The Irish Independent's View: Cessation of US-Iran hostilities will need diplomatic steps
The Cold War saw US interest in Iran turn from cordial to hostile. The CIA-backed overthrow of the democratically-elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953 was carried out under the cloud of communist fears. In reality, it was about the control of oil supplies for the Western powers.
The autocratic rule of the US and British-backed Shah disrupted the structures in the country, heightening social, religious and tribal tensions.
The seeds of the Islamic Revolution of 1979 were sown in the 1953 coup. The subsequent Iran hostage crisis, when 66 American diplomats and civil staff were taken hostage at the US embassy in Tehran, ended diplomatic relations between the two countries, which have never been restored since.
The only high point was a thaw during Barack Obama's time in office
The US and Iran have engaged in proxy wars ever since in the Middle East and beyond, from the arming of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, to the funding of terrorism.
The only high point was a thaw during Barack Obama's time in office, resulting in a nuclear agreement in 2015, but this was short-lived.
Now nuclear armament is the premise for the latest outbreak of hostilities, with the US joining Israel in targeting Iran's nuclear facilities. US bombers targeted three sites in an effort to curtail Tehran's nuclear programme. But Donald Trump has echoed the sentiments of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in raising the possibility of a regime change in Iran.
The US and Israel have speculated about assassinating Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has now gone into hiding as his foes boast they know how to get at him. But the killing of Iran's leader could further destabilise the Middle East.
Iran has now followed through on threats to strike back against the US and Israel, targeting military bases in Qatar. Shipping in the region, key for the flow of oil to the rest of the world, is a potential further target. Iran's military capabilities, however, have been severely limited by Israeli airstrikes on long-range ballistic missile launchers.
Iran still has a formidable arsenal of shorter-range missiles and drones. But the capacity of its proxies, Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthis in Yemen, has been dramatically reduced over the past 18 months. The US has also taken precautions over the past few weeks, dispersing its naval presence in the region and beefing up air defences, to try to ensure it presents as hard a target as possible.
Diplomatic efforts have so far been fruitless as the conflict between Israel and Iran has escalated with the direct intervention of the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
NGOs say new Israeli rules keep them from delivering aid to Gaza
New Israeli legislation regulating foreign aid groups has been increasingly used to deny their requests to bring supplies into Gaza, according to a joint letter signed by more than 100 groups. Ties between foreign-backed aid groups and the Israeli government have long been beset by tensions, with officials often complaining the organisations are biased. "Israeli authorities have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are 'not authorised to deliver aid'," the joint statement reads. According to the letter, whose signatories include Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders (MSF), at least 60 requests to bring aid into Gaza were rejected in July alone. In March, Israel's government approved a new set of rules for foreign non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working with Palestinians. The law updates the framework for how aid groups must register to maintain their status within Israel, along with provisions that outline how their applications can be denied or registration revoked. Registration can be rejected if Israeli authorities deem that a group denies the democratic character of Israel or "promotes delegitimisation campaigns" against the country. "Unfortunately, many aid organisations serve as a cover for hostile and sometimes violent activity," Israel's Diaspora Minister Amichai Chikli said. "Organisations that have no connection to hostile or violent activity and no ties to the boycott movement will be granted permission to operate," added Mr Chikli, whose ministry directed an effort to produce the new guideline. Gazans left without help, say aid groups Aid groups say, however, that the new rules are leaving Gazans without help. "Our mandate is to save lives, but due to the registration restrictions civilians are being left without the food, medicine and protection they urgently need," said Jolien Veldwijk, director of the charity CARE in the Palestinian territories. Ms Veldwijk said that CARE has not been able to deliver any aid to Gaza since Israel imposed a full blockade on the Palestinian territory in March, despite partially easing it in May. Israel has long accused Hamas of stealing aid entering the enclave, and since May, the government has relied on the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to manage food distribution centres. According to Gaza's civil defence agency, its operations have been frequently marred by chaos as thousands of Gazans have scrambled each day to approach its hubs, where some have been shot, including by Israeli soldiers. Charities and humanitarian organisations, including Oxfam, Save the Children and Amnesty International, have called for the GHF to be shut down, citing "routine" shootings and "repeated massacres in blatant disregard for international humanitarian law".
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
What's at stake for Europe at the Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine?
Analysis: The build-up to the summit highlights European doubts and concerns about Russia's sincerity to halt aggression in Ukraine The end of the Cold War was once greeted in Europe as " the end of history". Both Naziism and communism - extreme ideologies that had caused violent turmoil and oppression during the 20th century – had collapsed. Liberal democracy had persevered and was unrivalled by the 1990s. Western governments viewed liberal political and economic reform as vital to nurture peace and security in post-communist Europe. An enlarged security community covering much of the northern hemisphere " from Vancouver to Vladivostok" was an active political aspiration to reduce risks from violent conflict. Institutionalised through the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), this community aimed to enshrine the principles of the Helsinki Final Act agreed in 1975, most notably exclusive adherence to peaceful conflict resolution and no border changes by military force. All has changed. This vision for a pan-European security order defined by enduring peace has been shattered by Russia's military aggression, first in Georgia in 2008 and subsequently in Ukraine after 2014, with Moscow escalating its offensive in 2022. Ukrainians have suffered the most by far, but this war has also caused many reverberations that weaken wider security in Europe. When campaigning for a second US presidential term in 2024, Donald Trump claimed that he would resolve the war in Ukraine " in one day". But after his second term began in January 2025, Trump's administration has instead grappled with many arduous complications inflicted by Russia's aggression. In recent days, Trump has outlined his exploratory expectations for the US-Russia summit with Russia's president Vladimir Putin in Alaska this week. Describing the summit as a " feel-out meeting", Trump claims that he is seeking a measure on Putin's seriousness for peace in Ukraine. His US administration describes the summit as a " listening exercise". Efforts to assist peace in Ukraine must be welcomed once these efforts are sincere. From RTÉ News' Behind the Story podcast, why meeting Trump in Alaska is 'handing Putin victory' But the build-up to the summit highlights many continuing doubts on Putin's sincerity to halt Russian aggression. In Kyiv, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has raised concerns that Putin is "bluffing"about his intent to make peace. In Brussels, EU leaders fear that Putin will gain a diplomatic advantage over Trump to slowly ease Russia closer to the strategic aims it defined when it escalated its war in Ukraine in 2022. These aims included a forceful overthrow of the Ukrainian government; stifling stronger links between Ukraine and the EU and NATO; and consolidating a sphere of influence to insulate Russia's authoritarianism from the West's liberal democratic influences. Putin is considered to have got the better of Trump at the Helsinki Summit between the two presidents in 2018. After this meeting, Trump appeared to publicly support the Russian president's view that Moscow had not interfered in the 2016 US presidential election, despite contrary information communicated to him by America's own security agencies. Seeking to avoid being out-manoeuvred by Putin again, Trump has threatened "very severe consequences", meaning further sanctions will be proposed, should Russia refuse to take US peace efforts seriously. Missing the military power that converts into diplomatic clout, the EU is forced to watch a summit that will likely impact its future security from the sidelines. Trump has discussed " land swapping" as a means to settle the conflict while insisting that such arrangements can only be confirmed by direct negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. De jure border change is unacceptable for Ukraine. However, Kyiv might still painfully accept some de facto compromises understood as temporary until future political circumstances change to allow Ukraine to restore full functional sovereignty within borders benchmarked from its independence in 1991. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland, 26 EU leaders say Ukraine should have freedom to decide its future Should Russia retain de facto military control over territories in eastern Ukraine, a large risk remains that Moscow will use this presence to slowly grind away to coerce and undermine Kyiv in its aims to accelerate Ukraine's democratisation and EU integration. The Trump administration has frustrated Ukrainian attempts to gain a clear pathway towards NATO accession. According to US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, "the United States does not believe that NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement". The Alaska summit also offers Putin an opportunity to propose limitations on Ukraine's future military strength as a condition for Russia's consent to progress settlement talks. Washington is Ukraine's most important military supplier, handing Trump some leverage to pressure Zelenskyy to accept limits on Ukraine's future defence capabilities. This would undercut Ukraine's potential for independent deterrence but with Russia remaining free to replenish its military power to threaten Ukraine again. Observing developments on Ukraine, EU member states at the bloc's frontline with Russia remain concerned that Putin will skilfully manipulate Trump's peace efforts to instead piecemeal towards the aggressive aims he originally revealed in 2022. Should Russia gain such momentum, EU governments in Finland, the Baltic states and Poland anticipate that Moscow's military aggression will only gain further impetus. From RTÉ Radio 1's This Week, Prof Donnacha Ó Beacháin from DCU on whether Russia is ready to end the war in Ukraine or is simply stalling for time Putin's mistakes directed Russia into an unexpectedly long and attritional military campaign where a staggering one million Russian soldiers have died by 2025. However, a negotiated reprieve in Ukraine matched with Trump's ambivalent commitment to NATO will have retrieved Putin's ambitions to eventually challenge the alliance. If a frozen conflict is the most likely compromise to emerge from current negotiations on Ukraine, tensions simmering at the fault line that Russia has created there will endure to undermine European security. Unpredictable and unstable, this order contrasts starkly with optimistic aspirations of peace "from Vancouver to Vladivostok" expressed after the Cold War. In the sentiments of Finnish president Alexander Stubb, Europe's " holiday from history" is now over.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Russia says it struck Ukrainian missile plants
Russia's defence ministry has said that its forces struck a number of Ukrainian missile plants, weapons design bureaus and rocket fuel productions enterprises with missiles and drones in July. Russian forces destroyed a number of Western missile defence systems - including Patriot launchers and fire control radar in the Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy regions - that had been deployed to defend the plants, the ministry said. "An attempt by the Kyiv regime, together with its Western partners, to organise the production of missiles to carry out attacks deep into the territory of the Russian Federation was thwarted," the ministry said. It comes as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be joined by the Ukrainian president at Downing Street this morning, as Europe braces for the outcome of Donald Trump's face-to-face discussions with his Russian counterpart tomorrow.
