories. But now, it seems, local authorities have reached their breaking point. It is not just Conservative and Reform councils considering appeals: both Tamworth and Wirral – two Labour-run authorities – are reportedly doing the same. That makes it harder for the government to suggest this is merely partisan gamesmanship. With ministers now scrambling to devise contingency plans, we could potentially be witnessing the complete unravelling of the existing system of dispersing migrants across the country. The obvious resort for the Home Office is to turn from hotels to smaller private dwellings instead, which would fit with the Chancellor's pledge at the Spending Review to stop using hotels by 2029. But the risk is in piling even more pressure on the private rental sector, as asylum seekers will add to competition for places among young renters. The government had reportedly been expecting the co-operation of councils in this goal; after Epping, this hope looks increasingly to be a forlorn one. For Cooper and the Home Office, working out where to house the 106,000 asylum seekers in receipt of taxpayer-ended support, is a never-ending game of whack-a-mole.
Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Spectator
Labour's first year sees 111,000 asylum claims
When it rains for Sir Keir Starmer, it pours. Now it has emerged that during the Labour lot's first year in office to June 2025, a whopping 111,000 people claimed asylum in the UK amid a surge in small boat crossings – up by a staggering 14 per cent on the previous 12 months. So much for smashing the gangs, eh? Figures reveal that the numbers of those claiming asylum during this period was 8 per cent greater than the last asylum claim peak in 2002. Half of those looking for asylum entered the UK irregularly: four in ten arrived by small boat while an additional one in ten arrived via lorries, shipping containers or without the correct documents. Good heavens… The areas with the highest proportions of asylum seekers included 'red wall' areas, such as England's North West and North East which have approximately 2,700 and 2,600 people per million residents respectively. However, while the number of people receiving asylum support in the UK has increased by 5 per cent year on year, this remains lower – by 14 per cent – than at the end of September 2023, when it reached 123,758. And as if that wasn't enough bad news, while the use of hotels has fallen since last September, the number of people in migrant hotels has, in fact, increased under Starmer. In June 2024, just under 30,000 people were living in asylum hotels with 67,000 staying in other accommodations. In June 2025, 32,000 were being housed in hotels with 70,800 staying elsewhere. And, as James Heale writes on Coffee House, local authorities seem to be reaching their breaking point… Immigration remains a top priority for Brits, while the taxpayer coughed up £3.1bn for asylum hotels last year. After Tuesday's landmark High Court ruling – which saw Epping Forest district council granted a temporary injunction that requires the area's Bell Hotel to stop housing asylum seekers within 24 days – more councils across the country are considering similar legal action. Yet the Labour lot don't seem all that sure where migrants will go, with security minister Dan Jarvis conducting a pretty disastrous interview on the airwaves on Wednesday morning. Starmer's army certainly has its work cut out…
Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Spectator
France is in denial about its migrant hotels
The High Court victory of Epping Forest District Council has made news in France. The decision to temporarily block migrants from being housed in The Bell Hotel was covered by newspapers such as Le Monde and Le Figaro. The latter provided some context to the growing tension in England, noting that the migrants in Epping are just a few of the estimated 32,000 migrants housed in hotels 'at the expense of the British taxpayer.' Earlier this month the cover story of a weekly current affairs magazine in France, JDD News, was devoted to the growing disquiet of Europe's silent majority at mass immigration. The article was inspired by the protests in Epping but also namechecked the anti-migrant demonstrations in Ireland, Poland and Spain. 'Across Europe, citizens are taking matters into their own hands in the face of immigration they consider uncontrolled and insecurity that is no longer a fantasy,' it explained. One country is an exception to the rule. There have been no mass protests in France, which one might consider surprising given the country's reputation for street demonstrations. Since Emmanuel Macron came to power in 2017 France has undergone record levels of legal and illegal immigration. It's estimated that there around 900,000 illegal immigrants in France while in 2024 a record 2.8 million visas were issued, a 16.8 per cent hike on the previous year. The vast majority of arrivals come from four countries: Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia and Turkey. As in Britain, accommodating this vast number of newcomers is a challenge, and one that the mainstream media is reluctant to talk about. It wasn't always the case. In October 2015 the left-wing Liberation reported that 'around 35,000 people are accommodated each night in 538 hotels in the capital'. Most were migrants and refugees, some of the one million plus people who had flooded into Europe since Angela Merkel opened the continent's borders that summer. The head of Paris's social services told the newspaper that 'we have reached saturation point in the budget hotel market.' As a result of this saturation, tented migrant camps began appearing in Paris and these captured the attention of sympathetic journalists. The fallacy took hold that migrants and asylum seekers in France were treated far more inhumanely than those in Great Britain. In reality, France pioneered the practice of housing migrants in hotels. In 2013 it was reported that 900 migrants were being put up in a Strasbourg hotel; four years later, at the height of Europe's migrant crisis, the government of France purchased 62 hotels belonging to a budget chain in order to transform them into emergency accommodation. The news was seized on by Marine Le Pen's National Rally party, prompting an angry backlash from most of the mainstream media. They pointed out that only 38 of the 62 hotels would house migrants; the rest were for France's homeless. In the years since most journalists have shied away from reporting on the ongoing practice of housing migrants in hotels. Better to keep up the pretence of the tented camps than be seen providing ammunition for Le Pen. Local journalists sometimes break ranks. In 2023 it was reported that a hotel in Châteauneuf-Grasse in the Alpes-Maritimes had been transformed into migrant accommodation – at a cost of €2 million – to the fury of locals. They described a catalogue of daily disturbances. 'Our lives are miserable, and no one helps us,' said one woman whose housed backed on to the hotel. 'People are afraid to speak up, afraid of being labelled 'fascists'.' The situation in Châteauneuf-Grasse has got worse; earlier this year a squad of gendarmes were called to quell a riot in the hotel. The mayor of the town, an independent, was only informed of the decision at the last minute and he warned that it might lead to a surge in support for Le Pen's party. It did. In the 2024 legislative election the National Rally came second (to the centre-right Republicans) with 43 per cent of the vote; in the 2022 election it had polled just 17 per cent. The big loser was Macron's Renaissance party, whose share of the vote fell from 49 per cent in 2022 to 21 per cent two years later. On the eve of the 2024 legislative election, Eric Ciotti, then the president of the Republicans, claimed that in the greater Paris region alone, 'every night, 52,000 hotel beds are rented for immigration'. This, he said, cost the taxpayer around €1.2 billion. A decade earlier, in 2014, Ciotti had published a report in which he drew attention to the growing number of migrants arriving in France, stating that 'emergency accommodation expenses, particularly in the form of hotel stays, have consequently increased in a largely uncontrolled manner.' In contrast Britain's illegal immigration crisis in 2014 was largely controlled. Back then there were no small boats and the few migrants that did cross the Channel did so in the back of lorries. On one occasion in September 2014, a mob of about 150 migrants stormed a ferry terminal in Calais in an attempt to board a ship. They were repelled. It took the criminal gangs until 2018 to work out that the best way to enter Britain wasn't on a big boat but on a small one. Consequently, Britain's migrant crisis is now as uncontrolled as France's. The solution of Tory and Labour governments has been to copy Paris and house the migrants in hotels. But the British media is less subservient than the French press. Even the BBC. It has been asking uncomfortable questions about the cost of housing migrants in hotels since early 2023. France's state broadcaster doesn't touch the subject. As opinion polls regularly show, France's silent majority are as troubled as the British by mass uncontrolled immigration. The difference is that in Britain the people are no longer afraid to air their disquiet. In France they have been cowed into submission by their mainstream media. To paraphrase the frightened woman in Châteauneuf-Grasse, better to keepschtum than be called a fascist.
